Comments on: Cal football: In case you missed it…

By: BluenGold

BluenGold — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:49:18 +0000

Perhaps moron should inquire of Pastor Bill whether falsely accusing someone of stalking and of using three other unrelated screen names to post to a message board causes him/her/it to have a credibility problem. He/she/it might not get the same answer.

By: covinared

covinared — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:50:09 +0000

Not to imply that Ezeff cannot do the job because he can.

By: covinared

covinared — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:22:03 +0000

I agree. There must be some pent up emotion that needs an outlet. For what its worth, I saw the you tube stuff on him, and he looks like a player. I like our db’s for now, except that I think Conte is best as a ss. He is adequate as a cb, but seems to be too good against the run to only put in nickel packages when hagan is ok.

By: Calduke

Calduke — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:31:51 +0000

INCREDIBLE!!!!!

A note about a JC recruit from Laney College,
Chris Moncrease, generated 68 comments.

By: MoreNCsarecoming

MoreNCsarecoming — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:49:14 +0000

First of all I have no credibility problem. Secondly it would be against my principles to not tell the truth. Here this is where I go to church.

http://www.sierrachristian.com/

By: BluenGold

BluenGold — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:53:13 +0000

Why should I bother to critique postings by someone who falsely accuses me of stalking him/her/it and of being three or more other posters? It is you, moron, who has the severe credibility problem here; not me.

BTW, I did critique your earlier post. You are just too dense to catch it. As previously stated, you missed the point concerning the article about the U of sports corruption’s falsifications of its college of engineering faculty. The point of the articel was NOT that the same might be said about other school’s programs. The point of the article was that USC does it.

By: iamalcindor

iamalcindor — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:49:45 +0000

66 replies – must be a record

By: MoreNCsarecoming

MoreNCsarecoming — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:45:42 +0000

That’s right B&G don’t even attempt to critique my post #64. Just call me names and go back to claiming that you are the #1 Public U with the best club sport team in America.

By: BluenGold

BluenGold — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:21:45 +0000

Moron has elevated making excuses to an art form, but still misses the point more often than not. BTW, moron you would be lucky to graduate with a social welfare degree, or ANY degree for that matter.

By: MoreNCsarecoming

MoreNCsarecoming — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:19:59 +0000

Rocko Says:
June 24th, 2009 at 10:18 am
You back a loser monkey school! Read this peon!
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/06/08/usc>>>>
I can tell you must be a Social Welfare major. This article could have substituted virtually ANY large, well-known university’s name as its subject. It has been a common practice by most universities for more than a century to count part-time faculty or mentors or volunteers from industry among your faculty. Likewise, all emeriti are counted forever…some universities even list them posthumously! Don’t laugh, Stanford still lists Linus Pauling! You should see who UC counts among its faculty! Wouldn’t any school love to have Bill Gates or Warren Buffet stop by for a guest lecture? Most schools would have them listed on their websites as Volunteer Faculty by the next morning.

And why shouldn’t they? Any program that counted Pauling among its past faculty will still be recruiting top-notch faculty today. Isn’t the point that the finest schools want top prospective students at all levels to know that their faculty are outstanding? Isn’t a large part of a school’s reputation based upon its past as well as current records of success? I don’t know how a school can not be expected to publicize its faculty and their accomplishments. Universities also use these “calling cards” to recruit the best available current faculty to join their programs. Winners want to be associated with other winners at renown programs. And the best students want to know about the best programs in their chosen fields. Unlike high school kids, grad students don’t choose grad schools based upon their beautiful locations (UCSD, UCSB) or famous club sport programs like your rugby program), they want to study under the best and be associated with them because this guarantees their future success.