Comments on: Seymour perplexed by flurry of flags

By: Jerry McD: Seymour perplexed by flurry of flags - Oakland Raiders Forum | Message Board - Where the Raider Nation lives!

Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:11:05 +0000

[...] McD: Seymour perplexed by flurry of flags Seymour perplexed by flurry of flags – Inside the Oakland Raiders – A look inside the world of the h… __________________ RaideroftheSith aka [...]

By: 860Todd Christensen

860Todd Christensen — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:33:46 +0000

Mark it, Cable is done, this team is in fragments, I truly hate to say this, there is no hope til AD steps down, fan since 64″.

By: bjbrown1968

bjbrown1968 — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:27:18 +0000

What we really need is a GM and an offensive play-caller. Cable should, by all means, NOT be calling the plays like he is this year.

By: bjbrown1968

bjbrown1968 — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:26:28 +0000

Al NEVER pays coaches what they’re worth and Gruden would require waaaay too much. Al needs to stick with Cable because, let’s face it, who else would be willing to coach the Raiders? Maybe somebody looking to pull a “Kiffin”

By: CaptainBlack

CaptainBlack — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:07:54 +0000

The Raiders have a lot to be ashamed of after yesterday’s game. The play calling sicked; the defense sucked, and the referees always suck. Please exclude Janikowski, he has played on a Pro Bowl level all year.

By: CaptainBlack

CaptainBlack — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:04:07 +0000

Richochet, come here and suck my calk, ya lil’ beyotch! Come on and play you cut and paste ignoramus.

By: M Lonetree

M Lonetree — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 23:00:55 +0000

Vegas,

your post #23 echoes exactly what I also thought would unfold with The Cable Guy’s ill-conceived use of timeouts before the half.

By: SnB offense defense specialteams

SnB offense defense specialteams — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:54:21 +0000

HayesDaze37 Says:
December 28th, 2009 at 2:34 pm
Take out the emotion, and look at the QB situation…

Gradkowski: We already have an idea of what he can do. Did he earn a new contract? Absolutely. A “big” one? Absolutely not. A nice medium one would do. But, he shouldn’t play this game…we already know he’s a gamer.

Frye: We’ve seen what he can do…and know he’s not the under-fire answer at the position. Since we already know that, we need to move on.

Losman: Not fair to him, or the team, to expect him to do anything unless it’s an emergency. Ride the pines until camp, JP.

JaMarcus: This is the one last chance for JaMarcus to have a positive feeling going into the off-season. The team stands as much of a chance of winning with JaMarcus as they do with Frye…and it could be Jamarcus’s chance to throw down the gauntlet to Grad, JP, and a yet-to-be-named Free Agent, that he isn’t going to go away so easily.

For the sake of potential development, without diminishing the team’s chances to be competitive in the game, I say it’s time to put JaMarcus out there one more time.
=======================================================
Gradkowski didn’t EARN anything. 3 games is not enough to make a decision on a guy that’s already bounced around to 4 teams in his short career. The only thing he’s earned is a chance to legitimately compete for the starting job.

Frye should be a coach next year or 3rd string. Good to have a guy like that around.

Losman: I’d give him a shot next week if Gradkowski can’t go. Let’s see what he can do….He’s my choice to start next year pending training camp.

Russell: He needs to shut it down. No benefit comes from playing him. He’s clearly not ready and it would be a waste to play him if they are going to cut him anyway. He’s had his chances and threw them away in spectacular fashion. I personally don’t think he deserves another chance. Handed a starting job and treating the team, the league, the black QBs before him that paved a way, Davis, the fans and his own alma mater and family with a tremendous amount of disrespect and indifference.

Should Russell come back? Only if restructured and only if he’s dedicated 100%!

BTW, I would bring in Chad Pennington or Jason Campbell

By: KoolKell

KoolKell — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:51:00 +0000

#85 Ridiculous.

By: mack-madden

mack-madden — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:50:11 +0000

Your only a dirty player to the refs if you get caught in the act.
Do refs pay more close attention to raider players and keep them on a shorter leash?
I doubt it but I’m not sure.
I’ve seen A LOT of weird questionable calls against the raiders.
For example. I’ve never seen the ‘tuck’ rule enforced before that game against pats.
Most times its just a fumble.
Vincent Jackson spinning the ball after catch is ‘illegal forward pass’ instead of fumble.
Minor. Recent examples of note