Comments on: Football: Saturday night update

By: Golden Bear

Golden Bear — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 20:28:29 +0000

And ultimately, if what you say is true, Moron — and so little of what you do say is true — then Pete Carroll isn’t a smart enough coach to get his starting cornerback into a course he can pass? Pete is that stupid a coach?

By: Golden Bear

Golden Bear — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 19:52:09 +0000

If you want to talk about gimme classes, Moron, try to explain why half of the upper division players at SC are in the Sociology major.

Interesting thing about Sociology at USC — there are no tests. All grading is done on papers. And nobody checks to make sure the paper was written by the actual student.

Don’t expect Moron to provide you with anything. Just like you shouldn’t expect to find him posting on any SC message board. Punked and banned by his own fellow fans. Pity the troll — this is all he has.

By: BluenGold

BluenGold — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:29:49 +0000

Its time for the CCTimes to start deleting off topic posts, particularly those posted by trolls.

By: covinared

covinared — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:05:02 +0000

Please give us the facts of your dirty little secret: Names of players, courses taken, who masterminded the scheme, how was it done, how did you find out about it and how, in light of this, is Cal is second in the PAC 10 only to stanford in the football academic progress ratings? If you know about it, why don’t the raters? Don’t bear false witness against others.

By: MoreNCsarecoming

MoreNCsarecoming — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:12:09 +0000

AdvisingBear/misterpeabody: It says everything I have been saying about your football program and academics. One of the dirty secrets of the Tedford era is that the players were railroaded into “gimmee” type classes. He learned this from his time up there in Oregon. Care to disagree. I didn’t think so.

The bottom line is that it only matters if a player went to the school for academics. Yours don’t and most USC players don’t. What does it matter?

By: Golden Bear

Golden Bear — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:21:03 +0000

SC fans don’t seem to be as okay with the loss of Wright that some here pretend:

http://wearesc.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1043168&mode=linear#post1043168

By: Golden Bear

Golden Bear — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:52:39 +0000

I know someone who played soccer with Barkley and who lives on the same block as Barkley’s gf. He doesn’t have the same things to say about Barkley as some church guy said.

By: Golden Bear

Golden Bear — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 05:50:17 +0000

Gee, Verran Tucker could do at UC Berkeley what Wright could not do at $C. All that money and support and they couldn’t get Wright the proper advising? Or did he just not have the same drive and ambition and determination that Tucker did? What does that say about the SC team?

By: MoreNCsarecoming

MoreNCsarecoming — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 03:15:11 +0000

It’s old news. It appeared the same day as the Noah Smith news. And here is some more news. Sharece Wright is ineligible. That means Josh P goes back to safety along with Taylor and Will Harris goes back to CB. Our D just got better.

By: BluenGold

BluenGold — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:26:21 +0000

Cal predicted to win the 2009 Pac 10 title:

(yeah, its a bit old, but still informatave as to the reasons behind Wilner’s picks)

http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegesports/2009/08/26/pac-10-football-projections-for-09-final-version-i-swear/