Sarah Jessica Parker in Pleasanton?!
By Dino-Ray Ramos
Thursday, July 17th, 2008 at 2:41 pm in Actors, Celebrities, Clothing, Designers, East Bay, Entertainment, Fashion, Fashion Labels, Fred Leighton, Interviews, Jewelry, Macy's, Miu Miu, Perfume, Peter Soronen, Pleasanton, Pop Culture, SF Bay Area, San Francisco, Sarah Jessica Parker, Stores, Style, Women's.

Yes, you heard that right. The one and only Sarah Jessica Parker paid a visit to the humble Stoneridge Mall in Pleasanton to meet and greet her fans (and sign bottles of her fragrances) at Macy’s and to promote her fragrances, Lovely, Covet and Covet Pure Bloom

Donned in a beautiful Peter Soronen dress (the perfect silhouette on her), ferocious sequin dipped Miu Miu heels (she had to check and make sure they were Miu Miu) and a gorgeous Fred Leighton necklace, I had a brief interview the “Lovely” SJP.

We talked about everything from the vast difference of weather between the East Bay and SF and she even complimented my suit! When I told her I lived in the area she said, “Lucky You!” and she loved the cozy rural charm of the Tri-Valley Area…
Nonetheless, here’s what she had to say:
How do you go about creating your fragrances?
Well they have three different stories that are particular to each fragrance. Lovely, I had very specific idea in my mind based on this 20 year “vulgar” version of a chemist that I was. When I finally found Catherine and Cody, it was a matter of interpreting what I wanted, having real professionals and perfumers come into the conversation to teach me about the fragrance business. That, in a way, was the simplest process. Catherine told me early on in the journey of Lovely that I was much further along than I thought because most people come with all the options in the world available to them. With Covet, it was a very different animal because there was nothing specific I was thinking except that I wanted to have some connective tissue to Lovely. I wanted to create a fragrance that had drama and had more subversive qualities. With Pure Bloom, it had specificity from a flower – which was unusual for me. It was about capturing the idea of pikake and the experience I had with the flower when I was in Hawaii and when I was a young girl. They’ve all been different. As a result, I’ve learned so much about fragrance and getting to the final destination.

How do you think perfumes and cologne reflects one’s personality?
I don’t know if I have a philosophy, but people have relationships with fragrance. There’s a long history of women using fragrance and men using certain kinds of fragrance and more recently there have been genderless fragrances. I think fragrance makes you feel different. People use it for different reasons, some are more perfunctory others use it as an escapism. For myself, I’ve always just loved fragrance. From the time I was a little girl, my mother and a lot of influential women in my life wore fragrance. I had all this sense memory of fragrance. I think a lot of people like where fragrance takes you. It transports you.

How has life been post-“Sex and the City:The Movie”?
I am really relieved that it received that enthusiasm. I am thrilled that it has had success. Mostly I am very proud of the movie we got to make. Now that it is behind me to some degree, it’s an enormous sense of pride, satisfaction and relief. It’s been really lovely to hear people’s experiences seeing the movie. That was always the important part of the process to us; how the audience reacted. We were very cognizant of that. It was only with their commitment to the show that we were having this opportunity. Our fervent hope and wish was that the audience would respond. It’s been thrilling to see how they responded – and it’s been more restful now compared to those months leading up to the movie’s release.

What do you like about San Francisco and the Bay Area?
First of all, aesthetically speaking, we were really struck by the light. We arrived in San Francisco and then drove into Pleasanton. It’s really unique and very arresting. It’s stunning. The food, the culture, the people and the sophistication of the people and their curiosity – it’s just a very unusual part of the country. Before we had a child, my husband and I used to drive up the coast to Big Sur a lot and travel up further to San Francisco. It’s just very different from New York and Los Angeles. It’s really its own little world. This part of California is especially pretty.
SJP had to be one of the warmest interviews I have ever had (not temperature-wise). She is so grateful, personable and just unbelievably nice - no wonder why everyone LOVES her.
[Both comments and pings are currently closed.]



July 17th, 2008 at 4:04 pm
Did she look so much better without that huge distracting mole on her face? I found it very unpleasant on the big screen. I am so glad that it has been removed. What an improvement.
PS - I love that you took a pic of her feet. You are too funny.
July 17th, 2008 at 11:03 pm
Gee, Celeste, isn’t that a little harsh?
We all have our humanity after all!
Nice interview. I am not a big fan but I just so happened to see Sex in the City last night and she won me over!
July 18th, 2008 at 11:59 am
I think she is beautiful and it was so amazing to see her. A chance of a lifetime!
July 18th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
I have to say I absolutely adore her. She is so charming and genuine to her fans. She is beautiful and her personality influences that. As for the mole comment above, we all have something that makes us unique and our own person, she was beautiful with it and she is just as beautiful without it.
July 18th, 2008 at 1:29 pm
thanks for uploading the pics. I was on one of them…yay..My camera died yesterday!!! SJP is even more gorgeous in person!!!
July 18th, 2008 at 7:09 pm
Why is Celeste harsh? It’s the truth. That mole was horrid on her horse face. No one complained when that Iglesias brother got his hairy mole removed.
G-d bless the dermatologists!!
Love that pic of
July 19th, 2008 at 7:24 am
I am such a fan of Sarah Jessica and also of her character, Carrie Bradshaw. In person she is truly beautiful - inside and outside. It was totally worth it. Loved the photos. I am in one of them. Really happy about that.
July 20th, 2008 at 11:28 am
I never knew what was the fuss about her? I still don’t? I think she exemplifies too much materialism on clothes and shoes in this struggling economy. Most girls cannot afford, neither can Sarah if she actually spent money continuously on shoes and clothing, not tomention the importance they all put on relationships and men, not very good examples for women today…Its light fun an all, but alot take it seriously. I see Sarah walking thorugh the streets of Manhattan around 9th street mostly, she and Matt live near me, she never dresses like that at all, only to functions, her regular wear is comfort wear, not Blahniks!
July 20th, 2008 at 6:18 pm
I can’t believe that someone (coco) would be so cruel to call her “horse face” you are sooo unoriginal. By the way she was stunning. Is it a crime to have a mole?!!! We are all human, if you didn’t like it then don’t look at her!!!She is a very nice person, how can you be so hurtful?
August 6th, 2008 at 2:26 am
First of all, of course she doesn’t dress in dresses and Blahniks everyday… she’s a mother! Duh. She’s about as normal and personable as a celebrity can be, and from the looks of these comments, nicer than most average joe’s/josie’s. Contrary to what “Perin” has to say, SJP is a wonderful role model to women. Her pieces from her clothingline, Bitten, sell for $8.98 each because she understands the financial struggle that everyday women face and yet she still believes that every woman, no matter what size her bank account, should have the right to fashion and fabulousness. And by the way, those of you who are knocking the poor woman about her physical imperfections should be ashamed of yourselves because:
1.) It’s cruel and I’m sure your mothers would be ashamed that you turned out so shallow.
and
2.) You all are probably far less attractive than Mrs. Sarah Jessica Parker, inside and out.
Check yourselves.