I have yet to see a single alleged benefit for circumcision in the real world–or a rational reason of HOW and WHY a circumcised penis CAN have better sexual response–but I am patient and will be waiting for either one.

Hey Robert, these would be the same people who think circumcised females have better sex.
http://www.labiaplastysurgeon.com/labiaplasty-clinical-study.html

(from Joseph Lewis)
“You might tell me that female circumcision causes all this damage, that women
lose the ability to orgasm. “Studies show” that male circumcision “doesn’t
affect satisfaction”, and thus this is why circumcision can be recommended.
But did you know, studies ALSO show that women who have been circumcised do
not lose their ability to orgasm? In fact, women who have undergone
infibulation, which is the worst kind of female genital mutilation in the
world, are still able to orgasm.”

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17970975

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2837-female-circumcision-does-not-
reduce-sexual-activity.html

Yeast infections?(expanding on Hugh7) Stop using soap under the foreskin. Think about it. The inner mucosa is like the inside of the mouth and vagina. One wouldn’t use soap there. The foreskin has many functions. One is maintaining a proper pH balance. Soap can wreck this balance unless the soap is pH balanced. Bubble bath is the worst. Run away if a website says to use soap.

Remember this: 46,000 doctors and med. students , the KNMG: Royal Dutch Medical Association says “There is no convincing evidence that circumcision is useful or necessary in terms of prevention or hygiene.” This says it all!

http://mysite.verizon.net/dortfay/science.html