Combined feed (RSS)
Basketball: Winning at least two of next three games is Bears’ immediate goal
By Jeff Faraudo
Wednesday, February 23rd, 2011 at 1:17 am in Basketball, Mid-week.
Mike Montgomery has given his team a road map to the postseason:
“Coach says we need to win two out of these next three games,” senior Markhuri Sanders-Frison said.
At 14-13, two more regular-season wins would guarantee Cal a winning record. Even with a first-round loss in the Pac-10 tournament, the Bears could do no worse than 16-15, and that would make them eligible for the NIT.
“I just said that if you want to play postseason, you’ve got to win two out of these last three games,” Montgomery said. “Our goal is to win all three of them. The reality of it is to play postseason and have a winning record, you’ve got to win two out of three.”
Sanders-Frison said he can’t spend any time focusing on the NIT.
“We just want to keep on playing,” he said. “We want to aim for the stars and land on the clouds.
“We’d love to be in that March Madness. If it’s the NIT, as long as we’re playing, I think this group of guys will be satisfied with that.”
Montgomery said he believes there has been some communication between NIT officials and Cal’s athletic administration.
“At this point I think we would want to try to host (a game),” he said.
Cal is tied with Washington State for sixth place at 7-8 in the conference, just one-half game back of Oregon and USC, both at 7-7. USC plays first-place Arizona on Thursday, so a Cal win over the Ducks the same night could elevate the Bears to fourth place.
As much as the Bears would like a top-four finish, placing in the top six is critical because it would allow the Bears to avoid having to play in a 7-10 or 8-9 game on Wednesday night in the Pac-10 tournament.
“I think we’re going to make that happen,” Sanders-Frison said. “And I think personally we’re going to go into the Pac-10 tournament and do some damage.”
Asked to be more specific, he said, “Getting to the championship game. We owe a couple people some beating-ups. We let it slip by a couple times. They know that. We’re coming back during that tournament to get those W’s back.”
Montgomery said he’s not sure any team, except perhaps Washington (which beat Cal decisively twice) would welcome playing the Bears in the conference tournament.
“On any given game,” he said, “I think guys feel they can beat anybody, and I think that’s true. It’s proven itself out.”
[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]
February 23rd, 2011 at 7:05 am
geez, monty, this isn’t baseball. “take 2 out of 3?” the team knows they have to win 2 out of 3. maybe msf should be giving the talks. at this point.
February 23rd, 2011 at 8:13 am
Yeah, the also know everything msf said.
February 23rd, 2011 at 8:47 am
While Cal has bounced back very nicely from losing 8 of it’s top 10 players from last season, Oregon has to be considered as big a surprise, no?
They lost most their team from last year and appeared weak in pre-season. Yet, they are right up there in the middle of the Pac, tied for 4th with a 7-7 record, better than Cal’s 7-8. Should be a good game tomorrow night!
February 23rd, 2011 at 9:47 am
So true about Oregon, who saw that coming? This conference is now loaded with quality coaches, plus Utah comes in next year. Once most of the teams reload from the exodus of the last 3 to 4 years (like Arizona has done), this conference is going to be unbelievably difficult. What team isn’t going to be even better next year? (maybe WSU?)
February 23rd, 2011 at 12:14 pm
What team isn’t going to be better next year? A good question. But bear in mind that Derrick Williams, regardless of what he says now, is almost a sure thing to leave. He’s projected in one mock draft as the No. 2 overall pick. If he leaves, Arizona takes a big dip.
February 23rd, 2011 at 12:22 pm
@Jeff Faraudo If Williams leaves, I agree Arizona takes a “dip,” but a “big dip”? I don’t quite agree. You’ve also got to take into account their likely Top 10 recruiting class.
February 23rd, 2011 at 11:13 pm
I totally agree with the strategy of having a short-term goal of qualifying for the NIT. The guys on the team are playing for fun, so fun means playing more games. Going to the NIT provides that opportunity. Obviously, the long-shot goal is making it to the big dance by winning the Pac 10 tournament. I’m not sure whether winning all three remaining games or just two really helps achieve that goal.