If you know so much about football, why do you consistently exaggerate everything related to cal and usc to fit your own distorted view of the world? Sure, Cal has its ups and downs, but according to you, everything related to the Cal football program and the university, ever, has been terrible, while everything related to usc, ever, has been perfect. I can handle reality and can admit both good and bad things about Cal (and usc and everything else). If you can’t handle living in reality, get an xbox and stop annoying us. If you set the difficulty to “easy”, I’m sure you can play Cal’s opponent every week and win, and then you will have your own perfect little world.

Second, why do you always dodge my questions and responses? I’m guessing because they don’t fit neatly into your “reality.” In your reality, a jc in folsom is superior to Cal. Are you actually the delusional, or are you just dishonest? Maybe I’ll get around to answering your irrelevant posturing once you actually respond to relevant questions here and everywhere. In other words, I’ll treat you with respect once you stop being a coward.

Look, I’m sorry you didn’t get into Cal and I’m sorry you hate your dad. Go see a therapist.

No point. You & your Berkley friends are not in my league. I know more about Berkley, Stanford, pucla and USC football than all of you combined.

If you know anything about football, then answer these. Without going to Google – what is a rooster block? An Okie defense? Who runs drag patterns? From the center position number the holes. What kind of an offense did Jess Hill run at SC? What was Kapp’s favorite play in the 1958 season? Who was the all-American catcher on the SC team in ’67 and how did he relate to the Glove Man? ID the four positions in Red Sanders backfield and how did the O line lineup? How did that pucla team break the huddle?

All that for starters.

http://blog.al.com/bn/2008/03/southeastern_conference_at_75.html

Cheaters never prosper.