5

Basketball: Pac-10 writers roundtable

A holiday extra for you: Our first Pac-10 writers roundtable.

Five writers who regularly cover Pac-10 basketball — including myself — provide their opinions on five topics as we prepare to enter conference play.

Other participants are Percy Allen of the Seattle Times (who covers Washington), Ben Bolch of the Los Angeles Times (UCLA), Bob Clark of the Register-Guard in Eugene (Oregon) and Doug Haller of the Arizona Republic (Arizona State).

Our thanks to Haller for organizing the roundtable and compiling the answers.

Enjoy:  

1. At this point in the non-conference season, what’s surprised you most?

PERCY ALLEN: Regardless of what the coaches may say, I’m surprised the
conference hasn’t improved from last season. The scarcity of meaningful
nonconference wins is alarming and suggests we’re looking at another year when
the Pac-10 sends just two teams – if that – to the NCAA tournament. At this time
(Dec. 14), there’s not a Pac-10 team that’s ranked and I don’t know when that
will change. I wouldn’t be surprised if we went through the Pac-10 season
without a team in the polls.

BEN BOLCH: Oregon’s not-so-terrible start. Having been picked by the media to
finish last in the Pac-10, the Ducks didn’t figure to have much to showcase when
they opened Matthew Knight Arena next month. But Oregon has won pretty much
every game it should have won and nearly upset ninth-ranked Missouri. Senior
forward Joevan Catron has blossomed into one of the better big men in the
conference and sophomore forward E.J. Singler has stepped up as a formidable
rebounder. Coach Dana Altman appears to have the Ducks poised for a run at the
middle of the Pac-10, and that’s saying something in the wake of the mess left
by predecessor Ernie Kent.

BOB CLARK: Faisel Aden. I thought he was supposed to be a backup for Klay
Thompson. He’s the third-leading scorer in the league. He’s making 43 percent of
his threes. His addition has me wondering if the Cougars can go from last in the
league to contending for first. Next up might be Cal’s competitiveness, ignoring
that five-point first half. I didn’t see how the Bears would score points, but
maybe that was discounting the coaching of Mike Montgomery. On the other end, I
thought  both Oregon State and Arizona State would be better than they’ve shown.
I know they’re both counting on a lot of new players, but some of those results
have been mystifying. And disappointing.

JEFF FARAUDO: Probably the fact that Oregon is better than I expected, and
Oregon State is worse. Not sure why, especially with regards to the Beavers. But
they have been awful against an awful schedule.

DOUG HALLER: Washington State. I picked them sixth in the preseason media poll,
partly because of how it finished last season (last in the Pac-10) and also
because I didn’t know what junior-college transfer Faisal Aden would bring. As
it turns out, the Cougars are much improved, especially on defense, and Aden is
one of the Pac-10′s top scorers. Add in Klay Thompson, who’s playing at an
All-American level, and Reggie Moore, possibly the conference’s top point guard,
and the Cougars are a conference contender.

2.  Is Washington still the overwhelming favorite?

ALLEN: No. The Huskies have shown they have problems winning on the road against big, physical teams. Granted there’s not a lot of those in the Pac-10, but UW hasn’t shown the maturity to win on the road.

BOLCH: Yes. The Huskies have too much talent, too much depth and too good of a
coach not to finish atop the Pac-10 during another down year for the conference.
The Huskies have so many options that senior guard Venoy Overton ranks among the conference’s leaders in assists—and he comes off the bench. Junior guard Isaiah Thomas continues to cement his legacy as one of the best players in school history, senior forward Justin Holiday is an explosive scoring threat and
sophomore guard Abdul Gaddy is significantly improved from a year ago. What’s not to like?

CLARK: That might depend on your definition of overwhelming. I’d say solid
favorite, but the Huskies are going to need to win a few games out of Seattle,
and they can’t count on scoring 100 points very often against Pac-10 defenses,
which is how they’ve won so far. But, yes, they have a lot of what is needed to
win a title: experienced guards, some options on the inside, and a bunch of
people with the ability to score. And who has the overall depth of the Huskies?

FARAUDO: The favorite, yes. Overwhelming? Not sure I’d categorize it that way.
The Huskies must demonstrate they can beat good teams. They have been
competitive with the best opponents on their schedule, but haven’t gotten over
the hump. We also need to see how they fare on the road, because that’s been an
issue for them in recent seasons, and teams that rely so heavily on 3-point
shooting sometimes don’t travel well. At home, with that crowd, they are
virtually unbeatable.

HALLER: Yes, it’s just a matter of how quickly the Huskies put it together. They
have all the pieces: Experience in guards Isaiah Thomas and Venoy Overton. An
inside presence in Matthew Bryan-Amaning. Justin Holiday is one of the Pac-10′s
more complete players and C.J. Wilcox might be its best shooter. On top of all
that, they have the best depth in the conference. For some reason, Washington
still struggles away from home (losses to Kentucky, Michigan State and Texas
A&M), but last season’s team took a while to gel before making a Sweet Sixteen
run. I think this one will do the same and maybe advance a step further.

3.  Which team might surprise?

ALLEN: By surprise I’m assuming you’re talking about a team outside the top five
in the preseason media poll. In that case, I’ll say USC. Not sure if transfer
guard Jio Fontan is the real deal or not, but coach Kevin O’Neill believes he
is. O’Neill said he’s the team’s best player, which is high praise because
forward Nikola Vucevic may play in the NBA someday and Alex Stepheson is one of
the top post players in the conference.

BOLCH:  USC. The Trojans are going to be Forrest Gump’s box of chocolates in
that you never know what you’re going to get. They will pull off some upset
victories (see Texas) and suffer a few bad defeats (see Rider). The addition of
junior transfer Jio Fontan should help stabilize the Trojans’ inconsistent ways
and could thrust them into the Pac-10 title race. Coach Kevin O’Neill’s
signature stingy defense will also help USC win some games it probably shouldn’t
given that the Trojans don’t boast overwhelming talent and often appear lost on
offense. But their frontcourt tandem of Alex Stepheson and Nikola Vucevic is
probably better than anyone else’s in the conference except the UCLA duo of
Reeves Nelson and Joshua Smith.

CLARK: Honestly, if the Cougars do stay healthy and out of foul trouble, might
they end up in the NCAA tournament? They’ve got that win over Gonzaga, which
will become more important as the season goes on, and a close loss to Kansas
State won’t hurt the view of the selection committee. That tournament in
Honolulu could play big. And then there’s this (and laugh if you want) but Oregon may surprise a team or two, on a night when the Ducks shoot well, and their fullcourt pressure wears down the ball handlers on another team.

FARAUDO: USC, without a doubt. The Trojans own perhaps the Pac-10′s two best
non-conference victories so far — at home vs. Texas and on the road vs.
Tennessee (prior to WSU beating Baylor, anyway). They have two big, physical frontcourt players in Nikola Vucevic and Alex Stepheson, good young guards and a newcomer in point guard Jio Fontana who coach Kevin O’Neill says is his best player in every way. At this point, USC will be a disappointment if it doesn’t finish in the top three or four in the conference.

HALLER: USC is the easy answer, but UCLA could surprise by challenging
Washington. The Bruins have the Pac-10′s best frontline in Tyler Honeycutt,
Reeves Nelson and Josh Smith. Problem is, you never know what you’re going to
get with the Bruins. The team that took Kansas to the wire and beat BYU or the
team that lost to Montana at home.

4. Your pick for Pac-10 Player of the Year?

ALLEN: “I think it’s a two-man race between Arizona’s Derrick Williams and
Washington State’s Klay Thompson. We’ve seen in the recent past the player with
the best statistics doesn’t always win this award and the coaches sometimes give
a vote to the best player on the best team. For my money, Williams and Thompson
have separated themselves from everyone in the league right now. They’re playing
at a high level.”

BOLCH: Isaiah Thomas, Washington. Klay Thompson will score more points. Nikola
Vucevic will grab more rebounds. But in terms of making a difference, no one
will eclipse Thomas. He is the leader of one of the nation’s most prolific
offenses, a player equally comfortable passing and shooting. In fact, he is so
unselfish that his scoring average was down a bit from last season in the early
going. But whether he adapts to whatever opening an opponent presents by scoring
25 points or getting 12 assists, no one can match his impact.

CLARK: I don’t think one Husky will stand out from the others enough, so I’d
look to Klay Thompson of WSU or Derrick Williams of Arizona. Yes, I know, all
I’m doing there is pointing out  the league’s top two scorers (at this date).
But Thompson also leads in assists, and Williams is close to the lead in field
goal percentage and rebounds. Very nice all-around players. And if one of them
leads his team to the title, or at least is in contention to the final week,
they’ll have the edge.

FARAUDO: Arizona’s Derrick Williams is the best and most efficient player in the
league. He can score without hogging the ball because he gets to the free throw
line so often. Plus he’s added 3-point shooting range from a year ago when he
was primarily a low-block player. He means more to his team’s success than
perhaps any other player in the Pac-10.

HALLER: Klay Thompson. His maturity has elevated the Cougars. Example: In
Washington State’s win over Gonzaga on Dec. 8, Thompson scored just three points in the first half. Last season, this would’ve bothered him. This season, he stayed patient, using his defense to trigger his offense. He found an offensive rhythm in the second half, finishing with 24 points, six rebounds, six assists and seven steals.

5. Your pick for Pac-10 Freshman/Newcomer of the Year?

ALLEN: Talk about a void of talent. Everyone likes to talk about the dearth of
seniors in the Pac-10, but where are the outstanding freshman? Simply put,
there’s not many. There’s not a freshman currently among the top 20 scorers in
the league. I say when it’s all said and done, UCLA big man Josh Smith will
stand taller than anyone else.

BOLCH: Joshua Smith, UCLA. The arrival of the super-sized McDonald’s
All-American in Westwood was a big deal not just because Smith tipped the scales
at well over 300 pounds (don’t believe his listed weight of 305). The 6-foot-10
freshman can score, rebound, move people out of the way as if they’re made of
straw and has some of the best hands for a big man Coach Ben Howland has ever
seen. After a slow start plagued by foul trouble, Smith started to show the
difference he could make with a double-double against Kansas. But you have to
check some more obscure stats to fully appreciate Smith’s impact. He helped the
Bruins upset Brigham Young by taking a charge and is the runaway leader on his
team in that category. Smith will be in the middle of everything UCLA does as it
tries to get back to the NCAA tournament.

CLARK: WSU’s Faisal Aden is the best newcomer right now, but I’ve never seen Jio
Fontan play. USC coach Kevin O’Neill said Fontan will be his best passer,
defender, scorer and leader, which is a lot to put on a transfer before he’s
seen any action. If he does all that, and turns the Trojans into a
first-division team, then he’ll be pushing Aden for best newcomer. Just one
question, though: how did a player that good end up at Fordham? And nobody
between New York and Los Angeles tried to land him before the Trojans welcomed
him across the country?

FARAUDO: I’m going with (real) big Joshua Smith of UCLA. If he can stay out of
foul trouble he should produce good numbers on a frontline with two excellent
forwards in Tyler Honeycutt and Reeves Nelson. Smith seems to have a better
skill set than I had imagined. And at 6-foot-10, 305 pounds, he’s gigantic.

HALLER: Smith is the freshman favorite and with his size, he could develop into
a real force as the season progresses. But Arizona State’s Kyle Cain can make
this an interesting race. Yes, he’s raw offensively, but he could possibly lead
the conference in rebounding. He already has games of 17, 16 and 14 boards.
Outside of those two, no other freshman has really emerged.

Jeff Faraudo

  • Uh Oh

    I like the way Bob Clark – whoever he is – admitted in the first answer he was wrong in his expectations, and how he admits he still hasn’t seen USC play in his final response. Like, we don’t expect writers to have seen every game by every team. But it’s nice when they don’t come off as if they have. And we know nobody can watch every game, as there are simply way too many.
    This is not a commentary on anyone else here, just refreshing for someone to qualify their statements. See, then we can all share in the discussion on equal terms. We are all fans who catch many games, not all. You guys are just the professional writers while we are hacks. But we can share in the discussion equally.

  • takeoffthatredshirt

    I strongly disagree with Percy Allen’s first comment that the PAC 10 has scarce meaningful wins. I agree the PAC 10 isn’t a powerhouse, but here’s a few off the top of my head- which are way, way more than last year at this point. WSU and Az will be ranked soon:

    WSU over Baylor, gonzaga, MSU
    USC over Tenn and Texas 
    UCLA over BYU, and Kansas (except cheating prevented the win)
    Arizona over Oklahoma and NC St
    Cal over Temple, New Mex, Iowa st.

    His comment gives me hope that I can be a sportswriter, since clearly knowledge and research aren’t important.

    Go Bears!

  • Uh Oh

    Cheating?
    Please. The guy was hit significantly.
    He wasn’t going to make that shot, but you pretty much HAVE to call the foul. Everyone hates it, but it was a foul, not cheating.

  • joey

    Big 12 is overrated.

  • takeoffthatredshirt

    Yep, cheating. The fact that Uh Oh disagrees only proves my point.