<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Raiders begin Alameda state of mind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/08/24/raiders-begin-alameda-state-of-mind/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/08/24/raiders-begin-alameda-state-of-mind/</link>
	<description>A look inside the world of the highly classified Oakland Raiders from the writers of Bay Area News Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:08:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RaiderNsuede</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/08/24/raiders-begin-alameda-state-of-mind/comment-page-10/#comment-136005</link>
		<dc:creator>RaiderNsuede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=6122#comment-136005</guid>
		<description>http://www.nfl.com/players/joecohen/profile?id=COH426447

On Nfl.com they are saying we signed this guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nfl.com/players/joecohen/profile?id=COH426447" rel="nofollow">http://www.nfl.com/players/joecohen/profile?id=COH426447</a></p>
<p>On Nfl.com they are saying we signed this guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teabag</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/08/24/raiders-begin-alameda-state-of-mind/comment-page-10/#comment-135913</link>
		<dc:creator>Teabag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=6122#comment-135913</guid>
		<description>Am I confused? Warren doesn’t play UNDER tackle. He is a DT.

We may on occasion switch to the 3-4 but 4-3 is our primary and that means no under tackle.

BTW, 3-4 “under” or “nose” tackles are one of the hardest players to find.
-------------------------------------------------

LOL

Here goes Nnamdi showing he knows absolutely NOTHING about football again....

there is no UT in a 34, its impossible... lol

a NOSE TACKLE lines up directly over C hence the &quot;nose&quot; terminology. 

There is NO NT in a 43....

You can PLAY a NT in a 43 scheme but he will still be a 1 or a 2 technique. a Nose Tackle is responsible for both A gaps on either side of the Center.. It is not possible to have ONE DT occupy both A gaps lining up in a traditional 43 formation. ONE of the DT&#039;s have to be a 3 technique. having both DT&#039;s line up in the middle of an A gap does not allow this.

Now follow me Nnamdi...

NT = Nose Tackle

UT = Under Tackle

DT = DEFENSIVE TACKLE....

A NOSR TACKLE is a DEFENSIVE TACKLE

AN UNDER TACKLE is also a... DEFENSIVE TACKLE..


ALL 43&#039;s incorporate an UNDER TACKLE.. sometimes TWO

in a 43 scheme.... there is NO NOSE TACKLE...

Whoever lines up over Center in the 43 scheme is called the 0 TECHNIQUE...

got it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I confused? Warren doesn’t play UNDER tackle. He is a DT.</p>
<p>We may on occasion switch to the 3-4 but 4-3 is our primary and that means no under tackle.</p>
<p>BTW, 3-4 “under” or “nose” tackles are one of the hardest players to find.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>LOL</p>
<p>Here goes Nnamdi showing he knows absolutely NOTHING about football again&#8230;.</p>
<p>there is no UT in a 34, its impossible&#8230; lol</p>
<p>a NOSE TACKLE lines up directly over C hence the &#8220;nose&#8221; terminology. </p>
<p>There is NO NT in a 43&#8230;.</p>
<p>You can PLAY a NT in a 43 scheme but he will still be a 1 or a 2 technique. a Nose Tackle is responsible for both A gaps on either side of the Center.. It is not possible to have ONE DT occupy both A gaps lining up in a traditional 43 formation. ONE of the DT&#8217;s have to be a 3 technique. having both DT&#8217;s line up in the middle of an A gap does not allow this.</p>
<p>Now follow me Nnamdi&#8230;</p>
<p>NT = Nose Tackle</p>
<p>UT = Under Tackle</p>
<p>DT = DEFENSIVE TACKLE&#8230;.</p>
<p>A NOSR TACKLE is a DEFENSIVE TACKLE</p>
<p>AN UNDER TACKLE is also a&#8230; DEFENSIVE TACKLE..</p>
<p>ALL 43&#8217;s incorporate an UNDER TACKLE.. sometimes TWO</p>
<p>in a 43 scheme&#8230;. there is NO NOSE TACKLE&#8230;</p>
<p>Whoever lines up over Center in the 43 scheme is called the 0 TECHNIQUE&#8230;</p>
<p>got it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richochet</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/08/24/raiders-begin-alameda-state-of-mind/comment-page-10/#comment-135891</link>
		<dc:creator>Richochet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=6122#comment-135891</guid>
		<description>Brien the General Says: 
August 25th, 2009 at 2:34 pm 
So Kell if he succeeds then he will deserve all the credit?
=====================
Tell you what..admit all of he stupid signings are on Al, all of the bad head coach hires are on Al, all of the negative press given the Raider organization by previous players, are on Al, and the current NFL record of consecutive suck seasons are on Al..and the very next SB win, by the Raiders, will be bestowed upon Al.

&quot;And to Al Davis, who celebrated his 112th birthday back in July, finally gets his 4th SB ring.
Last ring was 55 years ago, give or take a decade&#039;
During that period the Raiders have had 63 coaches, 4 this year alone.&quot;

sounds about right. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brien the General Says:<br />
August 25th, 2009 at 2:34 pm<br />
So Kell if he succeeds then he will deserve all the credit?<br />
=====================<br />
Tell you what..admit all of he stupid signings are on Al, all of the bad head coach hires are on Al, all of the negative press given the Raider organization by previous players, are on Al, and the current NFL record of consecutive suck seasons are on Al..and the very next SB win, by the Raiders, will be bestowed upon Al.</p>
<p>&#8220;And to Al Davis, who celebrated his 112th birthday back in July, finally gets his 4th SB ring.<br />
Last ring was 55 years ago, give or take a decade&#8217;<br />
During that period the Raiders have had 63 coaches, 4 this year alone.&#8221;</p>
<p>sounds about right. <img src='http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PassTheCheetos</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/08/24/raiders-begin-alameda-state-of-mind/comment-page-10/#comment-135888</link>
		<dc:creator>PassTheCheetos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=6122#comment-135888</guid>
		<description>well the bengals have always sucked, along with cleveland a detroit. The Raiders could keep on losing for fifty more years and still have more super bowls than those three teams. While were at it throw in the cardinals as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well the bengals have always sucked, along with cleveland a detroit. The Raiders could keep on losing for fifty more years and still have more super bowls than those three teams. While were at it throw in the cardinals as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZ Raider</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/08/24/raiders-begin-alameda-state-of-mind/comment-page-10/#comment-135886</link>
		<dc:creator>AZ Raider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=6122#comment-135886</guid>
		<description>superbowl teams since 1989:

1/22/89  Cincinnati
San Francisco 

1/28/90  San Francisco
Denver  

1/27/91  Buffalo
N.Y. Giants 

1/26/92  Washington
Buffalo  

1/31/93  Dallas
Buffalo  

1/30/94  Dallas
Buffalo  

1/29/95  San Diego
San Francisco 

1/28/96  Dallas
Pittsburgh  

1/26/97  New England
Green Bay  

1/25/98  Green Bay
Denver  

1/31/99  Denver
Atlanta  

1/30/00  St. Louis
Tennessee 

1/28/01  Baltimore Ravens
N.Y. Giants  

2/03/02  New England
St. Louis  

1/26/03  Tampa Bay
Oakland  

2/1/04  New England
Carolina  

2/6/05  New England
Philadelphia  

2/5/06  Pittsburgh
Seattle  

2/4/07  Indianapolis
Chicago  

2/3/08  N.Y. Giants
New England  
.....................................................

Lets take a look at this list Kell and tell me what you see..

It&#039;s all about Superbowls.  Winning records are fluff and mean nothing.  Just ask the current Dallas Cowboys and Jerry jones if that statment doesn&#039;t ring true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>superbowl teams since 1989:</p>
<p>1/22/89  Cincinnati<br />
San Francisco </p>
<p>1/28/90  San Francisco<br />
Denver  </p>
<p>1/27/91  Buffalo<br />
N.Y. Giants </p>
<p>1/26/92  Washington<br />
Buffalo  </p>
<p>1/31/93  Dallas<br />
Buffalo  </p>
<p>1/30/94  Dallas<br />
Buffalo  </p>
<p>1/29/95  San Diego<br />
San Francisco </p>
<p>1/28/96  Dallas<br />
Pittsburgh  </p>
<p>1/26/97  New England<br />
Green Bay  </p>
<p>1/25/98  Green Bay<br />
Denver  </p>
<p>1/31/99  Denver<br />
Atlanta  </p>
<p>1/30/00  St. Louis<br />
Tennessee </p>
<p>1/28/01  Baltimore Ravens<br />
N.Y. Giants  </p>
<p>2/03/02  New England<br />
St. Louis  </p>
<p>1/26/03  Tampa Bay<br />
Oakland  </p>
<p>2/1/04  New England<br />
Carolina  </p>
<p>2/6/05  New England<br />
Philadelphia  </p>
<p>2/5/06  Pittsburgh<br />
Seattle  </p>
<p>2/4/07  Indianapolis<br />
Chicago  </p>
<p>2/3/08  N.Y. Giants<br />
New England<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>Lets take a look at this list Kell and tell me what you see..</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all about Superbowls.  Winning records are fluff and mean nothing.  Just ask the current Dallas Cowboys and Jerry jones if that statment doesn&#8217;t ring true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZ Raider</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/08/24/raiders-begin-alameda-state-of-mind/comment-page-10/#comment-135881</link>
		<dc:creator>AZ Raider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=6122#comment-135881</guid>
		<description>Kell,

do you have that hanging on your wall?  I&#039;ve seen it hundreds of times.  And only here.  You post it every day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kell,</p>
<p>do you have that hanging on your wall?  I&#8217;ve seen it hundreds of times.  And only here.  You post it every day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrapin</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/08/24/raiders-begin-alameda-state-of-mind/comment-page-10/#comment-135880</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrapin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=6122#comment-135880</guid>
		<description>To be honest I don&#039;t get mixed up in the terminology of things. I really don&#039;t care for who calls what what. People frankly use terminology interchangeably. Some ppl will simply refer to a NT as a DT - I really dont give a sht (no offense to you of course). But yes, I meant to type NT for Warren  ...but some still may refer to his position differently as simply a DT. It really doesn&#039;t matter so long as you get the point. Warren is better suited for Kelly&#039;s spot; not a position that a player like Sands would&#039;ve occupied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest I don&#8217;t get mixed up in the terminology of things. I really don&#8217;t care for who calls what what. People frankly use terminology interchangeably. Some ppl will simply refer to a NT as a DT &#8211; I really dont give a sht (no offense to you of course). But yes, I meant to type NT for Warren  &#8230;but some still may refer to his position differently as simply a DT. It really doesn&#8217;t matter so long as you get the point. Warren is better suited for Kelly&#8217;s spot; not a position that a player like Sands would&#8217;ve occupied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZ Raider</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/08/24/raiders-begin-alameda-state-of-mind/comment-page-10/#comment-135879</link>
		<dc:creator>AZ Raider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=6122#comment-135879</guid>
		<description>KoolKell Says: 
August 25th, 2009 at 4:35 pm 
I’m looking at another losing season, and I’m pissed.

Old Vets my arse. Davis likes flashy players, like a fantasy league player.

Anybody who’s got a name or a Heisman Trophy.
......................................................

Are you for real?  How long you been a fan Kell?  Al Davis would rather find the diamond in the rough that no one thought would make it, than take the &quot;sure thing&quot; heisman guy any day of the week.  Doesnt mean he doesnt take &#039;em, I mean we couldn&#039;t pass on DMAC. Point is, that&#039;s part of Al&#039;s legacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KoolKell Says:<br />
August 25th, 2009 at 4:35 pm<br />
I’m looking at another losing season, and I’m pissed.</p>
<p>Old Vets my arse. Davis likes flashy players, like a fantasy league player.</p>
<p>Anybody who’s got a name or a Heisman Trophy.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Are you for real?  How long you been a fan Kell?  Al Davis would rather find the diamond in the rough that no one thought would make it, than take the &#8220;sure thing&#8221; heisman guy any day of the week.  Doesnt mean he doesnt take &#8216;em, I mean we couldn&#8217;t pass on DMAC. Point is, that&#8217;s part of Al&#8217;s legacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KoolKell</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/08/24/raiders-begin-alameda-state-of-mind/comment-page-10/#comment-135878</link>
		<dc:creator>KoolKell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=6122#comment-135878</guid>
		<description>But every team faces this same conundrum.
==========================
Yes, but team with professional management seem to handle their conundrums:


In the 20 Seasons since the implementation of Free Agency and the Modern Era, some teams have adjusted, some have not. The following is the number of winning seasons by team since 1989:

Pittsburg 15 
Miami 14 
Green Bay 14 
New England 13 
Philadelphia 13 
San Francisco 12 
Minnesota 12 
Kansas City 12 
Indianapolis 12 
Denver 12 
Dallas 12 
Tennessee 11 
New York Giants 10 
Buffalo 9 
Seattle 8 
Tampa Bay 8 
San Diego 8 
New York Jets 8 
Chicago 8 
Washington 8 
Oakland 6 
Atlanta 6 
New Orleans 6 
St Louis 5 
Detroit 5 
Cleveland 4 
Cincinnati 2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But every team faces this same conundrum.<br />
==========================<br />
Yes, but team with professional management seem to handle their conundrums:</p>
<p>In the 20 Seasons since the implementation of Free Agency and the Modern Era, some teams have adjusted, some have not. The following is the number of winning seasons by team since 1989:</p>
<p>Pittsburg 15<br />
Miami 14<br />
Green Bay 14<br />
New England 13<br />
Philadelphia 13<br />
San Francisco 12<br />
Minnesota 12<br />
Kansas City 12<br />
Indianapolis 12<br />
Denver 12<br />
Dallas 12<br />
Tennessee 11<br />
New York Giants 10<br />
Buffalo 9<br />
Seattle 8<br />
Tampa Bay 8<br />
San Diego 8<br />
New York Jets 8<br />
Chicago 8<br />
Washington 8<br />
Oakland 6<br />
Atlanta 6<br />
New Orleans 6<br />
St Louis 5<br />
Detroit 5<br />
Cleveland 4<br />
Cincinnati 2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nnamdi21</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/08/24/raiders-begin-alameda-state-of-mind/comment-page-10/#comment-135877</link>
		<dc:creator>Nnamdi21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=6122#comment-135877</guid>
		<description>Attitude needs the most work and I hope Cable lights a fire under this young teams azz.

The Raiders are a reactionary team instead of a dictator like they used to be.

They have the offensive fire power. They need to go on the ATTACK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attitude needs the most work and I hope Cable lights a fire under this young teams azz.</p>
<p>The Raiders are a reactionary team instead of a dictator like they used to be.</p>
<p>They have the offensive fire power. They need to go on the ATTACK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

