Comments on: Basketball: Pac-10 Reflections — Week 9

By: TakeOffThatRedShirt

TakeOffThatRedShirt — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:48:38 +0000

hey USC troll-

(and i call you that loosely because i’m sure that school wants nothing to do with you)

since you probably don’t read the articles, I’ve copied my favorite part here:

“USC has failed to score 50 points in three consecutive games for the first time in 26 years. What’s worse? Only 12 second-half points (six on tip-ins) at home against Oregon or the failure to reach 70 in any Pac-10 game this season?”

your likely response (if any):

“USC did better than expectations with such a thin roster. i have daddy issues. i have no friends.”

my response:

why are expectations so low? Because USC cheats and got caught, thus the depleted program. and either way, a beat-down by Oregon? Not scoring 70 in 16 games?
————
wow this is more fun than actually reading your posts.

you are no longer needed. time to go. bye now.

By: Bob

Bob — Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:43:15 +0000

I think if we win out from here and finish 24-9, winning 10 of our last 11, the committee will use the rationalizations that some of us on this board use to explain the losses, and we’ll get a 5 or 6 seed. Probably deserved too. But we have to win out and show that we’ve achieved consistent high level of play. Let’s do it Bears!

By: CruzinBears

CruzinBears — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:53:26 +0000

Uh Oh – But its the other 5-6 losses after those 4 that will hurt them….

Though I’ll be hoping for the best…

By: uh oh.

uh oh. — Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:46:36 +0000

Ohio State’s record would surely be better if Turner hadn’t been injured. I think the NCAA is going to surprise Cal with a much higher seed that people might think – they scheduled against top teams and that is usually rewarded.