Comments on: Nea Charter school applies again

By: Page

Page — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:45:42 +0000

Susan,

I share your concerns about NEA (even though I too think it can be an attractive model for some kids), but the number of 125 is considerably lower than NEA’s estimates. NEA’s application projects an enrollment of about 300 in year 1, going up to about 400 in year 3. According to Ed-Data, the total ADA revenue in 2006-2007 was $8871. So in year 1, if NEA’s enrollment estimates are correct, the district’s revenue loss would be over $2.6 million going up to over $3.5 million in year 3. Of course, some expenses would be saved after teacher layoffs, likely school closure(s) and other expense reductions, but the effect would be devastating nonetheless on the students who are not fortunate enough to attend NEA.

By: Susan Davis

Susan Davis — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:22:42 +0000

My fear is that with the estimated $800,000 – $1.5 million hit that the district will take if NEA opens, our kids will see even fewer cool programs (like school gardens and art), not more.

I.e., yes, 125 lucky students will get an enriched, progressive education via NEA. But the remaining 9900 are likely to lose still more programs and services, which may very well drive more families out of the district.

I actually find the NEA model very attractive. I just have a hard time stomaching what it means for the majority of children in this district.

By: Mike McMahon

Mike McMahon — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:22:41 +0000

Berkeley Unified School District replaced two special taxes expiring in 2007 with one annual special tax for 10 years at 22.80 cents/square foot for residential buildings, 34.36 cents/square foot for commercial/industrial/institutional buildings in 2006. So if Alameda residents were to pass a parcel tax at that level, I would imagine AUSD could provide unique and innovative programs to attract and retain students.