<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s a must, all right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/11/14/its-a-must-all-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/11/14/its-a-must-all-right/</link>
	<description>A look inside the world of the highly classified Oakland Raiders from the writers of Bay Area News Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:08:44 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: djohnnyg</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/11/14/its-a-must-all-right/comment-page-9/#comment-190366</link>
		<dc:creator>djohnnyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=8144#comment-190366</guid>
		<description>I agree that we need to see how JaDoofus can play with a decent receiving core, not these hapless donuts, but I&#039;m not saying give him 3 freakin years, or even one year, he has to show SOME progress almost right away, or he is just another Ryan Leaf or worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that we need to see how JaDoofus can play with a decent receiving core, not these hapless donuts, but I&#8217;m not saying give him 3 freakin years, or even one year, he has to show SOME progress almost right away, or he is just another Ryan Leaf or worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhill</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/11/14/its-a-must-all-right/comment-page-9/#comment-190354</link>
		<dc:creator>jhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=8144#comment-190354</guid>
		<description>Then again, looks like we will be picking somewhere around 8-12 as oppossed to top 5.

So with that in mind, OL would be a decent pick there. That or LB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then again, looks like we will be picking somewhere around 8-12 as oppossed to top 5.</p>
<p>So with that in mind, OL would be a decent pick there. That or LB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhill</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/11/14/its-a-must-all-right/comment-page-9/#comment-190353</link>
		<dc:creator>jhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=8144#comment-190353</guid>
		<description>Charlie,

I agree with you, actually.

I just think that we can get a good RT and RG prospect in rd 3 and 4.

MLB and Nickle corner have to be addressed.

I&#039;d actually like to see us add a solid veteran at RG, and maybe see what Walker had left at RT. Obviously, I&#039;d like to see us get away from the ZBS and add more beef to the line. But with Henderson, Gallery, and Satele looking like fixtures, I&#039;d like to see a solid vet added to that group.

Like Cuz says though, I&#039;d be ok with a decent MLB and Nickle acquistion via FA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie,</p>
<p>I agree with you, actually.</p>
<p>I just think that we can get a good RT and RG prospect in rd 3 and 4.</p>
<p>MLB and Nickle corner have to be addressed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d actually like to see us add a solid veteran at RG, and maybe see what Walker had left at RT. Obviously, I&#8217;d like to see us get away from the ZBS and add more beef to the line. But with Henderson, Gallery, and Satele looking like fixtures, I&#8217;d like to see a solid vet added to that group.</p>
<p>Like Cuz says though, I&#8217;d be ok with a decent MLB and Nickle acquistion via FA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Tato</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/11/14/its-a-must-all-right/comment-page-9/#comment-190352</link>
		<dc:creator>El Tato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=8144#comment-190352</guid>
		<description>I think our LB corp needs some adjustements too, we need a run-stopper there like Biekert was in his time

DL is fine. If Shaugnessy does well like he did in San Diego the last game, maybe we can play Seymour and Kelly inside, with Shaughnessy and Ellis outside.

Routt is a FA, our 4th CB is Holland, and C Johnson is 30. So they are going to look at CB via Draft/Free Agency</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think our LB corp needs some adjustements too, we need a run-stopper there like Biekert was in his time</p>
<p>DL is fine. If Shaugnessy does well like he did in San Diego the last game, maybe we can play Seymour and Kelly inside, with Shaughnessy and Ellis outside.</p>
<p>Routt is a FA, our 4th CB is Holland, and C Johnson is 30. So they are going to look at CB via Draft/Free Agency</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Forces</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/11/14/its-a-must-all-right/comment-page-9/#comment-190351</link>
		<dc:creator>Dark Forces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=8144#comment-190351</guid>
		<description>Raiders should be using McFadden like Philly uses Westbrook. They should be doing a lot of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raiders should be using McFadden like Philly uses Westbrook. They should be doing a lot of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CuzImaRaider</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/11/14/its-a-must-all-right/comment-page-9/#comment-190350</link>
		<dc:creator>CuzImaRaider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=8144#comment-190350</guid>
		<description>agreed also, RT RG and DT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed also, RT RG and DT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/11/14/its-a-must-all-right/comment-page-9/#comment-190349</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=8144#comment-190349</guid>
		<description>Jhill

Top team priority is Oline simply because it allows you to score points and keeps your D off the field.
It also protects your QB.

A close second is Dline.

I had Dline as the top team priority until we got Seymour.

Draft priority for me would be RT,RG,DT in that order.

Warren is AWFUL and disappears against good Olines. He will be gone next year.

In 2011 I would look at MLB shifting Morrison outside.

Similar to the Oline and trying to evaluate skill guys, I think it is hard to evaluate LB&#039;s behind guys like Warren and a very inconsistent Kelly.
Ellis is aging but we may have enough with Scott and Shaugnessy to be OK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jhill</p>
<p>Top team priority is Oline simply because it allows you to score points and keeps your D off the field.<br />
It also protects your QB.</p>
<p>A close second is Dline.</p>
<p>I had Dline as the top team priority until we got Seymour.</p>
<p>Draft priority for me would be RT,RG,DT in that order.</p>
<p>Warren is AWFUL and disappears against good Olines. He will be gone next year.</p>
<p>In 2011 I would look at MLB shifting Morrison outside.</p>
<p>Similar to the Oline and trying to evaluate skill guys, I think it is hard to evaluate LB&#8217;s behind guys like Warren and a very inconsistent Kelly.<br />
Ellis is aging but we may have enough with Scott and Shaugnessy to be OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CuzImaRaider</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/11/14/its-a-must-all-right/comment-page-9/#comment-190348</link>
		<dc:creator>CuzImaRaider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=8144#comment-190348</guid>
		<description>Second Keaton Kristick!! Dudes fast and gots fire!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Second Keaton Kristick!! Dudes fast and gots fire!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhill</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/11/14/its-a-must-all-right/comment-page-9/#comment-190347</link>
		<dc:creator>jhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=8144#comment-190347</guid>
		<description>Mornin!

I think Charlie and Vegas are both right. But you really have to factor in need. You can say what you want about this team, but the ONE thing that has been consistently bad is tackling and run defense. Because our defense is so unreliable, we want offense to ensure we can score 24-28 pts a game. I say plug up the holes on defense, and we will be in WAY more games.

We need a MLB, DT, and Nickle corner in the worst way, IMO. I believe if we shore up those positions, our defense will be one that can easily hold teams to 20 pts or less each game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mornin!</p>
<p>I think Charlie and Vegas are both right. But you really have to factor in need. You can say what you want about this team, but the ONE thing that has been consistently bad is tackling and run defense. Because our defense is so unreliable, we want offense to ensure we can score 24-28 pts a game. I say plug up the holes on defense, and we will be in WAY more games.</p>
<p>We need a MLB, DT, and Nickle corner in the worst way, IMO. I believe if we shore up those positions, our defense will be one that can easily hold teams to 20 pts or less each game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2009/11/14/its-a-must-all-right/comment-page-9/#comment-190346</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 18:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=8144#comment-190346</guid>
		<description>Vegas

Enjoyed the conversation.

One last thought.
The only difference I have seen in Pro football over the last fifty years is the speed of defensive ends which has helped create the zone blitz.

The game is STILL won/lost based on matchups at the line of scrimmage.
Ultimately it is a game of time and space.

Your Oline creates it and your Dline tries to destroy it.

Everyone else on the field is USELESS without time and space.

I have seen Namath, Dawson, Staubach and more recently Tom Brady look awful inept when their protection breaks down.
Think about that the next time you watch JR get nervous feet and make a bad throw.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vegas</p>
<p>Enjoyed the conversation.</p>
<p>One last thought.<br />
The only difference I have seen in Pro football over the last fifty years is the speed of defensive ends which has helped create the zone blitz.</p>
<p>The game is STILL won/lost based on matchups at the line of scrimmage.<br />
Ultimately it is a game of time and space.</p>
<p>Your Oline creates it and your Dline tries to destroy it.</p>
<p>Everyone else on the field is USELESS without time and space.</p>
<p>I have seen Namath, Dawson, Staubach and more recently Tom Brady look awful inept when their protection breaks down.<br />
Think about that the next time you watch JR get nervous feet and make a bad throw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

