<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawsuit to halt closure of Santa Fe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/2012/04/06/lawsuit-to-halt-closure-of-santa-fe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/2012/04/06/lawsuit-to-halt-closure-of-santa-fe/</link>
	<description>Katy Murphy&#039;s blog on Oakland schools</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:29:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ItGetsWorse</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/2012/04/06/lawsuit-to-halt-closure-of-santa-fe/comment-page-1/#comment-51457</link>
		<dc:creator>ItGetsWorse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 20:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/?p=14669#comment-51457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Peach--it&#039;s even more absurd than what you&#039;ve laid out here.  E&#039;ville will only move 8-12 graders to Santa Fe.  The remaining elementary school in Emeryville will now be K-8.  What&#039;s being built is not a high school, but a giant monolith that will house all our schools, at every level, along with our community activities and a library to be shared between the public and school kids.  It&#039;s a giant consolidation of public facilities which will leave other buildings open for &quot;other uses.&quot;  Our elementary school had millions of dollars poured into it, only to be slated for abandonment by the Emeryville district.  Who was on board in Emeryville for this grand scheme?  Look no further than your friendly neighborhood superintendent in Oakland.  It is about real estate and the abandonment of public facilities to private interests, contracts for consultants, charter schools, and the eventual flight of families in need from these communities.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peach&#8211;it&#8217;s even more absurd than what you&#8217;ve laid out here.  E&#8217;ville will only move 8-12 graders to Santa Fe.  The remaining elementary school in Emeryville will now be K-8.  What&#8217;s being built is not a high school, but a giant monolith that will house all our schools, at every level, along with our community activities and a library to be shared between the public and school kids.  It&#8217;s a giant consolidation of public facilities which will leave other buildings open for &#8220;other uses.&#8221;  Our elementary school had millions of dollars poured into it, only to be slated for abandonment by the Emeryville district.  Who was on board in Emeryville for this grand scheme?  Look no further than your friendly neighborhood superintendent in Oakland.  It is about real estate and the abandonment of public facilities to private interests, contracts for consultants, charter schools, and the eventual flight of families in need from these communities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peach</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/2012/04/06/lawsuit-to-halt-closure-of-santa-fe/comment-page-1/#comment-51413</link>
		<dc:creator>Peach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/?p=14669#comment-51413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In other words, the Emeryville district that just emerged from state receivership has an extra half million dollars a year to rent a slightly larger building with more sports facilities (just rebuilt by the city of Oakland), rather than use a free unused facility.  Emery Secondary, 6-12, has an enrollment of 405 while Havens Elementary from Piedmont used the Emeryville facility with 475 students so it&#039;s really not about space.

Again, why are they leasing Santa Fe when Emeryville, like all districts, is cutting curriculum offerings, support programs, and staff for their students?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other words, the Emeryville district that just emerged from state receivership has an extra half million dollars a year to rent a slightly larger building with more sports facilities (just rebuilt by the city of Oakland), rather than use a free unused facility.  Emery Secondary, 6-12, has an enrollment of 405 while Havens Elementary from Piedmont used the Emeryville facility with 475 students so it&#8217;s really not about space.</p>
<p>Again, why are they leasing Santa Fe when Emeryville, like all districts, is cutting curriculum offerings, support programs, and staff for their students?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cranky Teacher</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/2012/04/06/lawsuit-to-halt-closure-of-santa-fe/comment-page-1/#comment-51334</link>
		<dc:creator>Cranky Teacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/?p=14669#comment-51334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Parent Stuck in OUSD: Emeryville is looking to rent Santa Fe only temporarily, while they rebuild the town&#039;s only high school. 

There is an alternative site the Hawley school which Piedmont has been leasing (but is done with this year) but it is smaller, especially for sports. 

Many Emeryville students are from other cities, FYI, such as Oakland, Antioch, Richmond, etc. 

I think most folks would be astonished by the geographical mobility of high school students in the East Bay. Some parents seem to think kids will get in less trouble if they school far from their neighborhood.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Parent Stuck in OUSD: Emeryville is looking to rent Santa Fe only temporarily, while they rebuild the town&#8217;s only high school. </p>
<p>There is an alternative site the Hawley school which Piedmont has been leasing (but is done with this year) but it is smaller, especially for sports. </p>
<p>Many Emeryville students are from other cities, FYI, such as Oakland, Antioch, Richmond, etc. </p>
<p>I think most folks would be astonished by the geographical mobility of high school students in the East Bay. Some parents seem to think kids will get in less trouble if they school far from their neighborhood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parent stuck in OUSD</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/2012/04/06/lawsuit-to-halt-closure-of-santa-fe/comment-page-1/#comment-51270</link>
		<dc:creator>Parent stuck in OUSD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/?p=14669#comment-51270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure if it pertains or how it would pertain, but its interesting that Emeryville has leased space to the Piedmont school district for the last 2-3 years  while Havens and Beach Elementary schools have been renovated.  The renovations will be done by Fall. With a housing supply that is mostly small apartment or loft  style condos and a dwindling school age population and an empty school site that is &quot;good enough&quot; for Piedmonters to --albeit temporarily---house their kids in, why arethey leasing Sante Fe? 

It does really rankle that there will be no public schools below Telegraph. I fail to see why a school so close to Sante Fe (sharing the same boundries with Peralta) with tiny enrollment, poor test scores that haven&#039;t improved, no neighborhood kids, very close to a middle school that is also under enrolled should  receive close to $10 mil in upgrades and be transformed K-8 while Sante Fe is shuttered.  What are the ulterior motives here? What is the real plan and where is the transperancy?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if it pertains or how it would pertain, but its interesting that Emeryville has leased space to the Piedmont school district for the last 2-3 years  while Havens and Beach Elementary schools have been renovated.  The renovations will be done by Fall. With a housing supply that is mostly small apartment or loft  style condos and a dwindling school age population and an empty school site that is &#8220;good enough&#8221; for Piedmonters to &#8211;albeit temporarily&#8212;house their kids in, why arethey leasing Sante Fe? </p>
<p>It does really rankle that there will be no public schools below Telegraph. I fail to see why a school so close to Sante Fe (sharing the same boundries with Peralta) with tiny enrollment, poor test scores that haven&#8217;t improved, no neighborhood kids, very close to a middle school that is also under enrolled should  receive close to $10 mil in upgrades and be transformed K-8 while Sante Fe is shuttered.  What are the ulterior motives here? What is the real plan and where is the transperancy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter von Ehrenkrook</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/2012/04/06/lawsuit-to-halt-closure-of-santa-fe/comment-page-1/#comment-51254</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter von Ehrenkrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 05:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/?p=14669#comment-51254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Mick and Peach. The three day silence till someone finally posted a comment was deafening.

I am immensely proud of the parents at Santa Fe who sought out legal recourse, and extremely grateful to Michael Siegel for his pro bono work.

Having visited several schools with an eye toward next year&#039;s placement, I have been flooded with gratitude for the opportunity to teach at Santa Fe. The staff, children, and facilities will be hard to match.

As has been stated quite well in the litigation papers, there is no justifiable reason for closing Santa Fe.

Thanks again to Mick and Peach for your encouraging words.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Mick and Peach. The three day silence till someone finally posted a comment was deafening.</p>
<p>I am immensely proud of the parents at Santa Fe who sought out legal recourse, and extremely grateful to Michael Siegel for his pro bono work.</p>
<p>Having visited several schools with an eye toward next year&#8217;s placement, I have been flooded with gratitude for the opportunity to teach at Santa Fe. The staff, children, and facilities will be hard to match.</p>
<p>As has been stated quite well in the litigation papers, there is no justifiable reason for closing Santa Fe.</p>
<p>Thanks again to Mick and Peach for your encouraging words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peach</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/2012/04/06/lawsuit-to-halt-closure-of-santa-fe/comment-page-1/#comment-51239</link>
		<dc:creator>Peach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/?p=14669#comment-51239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like Walmart, which heavily funds charters and ed reform, all of this is about real estate.

Santa Fe is the latest casualty in the march to eliminate all public schools in West and North Oakland.  This will further facilitate the growth of charters.  More importantly, it will create empty buildings for the children of the new middle class inhabitants of West and North Oakland and Emeryville.

The same is the case of schools near the estuary and port.  The Chief Illusionist of the American Indian School was helped to create a distraction so that its growth to include elementary grades would pass the Board late in the night. Since the development of housing in the Jack London and estuary area began, there have been plans to build a school in the 9th Avenue or Laney College area.  These plans were foiled.  

Now with the American Indian School offering elementary grades, space will be freed up in Lincoln Elementary for a themed magnet or some such for the children from the loft districts.  Also there will be the bright new building on 10th Street for La Escuelita.  Charter schools are already being established nearby.  These developments may allow Lazear to exist for a few more years if it is not needed for others.

The children of working and low income parents, like those at Santa Fe and Lazear, are so often sacrificed for the convenience of advantaged parents.  

I wish the litigants success.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Walmart, which heavily funds charters and ed reform, all of this is about real estate.</p>
<p>Santa Fe is the latest casualty in the march to eliminate all public schools in West and North Oakland.  This will further facilitate the growth of charters.  More importantly, it will create empty buildings for the children of the new middle class inhabitants of West and North Oakland and Emeryville.</p>
<p>The same is the case of schools near the estuary and port.  The Chief Illusionist of the American Indian School was helped to create a distraction so that its growth to include elementary grades would pass the Board late in the night. Since the development of housing in the Jack London and estuary area began, there have been plans to build a school in the 9th Avenue or Laney College area.  These plans were foiled.  </p>
<p>Now with the American Indian School offering elementary grades, space will be freed up in Lincoln Elementary for a themed magnet or some such for the children from the loft districts.  Also there will be the bright new building on 10th Street for La Escuelita.  Charter schools are already being established nearby.  These developments may allow Lazear to exist for a few more years if it is not needed for others.</p>
<p>The children of working and low income parents, like those at Santa Fe and Lazear, are so often sacrificed for the convenience of advantaged parents.  </p>
<p>I wish the litigants success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick,</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/2012/04/06/lawsuit-to-halt-closure-of-santa-fe/comment-page-1/#comment-51213</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick,</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/education/?p=14669#comment-51213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree 100%.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 5/16 queries in 0.005 seconds using apc
Object Caching 239/243 objects using apc

Served from: www.ibabuzz.com @ 2013-06-18 17:00:09 -->