<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Basketball: Is Pac-10 expansion talk serious?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/02/09/basketball-is-pac-10-expansion-talk-serious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/02/09/basketball-is-pac-10-expansion-talk-serious/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueNGold</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/02/09/basketball-is-pac-10-expansion-talk-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-17938</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueNGold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=11276#comment-17938</guid>
		<description>All the reports I have seen are talking about expanding to 12 teams. Having an odd number would seriously screw up the current scheduling systems, especially in b-ball.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the reports I have seen are talking about expanding to 12 teams. Having an odd number would seriously screw up the current scheduling systems, especially in b-ball.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milo</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/02/09/basketball-is-pac-10-expansion-talk-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-17918</link>
		<dc:creator>milo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=11276#comment-17918</guid>
		<description>Not gonna happen. Instead the Pac10 will cobble together a TV alliance with the Big12 and ACC that will bring in the revenues the P10 wants. 

A few specially design inter-league match-up like the Big 12/Pac 10 Hardwood series extended to football and hoops would make more sense. 

I could see a Big12/Pac10 pre-season football match up weekend, conference winners plus another decent game, $C-Texas, Cal-Oklahoma, UCLA-Nebraska, etc. Give it a name like Shoot-out Weekend. Apply the same to the ACC and hoops. Plenty of great match up. 

Toss in the Olympic sports like women&#039;s hoops, water polo, track and field, rugby and you&#039;ll have enough programming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not gonna happen. Instead the Pac10 will cobble together a TV alliance with the Big12 and ACC that will bring in the revenues the P10 wants. </p>
<p>A few specially design inter-league match-up like the Big 12/Pac 10 Hardwood series extended to football and hoops would make more sense. </p>
<p>I could see a Big12/Pac10 pre-season football match up weekend, conference winners plus another decent game, $C-Texas, Cal-Oklahoma, UCLA-Nebraska, etc. Give it a name like Shoot-out Weekend. Apply the same to the ACC and hoops. Plenty of great match up. </p>
<p>Toss in the Olympic sports like women&#8217;s hoops, water polo, track and field, rugby and you&#8217;ll have enough programming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveNTexas</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/02/09/basketball-is-pac-10-expansion-talk-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-17917</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveNTexas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=11276#comment-17917</guid>
		<description>It must be that rumor time of year.  Big Ten and their fans are talking about it too.   Boise State&#039;s poor academics make them a horrible fit -its not even in a major media market - NO WAY.

Colorado would be attractive- Its a giant media market and fast growing as well. UTAH would be ok - at least both of those schools have decent academics.  I can&#039;t think of any other west coast schools worthy- maybe BYU comes close.   UTEP -its part of the UT system and the academics are ok.  It would easily win the Pac 10 in Bball this year. Football probably in the lower half of the Big Ten. El Paso -Juarez is a decent sized media market- if we took  UTEP then New Mexico would be a logical choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must be that rumor time of year.  Big Ten and their fans are talking about it too.   Boise State&#8217;s poor academics make them a horrible fit -its not even in a major media market &#8211; NO WAY.</p>
<p>Colorado would be attractive- Its a giant media market and fast growing as well. UTAH would be ok &#8211; at least both of those schools have decent academics.  I can&#8217;t think of any other west coast schools worthy- maybe BYU comes close.   UTEP -its part of the UT system and the academics are ok.  It would easily win the Pac 10 in Bball this year. Football probably in the lower half of the Big Ten. El Paso -Juarez is a decent sized media market- if we took  UTEP then New Mexico would be a logical choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CruzinBears</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/02/09/basketball-is-pac-10-expansion-talk-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-17914</link>
		<dc:creator>CruzinBears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=11276#comment-17914</guid>
		<description>It can&#039;t/won&#039;t be Boise St. or BYU due to ineligibility on either an athletic or academic front... Same goes for the Cal States/UNR/UNLV argument... Possibly CO and Utah, but other than them it&#039;d be hard to add two teams... Not a big fan of the expansion idea though round robin just makes more sense...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It can&#8217;t/won&#8217;t be Boise St. or BYU due to ineligibility on either an athletic or academic front&#8230; Same goes for the Cal States/UNR/UNLV argument&#8230; Possibly CO and Utah, but other than them it&#8217;d be hard to add two teams&#8230; Not a big fan of the expansion idea though round robin just makes more sense&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CalBear91</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/02/09/basketball-is-pac-10-expansion-talk-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-17913</link>
		<dc:creator>CalBear91</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=11276#comment-17913</guid>
		<description>I agree 100% with Uh Oh. Expansion is a bad idea. Shoot, I have trouble with Arizona being in the Pacific 10!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100% with Uh Oh. Expansion is a bad idea. Shoot, I have trouble with Arizona being in the Pacific 10!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H8sRed</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/02/09/basketball-is-pac-10-expansion-talk-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-17912</link>
		<dc:creator>H8sRed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=11276#comment-17912</guid>
		<description>Noooo expansion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noooo expansion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocbears</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/02/09/basketball-is-pac-10-expansion-talk-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-17910</link>
		<dc:creator>ocbears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=11276#comment-17910</guid>
		<description>As for the expansion, I definitely love having the 10 teams and being able to play everybody.  But if it must be done, I say we try to grab Utah and BYU.  That would keep the two teams to a state/region.  You could divide it something along the lines of North/South.  North:  UDub, Wazzu, Oreg, OSU, Cal, Stanfurd.  South:  USC, UCLA, Zona, ASU, Utah, BYU.  Although that makes the South division brutal...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the expansion, I definitely love having the 10 teams and being able to play everybody.  But if it must be done, I say we try to grab Utah and BYU.  That would keep the two teams to a state/region.  You could divide it something along the lines of North/South.  North:  UDub, Wazzu, Oreg, OSU, Cal, Stanfurd.  South:  USC, UCLA, Zona, ASU, Utah, BYU.  Although that makes the South division brutal&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocbears</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/02/09/basketball-is-pac-10-expansion-talk-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-17909</link>
		<dc:creator>ocbears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=11276#comment-17909</guid>
		<description>Rollon, that&#039;s correct.  Check out their logo!

http://www.bigten.org/index-main.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rollon, that&#8217;s correct.  Check out their logo!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bigten.org/index-main.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bigten.org/index-main.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chasin'bear</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/02/09/basketball-is-pac-10-expansion-talk-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-17907</link>
		<dc:creator>chasin'bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=11276#comment-17907</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve posted once or twice in the past here and follow this blog closely. This is an interesting topic- I get the traditionalist viewpoint, but I also understand the need to keep pace with the other conferences. Let&#039;s be real- the BCS is the system in place, and while it sucks, it&#039;s the system we&#039;ve got. That extra champ game helps 1 loss teams get bumped into the NC game and also other BCS bowls. But, the Pac 10 is severely lacking that &quot;extra bump&quot; in the polls... it&#039;s virtually impossible for a 1 loss team in the Pac to have a shot at the NC with a round robin, which in turn means there&#039;s only 1 team that is typically eligible for a BCS bowl. And if the Big 10 makes that jump, the Pac is REALLY left in the dust. that&#039;s bad news for everyone in the Pac.

From a recruiting standpoint, Utah and Colorado are good choices- it will be difficult, though, to bring Colorado over from the Big 12. In my mind for Colorado, if you get 1 or 2 games in Texas every year with the Big 12, that&#039;s some prime recruiting ground. The flipside, you&#039;ll pick up 1 or 2 games in CA each year, which is also good. If this recruiting season was any indication, Tedford may enjoy the CO connection.

Another piece of this is we&#039;re also talking about ALL sports, not just football. The pac 10 has good olypmic sports, water sports, ect... don&#039;t know much about Utah and CO in that area. Might give the Pac some formidable ice hockey competition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve posted once or twice in the past here and follow this blog closely. This is an interesting topic- I get the traditionalist viewpoint, but I also understand the need to keep pace with the other conferences. Let&#8217;s be real- the BCS is the system in place, and while it sucks, it&#8217;s the system we&#8217;ve got. That extra champ game helps 1 loss teams get bumped into the NC game and also other BCS bowls. But, the Pac 10 is severely lacking that &#8220;extra bump&#8221; in the polls&#8230; it&#8217;s virtually impossible for a 1 loss team in the Pac to have a shot at the NC with a round robin, which in turn means there&#8217;s only 1 team that is typically eligible for a BCS bowl. And if the Big 10 makes that jump, the Pac is REALLY left in the dust. that&#8217;s bad news for everyone in the Pac.</p>
<p>From a recruiting standpoint, Utah and Colorado are good choices- it will be difficult, though, to bring Colorado over from the Big 12. In my mind for Colorado, if you get 1 or 2 games in Texas every year with the Big 12, that&#8217;s some prime recruiting ground. The flipside, you&#8217;ll pick up 1 or 2 games in CA each year, which is also good. If this recruiting season was any indication, Tedford may enjoy the CO connection.</p>
<p>Another piece of this is we&#8217;re also talking about ALL sports, not just football. The pac 10 has good olypmic sports, water sports, ect&#8230; don&#8217;t know much about Utah and CO in that area. Might give the Pac some formidable ice hockey competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rollonubears</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/02/09/basketball-is-pac-10-expansion-talk-serious/comment-page-1/#comment-17906</link>
		<dc:creator>rollonubears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=11276#comment-17906</guid>
		<description>big 10 has 11, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>big 10 has 11, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 4/18 queries in 0.008 seconds using apc
Object Caching 335/340 objects using apc

Served from: www.ibabuzz.com @ 2012-02-10 06:59:40 -->
