<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: C. Long vs. Gholston</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/</link>
	<description>A look inside the world of the highly classified Oakland Raiders from the writers of Bay Area News Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:04:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Change Me</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/comment-page-7/#comment-97065</link>
		<dc:creator>Change Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 15:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/raidersblog/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/#comment-97065</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Change Me...&lt;/strong&gt;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Change Me&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giants Osi Umenyiora Authentic Jerseys</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/comment-page-7/#comment-97064</link>
		<dc:creator>Giants Osi Umenyiora Authentic Jerseys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/raidersblog/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/#comment-97064</guid>
		<description>As a far-away (Europe) Giants fan, I am always looking for new sites with G-Men information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a far-away (Europe) Giants fan, I am always looking for new sites with G-Men information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ Legend #34</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/comment-page-7/#comment-97063</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ Legend #34</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/raidersblog/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/#comment-97063</guid>
		<description>Someone answer one question for me. Besides Chris Long having the last name Long like the legendary Howie Long, lets just say theoretically if his name was Chris Jones. What makes him so great? Would the Raider nation want the guy if he was named Chris Jones? It just sounds like we are getting caught up in this he is a Legend like his Dad thing and this is coming from a guy who wants to see McFadden wearing #34 in honor of the old Bo Jackson taking it to the house 6.5 yards a pop days. ha ha ha LOL!!!!! If Long gets 12 solo sacks this year (great season)that is less than the Raiders totaled last year and what was our record? Come on Raider nation we need a home run hitter!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone answer one question for me. Besides Chris Long having the last name Long like the legendary Howie Long, lets just say theoretically if his name was Chris Jones. What makes him so great? Would the Raider nation want the guy if he was named Chris Jones? It just sounds like we are getting caught up in this he is a Legend like his Dad thing and this is coming from a guy who wants to see McFadden wearing #34 in honor of the old Bo Jackson taking it to the house 6.5 yards a pop days. ha ha ha LOL!!!!! If Long gets 12 solo sacks this year (great season)that is less than the Raiders totaled last year and what was our record? Come on Raider nation we need a home run hitter!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OG</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/comment-page-7/#comment-97062</link>
		<dc:creator>OG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/raidersblog/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/#comment-97062</guid>
		<description>Great Article On Darren McFadden!!!!!!!! and Raiders..


http://bigbenlivingroom.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Article On Darren McFadden!!!!!!!! and Raiders..</p>
<p><a href="http://bigbenlivingroom.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://bigbenlivingroom.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Murder</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/comment-page-7/#comment-97061</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Murder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 04:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/raidersblog/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/#comment-97061</guid>
		<description>Gholston is horrid, Delawrence Grant 2.0, please keep him far from this team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gholston is horrid, Delawrence Grant 2.0, please keep him far from this team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaiderKC</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/comment-page-7/#comment-97057</link>
		<dc:creator>RaiderKC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 18:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/raidersblog/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/#comment-97057</guid>
		<description>I think Kiff was being coy to ward off Jerry or the Jets from trading up. There are still some descent DT out there in FA or if we can get a 2nd and 3rd or 3 and 4th for some of our baggage then Al will pick DMac (in for visit soon), then a OT in 2nd or 3rd, DT/LB in 3rd or 4th, and a QB in the 6th or 7th. If we can get LSU&#039;s QB in the 6th or 7th as #3 on the depth chart that would be great. Then hopefully next year Al can trade Walter for a 3rd or 4th round pick to make up for that lost 5th round to ATL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Kiff was being coy to ward off Jerry or the Jets from trading up. There are still some descent DT out there in FA or if we can get a 2nd and 3rd or 3 and 4th for some of our baggage then Al will pick DMac (in for visit soon), then a OT in 2nd or 3rd, DT/LB in 3rd or 4th, and a QB in the 6th or 7th. If we can get LSU&#8217;s QB in the 6th or 7th as #3 on the depth chart that would be great. Then hopefully next year Al can trade Walter for a 3rd or 4th round pick to make up for that lost 5th round to ATL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SNOOPY</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/comment-page-7/#comment-97060</link>
		<dc:creator>SNOOPY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/raidersblog/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/#comment-97060</guid>
		<description>Mc FAD-den, Mc FAD-den, Mc FAD-den. you all make good sence and thou this is my feeling I&#039;m still not buying it...

Except for one little thing Kiffen said that is bothering me. He said that they were NOT going after a running back... WHAAAAAA???

Lane is too smart for that. you never say that even if it&#039;s true. At this point it could be anything like a lil misdirection...

Maybe they want McFAD-den and believe someone above will take him? Or NOT?

The thing that intrigues me is that he said it and Lane is a smart SOB guys...

Frankly I can&#039;t wait to find out. I&#039;ll say this, Al&#039;s making this off season very interesting...

Hopefully, the season turns out to be as much fun...

Oh and what&#039;s with all of these recipes?!?!?!?! The CHEF&#039;s blog is elsewhere...

I try not to be negative especially with fellow RAIDER FANS so please guys... this ain&#039;t the place...

GO RAIDERS!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mc FAD-den, Mc FAD-den, Mc FAD-den. you all make good sence and thou this is my feeling I&#8217;m still not buying it&#8230;</p>
<p>Except for one little thing Kiffen said that is bothering me. He said that they were NOT going after a running back&#8230; WHAAAAAA???</p>
<p>Lane is too smart for that. you never say that even if it&#8217;s true. At this point it could be anything like a lil misdirection&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe they want McFAD-den and believe someone above will take him? Or NOT?</p>
<p>The thing that intrigues me is that he said it and Lane is a smart SOB guys&#8230;</p>
<p>Frankly I can&#8217;t wait to find out. I&#8217;ll say this, Al&#8217;s making this off season very interesting&#8230;</p>
<p>Hopefully, the season turns out to be as much fun&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh and what&#8217;s with all of these recipes?!?!?!?! The CHEF&#8217;s blog is elsewhere&#8230;</p>
<p>I try not to be negative especially with fellow RAIDER FANS so please guys&#8230; this ain&#8217;t the place&#8230;</p>
<p>GO RAIDERS!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Trojan</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/comment-page-7/#comment-97059</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Trojan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 06:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/raidersblog/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/#comment-97059</guid>
		<description>a decent DL with great players behind them suddenly becomes a very good DL, and an adequate OL in it&#039;s second year under cable with several key new additions and better skill position players suddenly becomes a good OL, factor in the additions we have made to each line, they&#039;re not blockbusters but they&#039;re solid signings, factor in that burges and kelly will be healthy next year and thathall is a drastic improvement over washington and that wilson is one of the best run defenders of all NFL S&#039;s, and that he is also a general playmaker, , factor in that russell will have a year of practice and study and an entire offseason to prepare and that better recievers will be open sooner and the OL will need to block less, but they&#039;re already better, this team looks like a playoff team, not a legit title contender but a lock to be in the wildcard discussion next year...how many holes do we really have, we have a QB, we are good at RB, we are two deep with very good FBs, we have a good TE, we have decent WRs, he have two good Gs, we have two capable starters at C, we have two decent starters at RT, we have a need at LT although we appear to have decent players contending for the job, we have an elite DE and a good DT, we have multiple options at the other DT spot and several capable of starting but it is arguably our greatest need, or you could argue that a bookend is our greatest need although we have a decent run option and a decent pass rush option in rotational roles, we are set with two pro bowl LBs and two adequate starters at LB, our secondary is great from top to bottom, a great coverage S a great run defense/hart hitter/playmaker, and we have two elite cover corners, one who also a playmaker, so for all the cynics and pessimists...we have 3(DT, DE, LT) real needs and our OLB and and WR spots arguably could use some improvement, but all of our needs already have what are rotational options/arguably adequate starters/quality depth, this team is capable of winning, regardless of who we draft, if Russell is half of what we drafted him to be this season then we will make the playoffs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a decent DL with great players behind them suddenly becomes a very good DL, and an adequate OL in it&#8217;s second year under cable with several key new additions and better skill position players suddenly becomes a good OL, factor in the additions we have made to each line, they&#8217;re not blockbusters but they&#8217;re solid signings, factor in that burges and kelly will be healthy next year and thathall is a drastic improvement over washington and that wilson is one of the best run defenders of all NFL S&#8217;s, and that he is also a general playmaker, , factor in that russell will have a year of practice and study and an entire offseason to prepare and that better recievers will be open sooner and the OL will need to block less, but they&#8217;re already better, this team looks like a playoff team, not a legit title contender but a lock to be in the wildcard discussion next year&#8230;how many holes do we really have, we have a QB, we are good at RB, we are two deep with very good FBs, we have a good TE, we have decent WRs, he have two good Gs, we have two capable starters at C, we have two decent starters at RT, we have a need at LT although we appear to have decent players contending for the job, we have an elite DE and a good DT, we have multiple options at the other DT spot and several capable of starting but it is arguably our greatest need, or you could argue that a bookend is our greatest need although we have a decent run option and a decent pass rush option in rotational roles, we are set with two pro bowl LBs and two adequate starters at LB, our secondary is great from top to bottom, a great coverage S a great run defense/hart hitter/playmaker, and we have two elite cover corners, one who also a playmaker, so for all the cynics and pessimists&#8230;we have 3(DT, DE, LT) real needs and our OLB and and WR spots arguably could use some improvement, but all of our needs already have what are rotational options/arguably adequate starters/quality depth, this team is capable of winning, regardless of who we draft, if Russell is half of what we drafted him to be this season then we will make the playoffs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Trojan</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/comment-page-7/#comment-97058</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Trojan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 06:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/raidersblog/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/#comment-97058</guid>
		<description>you can find good lineman just about anywhere in the draft in any draft, but you can only find a player like mcfadden at the top of the draft, and only in certain drafts(how many years between LT and AP were drafted? and between LT and barry? and between barry and OJ?), but we don&#039;t plan on being at the top of the draft next year, or any time soon, so let&#039;s take the superstar, all-world offensive player while we have the chance, our O and D lines are adequate, they&#039;re not good enough to win us any games on their own but not bad enough to lose us any games on their own, and we have pretty good WRs and what we believe will be an all-world QB, we have the best secondary i the NFL and one of the best LB cores, there will no be another mcfadden for who knows how long, but i can guarrantee that we can solidify either our O or our D line with our first next year, and we do have four picks available after #4, so we should take mcfadden while we can...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can find good lineman just about anywhere in the draft in any draft, but you can only find a player like mcfadden at the top of the draft, and only in certain drafts(how many years between LT and AP were drafted? and between LT and barry? and between barry and OJ?), but we don&#8217;t plan on being at the top of the draft next year, or any time soon, so let&#8217;s take the superstar, all-world offensive player while we have the chance, our O and D lines are adequate, they&#8217;re not good enough to win us any games on their own but not bad enough to lose us any games on their own, and we have pretty good WRs and what we believe will be an all-world QB, we have the best secondary i the NFL and one of the best LB cores, there will no be another mcfadden for who knows how long, but i can guarrantee that we can solidify either our O or our D line with our first next year, and we do have four picks available after #4, so we should take mcfadden while we can&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/comment-page-7/#comment-97056</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 04:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/raidersblog/2008/04/03/c-long-vs-gholston/#comment-97056</guid>
		<description>Hey guys all this talk about a a  dline man is nice but I
will bet my house that dfad will be our pick i know we
just re signed fargas and rhodes but big  Al is not going to let this barn burner bye. Is it logical no put hey were raider fans there is no logic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys all this talk about a a  dline man is nice but I<br />
will bet my house that dfad will be our pick i know we<br />
just re signed fargas and rhodes but big  Al is not going to let this barn burner bye. Is it logical no put hey were raider fans there is no logic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
