<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Raiders re-sign Barnes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2012/03/21/raiders-re-sign-barnes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2012/03/21/raiders-re-sign-barnes/</link>
	<description>A look inside the world of the highly classified Oakland Raiders from the writers of Bay Area News Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:00:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: snelle manier om af te vallen</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2012/03/21/raiders-re-sign-barnes/comment-page-4/#comment-948263</link>
		<dc:creator>snelle manier om af te vallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 20:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=18914#comment-948263</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;snelle manier om af te vallen ...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]Raiders re-sign Barnes - Inside the Oakland Raiders - A look inside the world of the highly classified Oakland Raiders from the writers of Bay Area News Group[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>snelle manier om af te vallen &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]Raiders re-sign Barnes &#8211; Inside the Oakland Raiders &#8211; A look inside the world of the highly classified Oakland Raiders from the writers of Bay Area News Group[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antispy3</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2012/03/21/raiders-re-sign-barnes/comment-page-4/#comment-889075</link>
		<dc:creator>antispy3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=18914#comment-889075</guid>
		<description># 48; ah, didn&#039;t Steve Wiesniewski, legacie&#039;s uncle play LG?  Memory lapse?  Wow. . .offseason must be getting to ya. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># 48; ah, didn&#8217;t Steve Wiesniewski, legacie&#8217;s uncle play LG?  Memory lapse?  Wow. . .offseason must be getting to ya. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alzadoX</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2012/03/21/raiders-re-sign-barnes/comment-page-4/#comment-888261</link>
		<dc:creator>alzadoX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=18914#comment-888261</guid>
		<description>J Hill Says: 
March 21st, 2012 at 2:26 pm
Ok, so I guess the GM agreed with the 3 or 4 of us who said Barnes needs to be brought back if the truly the only other option was Barksdale.
Are people holding Veldheer to the same penalty standards? You do realize he had just as many penalties as Barnes AND they were the holding types instead of simple 5 yard false starts.
Cmon now … Be fair, lol.
******************

BARNES=REALITY
below should be fair enough

AlzadoX Says: 
March 21st, 2012 at 12:43 pm

BARNES IS BACK DEAL WITH IT RAIDER NATION
most improved player on 2011 Raider team check it out
AlzadoX Says:
March 19th, 2012 at 10:59 am
Raider O Says:
March 19th, 2012 at 10:56 am
Stop promoting Barnes. You People are making me sick!
Barnes?!
Should we bring Harris too?
************************************
Dude, check it out
Preseason 2011, 1st game, 1st quarter, Barnes committed like 3 false starts in 4 plays.
Was at best, false start waiting to end
Now at worst false start waiting to happen
Can’t say that’s not improvement
AlzadoX Says:
March 19th, 2012 at 11:46 am
Khalif Barnes 2011 Raiders RT sacks allowed 3.5 for 15.5 yards; penalties 11 false start 6 holds 3 16 games started. Not bad stats
Last year our OL had low sacks &amp; good run blocking but high penalties. Not bad. I think a key was bringing a lot of decent players in to compete best start worst cut.
Khalif less holds than most of our OLs in 2011 sad to say
http://www.profootballweekly.com/players/khalif-barnes-148729/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J Hill Says:<br />
March 21st, 2012 at 2:26 pm<br />
Ok, so I guess the GM agreed with the 3 or 4 of us who said Barnes needs to be brought back if the truly the only other option was Barksdale.<br />
Are people holding Veldheer to the same penalty standards? You do realize he had just as many penalties as Barnes AND they were the holding types instead of simple 5 yard false starts.<br />
Cmon now … Be fair, lol.<br />
******************</p>
<p>BARNES=REALITY<br />
below should be fair enough</p>
<p>AlzadoX Says:<br />
March 21st, 2012 at 12:43 pm</p>
<p>BARNES IS BACK DEAL WITH IT RAIDER NATION<br />
most improved player on 2011 Raider team check it out<br />
AlzadoX Says:<br />
March 19th, 2012 at 10:59 am<br />
Raider O Says:<br />
March 19th, 2012 at 10:56 am<br />
Stop promoting Barnes. You People are making me sick!<br />
Barnes?!<br />
Should we bring Harris too?<br />
************************************<br />
Dude, check it out<br />
Preseason 2011, 1st game, 1st quarter, Barnes committed like 3 false starts in 4 plays.<br />
Was at best, false start waiting to end<br />
Now at worst false start waiting to happen<br />
Can’t say that’s not improvement<br />
AlzadoX Says:<br />
March 19th, 2012 at 11:46 am<br />
Khalif Barnes 2011 Raiders RT sacks allowed 3.5 for 15.5 yards; penalties 11 false start 6 holds 3 16 games started. Not bad stats<br />
Last year our OL had low sacks &amp; good run blocking but high penalties. Not bad. I think a key was bringing a lot of decent players in to compete best start worst cut.<br />
Khalif less holds than most of our OLs in 2011 sad to say<br />
<a href="http://www.profootballweekly.com/players/khalif-barnes-148729/" rel="nofollow">http://www.profootballweekly.com/players/khalif-barnes-148729/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Oracle</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2012/03/21/raiders-re-sign-barnes/comment-page-4/#comment-887970</link>
		<dc:creator>The Oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 20:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=18914#comment-887970</guid>
		<description>148.RaiderRockstar Says: 
March 21st, 2012 at 12:07 pm 
IN: Bartell, Spencer, Underwood &amp; Lee

OUT: Routt, CJ37, Sheppard &amp; Eugene

I’m cool with it!

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I second that opinion.
The least confortable cut (IMO)on that list would be CJ. I think the groin injuries that were apparent in the Buffalo game and kept him out were not fully healed when he bagan playing again. Add the sister murder and you have a defeated person...
I think CJ was a solid backup, not a dependable starter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>148.RaiderRockstar Says:<br />
March 21st, 2012 at 12:07 pm<br />
IN: Bartell, Spencer, Underwood &amp; Lee</p>
<p>OUT: Routt, CJ37, Sheppard &amp; Eugene</p>
<p>I’m cool with it!</p>
<p>xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<br />
I second that opinion.<br />
The least confortable cut (IMO)on that list would be CJ. I think the groin injuries that were apparent in the Buffalo game and kept him out were not fully healed when he bagan playing again. Add the sister murder and you have a defeated person&#8230;<br />
I think CJ was a solid backup, not a dependable starter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r8dercain</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2012/03/21/raiders-re-sign-barnes/comment-page-4/#comment-887855</link>
		<dc:creator>r8dercain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=18914#comment-887855</guid>
		<description>Vel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John David Booty</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2012/03/21/raiders-re-sign-barnes/comment-page-4/#comment-887836</link>
		<dc:creator>John David Booty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=18914#comment-887836</guid>
		<description>We say the same thing about Barnes every offseason.  And he comes back and sucks every season hes been here.  And during every season, we always say how we cant wait until Barnes is gone.  Sorry, Ive seen enough of Barnes.  Seen him kill enough drives with false starts and holds.  He is not going to all of the sudden get better this season.  Id rather take my chances on another lineman.  We know EXACTLY what we have in Barnes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We say the same thing about Barnes every offseason.  And he comes back and sucks every season hes been here.  And during every season, we always say how we cant wait until Barnes is gone.  Sorry, Ive seen enough of Barnes.  Seen him kill enough drives with false starts and holds.  He is not going to all of the sudden get better this season.  Id rather take my chances on another lineman.  We know EXACTLY what we have in Barnes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alzadoX</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2012/03/21/raiders-re-sign-barnes/comment-page-4/#comment-887827</link>
		<dc:creator>alzadoX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=18914#comment-887827</guid>
		<description>BARNES IS BACK DEAL WITH IT RAIDER NATION

most improved player on 2011 Raider team check it out


AlzadoX Says: 
March 19th, 2012 at 10:59 am
Raider O Says:
March 19th, 2012 at 10:56 am
Stop promoting Barnes. You People are making me sick!
Barnes?!
Should we bring Harris too?
************************************
Dude, check it out
Preseason 2011, 1st game, 1st quarter, Barnes committed like 3 false starts in 4 plays.
Was at best, false start waiting to end
Now at worst false start waiting to happen
Can’t say that’s not improvement
AlzadoX Says: 
March 19th, 2012 at 11:46 am
Khalif Barnes 2011 Raiders RT sacks allowed 3.5 for 15.5 yards; penalties 11 false start 6 holds 3 16 games started. Not bad stats
Last year our OL had low sacks &amp; good run blocking but high penalties. Not bad. I think a key was bringing a lot of decent players in to compete best start worst cut.
Khalif less holds than most of our OLs in 2011 sad to say
http://www.profootballweekly.com/players/khalif-barnes-148729/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BARNES IS BACK DEAL WITH IT RAIDER NATION</p>
<p>most improved player on 2011 Raider team check it out</p>
<p>AlzadoX Says:<br />
March 19th, 2012 at 10:59 am<br />
Raider O Says:<br />
March 19th, 2012 at 10:56 am<br />
Stop promoting Barnes. You People are making me sick!<br />
Barnes?!<br />
Should we bring Harris too?<br />
************************************<br />
Dude, check it out<br />
Preseason 2011, 1st game, 1st quarter, Barnes committed like 3 false starts in 4 plays.<br />
Was at best, false start waiting to end<br />
Now at worst false start waiting to happen<br />
Can’t say that’s not improvement<br />
AlzadoX Says:<br />
March 19th, 2012 at 11:46 am<br />
Khalif Barnes 2011 Raiders RT sacks allowed 3.5 for 15.5 yards; penalties 11 false start 6 holds 3 16 games started. Not bad stats<br />
Last year our OL had low sacks &amp; good run blocking but high penalties. Not bad. I think a key was bringing a lot of decent players in to compete best start worst cut.<br />
Khalif less holds than most of our OLs in 2011 sad to say<br />
<a href="http://www.profootballweekly.com/players/khalif-barnes-148729/" rel="nofollow">http://www.profootballweekly.com/players/khalif-barnes-148729/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HairyBush</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2012/03/21/raiders-re-sign-barnes/comment-page-4/#comment-887805</link>
		<dc:creator>HairyBush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=18914#comment-887805</guid>
		<description>@Dakota, Who are you refering too?


Too funny…these guys have zero clue how the Raiders could have kept guys like Routt and Wimbley and went on to fill out the roster, but they expect Reggie to somehow do so.

Dumbest fans in America too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dakota, Who are you refering too?</p>
<p>Too funny…these guys have zero clue how the Raiders could have kept guys like Routt and Wimbley and went on to fill out the roster, but they expect Reggie to somehow do so.</p>
<p>Dumbest fans in America too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaiderRockstar</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2012/03/21/raiders-re-sign-barnes/comment-page-4/#comment-887804</link>
		<dc:creator>RaiderRockstar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=18914#comment-887804</guid>
		<description>new post ladies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new post ladies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dakota</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2012/03/21/raiders-re-sign-barnes/comment-page-4/#comment-887797</link>
		<dc:creator>Dakota</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/?p=18914#comment-887797</guid>
		<description>guest123 Says: 
March 21st, 2012 at 12:23 pm 
HairyBush Says:
 March 21st, 2012 at 12:14 pm
 guest123 Says:
 March 21st, 2012 at 12:08 pm
 —————
 I could see signing Branch long term because of his age. Seymour doesn’t make tons of sense to me, Unless Big Reg is going to be doing some wheeling and dealing around the draft. If I’m a betting man I’m saying there won’t be any big moves this year.
 
*******
 
Do you see anyone taking him off our hands, especially since we paid him all that up-front bonus money for this year? I don’t see any wheeling and dealing that will move Seymour’s deal. We’re stuck with him imo.
 
——————-
 when I said wheeling and dealing I was not refering to Sey, No one in there right mind would take him. I was just saying that maybe keeping Seymour would make more sense if Big reg was going to add more significent pieces to the team this year. Then I could understand keeping Seymour because Big Reg truly intended on making this more than a rebuiding year. As I said, I highly doubt that will happen.
 
**************
 
I think the proofs in the pudding, so to speak. We are all optimistic of the new regime and new structure, but if Reggie Mac’s going to tighten up the pursestrings…..there is no way…..
 
no way…
 
that anyone can interpret the Raiders 2012 offseason moves as anything but cap-clearing, rebuilding, look to 2013 moves. 

Reggie Mac’s shooting blanks and forgot to load the gun.
++++++++++++++++++++++++

Too funny...these guys have zero clue how the Raiders could have kept guys like Routt and Wimbley and went on to fill out the roster, but they expect Reggie to somehow do so.

Dumbest fans in America too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>guest123 Says:<br />
March 21st, 2012 at 12:23 pm<br />
HairyBush Says:<br />
 March 21st, 2012 at 12:14 pm<br />
 guest123 Says:<br />
 March 21st, 2012 at 12:08 pm<br />
 —————<br />
 I could see signing Branch long term because of his age. Seymour doesn’t make tons of sense to me, Unless Big Reg is going to be doing some wheeling and dealing around the draft. If I’m a betting man I’m saying there won’t be any big moves this year.</p>
<p>*******</p>
<p>Do you see anyone taking him off our hands, especially since we paid him all that up-front bonus money for this year? I don’t see any wheeling and dealing that will move Seymour’s deal. We’re stuck with him imo.</p>
<p>——————-<br />
 when I said wheeling and dealing I was not refering to Sey, No one in there right mind would take him. I was just saying that maybe keeping Seymour would make more sense if Big reg was going to add more significent pieces to the team this year. Then I could understand keeping Seymour because Big Reg truly intended on making this more than a rebuiding year. As I said, I highly doubt that will happen.</p>
<p>**************</p>
<p>I think the proofs in the pudding, so to speak. We are all optimistic of the new regime and new structure, but if Reggie Mac’s going to tighten up the pursestrings…..there is no way…..</p>
<p>no way…</p>
<p>that anyone can interpret the Raiders 2012 offseason moves as anything but cap-clearing, rebuilding, look to 2013 moves. </p>
<p>Reggie Mac’s shooting blanks and forgot to load the gun.<br />
++++++++++++++++++++++++</p>
<p>Too funny&#8230;these guys have zero clue how the Raiders could have kept guys like Routt and Wimbley and went on to fill out the roster, but they expect Reggie to somehow do so.</p>
<p>Dumbest fans in America too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
