Reps. Ellen Tauscher, D-Alamo, and Adam Smith, D-Washington state, today introduced the “Change the Course in Iraq Act,” adding yet another option to a plethora of anti-war bills floating around the Capitol.
“Almost five years ago we authorized the president to use force in Iraq for a myriad of reasons many of which are outdated or have been proven to be patently false,” Tauscher said. “American troops were not sent to Iraq to fight a civil war, they must be brought home sooner and safer.”
President George Bush has said he will veto any bill that interferes with his Iraq War strategy.
It’s an open question as to whether this bill will satisfy anti-war constituents at Moveon.org and CodePink who have demanded that Tauscher sign on as a co-sponsor to one of a half-dozen bills that would end or dramatically curtail the U.S. military presence in Iraq. UPDATE: SEE RESPONSE BELOW FROM A MOVEON.ORG REPRESENTATIVE IN WALNUT CREEK WHO RECENTLY VISITED TAUSCHER’S OFFICE AS PART OF A GROUP OF PEOPLE WHO ASKED HER TO TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE WAR.
According to Tauscher’s office, the bill terminates the congressional authority for President George Bush to use force in Iraq on the grounds that the U.S. military mission in Iraq has changed dramatically.
It requires the Bush administration to submit a plan for phased redeployment of U.S. forces and mandates the appointment of a high-level coordinator for Iraq stabilization.
Other terms of the bill, Tauscher’s office said, include:
– Forces the Iraqi government to take on a greater role in stabilizing Iraq.
– Conditions further funding for Iraqi security and reconstruction, beginning in 2008, on the president certifying that the Iraqis have met specific benchmarks recommended by the Iraq Study Group.
UPDATE: RESPONSE FROM MOVEON.ORG REPRESENTATIVE TOM MAHON:
“This looks good to me and very encouraging. I don’t know what’s not being said here, but what is said seems to satisfy our request that she co-sign any one of several bills calling for phased redeployment of troops.
She has instead authored legislation that appears to have the same goals as H.R.508 (plan to end war); H.R.413 (revoke 2002 war authorization); H.R.746 (redeploy troops w/in 6 mo.), and H.R.455 (troops out Iraq by 12/07) .
I don’t see any ref to cutting funding of the troop surge (Markey’s H.R.353 and Kucinich’s H.Con. Res.23). Do you know anything about that?
We also urged her to block any impending attack on Iran, and I see she calls for diplomacy with bordering and regional powers. (Even in the Cold War the US talked to the Soviets.)
So I think this is a very good step. I realize how diverse her constituency is, from Livermore nearly to Sacto, and for a Centrist this may represent a ‘profile in courage.’ ”
Here are details of the bill as provided by Tauscher’s office:
Section 1 commends the troops on a job well done. Revokes the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (H.J.RES.114). The original authorization signed by the President on October 16, 2002 was based on the Bush administration’s rationale and objectives of the war, which no longer bear any resemblance to current military operations in Iraq. Repealing the authorization would allow a new vote on U.S. military involvement and force the Bush administration to make its case for continued involvement in Iraq.
Requires the Secretary of Defense to submit to the defense committees a plan for phased redeployment of the troops based on a mission that is focused on training Iraqi troops, fighting terrorism, and force protection.
Section 2 mandates that the President appoint a Coordinator for Iraq Stabilization to pursue diplomacy with bordering and regional powers to secure Iraq’s borders, encourage national reconciliation and stabilization of Iraq, and promote economic assistance.
Section 3 using the benchmarks recommended by the Iraq Study Group, requires the President to submit a certification by December 31, 2007, to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations and Armed Services that the government of Iraq has made significant achievements in approving laws regarding Iraqi oil revenue sharing, de-Baathification, and disarming the militia. Additionally, as recommended by the Iraq Study Group, Iraq’s security forces must be in the lead of operations and exercise control in all Iraqi provinces and the Iraqi Constitution must be reviewed and amended if appropriate. If the President fails to certify the Iraq government has met each of these benchmarks by December 31, 2007, no further funds shall be obligated for the Iraq Security Forces Funds or the Iraq Relief and Reconstruction Fund until such certifications are made.