<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Raiders live chat on Tuesday, with a new twist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2010/01/18/raiders-live-chat-on-tuesday-with-a-new-twist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2010/01/18/raiders-live-chat-on-tuesday-with-a-new-twist/</link>
	<description>A look inside the world of the highly classified Oakland Raiders from the writers of Bay Area News Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 08:54:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RaiderDebo</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2010/01/18/raiders-live-chat-on-tuesday-with-a-new-twist/comment-page-10/#comment-234873</link>
		<dc:creator>RaiderDebo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=9549#comment-234873</guid>
		<description>Post #442 is brilliant.  Jhill, you and Priest are about the only two guys that seem to &quot;get it&quot;.  I call into Sirius all the time and try to make the same point.  Some guys just let themselves get brainwashed by the media.  JaMarcus needs to do better, but you can&#039;t ignore the issues with his supporting cast, nor the fact that he was coming along quite nicely before the offseason from hell where we lost Knapp, Schneider and Chaz.  Al knows this and he&#039;ll do what&#039;s right regardless of what the talking heads and the blind fans that hang on their words say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post #442 is brilliant.  Jhill, you and Priest are about the only two guys that seem to &#8220;get it&#8221;.  I call into Sirius all the time and try to make the same point.  Some guys just let themselves get brainwashed by the media.  JaMarcus needs to do better, but you can&#8217;t ignore the issues with his supporting cast, nor the fact that he was coming along quite nicely before the offseason from hell where we lost Knapp, Schneider and Chaz.  Al knows this and he&#8217;ll do what&#8217;s right regardless of what the talking heads and the blind fans that hang on their words say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom cables pimp hand</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2010/01/18/raiders-live-chat-on-tuesday-with-a-new-twist/comment-page-10/#comment-234801</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom cables pimp hand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=9549#comment-234801</guid>
		<description>that ole poo butt jerry aint answer or respond to any of my comments... What a fat slob.smh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that ole poo butt jerry aint answer or respond to any of my comments&#8230; What a fat slob.smh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom cables pimp hand</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2010/01/18/raiders-live-chat-on-tuesday-with-a-new-twist/comment-page-10/#comment-234718</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom cables pimp hand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=9549#comment-234718</guid>
		<description>If the niners picked tebow first that&#039;d be pretty stupid... So I hope they do it.lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the niners picked tebow first that&#8217;d be pretty stupid&#8230; So I hope they do it.lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcz24</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2010/01/18/raiders-live-chat-on-tuesday-with-a-new-twist/comment-page-10/#comment-234701</link>
		<dc:creator>bcz24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=9549#comment-234701</guid>
		<description>Im of the opinion that if available, SF takes Tebow in the first round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im of the opinion that if available, SF takes Tebow in the first round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom cables pimp hand</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2010/01/18/raiders-live-chat-on-tuesday-with-a-new-twist/comment-page-10/#comment-234692</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom cables pimp hand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=9549#comment-234692</guid>
		<description>I doubt the eagles get rid of him... they&#039;d be stupid if they did because they will be in for a rude awakening when that other qb plays a full season, part of that becareful what you wish for type of thing. If he did leave I doubt he&#039;d come to oakland, I could see him in san fran tho with vd, crabtree, gore, and dez bryant. Idk why but I have a feeling if bryants there when they pick the niners wil take bryant with one of their first picks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt the eagles get rid of him&#8230; they&#8217;d be stupid if they did because they will be in for a rude awakening when that other qb plays a full season, part of that becareful what you wish for type of thing. If he did leave I doubt he&#8217;d come to oakland, I could see him in san fran tho with vd, crabtree, gore, and dez bryant. Idk why but I have a feeling if bryants there when they pick the niners wil take bryant with one of their first picks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcz24</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2010/01/18/raiders-live-chat-on-tuesday-with-a-new-twist/comment-page-10/#comment-234691</link>
		<dc:creator>bcz24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 20:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=9549#comment-234691</guid>
		<description>If we dump Jamarcus there is a slim possibility we grab McNabb, no way we keep Russell and get McNabb though... no way we could spend almost 20 million next year on QB&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we dump Jamarcus there is a slim possibility we grab McNabb, no way we keep Russell and get McNabb though&#8230; no way we could spend almost 20 million next year on QB&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ Legend 34</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2010/01/18/raiders-live-chat-on-tuesday-with-a-new-twist/comment-page-10/#comment-234678</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ Legend 34</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=9549#comment-234678</guid>
		<description>Does anyone think we will pick up McNabb next year if his contract does not pan out? Rumor has it he is already being phased out. He can throw the deep ball and he can set it up as well. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone think we will pick up McNabb next year if his contract does not pan out? Rumor has it he is already being phased out. He can throw the deep ball and he can set it up as well. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bcz24</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2010/01/18/raiders-live-chat-on-tuesday-with-a-new-twist/comment-page-10/#comment-234674</link>
		<dc:creator>bcz24</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=9549#comment-234674</guid>
		<description>MR - What dictionary do you read that has &quot;improvement&quot; in the definition of &quot;continuity&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MR &#8211; What dictionary do you read that has &#8220;improvement&#8221; in the definition of &#8220;continuity&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seymour Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2010/01/18/raiders-live-chat-on-tuesday-with-a-new-twist/comment-page-10/#comment-234671</link>
		<dc:creator>Seymour Bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=9549#comment-234671</guid>
		<description>jhill Says:
January 19th, 2010 at 11:40 am

The Washington game?
===========================================

What most &quot;fans&quot; don&#039;t remember about the Washington game was late in the lst half, we had a 3rd and 12 that Gradkowski &quot;completed&quot; to Murphy.  The Raiders then went up and ran another play gaining two yards, only to have the prior play reviewed!  I have NEVER seen that before!

  The lst down completion was over ruled, forcing the Raiders to punt.  On the ensuing punt, Eugene breathed on the Washington returner giving them 15 yards! Fassel jumped onto the playing field, giving Washington ANOTHER 15 yards!  The Raiders then completely gave up, giving Washington a late TD and deflating the team.   Russell then came in to start the 2nd half to a deafening chorus of boooos, and he was the one given credit for deflating the team.  Good one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jhill Says:<br />
January 19th, 2010 at 11:40 am</p>
<p>The Washington game?<br />
===========================================</p>
<p>What most &#8220;fans&#8221; don&#8217;t remember about the Washington game was late in the lst half, we had a 3rd and 12 that Gradkowski &#8220;completed&#8221; to Murphy.  The Raiders then went up and ran another play gaining two yards, only to have the prior play reviewed!  I have NEVER seen that before!</p>
<p>  The lst down completion was over ruled, forcing the Raiders to punt.  On the ensuing punt, Eugene breathed on the Washington returner giving them 15 yards! Fassel jumped onto the playing field, giving Washington ANOTHER 15 yards!  The Raiders then completely gave up, giving Washington a late TD and deflating the team.   Russell then came in to start the 2nd half to a deafening chorus of boooos, and he was the one given credit for deflating the team.  Good one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Big Banana</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2010/01/18/raiders-live-chat-on-tuesday-with-a-new-twist/comment-page-10/#comment-234663</link>
		<dc:creator>The Big Banana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=9549#comment-234663</guid>
		<description>#  RaiderRockstar Says:
January 19th, 2010 at 11:41 am

hire Gilbride!

he’s good with young QB’s and knows how to use more than 1 RB …

plus I doubt he’d settle for scrubs along the o-line like Cable does
==================================================
That&#039;s something I feel some folks are overlooking. Here&#039;s a guy who&#039;s specialty is the O-line and yet the O-line is crap. Playcalling? Please. Commitment to running the ball. Non-existent. Motivator? Maybe, but why all the blowout losses, especially after a W? Working with Al. I&#039;ll give you that but do we have to put up with all his other inefficiencies just because he works well with Al? And if he does work well with Al, why didn&#039;t he convince him that we weren&#039;t ready to be a passing offense?

Seymour said so himself. Bring in some good coaches.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#  RaiderRockstar Says:<br />
January 19th, 2010 at 11:41 am</p>
<p>hire Gilbride!</p>
<p>he’s good with young QB’s and knows how to use more than 1 RB …</p>
<p>plus I doubt he’d settle for scrubs along the o-line like Cable does<br />
==================================================<br />
That&#8217;s something I feel some folks are overlooking. Here&#8217;s a guy who&#8217;s specialty is the O-line and yet the O-line is crap. Playcalling? Please. Commitment to running the ball. Non-existent. Motivator? Maybe, but why all the blowout losses, especially after a W? Working with Al. I&#8217;ll give you that but do we have to put up with all his other inefficiencies just because he works well with Al? And if he does work well with Al, why didn&#8217;t he convince him that we weren&#8217;t ready to be a passing offense?</p>
<p>Seymour said so himself. Bring in some good coaches.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
