Comments on: Asomugha: Coaching turnover has hurt

By: THREE RING CIRCUS

THREE RING CIRCUS — Sun, 19 Jul 2009 05:41:10 +0000

8-8 baby

By: RaiderTW

RaiderTW — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:50:54 +0000

So, instead of chasing the tail around again… how ’bout we just call it a truce? I know you’re right in a way, and even though I make valid points*, you won’t consider more than your own already set viewpoint. Sounds like the groundworks of a truce to me!
————-
Just sayin’ the first Dr there reported murder from the 100 or so bodies. They sat in the sun for a week which CSI: Guayana wouldn’t find needle marks.
Fair enough, truce, actually no arguement just talking nonRaiders stuff.Hahaha
You’re also right about the Flavor Aid, cheap bast@rd, can’t even spring for the real stuff. Hey, would have made a difference in taste!!!lol

By: weaselbit

weaselbit — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:49:11 +0000

Garcia probably got cut loose for being a running the mouth cancer that he’s starting to look like.
JM will motivate and learn to do things his own way.
He’s better off.
When it starts to click he be a bad xxxxx.
I hate talkers.
People who talk their way into a job or promotion, and ultimately fail because they didn’t deserve to be there in the first place.
As I said before, Garcia’s merely adequate.
They ended the season strong and the coaching stability will push them over the top.
Wait till a defender tries that one hand tackle poop that works on 90% of NFL QB’s.
Or when he rolls right and throws far left.
and it’s going to be sweet when he lowers his head and punishes defenders because he’s big enough to do it and he will.
He’s gonna throw so hard it’ll be challenging for receivers to catch it and defenders won’t have time to get to it.
Receivers will have to get used to him.
And if he doesn’t make mistakes, he’s not taking risks.
If he really hits the books he could be like a taller Elway/Bradshaw hybrid thing that terrorizes defenses.
Oh yeah, we got a running game too.
And maybe a DC who won’t have the defense lay down in the 4th.

By: HayesDaze37

HayesDaze37 — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:37:43 +0000

Truth is…if even ONE of the rookie WR’s plays a lot this year, it will be a major success (unless it’s due to injuries!).

By: Dude

Dude — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:37:24 +0000

Yet somehow ONLY Raider fan claims either will be a good pro. Weird!

By: HayesDaze37

HayesDaze37 — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:33:41 +0000

In each of his 3-years, DHB had a play go longer than Murph had during his entire 4-year career.

If Schilens and JLH really are “all that,” the Raiders receiver corps could be VERY special. Especially if JaMarcus is ready!

By: HayesDaze37

HayesDaze37 — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:26:12 +0000

So — Here’s an interesting question. DHB’s stats are remarkably similar to Louis Murphy’s stats (even though DHB was not on a team known for its Offensive prowess). How is it that some people think DHB will be a bust before they’ve ever seen him as a pro…but the same people think Murph will be a star?

These kids need to show us something — ANYTHIMG — before any of us can make a claim to their sure-fire success or failure.

If they both catch somewhere around 30-catches this year, it means they’re both ready-for-primetime earlier than 95% of their peers. It also would mean somebody made some great picks from the front office (as much as it pains some to admit it)!

Heyward-Bey stats:

Season Games Rec Yds Avg Lg TD Att YdsAvg Lg TD
2006 13 45 694 15.4 96 5 5 14 2.8 9 0
2007 13 51 786 15.4 63 3 5 110 21.4 54 1
2008 12 42 608 14.5 80 5 15 202 13.5 76 1

Louis Murphy stats:
Receiving Rushing Fumbles
YEAR REC YDS AVG LNG TD ATT YDS AVG LNG TD FUM LST
2005 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2006 2 42 21.0 35 1 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0
2007 37 548 14.8 66 5 1 12 12.0 12 0 0 0
2008 38 655 17.2 48 7 2 7 3.5 4 0 0 0

By: HayesDaze37

HayesDaze37 — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:00:42 +0000

TW — Citing other conspiracy theories won’t change the facts that I see. And, I never said the children did themselves in…and I never said everybody went along truly voluntarily. Official findings were that the vast majority of deaths were caused by cyanide poisoning — and gunshot wounds were not found on the majority of bodies. I won’t, and can’t with any confidence, state that things you mention didn’t happen — some of that is well-documented. But what you mention doesn’t show up as the main cause of death for the majority of people there — and catastrophic wounds don’t just disappear over a few days. As I told you I would, I looked, but I still can’t find your claim of survivors being suspiciously knocked-off after the event.

(*And, no, I sure don’t believe the gov’t reports are as accurate as they’d like us to believe they are…about anything, actually. I just try to look at all options for what/why it happened.)

If you really want to correct the Kool-Aid record… maybe you should let everybody know that the actual drink of that horrible day was Flavor Aid.

Next subject!

It’s a great day to be a Raiders fan. Isn’t it?

By: beeecham

beeecham — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:46:41 +0000

Wow, the Lady Raccoon is still showing up in the blog despite wimping out of meeting your pal Beeecham – TWICE! It takes a lot of guts – even for chick – to talk all tough on a blog and then hide at home with her tail between her legs.

Anyway, I guess the Lady Raccoon has learned a valuable lesson – she’s not really a member of the Pink Ladies and never talk tough if you’re wasted on watermelon wine coolers. What a tramp!

I’ve got a great feeling Charged Down is going to show up today to discuss that awesome Philip Rivers video! Let’s wait and see!

By: DirtyRaccoon

DirtyRaccoon — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 16:19:13 +0000

ShanaRAT to San Daygo in 2010!!

http://cbs4denver.com/broncos/mike.shananan.2.1090801.html