<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Basketball: Brackets, computers and polls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/03/01/basketball-brackets-computers-and-polls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/03/01/basketball-brackets-computers-and-polls/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Laak</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/03/01/basketball-brackets-computers-and-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-18808</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Laak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=12426#comment-18808</guid>
		<description>I guess no one got the memo, Wilner says that Cal is not in yet.  And what Wilner says is ALWAYS correct.  I will not hear otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess no one got the memo, Wilner says that Cal is not in yet.  And what Wilner says is ALWAYS correct.  I will not hear otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davidson</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/03/01/basketball-brackets-computers-and-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-18801</link>
		<dc:creator>Davidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=12426#comment-18801</guid>
		<description>CAL is in.  Even if we lose to Stanford and then lose 1st round in Pac-10 Tourney (worst case scenarios)...We are in.  

You can wonder and wonder all you want and look at things from a worst-case scenario, but all you have to know is that we are in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CAL is in.  Even if we lose to Stanford and then lose 1st round in Pac-10 Tourney (worst case scenarios)&#8230;We are in.  </p>
<p>You can wonder and wonder all you want and look at things from a worst-case scenario, but all you have to know is that we are in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/03/01/basketball-brackets-computers-and-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-18800</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=12426#comment-18800</guid>
		<description>Ken Pomeroy&#039;s ratings are strongly considered by the committee.  Not sure what JF is talking about because I&#039;m sure we&#039;re seen as a 7 seed or so right now.  Lunardi had us as a 10-seed last year too IIRC (7-seed against Maryland)

Oh, and we&#039;re definitely in the tourney.  It may be much more helpful to the conference if we don&#039;t win the whole thing @ Staples.  No need for paranoia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken Pomeroy&#8217;s ratings are strongly considered by the committee.  Not sure what JF is talking about because I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;re seen as a 7 seed or so right now.  Lunardi had us as a 10-seed last year too IIRC (7-seed against Maryland)</p>
<p>Oh, and we&#8217;re definitely in the tourney.  It may be much more helpful to the conference if we don&#8217;t win the whole thing @ Staples.  No need for paranoia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stapes</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/03/01/basketball-brackets-computers-and-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-18794</link>
		<dc:creator>Stapes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=12426#comment-18794</guid>
		<description>It would really help if ASU and UW sneak into the top RPI top 50 to give us 3 wins.  Joe Lundardi is pretty accurate but even he admits he is in the minority on Cal with a 9 seed.  

Two other things:
-By all accounts, the bubble is soft this year
-the injury crutch is huge for the November losses.

I think a win on Saturday gets us in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would really help if ASU and UW sneak into the top RPI top 50 to give us 3 wins.  Joe Lundardi is pretty accurate but even he admits he is in the minority on Cal with a 9 seed.  </p>
<p>Two other things:<br />
-By all accounts, the bubble is soft this year<br />
-the injury crutch is huge for the November losses.</p>
<p>I think a win on Saturday gets us in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mountain Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/03/01/basketball-brackets-computers-and-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-18786</link>
		<dc:creator>Mountain Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=12426#comment-18786</guid>
		<description>Re No. 3, yeah the drop in Pac-10 teams worthy of a bid alone might account for St. Mary&#039;s getting in.  Which, by the way, is no certainty.  Most of these so-called experts are wrong year after year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re No. 3, yeah the drop in Pac-10 teams worthy of a bid alone might account for St. Mary&#8217;s getting in.  Which, by the way, is no certainty.  Most of these so-called experts are wrong year after year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rollonubears</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/03/01/basketball-brackets-computers-and-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-18782</link>
		<dc:creator>rollonubears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=12426#comment-18782</guid>
		<description>i think we just need to beat stanfurd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think we just need to beat stanfurd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/03/01/basketball-brackets-computers-and-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-18776</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=12426#comment-18776</guid>
		<description>It’s March, and according to bracket projections, Cal ranges anywhere from a 7 seed to a 13 seed. 

That’s the difference between “should be in” and “no chance for at-large bid”. 

The reason for such a disparity in opinion is that Cal has an impressive RPI but no impressive wins. (Cal has managed this by playing only one team with an RPI worse than 200.)

More on Cal’s historically unique NCAA tournament resume:
• Pac-10 champion (at least a split title). The Pac-10 is #8 in conference RPI.
• 20-9 overall
• 12-5 in conference
• 5-8 in non-home games
• RPI: 21 
Only one eligible team in the RPI top 25 has missed the tournament since 1994
• SOS: 11
• W-L vs RPI top 50: 0-4 
• W-L vs RPI 51-100: 5-2
• Cal has zero wins against the RPI top 50 and has 3 losses to RPI 100+ teams (at USC, at Oregon St, UCLA)
Only eight teams have earned at-large bids the past 16 seasons without beating at least one top-50 opponent, and none of those bids came with the current selection committee
• Cal has beaten every team in the Pac-10 at least once.

The selection committee probably won’t do this, but drilling down further:

Opponent RPI
Cal&#039;s Record
1-10	0-3
11-20	0-0
21-30	0-0
31-40	0-1
41-50	0-0
51-60	3-1
61-70	1-0
71-80	0-0
81-90	1-1
91-100	0-0

• Cal has played only one game against an RPI top 11-50 team the entire year (Ohio St). 
• Cal had injury issues against Syracuse, Ohio St, and New Mexico. 
• The only game that a healthy Cal team has played against a RPI top 50 team was at #1 Kansas.
• #53 Washington and #54 Arizona St are just outside the RPI top 50.

There are even more considerations: 
• Does the “eye-test” help or hurt Cal, a senior-laden team with good outside shooting, but a lack of inside depth?
• No major conference regular season champion has missed the NCAA tournament.
• The UCLA athletic director is this year’s committee chairman and is allowed to make a case for Cal.

If Cal loses at Stanford (rivalry game/letdown effect) and in the first round of the Pac-10 tournament (very possible if Cal’s opponent is Oregon St), then Cal probably won’t make the NCAA tournament. 
Win out until the Pac-10 tournament final, and Cal is probably in. 
Anything in the middle of those 2 outcomes becomes extremely hard to predict.

I hope I’m not being too much of a paranoid Cal fan. More than anything, the historical uniqueness is fascinating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s March, and according to bracket projections, Cal ranges anywhere from a 7 seed to a 13 seed. </p>
<p>That’s the difference between “should be in” and “no chance for at-large bid”. </p>
<p>The reason for such a disparity in opinion is that Cal has an impressive RPI but no impressive wins. (Cal has managed this by playing only one team with an RPI worse than 200.)</p>
<p>More on Cal’s historically unique NCAA tournament resume:<br />
• Pac-10 champion (at least a split title). The Pac-10 is #8 in conference RPI.<br />
• 20-9 overall<br />
• 12-5 in conference<br />
• 5-8 in non-home games<br />
• RPI: 21<br />
Only one eligible team in the RPI top 25 has missed the tournament since 1994<br />
• SOS: 11<br />
• W-L vs RPI top 50: 0-4<br />
• W-L vs RPI 51-100: 5-2<br />
• Cal has zero wins against the RPI top 50 and has 3 losses to RPI 100+ teams (at USC, at Oregon St, UCLA)<br />
Only eight teams have earned at-large bids the past 16 seasons without beating at least one top-50 opponent, and none of those bids came with the current selection committee<br />
• Cal has beaten every team in the Pac-10 at least once.</p>
<p>The selection committee probably won’t do this, but drilling down further:</p>
<p>Opponent RPI<br />
Cal&#8217;s Record<br />
1-10	0-3<br />
11-20	0-0<br />
21-30	0-0<br />
31-40	0-1<br />
41-50	0-0<br />
51-60	3-1<br />
61-70	1-0<br />
71-80	0-0<br />
81-90	1-1<br />
91-100	0-0</p>
<p>• Cal has played only one game against an RPI top 11-50 team the entire year (Ohio St).<br />
• Cal had injury issues against Syracuse, Ohio St, and New Mexico.<br />
• The only game that a healthy Cal team has played against a RPI top 50 team was at #1 Kansas.<br />
• #53 Washington and #54 Arizona St are just outside the RPI top 50.</p>
<p>There are even more considerations:<br />
• Does the “eye-test” help or hurt Cal, a senior-laden team with good outside shooting, but a lack of inside depth?<br />
• No major conference regular season champion has missed the NCAA tournament.<br />
• The UCLA athletic director is this year’s committee chairman and is allowed to make a case for Cal.</p>
<p>If Cal loses at Stanford (rivalry game/letdown effect) and in the first round of the Pac-10 tournament (very possible if Cal’s opponent is Oregon St), then Cal probably won’t make the NCAA tournament.<br />
Win out until the Pac-10 tournament final, and Cal is probably in.<br />
Anything in the middle of those 2 outcomes becomes extremely hard to predict.</p>
<p>I hope I’m not being too much of a paranoid Cal fan. More than anything, the historical uniqueness is fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TakeOffThatRedShirt</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/03/01/basketball-brackets-computers-and-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-18773</link>
		<dc:creator>TakeOffThatRedShirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 04:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=12426#comment-18773</guid>
		<description>after some reading, it appears last year was the only year in recent memory they were left our with a good record. 

they were given an at-large bid in 2004/05 with 8 losses, and in 2007/2008 with 6 losses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>after some reading, it appears last year was the only year in recent memory they were left our with a good record. </p>
<p>they were given an at-large bid in 2004/05 with 8 losses, and in 2007/2008 with 6 losses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TakeOffThatRedShirt</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/03/01/basketball-brackets-computers-and-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-18771</link>
		<dc:creator>TakeOffThatRedShirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 04:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=12426#comment-18771</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s interesting that St. Mary&#039;s is predicted as &#039;in&#039; by most experts. they have had more marquee wins and a similar record in other seasons.and not made it.

last year they had 6 losses going into selection sunday, with wins over Fresno St, Providence, Oregon, Southern Ill, Utah St, San Diego St and they didn&#039;t get in.

maybe there are fewer worthy teams this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s interesting that St. Mary&#8217;s is predicted as &#8216;in&#8217; by most experts. they have had more marquee wins and a similar record in other seasons.and not made it.</p>
<p>last year they had 6 losses going into selection sunday, with wins over Fresno St, Providence, Oregon, Southern Ill, Utah St, San Diego St and they didn&#8217;t get in.</p>
<p>maybe there are fewer worthy teams this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/2010/03/01/basketball-brackets-computers-and-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-18765</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/beartalk/?p=12426#comment-18765</guid>
		<description>Tom Tolbert actually knows what he&#039;s talking about, so I&#039;d count on it happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Tolbert actually knows what he&#8217;s talking about, so I&#8217;d count on it happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 5/18 queries in 0.007 seconds using apc
Object Caching 335/340 objects using apc

Served from: www.ibabuzz.com @ 2012-02-10 06:45:35 -->
