19

Wednesday: Researchers, Oakland district staff, to discuss the recent reports on black male achievement

An earlier thread about African American male achievement elicited some thoughtful comments and ideas. Want to learn more about what the district is doing in response to this data, or to share your ideas with the researchers and the head of OUSD’s black male achievement office, Chris Chatmon?

Urban Strategies Council is hosting an hour-long webinar on the subject at 10 a.m. tomorrow (Wednesday). You can register here.

46

OUSD’s black male students: school-by-school data

This morning, Urban Strategies Council released a series of reports about the experience of black boys in the Oakland school district: one on out-of-school suspensions, one on chronic absenteeism, and lastly, an analysis of numerous factors to estimate how many children are on track to graduate high school — beginning in elementary.

There is so much data here that the short story in today’s Tribune (which is long by today’s standards) and blog post can’t do it justice. Each school will receive a data profile to further the district’s African American Male Achievement initiative. These reports were produced in partnership with OUSD as part of the initiative.

Some of the stats that I pulled for the paper on African-American boys in OUSD. The suspension rates are the percentage of individual students that received an out-of-school suspension at least once during a single school year.

  • Twenty percent missed 18 or more days of school in 2010-11, making them chronically absent.
  • Eleven elementary schools gave no out-of-school suspensions to black boys in 2010-11, and 20 schools suspended 3┬ápercent or less; by contrast, some elementary schools suspended 22 to 35 percent of their black male students that year.
  • Middle schools had the highest suspension rates for black boys. Out-of-school suspensions jumped from 12 percent in fifth grade to 31 percent in sixth grade. At West Oakland Middle School, 60 percent of the students received at least one suspension in 2010-11.
  • About 38 percent of the suspensions were for defying authority or causing a disruption; 28 percent were for causing, attempting or threatening injury.

Continue Reading