Part of the Bay Area News Group

Patriots announce deal for Burgess

By Jerry McDonald - NFL Writer
Thursday, August 6th, 2009 at 3:06 pm in Oakland Raiders.

The New England Patriots have announced the acquisition of Derrick Burgess from the Raiders for an “undisclosed draft considerations.”

No confirmation from the Raiders yet. There were unconfirmed reports they were seeking third- and fourth-round draft picks. Burgess, unhappy with his contract over the past three years, forced the issue by not showing up to training camp, with free agent acquisition Greg Ellis taking over his starting job at left end.

With the Patriots, Burgess will be a 3-4 outside linebacker where he ostensibly will be used as a pass rusher.

The wording of the deal by the Patriots, “draft considerations,” indicates that the better Burgess plays, the better the deal for Oakland. Burgess’ production has declined each year he was with the Raiders, with his sack totals going from 16 to 11 to 8.5 to 3.5 (in 10 games).

  • Share/Bookmark

[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]

107 Responses to “Patriots announce deal for Burgess”

  1. raidertay Says:

    Undisclosed?? WTF!

  2. Raider O Says:

    What about V Wilfork??????

    Did they F us again??????

  3. raidertay Says:

    With the Patriots we already know they are going to be at the bottom of the round.

  4. raidertay Says:

    For a man that is known for being so cut throat on trades why does he routinely let the Patriots screw us. Al pls block their number!!!

  5. KoolKell Says:

    Man, The Patriots sop up Raider players like biscuits n’ gravy.

    But the Raiders never get anything in return.

  6. Mistabrown Says:

    Did we throw in John Bowie?

  7. Raider O Says:

    I hope it was a 2nd RD pick!!!

  8. 909RaiderLifer Says:

    JerryMac..

    According to pft.com, Burgess was acquired for:

    “Undisclosed draft CONSIDERATIONS.”

    Get your pal, John H. on the blower and get us the low down.

  9. Raider O Says:

    What about a player? LB, DT, anything!!!!!!

  10. Kush Says:

    How is this going to help us THIS season???

  11. beeecham Says:

    Krappy, how many times are you going to post your lame “biscuits n’ gravy” comparison?

    For crying out loud, old man – it was dumb enough the first time, but 3 more times?

    Listen, I spoke with your high school pal Oakcrapper about taking you out for a nice old man night on the town. We’re talking some local rec room action, Metamucil and maybe some soft serve ice cream.

    How does that sound, old pal?

  12. raidertay Says:

    Raider O,

    I agree we need help NOW…screw more draft picks.

  13. bdlraider Says:

    First Gabriel, then Moss, Jordan, Walter, and now Burgess? I don’t get why the Pats are stocking up on Ex-Raiders.

  14. Norco Bob Says:

    Should have released him and got nothing, because thats what hes worth.

  15. Mistabrown Says:

    I know you ladies like to piss & moan but T Scott & Ellis will make Burgess’s absence a non factor. Be happy with the draft pick. Burgess hasnt been healthy for 2 years.

    Get over it.

  16. raidertay Says:

    I hope the Pats atleast gave us back the $1.5 m roster bonus they just paid him.

  17. AlDavis Stopwatch Says:

    Glad he’s gone. I don’t care if it was for gift cards. Adios A-hole.

  18. Raider O Says:

    I hate the Pats!!!

  19. BART Bridge Blues Says:

    Now we have room on the roster for one more, perhaps Sulak or O’Neill get a second chance.

  20. AlDavis Stopwatch Says:

    Kush Says:
    August 6th, 2009 at 3:17 pm
    How is this going to help us THIS season???

    ————————————————————————————————————–

    Probably very similar to how he helped us last season.

  21. Raider O Says:

    I hate Tom Brady
    I hate the tuck rule
    I hate Bill B
    I hate the Moss trade

    And this is one more reason to hate the pats:

    I hate Burgess to the Pats for a draft pick. Unless it was a 1st RD pick.

  22. KoolKell Says:

    Mike Lombardi, who once-upon-a-time wanted to get Burgess a better Raiders deal, tweets its a 3rd and 5th rounder in 2011 . . .
    2 minutes ago from web

  23. BART Bridge Blues Says:

    A 3rd and 5th rounder in 2011? according to PFT. 2011? That is kinda lame.

  24. SnB offense defense specialteams Says:

    Man…someone earlier said to do a package deal with Walter and Burgess.

    Should have moved quickly during the draft…prior to signing Garcia, Frye and Gradkowski. The moment we signed those guys…it made Walter’s trade value nil….

    I hope the minimum is a 3rd with considerations as high as a second.

    Too bad we couldn’t get a lineman (offense or defense) in a package deal.

    But lets move on. Give Trevor Scott a tremendous opportunity!

  25. AlDavis Stopwatch Says:

    Whats the fuss over Burgess? I don’t see it. He won’t do a thing in New England. His play has declined and he’s more injury prone than Reggie Bush. As soon as it gets cold up there, his joints are going to lock up on him and he will be out for the season.

  26. raidertay Says:

    Im not convinced that T. Scott is going to be an everydown player. Im not encouraged by the fact that Mario has been handling him so easily.

  27. SnB offense defense specialteams Says:

    burgess for 3rd round in 2010 and 5th round in 2011….

  28. 4evaRaider Says:

    lets throw Shaunessy into the fire

  29. beeecham Says:

    Krappy, get off the tweeter and into the shower! You’ve got another large dump in your diapers!

    Sheesh, does this old dog ever learn his lesson?

  30. 4evaRaider Says:

    now if we can just off sands

  31. priesttj Says:

    That’s not too bad when you think we got Burgess for nothing and paid for his production. So now we move on. I hate to lose him but he wasn’t happy and Cable doesn’t want the distractions.

  32. Raider O Says:

    Why 2011???
    Has the 2010 draft been cancelled?!?

  33. AlDavis Stopwatch Says:

    A 3rd and 5th two years from now is a good deal. Burgess will be out the league by then. It’s the same type of deal the Pats do all the time which is why they always have so many draft picks. We need to do trades like this so down the road we can package picks to move up in the draft. Cus with this good young team we will be picking 31 or 32 the next 5-10 years.

  34. Norco Bob Says:

    Kool,..thanks for the updates on Lombardis tweets,…was really good of you. We owe you for that one. You are the man.

  35. Raider O Says:

    This is …….

    Thank you Mr. Davis. I love my gift!!

  36. raidertay Says:

    Are the Patriots the only team in the NFL that answer’s Al’s calls???

  37. 909RaiderLifer Says:

    pft.com, via Lombardi. Also reports, that Al was offered a 3rd. (year unknown) and a player for Burgess, from the Eagles.

  38. 4evaRaider Says:

    bydavidwhite .
    Michael Lombardi reports Burgess for a 2010 third rounder and 2011 fifth rounder. That’s a good deal for a 30-year-old off 3.5-sack year.
    11 minutes ago from web

  39. Raider O Says:

    They owed us for the Moss trade, and this doesn’t make up for it!!!!

    I hate the Pats, as if the Tuck Rule wasn’t enough, nowwehave to add the Miss and Burgess trade.

    Even J Taylor was traded for a 2nd RE pick. He was 33!!!

  40. RaiderLen Says:

    Afternoon Fellas.

    Burgess has been a injury prone one dimensional player His entire career.

    He also is a notorious no show in the offseason conditioning program OTA’s etc.

    What kind of message does that send to some of the younger GFuys on the roster?

    Not the kind of attributes I’m looking for in a player.

    Burgess is a situational pass rusher…when healthy.

    The end.

  41. KoolKell Says:

    Still, now there’s no name recognition at all on the Raider D-Line.

  42. Norco Bob Says:

    4eva,…only Kool is allowed to forward anything from lombardi,..tweets and all.

  43. Oakglenn Says:

    Burgess doesn’t like to practice. Bellichik and Pees like to practice. This should be fun to watch.

  44. 4evaRaider Says:

    oops!!!

  45. 4evaRaider Says:

    yeah Raider O but Burgess sucks compared Taylor,you ever see the cat dance LOL

  46. Raider O Says:

    Eli signed a 97 Mil extension!

  47. raidertay Says:

    I dont mind them getting rid of Burgess. He is being known for being the type of selfish player that Cable is trying to get rid of. I just wish we got a player in there somewhere.

  48. Raider O Says:

    4eva,

    So, to recap what you are saying:
    If Burgess was a better Dancer, we could have traded him for a 2nd!

    Dance Huff!!! Dance !!!!

  49. No More Infield or Trolls Says:

    BURGESS WAS FUN TO WATCH BUT MADDENINGLY INJURY PRONE. THANKS FOR YOUR SERVICE AND GOOD LUCK…

  50. priesttj Says:

    4eva, Shaughnessey’s play has allow the Raiders to let go of Burgess eve though Ellis is t the age he is.

    Also Mario Henderson is no slouch the fact that T Scott is having problems with him is actually GOOD news.

  51. Lynn from Snot Says:

    Out with the old in with the new . Burgess is on the down side of his career I think he peaked in 05 and ever since has been less effective.

  52. KoolKell Says:

    Jeff Garcia is next.

  53. Lynn from Snot Says:

    Huff is the next one to be thinned out of the herd.

  54. RaiderLen Says:

    KoolKell Says:
    August 6th, 2009 at 3:55 pm
    Jeff Garcia is next.

    ======================================================
    Yep,

    It sounds like Frye could end up as the back up.

    I like it.

  55. Larz Says:

    We went from getting nothing and tying up a roster spot for a non-player, to receiving 2 mid to high level picks.

    Overall a good day.

  56. DarthPirate Says:

    Good.
    ====================
    KoolKell Says:
    August 6th, 2009 at 3:55 pm

    Jeff Garcia is next.

  57. Lynn from Snot Says:

    With the 10th pick of the 2008 draft the San Francisco Fortyniners get the “crabs” I’m just itching thinking about what could have been.

  58. Lynn from Snot Says:

    I hope we don’t cut the picks we get before we draft in 2011.

  59. Larz Says:

    Bye bye

    Ungratefull prima dona

  60. KoolKell Says:

    “It’s a great atmosphere,’’ said Walter. “True pros. Guys that go to work. Positive vibes, from the top down. The organization has had success. What else could I say? It speaks for itself.’’

    Walter said the Patriots offense is the most explosive that he’s ever been associated with, but he acknowledged he has a big learning curve since there are few similarities to any of the offenses he ran with the Raiders. The biggest similarity is wide receiver Randy Moss, who played with Walter in Oakland in 2005 and 2006.

    “Obviously, we had a chance to play together. It was really for one season,’’ said Walter, who was inactive as a rookie. “Just to watch him and how he handles himself. He’s a professional. He’s a very smart guy, so obviously seeing how he may read a route or a defense and having a smart guy like that around helps out a lot.’’

    The Patriots believe that Walter’s output in Oakland belies his ability. In 15 games (nine starts), Walter completed 52.3 percent of his passes and threw three touchdowns against 16 interceptions. He was sacked 51 times, including 46 in 2006, when he started eight games.

    When asked how much those numbers had to do with playing for the Raiders, Walter said, “Anybody who would do a couple of Google searches and a little research could easily find the answer to that.’’

    He pointed out that plenty of players who have left Oakland – from Moss to quarterback Kerry Collins – have found success.

  61. 909RaiderLifer Says:

    Lynn…

    LOL @ #58….

  62. DKnight007 Says:

    The old man and Cable better not have just given the Pats Burgess for anything less than 2nd and 4th rounders or at least a 3rd and 5th rounders or a player!

    If the Raiders only get a 3rd or just a 4th…..I will be pissed….if they get both, than that is much better!

  63. 4evaRaider Says:

    Y

  64. BS Detector Says:

    KoolKell loves it when people speak badly about the Raiders. He mops it up like biscuits and gravy! LMAO

    “He pointed out that plenty of players who have left Oakland – from Moss to quarterback Kerry Collins – have found success.”

    How come he didn’t mention Chris Carr, Fabian Washington, Napoleon Harris or Tyler Brayton’s success with other teams?

    I can only hope that the Patriots have to rely on Walter. Bye bye season if it comes to that for them. Walter is a b1tch, nothing more nothing less. Just like KK’s punk ass

  65. 4evaRaider Says:

    you know Big Al has been kind to Walter,if you look at it ,imo

  66. NoMoreFargas Says:

    Why of all teams the pats, If he rips it up their better be at least a 2rd!

  67. Lynn from Snot Says:

    “Just to watch him and how he handles himself. He’s a professional.

    Yeah Right, True professionals don’t lie down on their team like a Moss did the Raiders. What a POS

  68. SharkCatcher Says:

    do u guys think NIck mIller will beat out jonathan holland?

  69. priesttj Says:

    There is a very good interview on KNBR .com of Tom Cable going over the entire team especially Russell and DHB and MM. Go to the Murph and Mac show and download the interview very interesting insights.

  70. 909RaiderLifer Says:

    JerryMac comedian:

    When Burgess meets the NE media: “I just want to say I’m a big fan of the tuck rule.”–Jerry’s twitter.

  71. DirtyBathWater Says:

    Yeah im sure we got had on this deal as well, shoot might as well throw in bowie as well lol man what a crummy way to loose the most feared guy on our Dline

  72. Oakglenn Says:

    Sometimes KookieKell can’t control his bowels due to his age. Fortunately his diaper soaks it up like biscuits and gravy.

  73. Lynn from Snot Says:

    How come he didn’t mention Chris Carr, Fabian Washington, Napoleon Harris or Tyler Brayton’s success with other teams?

    You forgot Barry Simms

  74. RaiderRobG Says:

    #13.

    “First Gabriel, then Moss, Jordan, Walter, and now Burgess? I don’t get why the Pats are stocking up on Ex-Raiders.”

    Because the Pats know what to do with good (well Gabriel was average) players…the Raiders? Not so much.

    I hope Cable turns things around, and Al stays out of his way…I know, “Insanity.”

    Still I thought we could have used Ellis and Burgess together in some great Blitz packages.

    But alas another productive play walks out the door.

  75. DirtyRaccoon Says:

    What up Oakglenn?

  76. DirtyRaccoon Says:

    Crabtree apparently operates in a world ruled by Mel Kiper. He wants to be paid based on what was wrongly predicted to occur rather than what actually did. In his mind, he was the first receiver drafted, even if he wasn’t.

    Talk about your mock drafts.

  77. Richochet Says:

    Lynn from Snot Says:
    August 6th, 2009 at 3:55 pm
    Out with the old in with the new . Burgess is on the down side of his career I think he peaked in 05 and ever since has been less effective.
    ===================
    And you would be wrong.
    He led the NFL is sacks in ‘05, and got to the ProBowl, in ‘05..true.
    Also was in the ProBowl is ‘06 as well.
    Had 8 sacks in ‘07, and injured most of ‘08.

    Another player that will look back with a sigh of relief that he got out of the abyss known as Oakland.

  78. DirtyRaccoon Says:

    SharkCatcher Says:
    August 6th, 2009 at 4:14 pm
    do u guys think NIck mIller will beat out jonathan holland?

    ******************

    Yes, Miller is faster, younger, can return punts/kicks.

    Holland is not a gifted pass catcher, ans he does not have RAIDER speed.

  79. DKnight007 Says:

    Old man better have made a good deal with the Pats and not just GIVEN away Burgess for a lousy 3rd rounder like he just gave away Moss to them for a lousy 4th!

    The draft pick compensation should be a a 2nd and 4th or a 3rd and 5th and maybe a player.

    I don’t see how the old man couldn’t just trade Burgess and Walter to the Pats for Wilfork and a 3rd Rounder?

    Sheesh…..

  80. cen.val.raid Says:

    The old FOOL did it again! Watch Burgess revive his career with the Pats. I just don’t understand how he conducts buisness, WOW!! It is said the older one gets the wiser one gets, in this case the older he gets the stupider he gets! INCREDIBLE!!!

  81. cen.val.raid Says:

    Al do the nation a favaor, WALK AWAY!

    Go and enjoy your last years in a retirement home!

  82. DirtyRaccoon Says:

    cen.val.raid Says:
    August 6th, 2009 at 4:35 pm
    The old FOOL did it again! Watch Burgess revive his career with the Pats. I just don’t understand how he conducts buisness, WOW!! It is said the older one gets the wiser one gets, in this case the older he gets the stupider he gets! INCREDIBLE!!!

    ********************************

    So if Al just ignored his dumb azz, and let him ride the pine, or stay at home, and lost him for nothin next year, that would have been better??

    Your are prob the same simplton that would call up Grant Nappy and cry about how/why Al did not pick Craptree.

    You get what you can get, turn the page and move forward!

  83. DKnight007 Says:

    Lets hope that 3rd next year becomes a 2nd if Burgess does decently which he probably will!

    A 5th in 2011?? WTF old man Al?

    Come on! Sheesh….

  84. DirtyRaccoon Says:

    So I guess Al is a dummy for getting D. Burg to play for peanuts the last 4 years??

    He got a he!! of a steal for a pro bowl player for 4 years. Then when the guy came up lame, and stopped producing, Al let the guy go for some picks. O yeah and he drafted Scott.

    Dummy!

  85. DirtyRaccoon Says:

    DKnight007,

    What it be?

  86. RaiderRobG Says:

    Yesterday I felt good about the state of the Raiders. However, days like these remind me it’s still a circus with a crazy ass ring master.

  87. AZ Raider Says:

    What the Raiders get in return for Burgess depends on his production in 2009. Lets hope he does well so we get a 2nd rounder outta NE.

  88. AZ Raider Says:

    My Pops just e-mailed me that little tid-bit but I cant get the link to paste here… Oh-well. It doesn’t say the in so many words but it said this:
    ………………………………………………
    With the Patriots, Burgess will be a 3-4 outside linebacker where he ostensibly will be used as a pass rusher.
    The wording of the deal by the Patriots, “draft considerations,” indicates that the better Burgess plays, the better the deal for Oakland. Burgess’ production has declined each year he was with the Raiders, with his sack totals going from 16 to 11 to 8.5 to 3.5 (in 10 games).

  89. Lynn from Snot Says:

    Burgess sack totals 08 /3.5 07/8 06/11 05/16

    Looks like a steady decline to me but , hey its a contract year.

  90. AZ Raider Says:

    Not a contract year anymore LOL… Unless of coarse the pats sign him to a 1 year.

  91. RaiderRobG Says:

    Oh, and I guess were supposed to be satisfied by that Racoon?

    We had another probowl player play on a crapy team for the last six years who played for peanuts, during which Davis traded good players all for low draft picks, overpaid average or less than average free agents, fought with coaches, made bad decisions, and micromanaged everything, and results on the field remained the same. Yeah dude, Al Davis is brilliant!

    Idiot!

    Get out of here with the, “Al Davis can do no wrong and you’re not a Raider fan if you disagree with anything the crazy old man does.”

    There was a time when Commitment to Excellence meant something.

    Now every time I hear Al Davis say it I’m sad.

  92. AZ Raider Says:

    Michael Lombardi reports Burgess for a 2010 third rounder and 2011 fifth rounder. That’s a good deal for a 30-year-old off 3.5-sack year.
    about 1 hour ago from web
    ……………………………………………….

    huh, i guess this is the real deal… Not bad. A 3rd and a 5th…

  93. Richochet Says:

    This isn’t new.

    Raiders should have done a new contract with Lechler and Aso years ago. Instead he lets it run out, and has to pay them record contracts, especially after both stated they’ll gladly move on.

    Yeah, Burgess was underpaid. And some of you think that was a good move?
    He said ’screw this’ and left.

    It’s idiot Al, and his odd way of doing math.

    You lost Gruden because Al became a cheapskate. You lost player after player same reason.
    And then Al goes and hands out $270 million of contracts last season for FA’s, then gets rid of most of them.

    You wonder why everyone laughs at you guys?

    How can you not?

  94. RaiderRobG Says:

    Either way you look at the situation it’s still negative.

    We lose Burgess for conditional picks. Even if he does well in NE, what’s that say about the Raiders?

    Giving away good talent again, for the hope of a better future.

    I’m sorry, as a Raider fan, I’m sick of hoping, and would much rather have the feeling, that I KNOW, my team is going to be great, that I KNOW the ownership is going to put a good product on the feild, that I KNOW we have good coaches who can coach the team. I don’t know that with the Raiders, I’m just HOPING someday I will.

    Get the picture?

  95. Lynn from Snot Says:

    Richochet

    The only people laughing, are the people in this blog at you for wasting your time on an another teams site. Must suck that you have to troll other sites for true football discussions. What a tool.

  96. omniscience Says:

    Yea Al is a idiot when he signed burgess 3 years ago from Philly he gave him big money for someone nobody knew and those people were laughing then. Now they are saying we are letting a pro bowler go first off he dont want to be here. Going to be 31 always hurt and we get a 3rd & 5th not to bad.

  97. Richochet Says:

    Lynn from Snot Says:
    August 6th, 2009 at 5:01 pm
    Richochet

    The only people laughing, are the people in this blog at you for wasting your time on an another teams site. Must suck that you have to troll other sites for true football discussions. What a tool.
    ===============
    awwww..aren’t you just precious?
    In other words, you got all flustered that I corrected you?
    Troll?
    Again, let me correct you.
    Trolls show up, toss down insults, and leave, never backing up their words.
    In my case, I always back up my words.

    If I’m wrong, I’ll state it. If someone challenges my comment, I reply. Trolls don’t do that.

    Now quit crying.

  98. AZ Raider Says:

    Lynn from Snot Says:
    August 6th, 2009 at 5:01 pm
    Richochet

    The only people laughing, are the people in this blog at you for wasting your time on an another teams site. Must suck that you have to troll other sites for true football discussions. What a tool.
    ………………………………………………

    nicely said. F*ck off Richochet…

  99. AZ Raider Says:

    who’s your team anyway Richocet?

  100. omniscience Says:

    Instead of jumping on New Englands jock lets back are Boss he always trys to make the team better cant make the right decision everytime remember he brought Moss here we just did not have a Oline or QB to get him the ball and he did not want to be here. Remember we were built on Vetrans and little youth 98 to 2001 after superbowl lost and loosing all the vets no team left Now we are young and have a few vets and will be a powerhouse to come by the way who is New England a few good years after screwing us (tuck game) and now there the modle franchise all they are doing is using Al`s old stradegy Reload not rebuilt they are getting old and about to fall……..

  101. AZ Raider Says:

    omniscience Says:
    August 6th, 2009 at 5:25 pm
    Instead of jumping on New Englands jock lets back are Boss he always trys to make the team better cant make the right decision everytime remember he brought Moss here we just did not have a Oline or QB to get him the ball and he did not want to be here. Remember we were built on Vetrans and little youth 98 to 2001 after superbowl lost and loosing all the vets no team left Now we are young and have a few vets and will be a powerhouse to come by the way who is New England a few good years after screwing us (tuck game) and now there the modle franchise all they are doing is using Al`s old stradegy Reload not rebuilt they are getting old and about to fall……..
    ……………………………………………….

    Don’t know how much water that holds… I believe we just didn’t have a decent coach since Gruden left. I like Cable so far, who knows. He should get this year and next to prove himself, then we’ll have to get Cower over here…

  102. DKnight007 Says:

    If both picks are a 3rd and a 5th for the 2010 draft….than that’s a MUCH better deal!

    Hearing about a 5th in 2011 pisses me off!

  103. Richochet Says:

    AZ Raider Says:
    August 6th, 2009 at 5:23 pm
    who’s your team anyway Richocet?

    ———-
    lol..you do abuse the right to be stupid, don’t you, Az?

    too much sun?

  104. destrilogy Says:

    HEY MAYBE WITH THE PICK WE GET FROM THE PATRIOTS. WE CAN GET MICHAEL CRABTREE IN NEXT YEARS DRAFT :-) :-D

    or. we would just get another 4.2 corner. makes sense to me :-\

  105. BigZ@CSM Says:

    Whats up guys. I havent posted in awhile but ive been reading everyday. We’re looking good so far in training camp. Im pumped burgess in gone. Se maybe we did make the right pick with DHB. Crabs is a whiner.

    Go Raiders!!

  106. The RaiderCast | Patriots announce deal for Burgess Says:

    [...] Read more. [...]

  107. RaiderRobG Says:

    Crabtree holding out has no bearing on DHB being a foolish pick at number seven. It’s not making DHB drop everything in camp. It’s not making Murphy look like the better pick of the two.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.