<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transitional kindergarten, California confusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/2012/01/27/transitional-kindergarten-california-confusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/2012/01/27/transitional-kindergarten-california-confusion/</link>
	<description>Katy Murphy&#039;s blog on Oakland schools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AH</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/2012/01/27/transitional-kindergarten-california-confusion/comment-page-1/#comment-48050</link>
		<dc:creator>AH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/?p=14184#comment-48050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems the whole idea of transitional kinder was not well-thought out.  Whose idea was it to fund another year of public school when we can&#039;t even afford the 13 years we&#039;ve already got?

Here&#039;s my idea: treat kindergarten students like kindergartners, rather than first-graders.  That&#039;s when they should be learning to line up, name colors and letters, and write their name.  Then nobody would need transitional kindergarten.

I&#039;ve been an OUSD parent for five years now and while it&#039;s true that kindergarten is more like first grade, it seems that the 4th grade curriculum is much like the 4th grade curriculum of the 70&#039;s.  So why the rush to front-load in kindy?

BTW, my youngest is a Sept 2008 baby.  She will start kindy in 2013 as the youngest student, regardless of whether transitional kindergarten is offered in OUSD.  If she struggles (which I don&#039;t anticipate), she could repeat kindy.  But, really, why do kindergarten twice if you don&#039;t have to?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems the whole idea of transitional kinder was not well-thought out.  Whose idea was it to fund another year of public school when we can&#8217;t even afford the 13 years we&#8217;ve already got?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my idea: treat kindergarten students like kindergartners, rather than first-graders.  That&#8217;s when they should be learning to line up, name colors and letters, and write their name.  Then nobody would need transitional kindergarten.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been an OUSD parent for five years now and while it&#8217;s true that kindergarten is more like first grade, it seems that the 4th grade curriculum is much like the 4th grade curriculum of the 70&#8242;s.  So why the rush to front-load in kindy?</p>
<p>BTW, my youngest is a Sept 2008 baby.  She will start kindy in 2013 as the youngest student, regardless of whether transitional kindergarten is offered in OUSD.  If she struggles (which I don&#8217;t anticipate), she could repeat kindy.  But, really, why do kindergarten twice if you don&#8217;t have to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 6/10 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 149/153 objects using apc

Served from: www.ibabuzz.com @ 2013-05-24 17:24:31 -->