<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAB Five for the Weekend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/aparentlyspeaking/2009/05/27/fab-five-for-the-weekend-78/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/aparentlyspeaking/2009/05/27/fab-five-for-the-weekend-78/</link>
	<description>From diapers to diplomas, an irreverent, practical guide to all things parenting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:18:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: alice adventure in wonderland</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/aparentlyspeaking/2009/05/27/fab-five-for-the-weekend-78/comment-page-1/#comment-3509</link>
		<dc:creator>alice adventure in wonderland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/aparentlyspeaking/?p=3416#comment-3509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On its release last year I couldn&#039;t find much to fault Avatar on. But after watching Alice – the first serious CGI-dominated 3D film since James Cameron&#039;s immersive motion picture – there&#039;s now a glaring issue with it: the bar was set waaay too high. Previously the computer generated effects in Alice would have knocked your socks off, however in a post-Avatar world it significantly underwhelms. Not an overly fair statement for a film which has consistently beautiful and detailed images – take the awe-inspiring climactic clash which is set on a chess board-esquire battlefield for example – but you can thank Cameron for that. Once you get past the fact that Burton&#039;s creation does not aim to achieve realistic environments or creatures and that the actors will never appear to be anywhere other than in front of a green screen, you are in good stead to enjoy the colourful animation for what it was intended for: pure, undemanding, trippy wonderment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On its release last year I couldn&#8217;t find much to fault Avatar on. But after watching Alice – the first serious CGI-dominated 3D film since James Cameron&#8217;s immersive motion picture – there&#8217;s now a glaring issue with it: the bar was set waaay too high. Previously the computer generated effects in Alice would have knocked your socks off, however in a post-Avatar world it significantly underwhelms. Not an overly fair statement for a film which has consistently beautiful and detailed images – take the awe-inspiring climactic clash which is set on a chess board-esquire battlefield for example – but you can thank Cameron for that. Once you get past the fact that Burton&#8217;s creation does not aim to achieve realistic environments or creatures and that the actors will never appear to be anywhere other than in front of a green screen, you are in good stead to enjoy the colourful animation for what it was intended for: pure, undemanding, trippy wonderment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 5/10 queries in 0.002 seconds using apc
Object Caching 149/153 objects using apc

Served from: www.ibabuzz.com @ 2013-05-23 12:34:18 -->