Part of the Bay Area News Group

NFL `guarantees’ are occasionally pipe dreams

By Jerry McDonald - NFL Writer
Saturday, February 18th, 2012 at 8:56 pm in Oakland Raiders.

Once upon a time the Raiders traded for cornerback DeAngelo Hall, who received a seven-year, $70 million contract with $24.5 million in guaranteed money.

The Raiders later cut Hall eight games into the season and paid him $8 million for his troubles.

Which brings us to Kamerion Wimbley, Stanford Routt, and the erratic way information regarding contracts is relayed in the NFL.

Wimbley was given an exclusive franchise tag about a year ago which guaranteed him approximately $11.3 million following a nine-sack season. The Raiders then renegotiated his deal to drop his salary cap number to $1.6 million. It was reported as a $48 million dollar deal with a whopping $29 million in guaranteed money.

Except Wimbley’s deal apparently wasn’t anything approaching $29 million in guaranteed money. The Raiders can get out of it by cutting him and paying him $6.5 million.

According to Adam Caplan, who has much of this contract stuff wired and was the first to report Wimbley’s situation last year, Wimbley earned $5 million last season ($4.25 million signing bonus, $750,000 salary).

This season, Wimbley’s base salary is $11 million and $6.5 million is guaranteed. Wimbley makes that amount even if he is cut. The rest of his contract ($4.5 million) is guaranteed as of March 17.

Add it up, and he earned almost $200,000 above and beyond his $11.3 million salary cap figure by agreeing to the restructure.

But as far as the Raiders owing him $29 million guaranteed, well, . . . the Raiders are off the hook for much of that figure if Wimbley is cut before March 17.

That’s a long way of saying take any “guaranteed” money with a grain of salt.

Routt’s three-year $31.5 million extension was reported as guaranteed to the tune of $20 million. Now there are reports that it was actually $15 million, with the Raiders having escaped a $5 million guarantee by cutting him what they did. A great deal for Routt, either way, he’ll get to sign another contract.

Still, contract reporting is one of the most imprecise parts of the business. That’s why you’ll see the word “reported” preceding most, if not all, contract issues that are dealt with here.

Agents are OK with overblown reports of guarantees because prospective clients will see it and figure they can get the same. Teams aren’t concerned with it because if they’re viewed as a team that pays that kind of money, what the heck? And it’s not as if players are going to step forward immediately after signing a contract and say, “You know, this isn’t nearly as big of a contract as it looks.”

So don’t reach too much into “guaranteed money” if the Raiders opt to part with Wimbley, frees safety Michael Huff ($4 million in salary, $4 million in bonus) or defensive tackle Tommy Kelly ($6 million in salary).

McKenzie and coach Dennis Allen could attempt to sign them for less or simply move on.

It’s hard to know what they’ve got planned for strong safety Tyvon Branch, a prospective free agent. San Diego safety Eric Weddle signed a contract last year with guaranteed money reported as high as $19 million, although it’s hard to know if it really approached that figure.

There’s a chance McKenzie, Allen and Co. may look at the defensive performance in 2011 and conclude that anyone coming in at a high price isn’t worth keeping and that those with reasonable salaries can be fitted in with low-level or street free agents and the end result couldn’t possibly be worse.

The other prominent free agent is running back Michael Bush, who if franchised would get more than $7 million.

It’s what makes this offseason the most interesting since the Raiders returned to Oakland in 1995.

  • Share/Bookmark

[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]

434 Responses to “NFL `guarantees’ are occasionally pipe dreams”

  1. lefty12 Says:

    Go Raiders

  2. kpark829 Says:

    2nd

  3. 92101_Raider Says:

    Turd

  4. 92101_Raider Says:

    Really hope RM looks at production for players in the draft / free agents!

  5. Thec Says:

    Wimbley shined against the disc 3rd stringer LT however,against gaither he did nada…

    The org is getting the team fiscally sound…

    Wimbley can go the way of routt.

  6. Gdog Says:

    Wimbley and Kelly were two of the three top sack leaders with the Raiders, and Allen puts a premium on sacks… I doubt both will be gone… my guess is Wimbley cut, if either because 4 came against SD against a third string LT.

    Cams refusal to restructure might also lead him to getting his ass hit by the door on the way out.

    Huff I am torn on… he actually might be a decent CB. He is a horrible FS, IMO, but there aren’t very many FS’s available in free agency to replace him, either.

    Guess we keep him to play either FS or CB.

  7. Carl Weathers Says:

    Good job Jer!

  8. CVRaider Says:

    Ill guarantee the defense is garbage in 2012. Without draft picks and not a great FA market, we’re screwed. Thinking anything else is a pipe dream. Good news is, it cant get much worse.

  9. luvmarvhub Says:

    Guys who love to play football–that’s what we need.

  10. CVRaider Says:

    And guys who love to hustle! Im sick of lazy players.

  11. RIPAL Says:

    if they restructure ,keep em but if they refuse cut em

  12. CVRaider Says:

    The guys that hustle include:
    Branch
    DHB
    Ford
    Wiz
    j-veld
    Houston
    Gio
    Shonasty
    Moore
    DMAC
    Reese
    Curry – the biggest reason to keep him.

    Guys who don’t:
    Romac
    Kelly
    Seymour
    Boyd- hes just dumb
    Satele
    Routt – 1 down

    There is a theme here if you haven’t caught on yet.

  13. Hardline Says:

    Gdog, #6

    “Huff I am torn on… he actually might be a decent CB.”
    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

    Gdog,

    The idea of converting Huff to CB is a Hue the Pimpin Magnificent pipe dream. How can that ever happen at Huff’s age? He too old to learn new tricks, even though he is next to worthless a FS. Maybe keep him this year, bring up some new talent, cut him early if he underperforms. Certainly by 2013, he needs to be gone.

  14. Hardline Says:

    We’re better keeping Boyd, Jerome Boyd, who seems to be key – in other words the straw that stirs the entire defense.

  15. 8RaiderReign8 Says:

    Well well…

  16. 8RaiderReign8 Says:

    On certain plays the pass rush was pathetic. I saw guys just standin straight up and playing paddy cake.

  17. Hardline Says:

    Wimbley got 7.5 sacks this year and was paid more than Jared Allen who got 22.5. Wimbley needs to go. We could pick up a 2nd or 3rd round pick for him, then show him the door.

    Totally ridiculous, considering he got 4 of those sacks against a 3rd string QB while playing SD the 1st game.

    As I have stated before there is an inverse proportion of high pay to performance. Great sackers normally last a season or two, negotitate an outlandish contract, then production takes a nosedive, forever.

    Get rid of this guy !!!

  18. djohnnyg Says:

    16.8RaiderReign8 Says:
    February 18th, 2012 at 11:15 pm
    On certain plays the pass rush was pathetic. I saw guys just standin straight up and playing paddy cake.

    My favorite was seeing Giordano running like a crazy man 30 YARDS on a “blitz; making a bee-line towards Rivers.

    I dare say Jamarcus Russell could’ve seen that “blitz” coming.

    One of the silliest things I ever saw.

    No wonder we had the worst D since the 1952 Dallas Texans.

  19. djohnnyg Says:

    14.Hardline Says:
    February 18th, 2012 at 10:40 pm
    We’re better keeping Boyd, Jerome Boyd, who seems to be key – in other words the straw that stirs the entire defense.

    Tears come to my eyes; tears of joy mind you, when I see the greatness of a Jerome Boyd gracefully and effortlessly apply his craft on the gridiron.

    If his bust isn’t already being prepared in Canton, then there is no such thing as justice that exists in this world.

  20. JB Says:

    Wimbley would have been a bust at pass rush this last year if you take away the San Diego game where they were down to their 3rd string OLT. Anybody rushing over there that game would have been successful at getting sacks. Overall, Wimbley was a failure for 2011. The fact that he won’t restructure tells me he’s all about himself and not the team. Time for RM to show us his skills at finding real players. As I see it, on D we need two starting OLB, 1 starting NT, 2 starting CB. On O we need 1 starting WR, 1 starting OG (in addition to resigning Heyer), 1 #2RB. That should make us respectable.

  21. 8RaiderReign8 Says:

    Djohnnyg Says:
    February 18th, 2012 at 11:22 pm
    16.8RaiderReign8 Says:
    February 18th, 2012 at 11:15 pm
    On certain plays the pass rush was pathetic. I saw guys just standin straight up and playing paddy cake.

    My favorite was seeing Giordano running like a crazy man 30 YARDS on a “blitz; making a bee-line towards Rivers.

    I dare say Jamarcus Russell could’ve seen that “blitz” coming.

    One of the silliest things I ever saw.

    No wonder we had the worst D since the 1952 Dallas Texans.
    _______________

    Nothing beats the nickel back Blix on your 15 yard line against the Bears.

  22. JB Says:

    Here are some realistic target FA’s to consider:

    • Jared Gaither OT
    • Carl Nicks OG
    • Marques Colston WR
    • Marshawn Lynch RB or
    • Mike Tolbert RB
    • Anthony Spencer LB
    • Dan Connor LB
    • Aubrayo Franklin NT or
    • Paul Soliai NT
    • Tracy Porter CB or
    • Carlos Rodgers CB

  23. Indiana Jones Says:

    Anyone got any cheats for Temple Run? Thanks in adavance Raider blog troopers.

  24. NFL `guarantees’ are occasionally pipe dreams Says:

    NFL `guarantees’ are occasionally pipe dreams

    By Jerry McDonald – NFL Writer
    Saturday, February 18th, 2012 at 8:56 pm in Oakland Raiders.

    Once upon a time the Raiders traded for cornerback DeAngelo Hall, who received a seven-year, $70 million contract with $24.5 million in guaranteed money.

    The Raiders later cut Hall eight games into the season and paid him $8 million for his troubles.

    Which brings us to Kamerion Wimbley, Stanford Routt, and the erratic way information regarding contracts is relayed in the NFL.

    Wimbley was given an exclusive franchise tag about a year ago which guaranteed him approximately $11.3 million following a nine-sack season. The Raiders then renegotiated his deal to drop his salary cap number to $1.6 million. It was reported as a $48 million dollar deal with a whopping $29 million in guaranteed money.

    Except Wimbley’s deal apparently wasn’t anything approaching $29 million in guaranteed money. The Raiders can get out of it by cutting him and paying him $6.5 million.

    According to Adam Caplan, who has much of this contract stuff wired and was the first to report Wimbley’s situation last year, Wimbley earned $5 million last season ($4.25 million signing bonus, $750,000 salary).

    This season, Wimbley’s base salary is $11 million and $6.5 million is guaranteed. Wimbley makes that amount even if he is cut. The rest of his contract ($4.5 million) is guaranteed as of March 17.

    Add it up, and he earned almost $200,000 above and beyond his $11.3 million salary cap figure by agreeing to the restructure.

    But as far as the Raiders owing him $29 million guaranteed, well, . . . the Raiders are off the hook for much of that figure if Wimbley is cut before March 17.

    That’s a long way of saying take any “guaranteed” money with a grain of salt.

    Routt’s three-year $31.5 million extension was reported as guaranteed to the tune of $20 million. Now there are reports that it was actually $15 million, with the Raiders having escaped a $5 million guarantee by cutting him what they did. A great deal for Routt, either way, he’ll get to sign another contract.

    Still, contract reporting is one of the most imprecise parts of the business. That’s why you’ll see the word “reported” preceding most, if not all, contract issues that are dealt with here.

    Agents are OK with overblown reports of guarantees because prospective clients will see it and figure they can get the same. Teams aren’t concerned with it because if they’re viewed as a team that pays that kind of money, what the heck? And it’s not as if players are going to step forward immediately after signing a contract and say, “You know, this isn’t nearly as big of a contract as it looks.”

    So don’t reach too much into “guaranteed money” if the Raiders opt to part with Wimbley, frees safety Michael Huff ($4 million in salary, $4 million in bonus) or defensive tackle Tommy Kelly ($6 million in salary).

    McKenzie and coach Dennis Allen could attempt to sign them for less or simply move on.

    It’s hard to know what they’ve got planned for strong safety Tyvon Branch, a prospective free agent. San Diego safety Eric Weddle signed a contract last year with guaranteed money reported as high as $19 million, although it’s hard to know if it really approached that figure.

    There’s a chance McKenzie, Allen and Co. may look at the defensive performance in 2011 and conclude that anyone coming in at a high price isn’t worth keeping and that those with reasonable salaries can be fitted in with low-level or street free agents and the end result couldn’t possibly be worse.

    The other prominent free agent is running back Michael Bush, who if franchised would get more than $7 million.

    It’s what makes this offseason the most interesting since the Raiders returned to Oakland in 1995.

    http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2012/02/18/nfl-guarantees-are-occasionally-pipe-dreams/

    And smoke dreams too!

    :mrgreen:

  25. lefty12 Says:

    JB,while we could use all those positions,a starting Wr isn’t necessary.We have DHB and Moore as starters with Ford and Murphy as backups.With Curry,we only need 1 LB .One of the young CBs will start-maybe both.It is also possible we go with the D-linemen we have,although a NT would be nice.Upgrades are always welcome,but we might go with what we have more than we realize.

  26. djohnnyg Says:

    Lefty,

    That’s a very depressing thought.

    If there is ONE THING i really need to see this coming season is lots of changes on defense.

    As “Jer” alluded to, really…it can’t get any worse.

    Are we gonna give up 3,000 yds. rushing and 5,000 passing instead of 2 and 4?

  27. lefty12 Says:

    We were a middle of the pack defense in 2010 with these players.If our LBs were any good at all,we would still be a decent defense.Of course any upgrade would be welcome,but maybe wholesale changes aren’t what is needed.Maybe some decent coaching with multiple looks would do wonders.We must remember,at the start of last season everyone said one of our strengths was our Dline so they must be highly thought of-by people in the league,not necessarily by the experts on here.

  28. uglyorc Says:

    This raises the question how much would it cost to cut Wimbley in 2013 compared to 2012.

  29. uglyorc Says:

    Gdog,

    The idea of converting Huff to CB is a Hue the Pimpin Magnificent pipe dream. How can that ever happen at Huff’s age? He too old to learn new tricks, even though he is next to worthless a FS. Maybe keep him this year, bring up some new talent, cut him early if he underperforms. Certainly by 2013, he needs to be gone.

    ————————-

    Huff played CB last year. How did you not notice Giordano on the field?

  30. WenzhouRaider Says:

    first off, good article, didn’t realize ‘guaranteed’ was such a loose term.

    Another point, obviously fans didn’t care about the amount of money Al threw away as it wasn’t ours. What was more important was the premium high 2nd rounder that we gave up for him which the Falcons ended up using to take Curtis Lofton, one of the best run stopping MLBs in the league (though I hear his pass coverage is lacking, something Chuck B definitely would have had him doing a lot of down the stretch).

  31. RaiderSam Says:

    it appears the shopping FA/draft “to do” list is huge
    Wimbley – restructure or cut – March 17
    Huff – restructure, move to CB or cut
    Bush – franchise?
    Branch – sign

    needs
    NT – 3-4
    rush backer for 3-4
    G/C that fits ZBS
    CB to replace Routt or compete with Chekwa/VanDyke
    RT
    SS
    ILB to compete/challenge or team with McClain inside
    DE to fit 3-4 or 4-3
    RB – in case Bush leaves

    NT FA that fits
    Aubrayo Franklin NT or
    Paul Soliai NT
    draft? – Nicolas Jean-Baptiste, Alameda Ta’amu, Akeim Hicks, Regina
    Hebron Fangupou, NT, BYU, Chingbo Anunyobi, Morehouse
    Billy Winn, DT, Boise St

    rush backer for 3-4
    Mario Williams
    Anthony Spencer (more of a run stopping guy/then pass rush)
    draft? Jake Bequette, Arkansas Vinny Curry, Marshall Brandon Lindsay, Pitt

    C or G
    that fits ZBS
    Carl Nicks
    Chris Myers, Houston Texans
    draft? Amini Silatolu, Midwestern St., Randy Wynn, Rutgers

    WR
    Marques Colston

    draft? Dwight Jones, N.Carolina, Marvin McNutt, Iowa, Gerrell Robinson, Ariz. St.

    CB
    Brandon Carr
    Tracy Porter
    Cortland Finnegan
    Carlos Rodgers
    draft? Shaun Prater, Iowa, Leonard Johnson, Iowa St., Asa Jackson, Cal Poly, Omar Bolden, Ariz. St., Richard Golden, Arizona
    (trade) Asante Samuel

    RT – likely going with Joseph Barksdale,
    but i’ll include
    Jared Gaither – will be signed in San Diego
    Adam Snyder
    Sean Locklear
    draft? Brandon Mosely, Auburn, Nate Potter, Boise St., Tony Bergstrom, Utah, Zebrie Sanders, Florida St., Tom Compton, S.Dakota, Ryan Miller, Colorado

    SS – if Tyvon Branch cuts via FA
    Michael Adams
    James Sanders (Falcons)
    Randy Phillips (Giants)
    draft? Harrison Smith, Notre Dame, George Iloka, Boise St.
    Duke Ihenacho, SJSU, Jerrell Young, FS, S.Florida, Christian Thompson, S.Carolina St.

    ILB –
    Dan Connor
    draft? – (trade up?) Vontaze Burfect, Sam Acho, Texas, Audie Cole, N.Carolina St.

    OLB
    in case Q.Groves isnt signed
    draft? Tyler Nielsen, Iowa (4-3), Terrell Manning, N.Carolina St. (4-3)
    Sean Spence, Miami (4-3), Keenan Robinson, Texas, Chandler Jones, LB, Syracuse

    DE (to fit 3-4)
    draft? – Derek Wolfe, Cincinnati (3-4 or 4-3)
    Brett Roy, Nevada (3-4 rush end or 4-3 rush end)
    Matt Conrath, Virginia
    Trevor Guyton, Cal (4-3)
    Kheston Randall, Texas

    RB
    Marshawn Lynch
    Kahlil Bell
    Mike Tolbert
    draft? Doug Martin, Boise St., Cyrus Gray, Texas A&M
    Robert Turbin, Utah St.,

  32. Deja vu Says:

    March can’t get here soon enough! My fave time of year, free angency and March Madness!

    I still can’t believe that a new era is in the making. I love Al for the team he built and we all love, but hated when he threw $ around on average players. I also couldn’t stand Al drafting although he did a decent job since the billboard incident.

    Wimbley best take a paycut if he’s a team player. I hope he does, beacause we have limited draft picks and already thin at LB.

  33. Deja vu Says:

    I know most would say just go out and plug anyone in to back up Palmer, but i don’t feel that way.

    If Palmer takes a shot to his knee, than we’re in the same boat we were in when we over paid for him and Boller stunk up the joint. (I like Palmer btw, just didn’t like the deal)

    Now i’m not saying over pay for a good back up, cause that’s not what RM is about. I hope they do their research and not wait until preseason to bring in another scrub.

  34. RaidingTexas - 1OAKLANDRAIDERS1 Champion Says:

    Someone here a couple of months back guaranteed that Hue would be re-hired as an OC or HC right away if the Raiders let him go. Idiot. I told you – whoever you are – he would be at best a positions coach again. Wish I could remember which crackhead said that.

  35. Deja vu Says:

    Good lord, sorry about the grammar in post 32. Ugh..i need a coffee. lol

    Have a great day fellas and the ladies too!

  36. HairyBush Says:

    yo

  37. r8eray Says:

    Looks like Routt might end up in Kansas…

  38. Rooks Says:

    I’m all on board with the idea of cutting this team down to the bone and -from what I’m reading here- most agree. We’ve given too many debatable pro players too much money for largely terrible results. We couldn’t take down one of the worst divisions in the NFL with all the over-priced players we held. That makes it clear: make cuts and trades, bring in the junk no one wants, build a pile of cash up, “earn” a high draft spot, and build through the draft, then a few ABSOLUTELY PROVEN studs in FAs.

    What I don’t get is how we’ve kept landing so many lazy guys in the last decade. You can’t have even 1 of those types playing in the NFL. Then, there’s the intelligence level of some players. The NFL is filled with athletes beyond compare, but without heart and intelligence, they’re all equal.

    Again, CUT the overpaid talent. Go for a Tolbert or Lynch who’ve shown they can run and will come fairly priced. Keep Palmer -ONLY because we’ve given too much to dump him. I like McFadden a ton, but if I were the Raiders owner/coach/management, I’d trade him in a second. What good does a Stud do whose never able to stay on the field? He’s progressed a lot since his rookie year and is a total game-breaker but he’s fragile. See ya! I’d like to Spencer and maybe Conner on our D, if the price is right.

    if NOTHING else comes of the next few years, I think it’s clear that the Raiders are going to stop giving away cash and deals for quick pay-offs, reaches in the draft will go away (OH please go away) and you’ll see many more capable, smart, and gutty guys taking the field. (It’s just going to be soooo painful waiting for this to happen.)

  39. kinz Says:

    Jerry,

    Thanks for putting up some facts about the Wimbley contract. It is appreciated. It would be good to know what happens if Wimbley is given his 6.5 mil bonues, is the rest of the 29 mil then guaranteed, or is it the same next year. It would also be really good to know such details about McClain and others with big contracts.

    Where does Adam Caplan get this info, it is special to him or possible for others to get it without waiting for him to post on twitter or something.

  40. StraightRaider Says:

    Any word on the new proposed stadium? this is driving me crazy.. The Winers will have there “Purse” open for the start of the 2014 season..Wow!

  41. Just Fire Baby Says:

    Cut Wimbley.

    The guy is great when he smells blood in the water, but he doesn’t create any blood in the water.

    He disappears for long stretchs rushing the passer, and is dreadful in coverage and in run support.

    Al’s last truly horrendous contract.

  42. No Lo Says:

    Re #40.
    The Raiders will move to San Jose and play in the new football stadium with San Jose State. Eat your heart out 49er fan.

  43. Raider O Says:

    Wimbley is not worth that huge contract, but he is still our best pass rusher. He can play OLB & DE, so he fits in a 4-3 & 3-4 defense. I don’t think we will cut him.

  44. Chris in NY Says:

    The more I think about it the less I feel the defensive roster needs to be torn up.

    I think fans vastly underrate TK and Seymour. I think Wimbley and Curry can play at a high level. Love Shaughnessy. Think Mike Huff is capable of great things as he showed in college and in 2010 under Marshall (he was hurt most of 2011). Branch was very good in 2011.

    Here’s what we need to focus on:

    - I definitely wouldn’t mind replacing RoMac. If they can’t find a great replacement and want to give him another year in a new system I’m OK with it. But at this point I wouldn’t be sad if they said bon voyage right now.

    - We need another edge rusher. Top tier ones are hard to come by, so if that’s not possible a speed rush specialist like Chris Clemons was for us several years ago would be acceptable. There’s also the chance Trevor Scott could have a bounceback year. He was Mr. Invisible in 2011, but he was coming off a torn up knee. It often takes two years for guys to come back from that.

    - We need legitimate corners. Routt was clearly our best CB, but he was overpaid. Chekwa and DVD have a lot of potential, IMO. I actually think DVD could be great if he improves his ball skills. Good length and a very fast and fluid guy. A healthy CJ and Lito are serviceable, but that’s a bit of a ragtag unit right now.

  45. Chris in NY Says:

    I love Al Davis and despite the rough stretch I believe he could still evaluate talent to the very end, but it’s tough to grade the players on this unit given the vanilla schemes we’ve been running forever that today’s sophisticated offenses can exploit.

  46. Marks hair Says:

    This was a geat post jerry. Some fans and reporters just cant wrap there heads around the cap or the difference between salary and guaranteed money.

  47. ohioraider Says:

    McKenzie and Allen are in a tough, unusual situation with the offense being near playoff caliber and the defense being a complete disaster. I suspect wholesale defensive changes through draft and free agency.

  48. ohioraider Says:

    Chris in NY Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 9:36 am

    I love Al Davis and despite the rough stretch I believe he could still evaluate talent to the very end, but it’s tough to grade the players on this unit given the vanilla schemes we’ve been running forever that today’s sophisticated offenses can exploit.
    ——————————–
    I think your view is not shared by many, including the new front office.

  49. Marks hair Says:

    39. Romac gets less than a mil this yr. He gets one more yr to improve

  50. Marks hair Says:

    I hope this puts all the we cant afford new FAs to bed.. As ive been saying the cap in the nfl is soft and pliable.. Soliai, porter & carr we’ve got your lockers and a parking spaces ready

  51. Mark Clemens Says:

    I just want everyone to know that the words expressed by my hair on this blog are not necessarily endorsed by my brain.

  52. Rooks Says:

    Man, do I dislike disagreeing with any Raider fan, but Chris in NY, I’m not with you entirely on the AL comment. Could AL find some gems in places others couldn’t or (more likely) wouldn’t go because reaches that don’t pay off mean getting canned, yes? The continual problem was that AL REACHED for these guys all the time.

    Seabass. Great kicker? Yep, mostly. But why take him round one when it could have happened round 3.

    J Russell. That’s all AL and we know how that went.

    Mike Mitchell. Could have been had in 6th easily. AL reached and we see a guy who couldn’t play first string, has been hurt a lot, and maybe can develop.

    Mike Huff was a #7 pick. He should be a dead on super stud with leadership ability and consistency at that spot. He’s not. Flashes only. Flashes don’t make teams win.

    The list goes on of course and yes -again- he could strike gold in come places, but mostly AL was a gambler. he bet too many long-shots too early and too often.

    As much as it pains me to write, we’re going to get better because the wild reaches and long-shots are going to end. We’ll be more like the rest in the NFL for better and worse, but mostly the better.

  53. Rooks Says:

    Man, do I dislike disagreeing with any Raider fan, but Chris in NY, I’m not with you entirely on the AL comment. Could AL find some gems in places others couldn’t or (more likely) wouldn’t go and because reaches that don’t pay off mean getting canned? Well, yes. But the continual problem was that AL REACHED for these guys all the time.

    Seabass. Great kicker? Yep, mostly. But why take him round one when it could have happened round 3.

    J Russell. That’s all AL and we know how that went.

    Mike Mitchell. Could have been had in 6th easily. AL reached and we see a guy who couldn’t play first string, has been hurt a lot, and maybe can develop.

    Mike Huff was a #7 pick. He should be a dead on super stud with leadership ability and consistency at that spot. He’s not. Flashes only. Flashes don’t make teams win.

    The list goes on of course and yes -again- he could strike gold in come places, but mostly AL was a gambler. he bet too many long-shots too early and too often.

    As much as it pains me to write, we’re going to get better because the wild reaches and long-shots are going to end. We’ll be more like the rest in the NFL for better and worse, but mostly the better.

  54. HayesDaze37 Says:

    It’s a great morning to be a Raiders fan. Isn’t it?!

    Free Agents?? Here’s my updated limited menu to pick from…they’re mostly in the “more-affordable” category for this year’s crop of FA’s.

    There are a few glaring exceptions on the list, though, like RB MForte and DE MWilliams, who are more pipe dreams than anything else…and either would take mega-financial/personnel gymnastics to make happen. The competition for those CB’$ could be crazy, too.

    I still say Mario W is going to make as much in his next 2-years, as the other 3 D-linemen I have on the list with him will, combined, in the same time frame.

    Adding any one of the FA’s listed below, will instantly improve that position group on the Raiders…and if we somehow find a way to add more than one of these guys, without gutting the Team first, it’ll be a great off-season:

    WR Pierre Garcon
    WR Mario Manningham
    WR Brandon Lloyd
    WR Reggie Wayne

    RB Matt Forte
    RB LeGarrette Blount
    RB Marshawn Lynch

    OG Ben Grubbs
    OG Carl Nicks

    QB Jason Campbell
    QB Kyle Orton
    QB Rex Grossman?

    CB Brandon Carr
    CB Cortland Finnegan
    CB Tracy Porter

    DT Red Bryant
    NT Paul Soliai
    DE Mario Williams
    DE Cliff Avril

    LB Stephen Tulloch
    LB Antwan Applewhite
    LB Jordan Senn

  55. Seymour Bush Says:

    Chris in NY Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 9:36 am

    I love Al Davis and despite the rough stretch I believe he could still evaluate talent to the very end, but it’s tough to grade the players on this unit given the vanilla schemes we’ve been running forever that today’s sophisticated offenses can exploit.
    ======================================

    True. Plus we have a mish mosh of players all of which would be better in different schemes. McClain is a perfect example. A 6′3″ 255lb MLB is really not a fit. Of course Urlacher did it but Urlacher is going to the Hall of Fame. You want a smaller faster MLB in a even scheme. Hopefully Dennis Allen and RM can get this all sorted out quickly.

  56. HayesDaze37 Says:

    I don’t want a smaller MLB…I want a faster one though, with explosive bursts of violence. On the field.

  57. Marley Bob Says:

    Kamerion Wimbley was in the Top 10 when it came to Pass-Rushing productivity last year.

    People keep saying he could only get sacks vs San Diego’s third stringer but everyone should know by now that sacks don’t tell the whole story.

    Take a look at this article from people who actually analyze data and sort out players production after grading each snap.

    “The sack stat.

    Also known as the bane of my existence.

    Every day I get emails or tweets where someone references how many sacks a player has as the sole reason why they deserve recognition.

    It’s like a sack is the only way a pass rusher can impact a game, forgetting how pressure also impacts the decision-making and accuracy of a quarterback.

    Now pressure doesn’t guarantee a negative play like a sack, but look at it this way: Aaron Rodgers completes 76.1% of passes when he isn’t pressured and completes “just” 54.4% when he is.

    It’s a universal truth for all QBs that getting pressured makes them far more inaccurate.

    So we devised our own pass rushing formula back after the 2008 season.

    Given that we are the only people to break down how many times a player rushes the passer we felt the best way of figure out the most productive pass rusher was to use that data, along with our sacks, hits and hurries counts, to give us a magical figure known as Pass Rushing Productivity.

    The Most Productive 25 Pass Rushers

    1 Carlos Dunlap CIN.
    2 Von Miller DEN.
    3 Trent Cole PHI.
    4 Cameron Wake MIA.
    5 Chris Long SL.
    6 Kamerion Wimbley OAK.
    7 Brian Orakpo WAS.
    8 Jason Babin PHI.
    9 Clay Matthews GB.
    10 Aldon Smith SF.
    11 Demarcus Ware DAL.
    12 John Abraham ATL.
    13 Chris Clemons SEA.
    14 Antonio D. Smith HOU.
    15 Clark Haggans ARI.
    16 Andre Carter NE.
    17 Dwight Freeney IND.
    18 Ryan Kerrigan WAS.
    19 Osi Umenyiora NYG.
    20 Tamba Hali KC.
    21 Robert Quinn SL.
    22 Cliff Avril DET.
    23 Adrian Clayborn TB.
    24 Terrell Suggs BAL.
    25 Rob Ninkovich NE.

    From profootballfocus.com

    ————————————————-

    Now is Wimbley overpaid?.

    Of course he is, but he’s a guy that actually produces, he’s not paid to get sacks, he’s paid to ut pressure on the QB and so far he’s done it, as stats prove it.

    They guy is owed 6.5 million next year, you can cut him but you’d still have to pay him that figure, or you keep him and throw 4.5 more million.

    So, stop considering those 6.5 million, that money is in Wimbley’s pocket already and it doesn’t matter if he plays for the Raiders or not, might as well keep him around.

  58. Chris in NY Says:

    Urlacher is also super fast, athletic, has good instincts and plays his azz off. Don’t think any of that applies to RoMac.

  59. HayesDaze37 Says:

    If D.A. and Tarver can get McClain in the right position to make a play (his biggest problem), his lack of explosiveness will be ameliorated. However…if they can’t get McClain to hit with more passion, he’ll be a total waste of potential.

  60. Seymour Bush Says:

    Chris in NY Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 10:24 am

    Urlacher is also super fast, athletic, has good instincts and plays his azz off. Don’t think any of that applies to RoMac.
    ===============================

    So very true. Unfortunately.

    With regards to Wimbley, Marley is right. Basically it is going to cost the team 4.5mm to play him. That is a no brainer. With another pass rusher, say Calais Campbell, teams can’t concentrate on Wimbley which would make him even that much more effective.

  61. Mark Clemens Says:

    I think Allen and Tarver can turn Rolando into a Pro Bowler.

  62. UCLA Raiders Says:

    Jerry,
    Excellent piece of reporting! That’s what I’m talking’ about.

  63. Marks hair Says:

    57. If wimbley gets cut, it will be because of all the remaining $$ on his deal, not just 4.5..

  64. Marley Bob Says:

    By the way, those numbers come from evaluating 324 snaps where Wimbley rushed the passer, not just a game or two.

    Now guys like Matthews, Ware, Suggs are listed below Wimbley but it obviously doesn’t mean he’s better tha them, those other guys face more double teams than Wimbley, but not as much as one would think since they move around a lot before the snap while looking for the best matchup to exploit and to avoid double teaming.

  65. J Hill Says:

    RRS ..

    GO KNICKS!!!!

  66. Seymour Bush Says:

    I should not have brought up Urlacher to compare to McClain. In a league FILLED with ridiculous super freaks of nature, Urlacher is a freak among freaks. The dude played safety in college and returned punts for crissakes. Rarely do you ever see guys move up to the front ranks from the back ranks. It’s normally the other way because guys in the league are so big.

  67. HayesDaze37 Says:

    I’d like to jump on that raft you’re floating on, Mark Clemens.

    So far, Rolando’s just another rich “kid” more interested in wasting away his prime years, than he is in playing football because he loves the game.

  68. HayesDaze37 Says:

    Any relation to Samuel?

  69. Marks hair Says:

    I was really hoping wimbley would redo that ugly deal. I like his game.

  70. Seymour Bush Says:

    Now guys like Matthews, Ware, Suggs are listed below Wimbley but it obviously doesn’t mean he’s better tha them, those other guys face more double teams than Wimbley, but not as much as one would think since they move around a lot before the snap while looking for the best matchup to exploit and to avoid double teaming.
    ====================================

    Again, that is the value of Kelly and Richard Seymour. You can’t double everyone. One more stud on the dline, with Shaughnessy coming back basically should seal the deal as far as making the defensive unit top notch.

  71. J Hill Says:

    - I definitely wouldn’t mind replacing RoMac. If they can’t find a great replacement and want to give him another year in a new system I’m OK with it. But at this point I wouldn’t be sad if they said bon voyage right now.

    ——————————————————–

    Agreed with every other part of your post.

    Why give up on a 1st rd draft pick after only 2 years?

    As a late as the Detroit game, the guy is hustling back to cover Megatron in a cover 2 zone drop.

    Played A LOT of games injured last year. TOOK the shot that a lot of folks give DMac crap for not taking.

    Ok, he made a boneheaded move with the gun thing.

    Not cutting him.

  72. HayesDaze37 Says:

    Mark’s Hair — Just whose hair are you — Mark Davis’ or Mark Clemens’? It could affect how we view your opinions, you know.

  73. Marley Bob Says:

    I doubt we’ll see another Brian Urlacher in a while, 6′4 258 smart, fast and strong, good in coverage, nice tackler and a big play-maker, sacks, int’s, fumbles, short yaradgae stops, that guy did it all.

  74. Seymour Bush Says:

    You certainly don’t cut mcClain, but there better be some improvement this year or you bench him. Bring in Grant from SF.

  75. J Hill Says:

    The Most Productive 25 Pass Rushers

    1 Carlos Dunlap CIN.
    2 Von Miller DEN.
    3 Trent Cole PHI.
    4 Cameron Wake MIA.
    5 Chris Long SL.
    6 Kamerion Wimbley OAK.

    ——————————————————-

    JFB doesn’t trust Profootballfocus’s numbers on Wimbley.

    He trusts them on every other evaluation though, lol.

  76. Marks hair Says:

    Is s.nasty really that great? I know he’s solid, but it seems like his legend has gotten pretty big..

  77. Marley Bob Says:

    Maybe JFB should put together his own research, you know grab the tape of every game and chart Wimbley’s every snap.

    I’d trust JFB.

  78. The Realist Dirty Raccoon Says:

    JB Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 12:03 am
    Here are some realistic target FA’s to consider:

    • Jared Gaither OT
    • Carl Nicks OG
    • Marques Colston WR
    • Marshawn Lynch RB or
    • Mike Tolbert RB
    • Anthony Spencer LB
    • Dan Connor LB
    • Aubrayo Franklin NT or
    • Paul Soliai NT
    • Tracy Porter CB or
    • Carlos Rodgers CB

    ::::::::::

    Texans C Chris Myers would allow Wiz to stay at LG. He is a ZBS BEAST! Barks at RG, and sign a FA RT, and draft a RT.
    If we do this we will have the best O-Line(regardless of playing much ZBS)!

  79. Marks hair Says:

    Who the h is mark clemens?

  80. HayesDaze37 Says:

    Shaughnessy could be the Defense’s DMC…tons of potential, and moments of brilliance…waiting to prove he’s healthy (and he’ll stay that way) again.

  81. Marks hair Says:

    78. Good call. Keeping wiz at lg. Gives us a great back up c. without having to waste a roster spot on a guy who can only play c. Or a weak center/guard..

  82. SnB offense defense specialteams Says:

    Those overpaid players on defense have done nothing for several years now. Gettin top shelf money and not a one of those “players” could make ONE play.

    Cut anyone on that defense getting over $3MM. Keep Branch, Shaughnessy, Bryant and Houston. The rest can kick rocks.

    Players make plays and there were PLENTY of oppprtunities for those guys to make a play.

    Foundation of the Defense is condemned…stop worrying about whether to keep a few fixtures!

    Clean this HOUSE Reggie!

  83. Marley Bob Says:

    Oh here comes SnB and his cut everyone, we’ll just “find” better players out on the street, you know since there aren’t 31 other teams competing for the same pool of available players.

  84. HayesDaze37 Says:

    I wouldn’t consider Colston THAT realistic as a FA for the Raiders. He’ll likely get the most money of all the WR’s on the market.

    I’d rather aim for “bargains,” who can catch just as well as Colston (or better). Guys like Manningham and Reggie Wayne won’t command the same price as Colston, but they would significantly upgrade our WR corps. Spend the savings on the Defense and our yet-to-sign RB, whomever he may be.

  85. Marley Bob Says:

    SnB offense defense specialteams Says:

    Cut anyone on that defense getting over $3MM. Keep Branch, Shaughnessy, Bryant and Houston. The rest can kick rocks.
    ———————————————–

    So what’s your plan dude?.

    “Cleaning house” and waiting 2 or 3 years to see if those new players can actually play? and then make a run…

  86. Marks hair Says:

    I think if we cut all of the whack deals, and rework 1 or 2..cp3.. That we’ll find the money to get the guys we need on D. Its gonna be a fun offseason..

  87. Marks hair Says:

    Porter became a nice player under Allen.. Id think he’s our first signing.

  88. SnB offense defense specialteams Says:

    Marley, the Raiders can get ther same production from young hungry guys. These guys lack hustle, smarts and discipline

    Let em go.

    Al davis put a lot of trust in these guys and they NEVER stepped up for him. They took Al’s check and trust and cashed it. And that’s where it ends

    Break the league record for penalties with all those vets?

    Raider Nation deserves better.

    Already have Routt checked off, just checking the post waiting for Wimbley or kelly’s name to come across. They can go steal from another team

  89. Marley Bob Says:

    Forget Colston.

    Nice player but always seems to be questionable with some sort of nagging injury and he might be the product of the Saints extremely pass-friendly offense, I’m not certain he can be a traditional # 1 for a more tradituonal offense.

    Let DHB, Moore, Ford and Murphy play.

  90. Marks hair Says:

    You dont pay big $$ to 29yr old wrs.

  91. r8eray Says:

    Don’t know why peeps keep on talking about picking up a FA WR…..we got other needs that need attention!!!

    Our WR group is good enough….

  92. Marks hair Says:

    Id wait untill the wrs are picked over, and if theres a great set of hands left ill take um. If not, sfw. We have a nice core.

  93. HayesDaze37 Says:

    No way should we cut & gut.

    RELOAD, do not rebuild.

    This team is average to above-average as it stands right now…even with a patchwork Defensive backfield and porous front-7. With all the disasters we dealt with last year, and question marks this year.

    The League is filled with question marks. Different teams improve every year…and different teams find just the right ingredient/s to make great things happen. From 8-8 to 10-6, and better, is possible with proper coaching, attention to detail by all, and Player dedication. I think D. Allen brings it out.

  94. J Hill Says:

    These guys lack hustle, smarts and discipline

    just checking the post waiting for Wimbley or kelly’s name to come across.

    ——————————————————

    So Wimbley and Kelly don’t hustle and are dumb???

    Kelly didn’t do exactly what was asked of him as a penetrating DT?

    Did you see the post earlier noting Wimbley production as a pass rusher?

    We can just find a young hungry guy to replace Wimbley’s production? Anyone in mind?

    We have a lot of depth on the Dline at TKs spot, so it wouldn’t surprise me to see him traded if we go to the 3-4.

    I doubt the Raiders think so lowly of him that they will just cut him though.

  95. Marley Bob Says:

    SnB offense defense specialteams Says:

    Marley, the Raiders can get ther same production from young hungry guys. These guys lack hustle, smarts and discipline

    Let em go.
    —————————————————-

    SnB.

    There’s this thing called talent, most of our players have it and it can’t always be replaced with hustle and effort.

    These players on D have been subject to the incompetent coaching of Rob Ryan, Marshall (not as incompetent, but far from a mastermind) and Chuck Bresnahan most of their careers, Al Davis just could not get it right over there.

    I’d wait and see what Dennis Allen and Jason Tarver come up with in terms of scheme and how they plan to take advantage of what those players can do best before firing everyone on the roster.

  96. Marks hair Says:

    Dhb almost got 1000yds. Fords a nice fit in the slot. And I think we all know that d-wow will set the world on fire next yr. This offense is great for him.

  97. J Hill Says:

    I thought everyone agreed that the Raiders defense just needed to get rid of the “big plays”?

    That’s maybe 4 or 5 plays per game outta how many?

    Do the guys get any credit for the other plays where they are doing what is expected?

  98. Mark Clemens Says:

    HayesDaze37 Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 10:34 am
    Any relation to Samuel?
    ——
    Obviously, duh!

  99. Marks hair Says:

    I dont think we’ll be able to trade our defenders. The other teams know about mar17 and they will just wait us out. But the guys we cut will get signed to proper contracts immediately.

  100. Marks hair Says:

    97. No not really. Worst defense in history.. It kind of kills my urge to pat them on the back for the plays the didnt fk up..

  101. HayesDaze37 Says:

    Ray — I don’t want a WR corps that is “good enough”…I want a GREAT WR unit.

    A great set of hands, on a wily veteran who knows how to get open, makes all of our WR’s that much better. Imagine how good (and open) the young guys will be if opposing Defenses are confounded by the guy they can’t keep from getting open from in slot. Imagine having a Hoosyermama in there when he could still catch 60-70 balls…only a better one.

    If we get a chance to add a WR with great hands (who can still get open) this year, we MUST do it. Carson Palmer agrees, I’m sure.

  102. luvmarvhub Says:

    “What I don’t get is how we’ve kept landing so many lazy guys in the last decade. You can’t have even 1 of those types playing in the NFL. Then, there’s the intelligence level of some players. The NFL is filled with athletes beyond compare, but without heart and intelligence, they’re all equal.”

    We “kept landing” them because Al Davis was awe-struck by sheer athleticism, including speed and strength.

    Recall his famous “God, I luv playahs” remark on one of those old tapes from the 60s? He meant it. For whatever psychological reason, Al must have figured that if he himself couldn’t be those warriors, those speedy, strong men of action, he’d be the next best thing, the guy who “owned” them.

    For years, the NFL was not the place warriors went to get rich for life. They played for many reasons: because it was a childhood love affair with the sport, because it was the only thing they did very well; because they were men of brawn, not brains; because they enjoyed the camaraderie of it all, etc. As a youngster, I recall that almost all NFL players used their “notoriety” in the game locally to parlay that name into other venues. In the Bay Area, for example, I recall the great Forty Niner lineman, Leo Nomellini, from Stockton, who made extra dough each off season wrestling, and who, with his brothers, I believe, had some other business pursuits that prominantly featured his name, automobile sales, maybe? Hall of Famer Colt Gino Marchetti opened a string of burger franchises.

    These guys played ball for different reasons than many play today, understandably. What Al seemed to refuse to accept is that there existed men who played the game who didn’t love it as players in the past loved it. I don’t understand why he didn’t get that. After all, if you have been a great athlete since upper elementary school, if you had been offered a free ride to a college, if in college your athleticism gets you noticed by the pros, you’d be a fool, if you’ve not the smarts to do something else with your life, to not pursue the dollars that going in the first two rounds of the draft can get you. Even if you fail to last, your name recognition in your home town will get you something financially if you play your cards right.

    Thus, there are many players who don’t love the game. Or maybe it’s fairer to say they don’t love the COST of the game–the debilitating injuries not just to body, but to the head, injuries that will affect their lives forever.

    Why Al didn’t understand that the modern football player had to have more than speed, agility, strength in order to be exceptional (exceptional is what one expects of a first round draft choice) was simply his inability to accept that guys with such attributes don’t necessarily love the game or love competing.

    The other think Al failed to understand is that a football team needs a handful of leaders as players, even if those leaders were not among the most physically gifted. He wasn’t able to accept that, I think, because he viewed himself as the leader. ONce in a while, he got lucky. Leaders come with different styles, different personalities but you DO need vocal guys in a leadership role. Gannon was a leader. Villapiano was a leader.

    When Al drafted, he overlooked the leadership potential of players and the competitive fire of players. For a guy who knew football, I don’t think he knew people.

  103. Marks hair Says:

    Look, we’re not getting soliai and porter for free. The moneys got to come from the overpaid guys..

  104. Marks hair Says:

    102. I wont read posts longer than jerrys..

  105. J Hill Says:

    Vet WR we need = Donald Driver.

  106. HayesDaze37 Says:

    “When Al drafted, he overlooked the leadership potential of players and the competitive fire of players. For a guy who knew football, I don’t think he knew people.”

    —————–

    That’s not quite right there, Marv — Al didn’t overlook those things…he miscalculated on those things.

    Who’da thunk the QB of one of the Nation’s biggest football programs, one of the highest-rated players to come out in the draft, would have the ambition, and speed, of a slug?

    Who’da thunk the MLB captain of the Defense would be willing to sacrifice his career, and his Team’s season, acting on hometown tough-guy gang bang fantasies?

    These are examples of young players who were expected to perform, and behave, better. Their respective character wasn’t overlooked…it was simply misjudged.

  107. HayesDaze37 Says:

    I’ll agree with you here, though, Marv — Al not being able to judge his signees’ character before throwing away so much money cost us years. He knew it too, sadly, as the years ran out on him.

  108. J Hill Says:

    acting on hometown tough-guy gang bang fantasies?

    ——————————————————

    Why do folks keep saying McClain and gang banger???

    The incident was with a friend of his who he thougt stole something not some cross time rival.

  109. J Hill Says:

    Prior to the incident with his former friend, the only other incident I recall with McClain is someone shooting at his SUV his rookie year.

    Where is all this McClain is a thug propoganda coming from?

  110. HayesDaze37 Says:

    I’d love Donald Driver a few years ago…not now though. If we go old, I’d rather go with Reggie Wayne. I’d prefer to go younger, though. I think Manningham and Brandon Lloyd would be great for the price.

  111. HayesDaze37 Says:

    J — Threatening with a firearm is one of the gang banger’s favorite plays…especially if he’s a wannabe tough guy.

    I’m not saying McClain’s a gang banger…but, I can picture his act, right off of a CSI episode. That’s why I said “fantasy.” Nobody here really believes McClain’s that tough guy.

    He acted like a thug, that’s where the propaganda came from. I’d like him to prove the image wrong.

  112. HayesDaze37 Says:

    Mark C — What would make it obvious that you are related to one Samuel Clemens? The name? It’s so common, yours could’ve come from anywhere. Duh.

  113. luvmarvhub Says:

    “Prior to the incident with his former friend, the only other incident I recall with McClain is someone shooting at his SUV his rookie year.”

    It only takes one such “incident” to tell me this guy doesn’t live like the typical, law-abiding American male his age.

  114. luvmarvhub Says:

    104: No one expects you to, you sarcastic idiot.

  115. luvmarvhub Says:

    “The incident was with a friend of his who he thougt stole something not some cross time rival.”

    How does one explain the picture? That was “posing” and posing when one has been arrested is a typical trait of the gangsta or simply thug culture.

  116. No Lo Says:

    WR is the lowest priority in the draft or FA. The issue last year were the injuries. Cross your fingers Moore, Ford stay healthy. DHB is actually more of a possession receiver. His best routes are the 10-15 yard out or the 10-15 yard curl. His hands are still very suspect. Moore and Ford are legitimate NFL wide receivers who can catch the ball with their hands and are legitimate deep threats over the middle or down the sidelines.
    The draft and FA should be on defense. It was more than the D giving up the big play. There were some ugly: Denver game in which they gave up 27 straight points, the pathetic performance v. Miami, the two gutless games v. Detroit and San Diego, the Green Bay debacle. Their was a post about that said the new HC can make McClain is proven MLB. The only person who can make McClain legit is himself. Based upon past performances that appears to be slim and none(and you know the rest of the saying). The focus should be CB, safety, LB, and DL if Kelly, Wimbley, Scott are cut.
    Our best players for the past 3-4 years have been Seabass and Lechler, hands down. Go get ‘um Reggie.

  117. RAIDERMAN99 Says:

    So you’re gonna cut KW to save 4.5M ?

    Brilliant.

    The Raids best pass rusher.

    Don’t g a s if 3 of his sacks came in one game against a turd. Point is – they came – and were a key factor in winning that game.

    Also seem to remember KW rumbling and nearly scoring against the Bears.

    Plenty of pressures and hurries.

    Guy hustles, plays hard. Is in shape. Well spoken, intelligent. Still relatively young. Fast.

    One of the only difference makers on defense.

    Is there room for improvement in his game ? Is he overpaid ? Heck, yeah.

    I’ll take KW on my team. And I wouldn’t be so quick to believe he’s not amenable to a restructure. It’s called negotiating.

    Keep KW.

    DUMP SLOWLANDO.

  118. Gdog Says:

    We can just find a young hungry guy to replace Wimbley’s production? Anyone in mind?
    >>>>>>>

    Cliff Avril, Michael Bennett,Jeremy Mincey, Anthony Spencer, Erin Henderson, Manny Lawson, Philip Wheeler… oh, and of course Super Mario was playing as a 3-4 LB before he got injured….

  119. RaiderRetribution Says:

    Mario Nicks Wayne and Petting are the only free agents I hope Reggie signs. I do think the Raiders will sign a record number of udfas.

  120. HayesDaze37 Says:

    No Lo Says:

    WR is the lowest priority in the draft or FA. The issue last year were the injuries. Cross your fingers Moore, Ford stay healthy. DHB is actually more of a possession receiver. His best routes are the 10-15 yard out or the 10-15 yard curl. His hands are still very suspect.

    ———————

    You contradict yourself a few times here, No Lo –

    The lowest priority in the draft/Free Agency is WR? But it has a problem with injuries?? We need as strong a WR corps as possible…and that could be had with the addition of one mid-priced Free Agent. The rotation of capable receivers would be tough to keep up with. Then, when we go 4-wide it would be exciting with possibilities, and not a question mark, with questionable #4-6 WR’s filling in (depending on those injuries).

    DHB is more of a possession receiver…but he has questionable hands?? DHB had fewer drops last year than a few other notable WR’s…and he caught nearly all balls thrown to him in pressure situations. His suspect hands might not look smooth to us, but he’s more comfortable catching the ball…and that’s the most important thing of all.

    Our WR’s look pretty good…but they don’t look great. BUILD on a team strength…we don’t have too many of them, and we can easily do it.

  121. HayesDaze37 Says:

    G — The problem with cutting Kam and adding any of those players you mention: they all will require a signing bonus and salary sure to compete with, or out-do the deal Wimbley has. Why change the Player just for change’s sake?

    I’d like to pick up at least one of the better D-linemen available in Free Agency…but not necessarily to replace Wimbley.

    I want to AUGMENT the current Raiders roster…I don’t want it sliced and diced to the bone.

  122. BewareofRaiders Says:

    Cluff Avril would be a good pick up especially since our new DL coach is his old college coach. Also need to pick up a FA CB like finnegan porter or grimes

  123. BewareofRaiders Says:

    Cliff*

  124. HayesDaze37 Says:

    Lunch!

    later

  125. Hardline Says:

    J Hill, 108, 109

    J,

    I don’t think McClain is so much a thug as a sub-moron. The guy is just not too bright. To install him as Captain of the D is just ridiculous and what is more asinine is whatching Hue the Pimpin Magnificent gush and squeeze cream pies all over himself in praise of that big flop.

    Let’s put it this way: McClain should have been no where near the scene of the ghetto gunplay incident considering he was endangering a $23M personal services contract, voidable under a morals clause.

    Also, McClain had the unmitigated audacity to disrespect his fans and reject interviews with the press claiming he would never hold interview again, until 3 days later he interviewed and told the interviewer he (McClain) was playing great since the “incident” – his mother told him so.

    Most telling, McClain is a wash out on the field with his slowness and inability to cover, tackle, take the proper angles, or stop the run.

    Worse yet was the blue striped horizontal shirt he was wearing when he posed for the camera on scene at the “incident”, truly makes him look like a circus clown and not the captain of the defense of one of the most storied franchises in NFL history.

    Dump Slowlando!

  126. Hardline Says:

    watching *** Hue

  127. Gdog Says:

    >>>
    Why change the Player just for change’s sake?
    >>>

    His refusal to restructure is one reason. No player on that horrid defense from last year should be refusing anything to the Raiders.

  128. lefty12 Says:

    100-How can we be the worst defense in history when we were #27 against the pass and the run and #29 in points allowed?Since there are 32 teams,wouldn’t that mean there were teams worse than us this past season?

  129. Master Beeecham Says:

    SMOKE TWO JOINTS IN THE MORNING, GET A BJ IN THE AFTERNOON

    Yo yo yo what’s cracking blog brahs & dweebos

    That was an off the chain Reggae Boat Cruise last night! Got into some major double trouble with these stripper sisters from Canada – my maple leaf was on guard for thee (if you know what I am talking about)

    Just kicking it in the penthouse with the Certified Platinum Posse getting high on weed and plotting my next career move.

    Working out the kinks in my Laker jam, want to get more phat lyrics down before showtime. Hopefully I can start test running this joint soon at some Dave & Buster’s open mic nights.

    Yo check out this swizzle fresh dope rhyme with Goudelock, gots to keep it real -

    Let’s “Eclipse the Suns”, no happy endings
    And yes, that phrase is still patent pending
    Homie, them Suns are down on their luck
    Time for a big dose of Goudelock

    TAKING IT TO THE STREETS, KOOL MOE DEE POPPIN CAPS

  130. lefty12 Says:

    Bob Marley,good article earlier on Wimbley.I’ve been of the mind he should go,but I’ve changed my mind.Hopefully the new coaching staff can put him into positions so his weaknesses(pass coverage,containing the run) won’t be so exploited.

  131. djohnnyg Says:

    47.ohioraider Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 9:42 am
    McKenzie and Allen are in a tough, unusual situation with the offense being near playoff caliber and the defense being a complete disaster. I suspect wholesale defensive changes through draft and free agency.

    I agree, except I think the offense is not NEAR playoff caliber I think it definitely IS.

    If the defense didn’t choke away at least TWO GAMES and more likely FOUR the Raiders would’ve been in the playoffs, so that makes them playoff caliber.

    That pathetic defense? OMG.

    All I ASK is ofr a modest leap to top 20. Maybe 18th ranked, and if the offense pretty much stays the same? We’re in.

  132. Gdog Says:

    100-How can we be the worst defense in history when we were #27 against the pass and the run and #29 in points allowed?Since there are 32 teams,wouldn’t that mean there were teams worse than us this past season?
    >>>>

    Do they have stats for giving up leads and 95 yard drives??

    For never making any plays when needed?

    For stupid penalties at the worst times?

    There were a lot of intangible “suckiness” factors last year.

  133. J Hill Says:

    Sounds like a personal thing against McClain than anything on the field related.

    You can’t in one breath say the Raiders D scheme was bad under Al Davis, and Chuck B was a bad DC AND also claim the players were terrible.

    Agree with the comment made earlier that let’s see what these players can do in a scheme where Allen and Tarver will have them doing what they do best and then make some judgements.

    I trust that the new regime is going over film as we speak of guys they believe can help them win games. Whoever makes the cut, I’m rolling with them 100%.

  134. No Lo Says:

    Re 120. Thanks for your response. I accept and see your point but I disagree and stand by my analysis. The Raiders don’t have the luxury to build on the strength of the WR corp due to the glaring deficiencies on defense. Here comes the proverbial hypothetical. If the Raiders could sign 2 playmaker free agents who could come in and start now and the positions were WR, CB, LB, I go CB and LB. My point was the priority must be defense.
    As true Raiders fans, we agree to disagree.

  135. lefty12 Says:

    Gdog-certainly we sucked,but to say we were the worst defense in history isn’t true especially since there were teams worse than us this year.We did commit the most penalties in modern history,but many of those were on the offense.

  136. ohioraider Says:

    Marks hair Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 11:26 am

    102. I wont read posts longer than jerrys..
    ——————————–
    Dude, that’s your loss. Very compelling post. I must say I get a kick out of the posts that fixate on players and schemes, when by far the most interesting/least understood component of the entire franchise is how Al Davis nearly destroyed the very thing he loved. Bit by bit, we’re getting clues, and most of what we’ll learn is by watching how McKenzie changes everything, beginning with the culture. You posters who year in and year out kept thinking that it was all about the talent never understood that the dysfunctional culture, Al’s leadership by cult of personality, made it a hard place for any kind of talent to be nurtured. I’m fascinated by this because it truly was a train wreck.

  137. raidertalk Says:

    Marley Bob Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 10:24 am
    Kamerion Wimbley was in the Top 10 when it came to Pass-Rushing productivity last year.
    ——————————————————-
    Wow! “rushing Productivity” what a concept! Look at how Wimbley’s great “pressure” on the QB disrupted all those passes especially toward the end of the season.

    You sight some crazy measure of rushing productivity, then completely OMIT his TOTAL liability in the pass coverage. His liability in coverage cost us more games than all of his great pressures on the QB.

    Where watching the games that I was, with QBs having ALL GOT DAMN DAY to throw to wide-open WRS???

    MAYBE, MAYBE WIMBLEY is worth it if he converts to end. BUT A LB NEEDS TO COVER.

    4.5 million may or may not be worth it for a pass “pressuring” DE but NOT a LB who cannot cover

  138. raidertalk Says:

    Who should be Wimbley’s replacement? Right now we need an LB that can actually COVER someone on Defense. REGARDLESS of whether we keep or cut Wimbley, we still have the same need.

    Maybe the argument for Wimbley’s replacement makes sense if you are talking about DE depth

  139. Gdog Says:

    I can’t get it out of my head the Denver game where Wimbley play after play tried to sack Tebow only to have him take off down the field for large gains or TDs.

    I mean, I bet he fell for it 5 straight times with no adjustment.

    Not exactly the sharpest tool in the shed… but with Allen putting such a premium on sacks, I bet he stays for at least another season.

  140. raidertalk Says:

    lefty12 Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 12:58 pm
    100-How can we be the worst defense in history when we were #27 against the pass and the run and #29 in points allowed?Since there are 32 teams,wouldn’t that mean there were teams worse than us this past season?
    —————————————————-
    There might not have been teams with a worse combination! Ouch 27th against the Run, 27th against the pass, and 29th in points allowed.

    That might be the worst combination of the three stats?

  141. Mark Clemens Says:

    Wimbley is a one trick pony who is way over payed. Cut him Reggie.

  142. wasbanned Says:

    The media won’t build the team. Reggie and Allen will do that. Don’t let sports writers tell you who will be cut and who will stay.

    Allen has a plan for defense. He has a scheme he wants to run and he knows what players will fit that scheme.

    If they really want a player they will find a way to make it happen. If they feel they can get similar production out of a cheaper player then they won’t.

    If Wimbley fits into Allen’s plan he will be a Raider.

  143. lefty12 Says:

    That might be the worst combination of the three stats?
    ===============================
    Actually that would be Tampa Bay.Also GB and NE were below us in total defense.

  144. Corporate_Raider Says:

    I think coaching is the key. Look at the ‘9ers. As much as I can’t stand Harbaugh his DC did a fantastic job. Granted the ‘9ers have lots on #1s on their roster because they sucked for so long but in 2010 they still stunk. Coaching is the key.

    Get rid of some of the attitude players and get guys like Giordano, who may not be the most talented but he has passion and goes all out. Right now, imo, those are the kind of players the Raiders need, and can get because of the draft situation.

  145. NavyRaider Says:

    From National Football Post

    *Ray Lewis’ toe injury came at a very opportune time for one Ravens teammate. Jameel McClain, who took over the defense calling and on-field leadership responsibilities from Lewis in his absence for five games, is about to become an unrestricted free agent. The Ravens went 5-0 without Lewis, in part because of McClain’s ability to do some of what Lewis did. McClain subsequently could get some action on the open market. It’s also possible the Ravens will step up and try to retain him, both for his short term value and his long term value as a replacement for Lewis after the 36-year old retires.

    Sounds like a good free agent target especially if we incorporate more 3-4.

  146. JB Says:

    Raiders supposedly picked up a RB from Fresno State. Any information available?

  147. HayesDaze37 Says:

    A McClain-McClain tandem in the middle? That might just work.

  148. NavyRaider Says:

    Signed to a future/reserve contract on January 3rd. Here is an article via silverandblackpride.com

    Lanyae Miller is from Fresno State. He was a College backup running back on a talented Fresno State squad. He ran a 4.43 in the forty and weighs in at 232lbs. Holy moly, Batman!

    Miller is known for long runs and power and speed when backed up against the goal line. He’s faster than Bush and also a younger man than Bush. He will come cheaper too. Miller is a shrewd pickup that hasn’t gotten a lot of attention. But it seems that McKenzie is using his magic to load the team with depth. There is no reason why the Raiders can’t provide depth behind their superstar lottery picks.

    Recently, Lanyae Miller learned blocking assignments during Cowboys camp as reported by ESPN.com.

    Lanyae Miller along with the other free agents the Raiders signed this offseason are a start of something great. They recently signed several defensive lineman, a nose tackle, defensive backs, and a quality backup quarterback round. Look them up.

    Missing from the list are linebackers. Because the Raider are going from a 4-3 to a 3-4, in terms of roster turnover, the Raiders, or any team with a 4-3 roster, have too many lineman and too few linebackers. The Raiders already picked up a few defensive lineman, so they are increasing the likelihood that they will target quality linebackers in the draft. Just my feeling for now. Things may change of course as we get closer to the draft. Free agents will be available and so on. Go Raiders!

    There is so much to say so little time.

  149. HayesDaze37 Says:

    Navy — Where are you/have you been in the Navy?

  150. Hardline Says:

    I live close to the beach in Los Angeles and have a few backyard chickens. They keep my garden clean, provide fertilizer and lay eggs. For one reason or another I sometimes have to catch these chickens.

    A chicken is quick – very quick – and more evasion than a man, and more importantly endowed with a fantastic instinct to survive predators.

    In order to catch a chicken one needs a plan to draw it into a lane. This necesitates being in the proper position and angle when the chicken makes its move toward escape.

    Ability to catch a chicken doesn’t happen randomly: it requires a plan. When I look at the dull eyes of most of our players, especially Slowlando McClain, our clutch of inept CB’s who don’t turn heads toward the ball or raise a hand to block the ball, our defensive line, I watch men who couldn’t even catch chickens, clueless, helpless, azz-over-tea kettle, arms flailing after missed arm tackles, out-of-position, with bad angles

    Anyone have further questions why we failed so miserably ?

  151. NavyRaider Says:

    I’m in the Navy in Yokosuka, Japan. Been in about 6 1/2 years and spent 5 1/2 here in Japan.

  152. Hardline Says:

    evasive ****

  153. Wha Says:

    http://www.raiders.com/news/article-1/Raiders-Senior-Executive-John-Herrera-Announces-Retirement/48a22470-b91f-4ab8-8e33-4d6f8a43dc5c

  154. Wha Says:

    Hardline Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 3:52 pm
    I live close to the beach in Los Angeles and have a few backyard chickens. They keep my garden clean, provide fertilizer and lay eggs. For one reason or another I sometimes have to catch these chickens.

    A chicken is quick – very quick – and more evasion than a man, and more importantly endowed with a fantastic instinct to survive predators.

    In order to catch a chicken one needs a plan to draw it into a lane. This necesitates being in the proper position and angle when the chicken makes its move toward escape.

    Ability to catch a chicken doesn’t happen randomly: it requires a plan. When I look at the dull eyes of most of our players, especially Slowlando McClain, our clutch of inept CB’s who don’t turn heads toward the ball or raise a hand to block the ball, our defensive line, I watch men who couldn’t even catch chickens, clueless, helpless, azz-over-tea kettle, arms flailing after missed arm tackles, out-of-position, with bad angles

    Anyone have further questions why we failed so miserably ?
    —————————–

    I get what your saying. Wouldn’t it be something if the Raiders incorperated ‘chicken catchin’ into their drills? If you could master the art of runnin down one of those little bastards, you’d be pretty good.

    But me personally, I use a 24″ radius net on a pole. Makes it pretty easy. Then before you know it, your eatin BBQ’d chicken.

  155. PurpleDrank81 Says:

    Lonyae Miller is a solid RB and if the cowboys didnt have Demarco Murray he would make a Impact… He’s not flashy but I can see this kid as making a pretty big impact.

  156. J Hill Says:

    I’m all for the catch the chicken drill.

  157. HayesDaze37 Says:

    Navy — I salute you and those you’re over there with. Are you land-based, or is that your ship’s home port?

  158. HayesDaze37 Says:

    Yes to Lonyae Miller. Hopefully he brings some punch with that build.

  159. Mark Clemens Says:

    Never seen this before:

    DHB’s Crib

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLUyyIJymFU

  160. PlunkforHOF Says:

    Navy- thank you for your sacrifice and service to this country.

  161. jesusraiderjim Says:

    I get what your saying. Wouldn’t it be something if the Raiders incorperated ‘chicken catchin’ into their drills? If you could master the art of runnin down one of those little bastards, you’d be pretty good
    ————————————————
    It worked for Rocky Balboa it can work for the Raiders.
    Rocky never took an Ass whippin (95 yards ) like our D did last year, and that boy took a few Ass whippens. And yes I know Rocky is a fictional character for any genius that feels the need to remind me!

  162. Twocents Says:

    Hardline, I have chickens too.
    I spoil my chickens and give them “treats” (left overs and other kitchen scraps).
    My chickens would follow me into battle!
    Until the treats run out.

  163. NavyRaider Says:

    Hayes – I am land based but head out to the ships a few times a year to support another command. Thank you guys for the recognition. I greatly appreciate it. Go Raiders!

  164. Twocents Says:

    If the military was truly protecting our freedom, the first target would be Washington D.C.

  165. Marley Bob Says:

    Lefty.

    The 2011 Raiders Defense was historically bad.

    * They were only the 6th team since the merger (nearly 50 years) to allow 4000 yds passing and 2000 yds rushing in a season.

    * Not since the 1950’s had a Defense allowed 30 + TD passes and 5 + ypc in a single season, the Raiders and Bucs did it in 2011.

    * 2011 Raiders D:Franchise worsts in passing TD’s (31), yds passing (4262), ypc (5.1) and third most points 433 allowed.

    Even with such a crappy performance, we were 1 win away from the playoffs.

  166. lefty12 Says:

    Bob,I did say we were terrible,but the fact is TB was worse and we ended the year ahead of NE and GB also.All I was saying is we weren’t the worst defense in the history of the modern NFL.I never said or insinuated we were anything but terrible.

  167. Twocents Says:

    Being one game away from the playoffs in a weak division is not my idea of a contender.

  168. Marley Bob Says:

    raidertalk Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 2:00 pm
    Marley Bob Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 10:24 am
    Kamerion Wimbley was in the Top 10 when it came to Pass-Rushing productivity last year.
    ——————————————————-
    Wow! “rushing Productivity” what a concept! Look at how Wimbley’s great “pressure” on the QB disrupted all those passes especially toward the end of the season.

    You sight some crazy measure of rushing productivity, then completely OMIT his TOTAL liability in the pass coverage. His liability in coverage cost us more games than all of his great pressures on the QB.

    Where watching the games that I was, with QBs having ALL GOT DAMN DAY to throw to wide-open WRS???

    MAYBE, MAYBE WIMBLEY is worth it if he converts to end. BUT A LB NEEDS TO COVER.

    4.5 million may or may not be worth it for a pass “pressuring” DE but NOT a LB who cannot cover.
    —————————————————-

    Edge Rushers like Wimbley are not paid to cover.

    Thomas Howard was great in coverage, he was an OLB.

    Kamerion is not an OLB but an Edge Rusher, a hybrid DE/LB whose job is to rush the passer and hold the edge vs the run.

    The only time they’re supposed to drop back is when some sort of zone-blitz is called and they should only be asked to cover an area of the field, not chase TE’s and RB’s out of the backfield.

    I’m hoping Jason Tarver and Dennis Allen will put Wimbley in position to make plays.

  169. SharkCatcher Says:

    I hate city people with roosters , chicken ect…move to fresno with that sh8t

  170. Twocents Says:

    Breaking news, SharkCatcher hates people that produce food!

  171. Twocents Says:

    Not in my neighborhood. SharkCatcher likes food but he would prefer that it was grown somewhere else.

  172. Mark Clemens Says:

    SharkCatcher likes to get his chicken from Popeyes. That is where he meets his ladies too.

  173. djohnnyg Says:

    166.lefty12 Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 5:36 pm
    Bob,I did say we were terrible,but the fact is TB was worse and we ended the year ahead of NE and GB also.All I was saying is we weren’t the worst defense in the history of the modern NFL.I never said or insinuated we were anything but terrible.

    Lefty u know I predicted the Raiders are going 12-4 this coming season.

    That being said i think our D WAS perhaps the worst in the modern era.

    “The Raiders are coming off one of their worst defensive seasons ever. Oakland had franchise worsts in touchdown passes allowed (31), yards per carry (5.1), yards passing (4,262) and total yards (6,201), while giving up the third-most points (433) in team history.

    The Raiders joined this year’s Tampa Bay team as one of the four teams to allow at least 30 TD passes and 5.0 yards per carry in a season, a distinction last reached by the 1952 Dallas Texans. The Raiders also became the sixth team since the 1970 merger to allow at least 2,000 yards rushing and 4,000 yards passing in a season.

    The Raiders also set an NFL record last season with 163 penalties for 1,358 yards.”

    Updated January 26, 2012

  174. djohnnyg Says:

    As to #173, I think if u add in the penalties…on top of all the horrible yardage stats you can make the argument that the D was THE WORST in the modern era.

    That being said, it can only get better.

    Can anyone foresee it being worse?

    How can it get worse?

    It can’t.

    12-4. (A prediction I reserve the right to change based on off season developments of course.)

  175. SharkCatcher Says:

    Shark Catcher is a vegetarian..I don’t eat any animals.

  176. luvmarvhub Says:

    #136:
    ” Al’s leadership by cult of personality, made it a hard place for any kind of talent to be nurtured. I’m fascinated by this because it truly was a train wreck.”

    Well-put.

    I can still remember reading newspaper accounts of the trial of Al versus NFL over the Raiders moving. The journalists were fascinated by Al’s testimony, in his body language, but especially in his use of language. They noted how his Massachusetts-Brooklyn accent would be used when he was making a salient, piercing point about business, then morph into a Southern drawl when he felt he needed to be charming. I do indeed think Al fashioned a “cult of personality.”

  177. Sullivan44 Says:

    Wonder if the Raiders are still going to play Too Short after the team scores a touchdown, considering his recent drama.

  178. Sullivan44 Says:

    Twocents Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 5:23 pm

    If the military was truly protecting our freedom, the first target would be Washington D.C.

    …………

    People have been detained indefinitely for saying less. Keep it up.

  179. Sweep The Leg. Says:

    OK I’ll bite, what did too short do?

  180. Seymour Bush Says:

    Master Beeecham Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 12:58 pm

    SMOKE TWO JOINTS IN THE MORNING, GET A BJ IN THE AFTERNOON

    Yo yo yo what’s cracking blog brahs & dweebos

    That was an off the chain Reggae Boat Cruise last night! Got into some major double trouble

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E32WCkSAwho

  181. Seymour Bush Says:

    Marley Bob Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 11:10 am

    SnB offense defense specialteams Says:

    Marley, the Raiders can get ther same production from young hungry guys. These guys lack hustle, smarts and discipline

    Let em go.
    —————————————————-

    SnB.

    There’s this thing called talent,
    ====================================================

    And then there is this thing called “heart”. For the last few years you have heard opponents say, get the Raiders down and they will fold. Pay a bunch of guys more than they are worth, and they fold down the stretch cause they got theirs. There are two guys on that roster that are NOT that: Seymour and Palmer.

  182. Seymour Bush Says:

    Master Beeecham Says:
    February 19th, 2012 at 12:58 pm

    Got into some major double trouble

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E32WCkSAwho
    ===========================================

    That had to suck, not the way you’re thinking biachi

  183. lefty12 Says:

    Djohnnyg-Naturally as fans we like to say that since we sucked on D we were the worst,but we weren’t.There was someone worse than us this past year.Actually there were 3 teams worse than us on defense.As I said many of the penalties were on offense,so you can’t put all those on the defense.Truthfully though,none of that matters.We sucked and it really doesn’t matter if we were the worst or the next to worst,we still sucked.

  184. Sullivan44 Says:

    Sweep, Too Short made a viral video basically telling young boys how to skip the kissing phase and get right to 3rd base with young girls. It was in jest but naturally, it got an angry response from a lot of journalists both music related and mainstream.

  185. wasbanned Says:

    I knew this would be a problem… You guys are all pissed at some of the staff Allen hired, but just like Jackson last year, he was denied access to many coaches.

    No telling what the staff would look like if he got the guys he really wanted.

    NFP Sunday Blitz: NFL’s system for interviewing other teams’ assistants flawed

    http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AtGcTk3EBdBUHGS.U8Ot_9lDubYF?slug=nfp-20120219_nfp_sunday_blitz_7019

    “The NFL, it seems to me, has a problem on its hands: position coaches are being prevented from interviewing for promotions to coordinator positions like never before.

    The Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Indianapolis Colts, Oakland Raiders, and Miami Dolphins all struggled to hire coordinators and fill out their staffs. The Bucs, in fact, were denied permission to interview 15 coaches, one source said.”

  186. RaidersEdge - More than half of Wimbley’s 2012 salary is guaranteed Says:

    [...] didn’t know about one complicating factor: The Raiders have to pay Wimbley $6.5 million whether they keep him or not, according to Adam Caplan.  (As Jerry McDonald of the Oakland Tribune points out, most of [...]

  187. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    O line defined? I don’t think so.

    Usually these guys are dead on but I think Campbell is a goner.

    Hes terrible in space and especially cut blocking in the ZBS.

    Flip flopping positions and schemes is the last thing “Evil Dead” needed.

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/

  188. DIRT-LOT FOOTBALL Says:

    WAS THERE A MUSHROOM CLOUD THIS MORNING ?? AM I THE LAST LIVING SOUL ??

  189. RaiderRockstar Says:

    The Rochester Lancers, of the MISL’s top level of pro indoor soccer, today announced a contract offer to former NBA star, Allen Iverson.

    The Rochester Lancers host two remaining regular season home games to conclude their season. The offer stands at $20,000 per game, with a bonus of $5,000 per goal scored, win bonuses, and merchandise bonuses. There are over 12 goals scored on average per game.

    “Allen Iverson is one of the premier athletes of our time,” said Rich Randall, Vice President of the Rochester Lancers. “With his athleticism and competitive hunger, I think he can be a great fit with our team and fans as we make an important playoff push, while also driving interest to an exciting, growing sport.”

    If accepted, the Lancers have also offered to host his friends and family through the duration of his stay. With the per-game pay and bonuses, this offer will come close to the offer (per game) set by Turkish basketball team, Besiktas and ultimately keeping him the United States.

    ***

    yeah boy!

  190. RaiderRockstar Says:

    nice work by the Suns.

    Lake Show = flop

    Go Heat!

  191. DIRT-LOT FOOTBALL Says:

    MISSOURI LIVES !! GOOD DAY ROCKSTAR..

  192. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Wimbley was given an exclusive franchise tag about a year ago which guaranteed him approximately $11.3 million following a nine-sack season. The Raiders then renegotiated his deal to drop his salary cap number to $1.6 million. It was reported as a $48 million dollar deal with a whopping $29 million in guaranteed money.

    Except Wimbley’s deal apparently wasn’t anything approaching $29 million in guaranteed money. The Raiders can get out of it by cutting him and paying him $6.5 million.

    According to Adam Caplan, who has much of this contract stuff wired and was the first to report Wimbley’s situation last year, Wimbley earned $5 million last season ($4.25 million signing bonus, $750,000 salary).

    This season, Wimbley’s base salary is $11 million and $6.5 million is guaranteed. Wimbley makes that amount even if he is cut. The rest of his contract ($4.5 million) is guaranteed as of March 17.

    Add it up, and he earned almost $200,000 above and beyond his $11.3 million salary cap figure by agreeing to the restructure.

    But as far as the Raiders owing him $29 million guaranteed, well, . . . the Raiders are off the hook for much of that figure if Wimbley is cut before March 17.

    That’s a long way of saying take any “guaranteed” money with a grain of salt.

    ***

    Jerry Mac actually came thru!

    great news :)

  193. RaiderRockstar Says:

    So don’t reach too much into “guaranteed money” if the Raiders opt to part with Wimbley, frees safety Michael Huff ($4 million in salary, $4 million in bonus) or defensive tackle Tommy Kelly ($6 million in salary).

    McKenzie and coach Dennis Allen could attempt to sign them for less or simply move on.

    ***

    take less or get out!

  194. DIRT-LOT FOOTBALL Says:

    THINK 2DAY IS 1ST DAY FRANCHISE TAGS CAN BE PLACED..

  195. RaiderRockstar Says:

    It’s hard to know what they’ve got planned for strong safety Tyvon Branch, a prospective free agent. San Diego safety Eric Weddle signed a contract last year with guaranteed money reported as high as $19 million, although it’s hard to know if it really approached that figure.

    There’s a chance McKenzie, Allen and Co. may look at the defensive performance in 2011 and conclude that anyone coming in at a high price isn’t worth keeping and that those with reasonable salaries can be fitted in with low-level or street free agents and the end result couldn’t possibly be worse.

    The other prominent free agent is running back Michael Bush, who if franchised would get more than $7 million.

    It’s what makes this offseason the most interesting since the Raiders returned to Oakland in 1995.

    ***

    We shouldn’t break the bank or franchise tag either of these players.

    Make’em both reasonable “take it or leave it” offers!

  196. bcz24 Says:

    The fact that the tag numbers went down this year means it is a lot more likely that Bush gets tagged, since the RB tag # is down to 7.7 million. I hope we tag Branch if for nothing else than to NOT tag Bush.

  197. RaiderRockstar Says:

    PFT’s take on Wimbley:

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/19/more-than-half-of-wimbleys-2012-salary-is-guaranteed/

  198. R8ER MIKE Says:

    Good Morning Nation !!!

  199. RaiderSam Says:

    RaiderRockstar Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 6:14 am
    Wimbley was given an exclusive franchise tag about a year ago which guaranteed him approximately $11.3 million following a nine-sack season. The Raiders then renegotiated his deal to drop his salary cap number to $1.6 million. It was reported as a $48 million dollar deal with a whopping $29 million in guaranteed money.

    Except Wimbley’s deal apparently wasn’t anything approaching $29 million in guaranteed money. The Raiders can get out of it by cutting him and paying him $6.5 million.

    According to Adam Caplan, who has much of this contract stuff wired and was the first to report Wimbley’s situation last year, Wimbley earned $5 million last season ($4.25 million signing bonus, $750,000 salary).

    This season, Wimbley’s base salary is $11 million and $6.5 million is guaranteed. Wimbley makes that amount even if he is cut. The rest of his contract ($4.5 million) is guaranteed as of March 17.

    Add it up, and he earned almost $200,000 above and beyond his $11.3 million salary cap figure by agreeing to the restructure.

    But as far as the Raiders owing him $29 million guaranteed, well, . . . the Raiders are off the hook for much of that figure if Wimbley is cut before March 17.

    That’s a long way of saying take any “guaranteed” money with a grain of salt.

    ***

    Jerry Mac actually came thru!

    great news
    ==========================
    the only way you pay a guy 6.5 mil to leave, is if you’re getting Mario Williams to replace him, or you are trading up to get Courtney Upshaw or you are getting both Vontaze Burfect AND say…Ahmad Brooks from the Niners…they may have to just bite the bullet and take it – Allen’s defense is predicated upon pressure to get sacks or force turnovers on the back-end.

    This is one of those times, where McKenzie’s ability to get UDFAs is going to be pushed to the limit.

    i cruched and crunched the draft and the best combination assuming we can get a couple of additional fourth picks would be

    CB Doug Fletcher, B.College
    DE/OLB Vinny Curry
    S Harrison Smith
    CB Josh Norman
    ILB Emanuel Acho or Sean Spence OLB
    OLB/DE Brett Roy
    OG Desmond Wynn
    DT Chigbo Anunoby

    and FA’s
    Tracy Porter (maybe)
    Jameel McClain
    Marques Colston
    Evan Mathis or C Chris Meyers
    Marques Colston or (gasp) Vincent Jackson?

  200. bcz24 Says:

    I don’t know that Wimbley gets cut. If you are on the hook for 6.5 no matter what it is hard to justify cutting your best LB (the best of a bad group, agreed, but the best never the less) to save 4.5 mill. I mean we are already tragically thin at LB, and I think there are some guys on the roster that may be more inclined to renegotiate their deals.

    Or we may just have to bite the bullet and cut a few guys and replace them with UDFA’s and bottom of the barrel types and just hope to hell we can coach these guys up.

  201. bcz24 Says:

    The most expensive free agent we sign will be in the $5 million per year range… that is my prediction right now.

  202. RaiderRockstar Says:

    the RB tag # is down to 7.7 million

    ***

    BCZ,

    Reggie aint gonna blow all his loot on a chunky dude thats almost 30 who has a steel rod in his leg!

    the ZBS is very RB friendly. I wouldn’t be surprised if Miller, Rankin & Cartwright are DMAC’s backups next season and we’re STILL a Top 10 Rushing team

  203. DIRT-LOT FOOTBALL Says:

    “WHEN” MCFADDEN GOES DOWN NEXT YEAR,WILL THE RAIDERS BE OK WITH THOSE 3 ?

  204. RaiderSam Says:

    Not even “if” McFadden goes down…”When”, LOL

  205. DIRT-LOT FOOTBALL Says:

    DMAC NOT PRACTICING THIS WEEK BY THE WAY !!

  206. R8ER MIKE Says:

    ?? did McFadden have a nick or a ding last year??

  207. Mark Clemens Says:

    Aaron Curry @AaronCurry51 Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
    Let’s tweet about Jesus all day today
    ———-
    Curry needs to spend more time watching film and less time reading the Bible.

  208. RaiderRockstar Says:

    we may just have to bite the bullet and cut a few guys and replace them with UDFA’s and bottom of the barrel types and just hope to hell we can coach these guys up

    The most expensive free agent we sign will be in the $5 million per year range… that is my prediction right now.

    ***

    Couldn’t agree more, BCZ!

    Raider fans are gonna think Mark Davis, Reggie McKenzie & Dennis Allen are trying to burn this place down. Truth is, our defense was PATHETIC last year. pick a category. you name it. we were terrible. 2010 was better with Nnamdi, but overall still pretty bad

    Hue Jackson may have actually told the truth this time when he said the Raiders will be gutted by BigMac

    Look at the drastic changes so far and it’s only mid-Feb

    defensive minded HC
    coaching staff overhaul
    ZBS/WCO offense
    3-4 Defense ?
    Stan Routt axed

    Wouldn’t surprise me a bit to see 3 or 4 more big names whacked from the defensive side, even if it only saves us $2 mil each

  209. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Curry needs to spend more time watching film and less time reading the Bible.

    ***

    Aaron Curry needs to spend his offseason reading the Bible, restructuring his contract and trying to teach ROMAC how not to be a douche bag

  210. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Dirt Lot,

    if the Raiders trade away Darren McFadden or he gets hurt and misses 10+ games … the Raiders will be ranked 10-12 in rushing for 2012

    if DMAC stays healthy for 10 or 12 games, the Raiders will be the #1 Rushing team in the NFL and win the AFC West with ease

  211. R8ER MIKE Says:

    if DMAC stays healthy for 10 or 12 games
    ****************************************
    and if a frog had wings, he wouldnt bump his ass !!
    if my autn had balls she would be my uncle !! lol lol lol

  212. RaiderRockstar Says:

    I dont know enough about Jones, Miller, Rankin or Cartwright to assume they could churn out 100 yard games if or when DMAC gets hurt again, but I trust McKenzie, Allen & Knapp will find a few ZBS stud runners at a bargain basement price to back up Darren McFranchise if they aren’t already in Alameda

  213. RaiderRockstar Says:

    LOL @ Mike

    good morning AM crew !!

  214. R8ER MIKE Says:

    RR good morning, and how the hell are you ?

  215. R8ER MIKE Says:

    not much happening in here until the west coast wakes up !!

  216. Dakota Says:

    211.R8ER MIKE Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 7:22 am
    if DMAC stays healthy for 10 or 12 games
    ****************************************
    and if a frog had wings, he wouldnt bump his ass !!
    if my autn had balls she would be my uncle !! lol lol lol

    +++++++++++++++++++

    McFadden started 20 of 23 games before this past injury.

  217. Marley Bob Says:

    I think that Lonyae Miller kid will make some noise in training camp, hopefully he turns out to be more than the next Louis Rankin.

  218. Marley Bob Says:

    Hopefully Miller beats out Rock Cartwright for the last RB spot, Rock’s a good special teamer so Miller will have to show he can produce there first and then think of earning some carries.

  219. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Reggie McKenzie is going to get our financial house in order. He’s not going to mortgage our future just for loyalty sake. there will be casualties. there will be sacrifice. there will be plenty of time for younger players to develop and step up and seize roles. Oakland will be the land of opportunity and competition

  220. Dakota Says:

    Wake me when we cut Wimbley, Huff or McClain.

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

  221. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Wake me when we cut Wimbley, Huff or McClain.

    zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

    ***

    Dakota,

    how about a 3-for-1 special?

    ya know, wouldn’t it be a kick in the pants if we axed ROMAC & Blackstock … replaced them with a few undrafted rookies and they improved our Run Defense by leaps & bounds ???

  222. bcz24 Says:

    There isn’t enough monetary savings to make cutting Romac a worth while proposition.

  223. Macho Man Randy Savage Says:

    Cuts:
    Wimbley
    Kelly
    Huffy

    Might cut:
    Seymore
    McClain

    Lets get this show on the road!

  224. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Rolando McClain makes Napolean Harris, Danny Clark & Kirk Morrison look like Ray Lewis, Patrick Willis & Brian Urlacher!

    ROMAC = Blackstock = R Brown = Goethel = S Williams = R Thomas

  225. Macho Man Randy Savage Says:

    I’ll trade Romac and his salary for Sam Williams and his salary. what say you?

  226. RaiderRockstar Says:

    There isn’t enough monetary savings to make cutting Romac a worth while proposition.

    ***

    BCZ,

    you’re just looking at his salary. Whats he making in total this season?

    anybody got Adam Caplan’s e-mail address ???

  227. RaiderRockstar Says:

    I’ll trade Romac and his salary for Sam Williams and his salary. what say you?

    ***

    Macho Man,

    Run Defense would remain the same and special teams would improve. we’d save some cash too. and SW is a good locker room guy with no off-field baggage

  228. Just Fire Baby Says:

    Judging a player after two years is beyond ridiculous.

    After their first two seasons, DHB and McFadden were garbage, and Jamarcus was winning games and playing very well.

    Rolando will be awesome soon enough!!

  229. RaiderRockstar Says:

    anybody follow Adam Caplan on Twitter, that could ask him how much dough McClain is taking home this season?

    how much it would cost to keep him or ditch him?

    This (Roto) is deceiving imo

    7/29/2010: Signed a five-year, $40 million contract. The deal contains $23 million guaranteed. 2011: $405,000, 2012: $970,000, 2013: $1.535 million, 2014: $2.1 million, 2015: Free Agent

  230. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Judging a player after two years is beyond ridiculous.

    After their first two seasons, DHB and McFadden were garbage, and Jamarcus was winning games and playing very well.

    Rolando will be awesome soon enough!!

    ***

    JFB,

    JaWalrus won 9 games in 3 years with the silver & black. Hard to call the guy a “winner” imo – the comparison to Slowlando is on point though. kudos

  231. Marks hair Says:

    229. Those #s dont add up

  232. bcz24 Says:

    McClains contract #s
    Salary Signing Bonus Total
    2010 320,000 4,600,000 – 4,920,000
    2011 405,000 4,600,000 – 5,005,000
    2012 970,000 4,600,000 – 5,570,000
    2013 1,535,000 4,600,000 – 6,135,000
    2014 2,100,000 4,600,000 – 6,700,000

    I know it seems like we can get out from the bonus, but it was a signing bonus, meaning we paid it up front, and prorated the hit over the 5 years of the contract. If we cut him know, it would accelerate the cap hit on the bonus. So instead of him costing us 5.5 million this year it would actually cost us 13.8 million towards the cap. Cutting Romac would COST more than keeping him. For better or worse, we are stuck with him.

  233. Raider Dell Says:

    Interesting to read how many of the semi pro’s on the blog say to keep “BUSH” or let him go.

    I’m always looking for a good argument, so let’s compare Michael Turner who backed up LT in S.D. and faced the AFC west opponents like Michael Bush did as well.

    First Turner came into the league at a fifth round pick,2004 draft. Bush fourth rounnd, 2007 draft, placed on IR broken leg in college, wasn’t ready for NFL.

    Turner in a back up role, to LT in his four years had played in 59 games, had 228 rush attempts, 1257 yards 6 TD’S and a 5.5 yd avg per carry.

    Bush in four years in a back up role has played in 61 games, 632 attempts, 2642 yards, 21 TD’S (many he stole from DMAC, short goal line replacement) and 4.2 yd avg per carry.

    Bush due to DMAC injurys had 404 more carrys than Turner and 15 more TD’S and 1385 more yards.

    Turner signed as a FA with Atlanta for 6yr $34.5 million with $15 million guaranteed.

    The Raiders to sign Bush will not be cheap. To sign Bush would be crazy to pay him anything close to Turner with the current salary that he will be given in today’s current pay for a RB.

    Do you pay him trade him or trade DMA. Bush will not accept a minor role, his numbers are better in most areas than Michael Turner, or do you franchise him and find a trade with someone who will want him. I looked at the history of NFL trades for his career stats, as a RB. The average draft pick received for Bush will be a third round. Most RB’s that usually get traded are not feature backs, which lowers their value, regarding the draft pick a team is willing to give.

    MY personal thoughts are to find a back up to DMAC, similar to Bush, and know Taiwain Jones, is your change of pace RB, and find someone else to fill Bush role if you go the trade route. If the Raiders keep Bush, it will be a franchise tag, and the one year will be around $7 million.

    What to do, that’s up to Reggie to decide.

  234. Marks hair Says:

    Today is the first day to use the franchise tag

  235. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Russell made Campbell look like Jim Plunkett

    Campbell made Palmer look like Brett Favre (prior to the weiner pics)

  236. Marks hair Says:

    Thank you 232. Romac stays, next topic

  237. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Cutting Romac would COST more than keeping him. For better or worse, we are stuck with him

    ***

    Can he play special teams?

  238. Just Fire Baby Says:

    JaWalrus won 9 games in 3 years with the silver & black

    **********************

    Point is, he looked his best at the end of his 2nd year.

  239. Marks hair Says:

    237 he can carry the water if he doesnt get his shht together

  240. bcz24 Says:

    Doesn’t matter if he can or can’t it isn’t likely that they will play him there, and they certainly aren’t cutting him which will cost an additional 8.5 million over what he is due this year. We don’t have that luxury. We need every penny of cap space.

  241. Just Fire Baby Says:

    I think you try to bring Bush back, within reason.

    I would not frachise him, or offer him a huge contract, but I don’t think it should take that to resign him.

    Unless he leaves for less money, for more playing time.

  242. Marks hair Says:

    We shouldnt tag antbody

  243. MistaBrown Says:

    On Presidents day it would be beautiful if we could evict this marxist piece of garbage out of the WH.

  244. RaiderRockstar Says:

    MY personal thoughts are to find a back up to DMAC, similar to Bush, and know Taiwain Jones, is your change of pace RB, and find someone else to fill Bush role

    ***

    Dell, Agreed!

  245. bcz24 Says:

    I am sure they will attempt to resign Bush. He didn’t help his cause with how badly he wore down. I can tell you a very likely landing spot for him is Cincy. Hue is there now, and they have the money and will be looking to replace Ced Benson.

    In that scenario, I wouldn’t mind at all signing Benson to replace Bush

  246. Marks hair Says:

    Bush is gonzo. He will look for a team with a back he thinks he can beat. He knows he fades when dmac is around.. He’ll be in cincy with hueburt

  247. MistaBrown Says:

    M Bush will be retained because DMAC is injury prone. Plain and simple.

    Get over it.

  248. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Mr Brown,

    I saw a bumper sticker this morning that said:

    I’ll keep my guns, money and freedom. you can keep the “change”

    I love it, LOL

  249. Marks hair Says:

    245. You beat me to the board with that one

  250. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Slowlando McLazy is about as worthless as Prez BO!

    neither of them deserve a second chance :)

  251. Raider Dell Says:

    Just Fire Baby Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 8:10 am
    I think you try to bring Bush back, within reason.

    I would not frachise him, or offer him a huge contract, but I don’t think it should take that to resign him.

    Unless he leaves for less money, for more playing time.

    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
    JFB,

    This will be Bush best chance for a large contract. His age, his season performance and catches the ball well, and finally no major injurys.

    If I’m Bush it’s see you later, I want my money. Some team GM will pay, and the Raiders will only be able to Franchise him and then trade him based on his demands.

  252. MistaBrown Says:

    Thats a good one RR. Did you give a thumbs up out the window ?

  253. Marks hair Says:

    247 we cant just handcuff him to the lockers. The only way to keep bush is to overpay. No way..

  254. MistaBrown Says:

    Prez BO should be relegated to food stamps when he leaves office since he has put a record # of americans on govt assistance.
    ______

    RaiderRockstar Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 8:18 am

    Slowlando McLazy is about as worthless as Prez BO!

  255. Marks hair Says:

    We need to scout the draft class for the demarco murray

  256. Raider O Says:

    Dell,

    Good morning.
    Hard to imagine paying a backup RB $7+ million that will count against the cap, so you can trade him later (assuming teams are willing to trade for him). Teams know we are not going to pay DMAC $6 million, and then tag Bush and pay him $7 million for 1 season. They will wait for Bush to be cut.

  257. MistaBrown Says:

    Will be interesting to see if more or less season tickets are sold with this new era

    The KK’s and MR’s of the world dont buy tickets but whine the most.

  258. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Mr Brown,

    Kell mostly complained about Al Davis.

    MR mostly complains about his cousin’s refusal to sleep with him

  259. Marks hair Says:

    Bush is so gone. Say your final goodbyes to guy whos too good for fullback.

  260. Raider Dell Says:

    Just Fire Baby Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 8:10 am
    I think you try to bring Bush back, within reason.

    I would not frachise him, or offer him a huge contract, but I don’t think it should take that to resign him.

    Unless he leaves for less money, for more playing time.

    Raider O,

    Good morning to you.
    You know as a great salesman as you are, their are many people who are in the market who want something else, but buy for affordable price.

    Bush rep, will see this market and find suitors for his services. The market will dictate his value,and the role with that team will be important. I can see Bush market in St. Louis, Cinn, Balt, Pitt, and a few others as the back up. There are a few teams that need starting RB with his skills that may be interested, like WAS, NYG, Ariz, Indy, and two others.

    Their is a market for Bush, just have to detrmine if is a starter or back- up.

  261. Just Fire Baby Says:

    I just can’t say many teams throwing big money at Bush.

    He is just kind of stuck in his career. Not young, not old. Not a ton of carries, but not fresh legs. Good, but not great.

    I read some people throwing out Cincy as a possible destination. Well, we certainly know they aren’t going to throw a bunch of money at him. They don’t even pay their own players well.

  262. bcz24 Says:

    247.MistaBrown Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 8:16 am
    M Bush will be retained because DMAC is injury prone. Plain and simple.

    Get over it.
    ***********************
    Blah blah blah… Who pays their back up at ANY position more than their starter?

  263. Sweep The Leg. Says:

    I have a bumper sticker on my truck with B.O., that simply has the caption, “COMMIE!”.

  264. bcz24 Says:

    Well, we certainly know they aren’t going to throw a bunch of money at him. They don’t even pay their own players well.
    ************
    The cap minimum starts in 2013, they are going to have to make moves to start approaching that minimum now.

  265. MistaBrown Says:

    Blah blah blah?
    What are you a 12yr old girl?
    _____

    bcz24 Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 8:33 am

    Blah blah blah

  266. Raider O Says:

    The Fat Monkey wanted Veldheer to play C, started Fargas over DMAC & Bush, and wanted Bush to play FB to block for Fargas.

    Someone should slap that fat monkey!

  267. Just Fire Baby Says:

    I have a BO shirt that has his “O” on there with a L in front and back of it.

  268. Marks hair Says:

    Lets say we offer bush 6mil a yr. He’d still say no because he knows he cant beat out dmac.. Bush has an ego. He wouldnt play fullback, and he wont remain a back up..

  269. MistaBrown Says:

    OMG = O must go

  270. Marks hair Says:

    Good point 264.

  271. MistaBrown Says:

    BO is an american tragedy and a disgrace to the office.

  272. bcz24 Says:

    MistaBrown Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 8:35 am

    What are you a 12yr old girl?
    ****************
    Why yes, actually I am.

    Are you so genuinely insecure with yourself that you can’t resist pitiful attempts at insulting people on a regular basis… even online?

  273. RaiderRockstar Says:

    I just can’t say many teams throwing big money at Bush.

    He is just kind of stuck in his career. Not young, not old. Not a ton of carries, but not fresh legs. Good, but not great.

    I read some people throwing out Cincy as a possible destination. Well, we certainly know they aren’t going to throw a bunch of money at him. They don’t even pay their own players well.

    ***

    JFB makes perfect sense about 90% of the time.

    He holds a scholarship program, similar to the way Al Davis used to. He clamored for us to draft McClain and it happened. ROMAC falls flat on his face for the first two seasons and here come the excuses. still holding out for the potential to translate into production on the football field. Heyward-Bey was very raw and green, almost more like Terrelle Pryor. Him going off in Year #3 didn’t surprise me. Most young wides don’t start to get it until then.

    McClain played for Alabama under Nick Saban and was highly touted as a can’t miss pick. Most NFL ready of anybody in RD1. basically, ROMAC was Robert Gallery. We kept him on as long as we could. Moved him to different positions, changed the scheme, he agreed to several paycuts or restructures to help us. In the end, we lowballed him an offer, he balked and took the money elsewhere and was an absolute failure on his new team.

    cut the cord, JFB!

  274. MistaBrown Says:

    I figured as much.
    _____

    bcz24 Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 8:43 am

    MistaBrown Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 8:35 am

    What are you a 12yr old girl?
    ****************
    Why yes, actually I am.

  275. Just Fire Baby Says:

    I think teams will look at Bush as a former 4th rounder, and ask themselves, “do we throw money at him, or look for the next Mike Bush in this draft, and try to get him at about 25% the cost”.

    Although, as we certainly learned with Al Davis, it only takes one team to unload a ton of money to make a market for a player.

  276. ohioraider Says:

    MistaBrown Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 8:35 am

    Blah blah blah?
    What are you a 12yr old girl?
    _____

    bcz24 Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 8:33 am

    Blah blah blah
    ————————–
    Yada Yada Yada

  277. Just Fire Baby Says:

    He holds a scholarship program, similar to the way Al Davis used to

    ***********************

    I have never denied having my favorites.

    We should have drafted Javier Arenas!!!

  278. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Q: What are you a 12yr old girl?

    A: Why yes, actually I am

    ***

    BCZ,

    expect a call from Steve Alford shortly.

  279. ohioraider Says:

    I see the chicken catching comments in this thread as kind of a metaphor for signing some talented free agents. Your thoughts?

  280. RaiderRockstar Says:

    We should have drafted Javier Arenas!!!

    ***

    Dan Williams for NT!

  281. bcz24 Says:

    expect a call from Steve Alford shortly.
    ****************
    I dont get the reference. Don’t know who Steve Alford is.

  282. Raider O Says:

    Bush is not a special RB, I’m sure he can start for some teams in the league, but I doubt he will get a huge contract.

  283. bcz24 Says:

    MistaBrown Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 8:44 am
    I figured as much.
    ************************
    Does it hurt to know a 12 year old girl has a FAR superior knowledge of football to yourself?

  284. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Someone should slap that fat monkey!

    ***

    O,

    Cable was HC when we selected Rolando McClain in the Top 10. slap away!

  285. djohnnyg Says:

    Steve Alford was a former point guard for Bob Knight at Indiana and former HC at Iowa who got in trouble for inappropriate “relationship” with a young girl.

    He’s also a born again christian.

  286. Raider O Says:

    My favorite players:
    DMAC
    TP
    Ford
    Moore
    McClain
    Houston
    Wimbley
    Branch
    Chekwa & DVD

  287. Raider O Says:

    I forgot to add Matt S.

  288. RaiderRockstar Says:

    I dont get the reference. Don’t know who Steve Alford is.

    ***

    BCZ,

    he blogged on here a few years ago. BSJ remembers him. he was a dude in his late 20’s or 30’s that used to drive by high schools looking to score chicks.

    BSJ has a teenage daughter and said Steve A wasn’t welcome over to his house, unless of course he could run without fumbling or longsnap!

  289. Raider O Says:

    RR,

    McClain will be fine. Get over it. You remember your arguments about Huff? Use the same logic. It’s not McClain. It’s the scheme! lol

  290. djohnnyg Says:

    This is the first yr. I can remember getting on blogs like this so early in the offseason.

    NFL has become a yr. long diversion when it used to be I’d shut it down after the SB and figured if Al made any big moves I’d hear about it.

    I’d start thinking about NFL football in late July.

  291. djohnnyg Says:

    I still can’t “get over’ the McClain whiff on Stafford, or his long, skinny neck.

    He just doesn’t seem like the proto typical MLB.

    If his play made up for it on the field i’d be okay with him…but it doesn’t.

  292. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Steve Alford was a former point guard for Bob Knight at Indiana and former HC at Iowa who got in trouble for inappropriate “relationship” with a young girl.

    ***

    DJG,

    I’m talking about the blogger, but now I see why he chose that as his nickname.

    However, Alford the blogger was NOT a christian. I debated religion with that dude for months

  293. Raider O Says:

    RR,

    You remember our debates about Huff? I wanted him gone, and you wanted to give him more time.

  294. Raider O Says:

    McClain is 22, he was playing for a great college program & a good HC, and then he plays for the Fat Monkey & Marshall, and then he has to play for Hue & Chucky.
    I’m willing to give the kid more time.

  295. RaiderRockstar Says:

    McClain will be fine. Get over it. You remember your arguments about Huff? Use the same logic. It’s not McClain. It’s the scheme!

    ***

    O,

    did ROMAC play for the Buckeyes? did he play for SDSU?

    why do you have a mancrush on him?

    when did I say “it’s the scheme” regarding Huff?

    I said he was out of position as SS under Rob Ryan, but I’m pretty sure most in here would agree with me on that. I like Huff, but I don’t like his contract.

    I’m fine if he stays, fine if he goes.

  296. MistaBrown Says:

    Bcz, you chose to respond to my post with Blah blah blah. I didn’t force you to doit, did I? So I responded to you in kind. Thats how it works! Now you have your panties in a knot. Get you some big boy pants, k ?

    Go cry to mommy…

  297. Raider O Says:

    O,

    did ROMAC play for the Buckeyes? did he play for SDSU?

    why do you have a mancrush on him?
    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

    LOL
    I like him dude. I think he can be a great player.
    Why did you have a man crush on JLh?

  298. Raider O Says:

    I remember what you said RR. We also talked about the scheme he plays in. Single high safety for the Raiders?!

  299. RaiderRockstar Says:

    You remember our debates about Huff? I wanted him gone, and you wanted to give him more time.

    ***

    O,

    It was never about “more time” imo. You said he sucks, I said he’s a player.

    apparently we were both wrong. He is serviceable, but he’s not a Pro Bowler and he’s not a bum

    WAY overpaid though. another terrible contract courtesy of Al Davis

  300. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Why did you have a man crush on JLh?

    ***

    I miss Johnnie Lee. that kid had PLAYMAKER written all over him.

  301. Raider O Says:

    Why did you have a man crush on JLh?

    ***

    I miss Johnnie Lee. that kid had PLAYMAKER written all over him.
    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

    LMAO

  302. djohnnyg Says:

    #292,

    I do kind of remember that guy now. Interesting why that guy would choose that name.

  303. bcz24 Says:

    296.MistaBrown Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 9:04 am

    Go cry to mommy…
    ***********************
    Why you haven’t had enough from a 12 year old girl, you now what my mom to school you as well?

  304. Raider O Says:

    I agree about Huff. He is an avg player who is not worth that huge contract Al gave him.

  305. Raider O Says:

    RR,

    I never said McClain will be the next Ray Lewis. I miss F Joseph. lol

  306. RaiderRockstar Says:

    O,

    JLH was a 3rd rounder with JaWalrus as his QB

    McClain was a Top 10 pick playing behind Seymour & Kelly!

    apples & oranges imo

  307. RaiderRockstar Says:

    I never said McClain will be the next Ray Lewis. I miss F Joseph

    ***

    watching ROMAC play makes me miss Frantz Joseph as well!

  308. Raider Dell Says:

    RaiderRockstar Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 9:10 am
    You remember our debates about Huff? I wanted him gone, and you wanted to give him more time.

    ***

    O,

    It was never about “more time” imo. You said he sucks, I said he’s a player.

    apparently we were both wrong. He is serviceable, but he’s not a Pro Bowler and he’s not a bum

    WAY overpaid though. another terrible contract courtesy of Al Davis

    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
    Let’s see, Raider O has a debate with RRS, and I have a debate with Raider O on the same player, Michael Huff.

    My debate was if Huff could play corner, yet Raider O defended his position like he was his agent, and the next great corner, cause he played a little bit in Texas as a colege player. Raider O argument was to move him there to corner, cause he can’t tackle. Now I read, Raider O always thought of Huff as a player who sucked, way to be on both sides of the debate Raider O. RRS, thanks for bringing the comment up. I know now the debate was won by me, and Raider O showed his true feelings, about the player, or sort of a player.

  309. hwnrdr Says:

    DIRT-LOT FOOTBALL Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 6:03 am
    WAS THERE A MUSHROOM CLOUD THIS MORNING ?? AM I THE LAST LIVING SOUL ??

    LOL, Good Morning Nation!!!
    Dirt Lot, Bcz, Dell, O, MB…what’s up guys? Off today, hence coming in here a little later than usual…

  310. MistaBrown Says:

    Ok Bcz you took me to school with “blah blah blah”. I give up! You dropped some serious knowledge! Why NFLN hasn’t scooped you up by now is beyond me.

    lmfao

  311. MistaBrown Says:

    Hwn how it do ?

  312. hwnrdr Says:

    Doing good Mista! Just me and the kids today!

  313. Raider Dell Says:

    Hwnrdr,

    morning

  314. hwnrdr Says:

    BBL…

  315. hwnrdr Says:

    Morning Dell…just enjoying the day off! Last 3 day weekend for awhile!

  316. RaiderRockstar Says:

    My debate was if Huff could play corner, yet Raider O defended his position like he was his agent, and the next great corner, cause he played a little bit in Texas as a colege player. Raider O argument was to move him there to corner, cause he can’t tackle. Now I read, Raider O always thought of Huff as a player who sucked, way to be on both sides of the debate Raider O.

    ***

    Dell,

    some guys are just going to hate. Sort of like BSJ with DMAC & Condo. Huff is not a fit at CB imo. I think he can tackle just fine (for a safety). My issue with him is his contract. He doesn’t make enough plays to justify it. Look at Matt Giordano. We signed that guy off the street for next to nothing and he comes in with a reserve role and leads the team with 5 INT’s!

    That tells me there are plays on the football to be made and he just isn’t makng them. Decent enough in coverage and passes defensed are cool, but he’s not a game changer. I can think of 2 plays he’s made to game the outcome of ballgames since he was drafted. Sack/Fumble on Philip Rivers in 2010. Int of Matt Schaub in 2011. Anything else ???

  317. djohnnyg Says:

    As a long suffering fan, it may be selfish of me, but after all, i’m not an NFL employee, nor am i an employee of the Raiders who needs to concentrate on and worry about the business side of things and how much $ we are spending etc. Only to the extent that it affects the salary cap and things the team can do as far as signings etc.

    My job as a fan is to let THEM worry about it and me worry about turning on the TV in September and seeing a good team on the field.

    I have enuff problems.

    It’s interesting to get on here and speculate about how they will handle things as that is what this is all about, but…

    I like to hear that they are doing things everyday to get better.

    I think we know by now Herrera is leaving (or not) and Routt was let go.

  318. MistaBrown Says:

    How many?
    __

    Hwnrdr Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 9:29 am

    Doing good Mista! Just me and the kids today!

  319. Raider O Says:

    Dell,

    LMAO
    I thought Huff sucked at S, and I wanted him to move around more. Play CB, NB, and FS to take advantage of his speed and coverage skills.

  320. djohnnyg Says:

    Next time I log on i’d like to see “Raiders sign Mario Williams and Cliff Avril”.

    Mark and Amy can worry about how they’re gonna pay those guys.

    We don’t always get what we want though.

  321. 504 Raider Says:

    315.hwnrdr Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 9:30 am
    Morning Dell…just enjoying the day off! Last 3 day weekend for awhile!

    ————————————————————————————————————–

    Should’ve lived down here in the N.O.

    5 day weekend. Mardi Gras tomorrow. Got to go score a king cake to get my day started.

  322. Raider O Says:

    Hwnrdr,

    Good morning brother.

  323. hwnrdr Says:

    Mista, I have 2
    504, really…NO lets you have 5 days off for the Mardi gras?
    What’s up, O?

  324. Raider Dell Says:

    Raider O Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 9:35 am
    Dell,

    LMAO
    I thought Huff sucked at S, and I wanted him to move around more. Play CB, NB, and FS to take advantage of his speed and coverage skills.

    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

    Raider O,

    Thanks for the clarificatio. I realize now our debate was on a player who sucks, at any position.

  325. RaiderDuck Says:

    MistaBrown Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 8:42 am

    BO is an american tragedy and a disgrace to the office.

    ==============================================

    He’s a big improvement over the last guy…

  326. Raider O Says:

    I said we should use Huff the same way GB uses Woodson, because Huff had issues with tackling, but he has good speed and coverage skills.

    My point is very simple.

  327. Raider O Says:

    Huff improved his tackling, but he is not a playmaker at S. I still think we should move him around, if we keep him (I rather keep resign Branch).

  328. Raider Dell Says:

    Raider O,

    Huff sucks, get over it.

  329. Raider O Says:

    Dell,

    I can’t say he sucks now since he improved his tackling, but I like to explore different options at this point.

  330. Raider O Says:

    LMAO!!

  331. 504 Raider Says:

    Yep Hwnrdr,

    Monday, Tues, Wed are holidays here. Will Ferrell was king of (Bacchus) the parade i went to last night. It’s pretty wild down here right now.

  332. hwnrdr Says:

    504 Raider Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 10:00 am
    Yep Hwnrdr,

    Monday, Tues, Wed are holidays here. Will Ferrell was king of (Bacchus) the parade i went to last night. It’s pretty wild down here right now.

    NICE!!!

  333. Raider Dell Says:

    504 Raider Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 10:00 am
    Yep Hwnrdr,

    Monday, Tues, Wed are holidays here. Will Ferrell was king of (Bacchus) the parade i went to last night. It’s pretty wild down here right now.

    $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
    Thanks for ruining my Monday, as I lookover balance sheets and tax issues.

  334. Raider O Says:

    Hwnrdr,

    Maybe we should move to NO. Good food & music, extras days off, and Mardi Gras.
    Mardi Gras!! Hummmm ummmm
    I got lots of beeds!

  335. Raider O Says:

    Beads*

  336. 504 Raider Says:

    Here’s where I get my king cakes. Sorry you guys can’t be here to enjoy the festivities:

    https://www.randazzokingcake.com/?gclid=CNSrkNiRra4CFYuc7Qodr2ItSg

  337. RaiderRockstar Says:

    Routt’s new deal expected today

    Posted by Mike Florio (PFT)

    On Sunday morning, we reported that former Raiders cornerback Stanford Routt will soon be picking his next team.

    We now expect that decision to be finalized and formalized today.

    Routt has visited the Bills, Chiefs, and Bengals since being released by the Raiders, who made the move to avoid fully guaranteeing his $5 million base salary for 2012. (Routt nevertheless leaves with $10 million in hand and another $5 million on the way; even DeAngelo Hall thinks that’s a good haul for a short stint in Oakland.)

    Since the Chiefs play the Raiders twice per year and they face the possible departure of Brandon Carr via free agency and they use the same kind of man-to-man style with which Routt is familiar, we’ve got a feeling Routt will be wearing an arrowhead on his next helmet.

  338. 504 Raider Says:

    You guys can get the same king cakes I get. There is a baby hidden in the cake. The tradition is whoever gets the baby has to buy the next king cake.

  339. RaiderRockstar Says:

    cross Marshawn Lynch off your FA wishlist:

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/20/seahawks-deep-in-contract-talks-with-lynch-prepared-to-use-tag/

  340. Marks hair Says:

    Huff needs to go. Bad angles, bad tackling, bad coverage..

  341. Raider O Says:

    504,

    Who cares about Cake. Can we get the same girls?

  342. r8eray Says:

    With today being the first day to tag players, I could see the Raiders 1 of these two things…

    1. Tag Bush, the reason I say that is because of DMC’s history with injurys. Also, if Bush were to be tagged I could see us trading DMC to recoup some draft picks in this years draft.

    2. Tag Branch, he’s a keeper, we have greater need on defense than offense. Bush leaves for starter money, watch DMC and Jones to take care of the back field!

    Also with Routt signing today with the Chiefs I wouldn’t be surprised to see Carr in the Silver and Black!!!

    Write it down, take a picture…..

  343. Raider O Says:

    I have to see Mardi Gras in NO and the Carnival in Rio. That’s a party.

  344. Raider O Says:

    Tag Branch!

  345. hwnrdr Says:

    Raider O Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 10:05 am
    Hwnrdr,

    Maybe we should move to NO. Good food & music, extras days off, and Mardi Gras.
    Mardi Gras!! Hummmm ummmm
    I got lots of beeds!

    I know right?

  346. 504 Raider Says:

    341.Raider O Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 10:15 am
    504,

    Who cares about Cake. Can we get the same girls?

    ————————————————————————————————————–

    You gotta be down here to get that. And they were looking good out there last night I must say.

  347. bcz24 Says:

    How incrediblely awesome would it be to watch the Chiefs ‘upgrade’ their CB position going from Carr to Routt… lol. If they sign him, I hope they don’t plan on using him at nickle, he is terrible inside.

  348. toolnutz Says:

    Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter
    Former Oakland CB Stanford Routt reached agreement with the Kansas City Chiefs.

  349. M Lonetree Says:

    Huff the Tragic Longhorn
    Failed bad on D
    And stinking up the Autumn Wind
    He sucked at safety

    Huff the Tragic Longhorn
    Failed bad on D
    Now some say cornerback where
    He’d suck for all to see

    -Peter,Paul&Mary

  350. r8eray Says:

    Per a source with knowledge of the situation, he has. The source says it’s a three-year deal worth just under $20 million.

  351. RaiderRockstar Says:

    with Routt signing today with the Chiefs I wouldn’t be surprised to see Carr in the Silver and Black!!!

    Write it down, take a picture…..

    ***

    ray,

    I’ll make that swap six times a week!

  352. Raider O Says:

    Routt signed with KC!

  353. Raider O Says:

    Sign Carr!

  354. RaiderRockstar Says:

    How incrediblely awesome would it be to watch the Chiefs ‘upgrade’ their CB position going from Carr to Routt… lol. If they sign him, I hope they don’t plan on using him at nickle, he is terrible inside.

    Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter
    Former Oakland CB Stanford Routt reached agreement with the Kansas City Chiefs.

    Per a source with knowledge of the situation, he has. The source says it’s a three-year deal worth just under $20 million.

    ***

    DHB, Ford, Moore & Murphy can’t wait to play against KC!

  355. hwnrdr Says:

    RaiderRockstar Says:
    February 20th, 2012 at 10:33 am
    with Routt signing today with the Chiefs I wouldn’t be surprised to see Carr in the Silver and Black!!!

    Write it down, take a picture…..

    ***

    ray,

    I’ll make that swap six times a week!

    Exactly!!! But…they are 60 million under the cap…I can see them keeping Carr and Bowe also!

  356. Raider O Says:

    Hwnrdr,

    And still afford to sign a few big name FAs. They are $60+ million under the cap!

  357. YoungAmerican Says:

    I, too, hope the Raiders go after Brandon Carr. He can be a true #1 corner. Younger than Routt – better, too.

    Hopefully they can clear enough room to make a run at him.

    Kelly, Henderson, Eugene, Chris Johnson will have to be cut. Maybe even Huff, but something tells me Huff is smart enough to restructure. He knows exactly how many calls his agent got when he was a free agent. Palmer will restructure, too.

  358. RaiderSam Says:

    i’m wondering if a lot trades will happen on draft day…

    as for KC – they need O-lineman more than anything else….

  359. r8eray Says:

    new post

  360. RaiderSam Says:

    looking as if KC was expecting for Carr to test the market….but supposedly, there wasnt that much “interest in his services” even though he scheduled visits….

  361. RaiderSam Says:

    meaning Routt, not Brandon Carr…..

  362. RaiderSam Says:

    PASS INTERFERENCE……NUMBER 26,,THE BALL WILL BE PLACED AT THE SPOT OF THE INFRACTION.THE PLAY RESULTS IN A FIRST DOWN

    …Oh yeah get used to heading that A LOT Chief fan.

  363. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/legends_of_the_silver__black

    endurance

  364. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    uh huh

  365. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    thats the way

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  366. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    i like it

    RUMOR: We’re hearing Green Bay Center Scott Wells may be talking with Raiders after NFLN reported the long time Packer O line anchor will likely part ways.

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  367. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    amazing

  368. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    seemed like HUff was getting scorched at CB

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  369. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    you gotta

  370. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    be able

  371. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    huff gone?

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  372. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    hybrid died on the table

  373. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    guarantee no XBOXES at camp this year

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  374. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    amukamura always hurt

    raiders with no game changers

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  375. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    on D anyway

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  376. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    HUFF GOES MITCHELL STAYS

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  377. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    MITCHELL STAYS HUFF GOES

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  378. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    SAFETY DANCE

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  379. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    IF U wanna

  380. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    and I do

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  381. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    rygjh

  382. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    run with scisors

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  383. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    all day long too if U want

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  384. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    or at least till the inevitable

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  385. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    stabbing

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  386. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    hi ya!!!

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  387. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    ;;lji

  388. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    gebubf

  389. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    jello wrestling

  390. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    foxy boxing

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  391. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    and such and such

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  392. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    iu ebyee

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  393. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    village

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  394. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    jauduyd

  395. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    kjkhj

  396. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    hgooh gjgf

  397. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    crazy babies

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  398. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    the3oireticall

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  399. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    nacell

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  400. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    new star trek

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  401. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    was long

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  402. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    but good

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  403. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    for all

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  404. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    christah fah

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  405. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    walken

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  406. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    skittles

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  407. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    bite sized candies

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  408. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    good

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  409. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    for you

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  410. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    to EAT

  411. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    raiders were a handful of plays away from the play offs. It was the players tanked not Hue

    All the Hue hate comes from media who right or wrong think hes a climber

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  412. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    put that team together healthy and we challenge deep

  413. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    bit NAAAW

    The hair cut wants to destroy it all

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  414. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    the hair that ate Oakland

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  415. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    steve and co all azz kissy towatrd the new regime hopin for a bone

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  416. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    regg gonna use em till they figure it out. They claim fans important but only their money/

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  417. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    step up correct

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  418. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    carr benefits from some solid play from team amtes

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  419. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    chiggidy check it

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  420. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    welker talks at a stand still…cuz hes on vacay with Brady

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  421. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  422. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    we’ll see

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  423. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    F elizabeth hasselbeck with her right winbg unearned certitude

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  424. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    I like Griffin long term over luck

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  425. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    combine soon gross

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  426. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    off the charts

  427. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    Harrison Smith

  428. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    No to Leo Johnson

  429. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    could develop

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  430. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

    projects

  431. RaiderWeaponX Says:

    raiders lookin CBs in FA

    http://www.raidernationstation.com/raider_nation_station

  432. EXPECT RAIDERS TO MAKE MORE ROSTER MOVES BY MARCH 13 « SBreport.com Says:

    [...] Wimbley $6.5 million this season whether he is on their roster or not. Cutting him by March 17th would save the team $4.5 million. The Raiders don’t have alot to work with at linebacker, but Wimbley is the best they have. [...]

  433. online shops for electronic items Says:

    online shops for electronic items…

    [...]NFL `guarantees’ are occasionally pipe dreams – Inside the Oakland Raiders – A look inside the world of the highly classified Oakland Raiders from the writers of Bay Area News Group[...]…

  434. каталог общетематических сайтов Says:

    каталог общетематических сайтов…

    [...]NFL `guarantees’ are occasionally pipe dreams – Inside the Oakland Raiders – A look inside the world of the highly classified Oakland Raiders from the writers of Bay Area News Group[...]…

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.