Comments on: Nate’s day http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2007/10/21/nates-day/ Fri, 24 May 2013 07:50:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Mike Heath http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2007/10/21/nates-day/comment-page-1/#comment-847 Mike Heath Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:47:40 +0000 http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2007/10/21/nates-day/#comment-847 “but it was clear the Bruins were focusing on stopping Cal’s rushing attack.”

Clear to everyone but Tedford, evidenced by his abandonement of the passing game in the fourth quarter.

]]> By: marke estis http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2007/10/21/nates-day/comment-page-1/#comment-846 marke estis Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:48:27 +0000 http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2007/10/21/nates-day/#comment-846 it seemed to me that they didn’t take advantage as the team kept trying to pound the ball without success. Also, why didn’t they use timeouts at the end of the first half. An extra couple of plays might have allowed the team to advance the ball to a point where the field goal could have been made.

thanks for your notes

]]> By: Lady Bear in LA http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2007/10/21/nates-day/comment-page-1/#comment-845 Lady Bear in LA Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:23:28 +0000 http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2007/10/21/nates-day/#comment-845 Yes, the passing game worked when the coaches decided to call pass plays. Unfortunately the coaches decided to run up the middle for 2-yard gains 90% of the time, and it cost us the game!

]]>