<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Football: Pac-10 ballot &#8212; No. 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2009/07/21/football-pac-10-ballot-no-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2009/07/21/football-pac-10-ballot-no-7/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:07:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AERose</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2009/07/21/football-pac-10-ballot-no-7/comment-page-1/#comment-8750</link>
		<dc:creator>AERose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 00:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=5193#comment-8750</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Arizona should be just one spot higher, but this was the easiest comparison to make. I also think you&#039;re underrating how much of a disaster Arizona State&#039;s offense will be. Their quarterback will get better protection than Rudy Carpenter, but that only ensures that he won&#039;t keel over and die at any point during the season and not a lot more. Of the four incoming quarterbacks in the conference&#039;s bottom 6, I give Scott or Foles (whichever one starts) the best chance with Luck of not spending their time getting chased all over the field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Arizona should be just one spot higher, but this was the easiest comparison to make. I also think you&#8217;re underrating how much of a disaster Arizona State&#8217;s offense will be. Their quarterback will get better protection than Rudy Carpenter, but that only ensures that he won&#8217;t keel over and die at any point during the season and not a lot more. Of the four incoming quarterbacks in the conference&#8217;s bottom 6, I give Scott or Foles (whichever one starts) the best chance with Luck of not spending their time getting chased all over the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jethro</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2009/07/21/football-pac-10-ballot-no-7/comment-page-1/#comment-8749</link>
		<dc:creator>Jethro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 20:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=5193#comment-8749</guid>
		<description>ASU will finish ahead of UCLA and Az and will battle Stanfurd for the 5th spot in the Pac 10. ASU gets Az at home this year and will beat both Washington schools for 3 wins. They will beat either Cal, USC, or Oregon State at home and/or Stanfurd or UCLA on the road for 4 or 5 wins.

I think Stanfurd gets the 5th spot because they will probably beat ASU in Palo Alto. It all about home field versus your closest rival.

So the order will be:

USC (will lose to either Cal or Oregon on the road)
Oregon (gets Cal at home; also USC and Oregon St at home)
Cal (gets Oregon State at home)
Oregon State (gets Stanfurd at home)
Stanfurd (gets ASU at home)
ASU (gets Az at home)
Az (gets UCLA at home)
UCLA (gets Wash at home)
Wash (gets Wash St at home)
Wash St</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ASU will finish ahead of UCLA and Az and will battle Stanfurd for the 5th spot in the Pac 10. ASU gets Az at home this year and will beat both Washington schools for 3 wins. They will beat either Cal, USC, or Oregon State at home and/or Stanfurd or UCLA on the road for 4 or 5 wins.</p>
<p>I think Stanfurd gets the 5th spot because they will probably beat ASU in Palo Alto. It all about home field versus your closest rival.</p>
<p>So the order will be:</p>
<p>USC (will lose to either Cal or Oregon on the road)<br />
Oregon (gets Cal at home; also USC and Oregon St at home)<br />
Cal (gets Oregon State at home)<br />
Oregon State (gets Stanfurd at home)<br />
Stanfurd (gets ASU at home)<br />
ASU (gets Az at home)<br />
Az (gets UCLA at home)<br />
UCLA (gets Wash at home)<br />
Wash (gets Wash St at home)<br />
Wash St</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan K Oski</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2009/07/21/football-pac-10-ballot-no-7/comment-page-1/#comment-8747</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan K Oski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=5193#comment-8747</guid>
		<description>I disagree AERose.  Many experts think ASU could have one of the top 3 defenses in the league.  Defense is going to pay big dividends in this league as it always does at every level of football.  Zona might have a slight advantage on offense, but that&#039;s half the game...  And, what&#039;s one spot in the preseason rankings?  You&#039;re splitting hairs in my opinion.

Go BEARS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree AERose.  Many experts think ASU could have one of the top 3 defenses in the league.  Defense is going to pay big dividends in this league as it always does at every level of football.  Zona might have a slight advantage on offense, but that&#8217;s half the game&#8230;  And, what&#8217;s one spot in the preseason rankings?  You&#8217;re splitting hairs in my opinion.</p>
<p>Go BEARS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AERose</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2009/07/21/football-pac-10-ballot-no-7/comment-page-1/#comment-8748</link>
		<dc:creator>AERose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=5193#comment-8748</guid>
		<description>Picking Arizona State, a team that has virtually no offensive prospects, over it&#039;s rival Arizona is borderline incomprehensible. Arizona has more quality depth in the offensive line (meaning that unlike ASU&#039;s inexperienced quarterback, Arizona&#039;s inexperienced quarterback is actually going to get some semblance of pass protection) and has much better running backs in addition to having solid depth at receiver. Arizona State might have a better defense but that won&#039;t help them win games if they can&#039;t score any points.

I think you&#039;ve underestimated Arizona in general but this just happens to be a particularly galling example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picking Arizona State, a team that has virtually no offensive prospects, over it&#8217;s rival Arizona is borderline incomprehensible. Arizona has more quality depth in the offensive line (meaning that unlike ASU&#8217;s inexperienced quarterback, Arizona&#8217;s inexperienced quarterback is actually going to get some semblance of pass protection) and has much better running backs in addition to having solid depth at receiver. Arizona State might have a better defense but that won&#8217;t help them win games if they can&#8217;t score any points.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;ve underestimated Arizona in general but this just happens to be a particularly galling example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iamalcindor</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2009/07/21/football-pac-10-ballot-no-7/comment-page-1/#comment-8746</link>
		<dc:creator>iamalcindor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=5193#comment-8746</guid>
		<description>not a bad choice. but pucla should finish below ASUck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not a bad choice. but pucla should finish below ASUck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 5/13 queries in 0.006 seconds using apc
Object Caching 245/250 objects using apc

Served from: www.ibabuzz.com @ 2012-02-10 04:19:11 -->
