Part of the Bay Area News Group

Reggie McKenzie Q&A

By Jerry McDonald - NFL Writer
Monday, March 26th, 2012 at 4:00 pm in Oakland Raiders.

A transcript of Raiders general manager Reggie McKenzie’s conference call with Bay Area media after the Raiders were awarded three compensatory selections in this year’s NFL draft:

What do you guys want? Yes. We’re not here to talk about my new picks, are we?

Q: Said you didn’t understand the formula, but is that what you expected, or did you not have any idea?

McKenzie: Let me tell you something. Whatever the formula is, I love this formula. I love it. I thought I would possibly get a three, a high one for Nnamdi, and the others, obviously, this is better than what I expected. So I’m extremely excited about the compensatory picks that the league has afforded the Raiders. Hopefully we can make due and have some good picks from this.

Q: Is a No.3 pick in your eyes a potential starter?

McKenzie: Yes. The No. 3 pick, the No. 4 pick, honestly, guys, when you set the board, you try to sete it to where you can have some possible starters through the fifth round. If you get lucky with a college free agent, seventh round, I’ve been fortunate to have some good fortune with latter picks in my 18-year career. I’m not going to just limit it to the third round. Ok, you’ve got a third so you’ve go tone opportunity to get a starter. I don’t want to go into this draft like that. I want to get some good players that we can try and get as many possible starters as possible. Whether they’re first-year starters, second or third year. I want to get to get some guys that got the potential to be starters. Don’t tie me down just to the third round.

Q: Coming into offseason, knowing you were going to get comp picks, did that any way change your approach to free agency?

McKenzie: No, it really didn’t. It really did not. I’m trying to build a team, so the more the merrier. If I see a possible free agent that we feel like, man we can do this, and this deal is pretty good. I’m going to do it in free agency, regardless of what we have in the draft. But that’s not going to minimize what I do in the draft, even if I sign an unrestricted free agent offensive lineman. That’s not going to say, I’m not going to draft one. I don’t look at it like that. I’m still looking for great backups who can become starters at every position. So I need a lot more picks than what I have now and some more free agent moves. The only thing I wish I had more of was NFL money and NFL cap. That’s what I wish I had more of.

Q: What do you do from here going forward in regards to clearing more space to add pieces to puzzle?

McKenzie: Not a whole lot this year. I think the bulk of it has been done. Now it’s just, you try to wait it out and see who the best fit for these 53 guys in the long run to make this team and then try to figure out, at this point its going to be production and talent. It’s not about money, money, money, as far as the comings and goings of players . . . the goings, mainly.

Q: Is the amount of picks you go into this draft with or is there a chance of trading existing players for picks?

McKenzie: that could be possible. I never close the door on trades. I really don’t. That door is always open, and so to answer your question, yes that could be a possibility.

Q: Overall how deep do you think this draft is and do you think at end of 3rd round could still land you a talented player?

McKenzie: I think there’s very good players in the middle rounds. So, from a standpoint of depth, I think it’s there. I don’t’ know as far as certain positions in the first two rounds it may not be as deep at certain spots, but for the most part there’s some good players throughout the draft.

Q: Throughout years at Green Bay , how many years did you spend on pro personnel, how much in college with draft, and how much doing both?

McKenzie: I did both a lot of times. My first year there, I began in pro personnel, so that was the brunt of my work. But when the scouting meetings started, I was heavily involved, in bringing guys in for visits, and from watching film in the meetings with the coaching, and putting the board together. So I was a part of that process early. I probably didn’t get started doing college scouting as far as going on the road and being a part of the pre-draft, the pre-combine scouting meetings until after about seven years. The last 10, 12 years I was part of that. The last 12 years, exactly. So that’s different. In saying that. I’ve always been involved in both. Always oversaw all the pro, from a free agent standpoint, and just the evaluation of my own team, which is I think is highly important, so it’s been a process, now. I’ve done this for quite some time but this is my show now so it’s going to be fun.

Q: Stepped in to new role this year, has it been frustrating spending with cap limitations and haven’t been able to go out sign free agents you wanted to get?

McKenzie: It’s not frustrating, it really isn’t. But you always like to have a comfort level, and to me, having cap, having cash, it gives you a comfort. So it’s teaching me how to manage money so to speak. This is good. This is good for me, learning how to deal on the fly with certain adverse situations. I think, initially now, we’re able to handle it so far. Hopefully, what I don’t want to do is allow this to get us in the end, but I always want to be in position, if we need to add a quality player, for a certain, and we feel it works out, financially, cap-wise, then sure, I want to be in position to make a move. And that’s my whole outlook, when we had to make certain cuts, we do it, with a future plan that we had. So far, it’s working accordingly.

Q: Still looking to add CB Pat Lee?

McKenzie: Yes.

Q: Said starting outside linebacker priority, speaking free agency or in draft?

McKenzie: Hey, let me tell you something. I will take it any way I can get it. If I can get it in free agency. In free agency, it has to work out contractually. If it don’t work out, I’m not tying my hands down to either/or. But still, regardless, I’m going to use the draft the best available player, and if it’s at position that we’re strong, so be it. If we think that’s the best guy, it’s the difference between adding solid starters and difference-makers. If I have a chance to get a difference-maker, we’re going to get ‘em. Whether it’s the draft, it’s hard to sign difference-makers if you don’t have money. If we have the potential to get some solid starters in free agency, still, I’m going to do it.

Q: The releases made so far, were those about production or lack of or was it about cap situation?

McKenzie: A little bit of both. When you talk about production versus a salary, in this business, once you get into the NFL, let’s fact it, guys, the contract and production, all of that goes hand in hand. If something is not matching, or it’s kind of out of whack, you’re going to have to be forced to make a decision. That’s what I was coming up to. It was not just all just either/or. If the production’s not there, but the guys’ making the minimum, then so be it, you can use this guy as the backup because of the contract. But when the thing doesn’t work out, contractually and production, you gotta be forced to evaluate. That’s after every season, we’re all up against that, gotta be evaluated. That’s where I made my decisions. It wasn’t, well, you’re costing too much money you’ve got to go, no, if the guy was highly productive and we could make it work, we’ll try to make it work, financially, but if not we’re going to have to make certain decisions and some tough decisions, which we did.’

Q: As you build, do you envision this team being stronger this year or take it 2-3 years to get your plan in place?

McKenzie: Honestly, I envision it being stronger.

Q: Tight end to position, elected to let Kevin Boss go, could you be comfortable with three TEs on roster or looking adding more?

McKenzie: I’m comfortable with it, but yes, I do want to continue to add. I’m not just going to, at any position really, just say, OK, I’m good there and I’m not going to add a guy. I’d like to add another guy there to compete.

Q: Is this a good draft for LBs as opposed to years past? A deep draft?

McKenzie: There are some good linebackers. Is it deep? I wouldn’t say that, but there are some good linebackers in this draft.

Q: How much does Peyton Manning being in Denver change the dynamics of the division, and to the extent that even in personnel evaluation and decision-making you might have an eye to that?

McKenzie: You know, the one thing I can say is I have a great admiration for Peyton. Now, do we have to put in a game plan for defending Peyton rather than Tebow? Absolutely. Guys, face it. This guy in the division, if he’s healthy and hitting on all cylinders physically, he’s going to be a good football player in our division. We’re going to have to find ways to slow him down. Yeah, I mean, the coaching staff, that’s going to be a challenge. And players that you add, do we have to make sure as far as cornerbacks are they going to have to be on their Ps and Qs on how they cover guys and timing and all that, absolutely. But are we going to be scared of him? Absolutely not.

  • Share/Bookmark

[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]

  • http://www.raiderettes.com Sullivan44

    Raider O,

    What Zimmerman did is a “real issue”, too.

  • papertiger418

    Speaking of losers, Chris Simms just joined the Patriots coaching staff, per PFT.

  • http://www.raiderettes.com Sullivan44

    testing…

  • Chris in NY

    Sullivan44 Says:
    March 26th, 2012 at 8:09 pm
    Raider O, most black people are murdered as a result of drug related crimes, or robberies. And I agree, that is a problem everyone should be addressing. What Zimmerman did was different. He saw a black kid wearing a hoodie, stalked him, accosted him, tried to physically subdue him without warrant, then shot the kid when he tried to fight back. That is pure chaos, and it’s a brand of racism most Americans thought that this country had moved past. This needs to be addressed just as much as black on black crime, and as you can see, it will be.

    ————————-

    That’s the narrative the media’s been pushing, but there’s a good chance it’s completely inaccurate.

    My gut feeling (based on the little we do know): Zimmerman felt the kid was up to something, which he may or may not have been. Approached him out of the blue and said “who are you, what are you doing here.” Not clear at that point if the kid didn’t like Zimmerman’s tone or attitude or what (or maybe Zimmerman already had his gun drawn) and the kid took a swing at him and then started bashing the back of his head into the pavement. Maybe the kid was grabbing for the gun. Maybe not. Zimmerman gets control long enough to fire off one shot in the struggle. Turns out to be fatal.

    Still a lot of holes in that and if Zimmerman did have his gun drawn would make all the difference in the world. Or who initiated the physical confrontation. But it now sounds as if that scenario of confusion, fear, and an escalating struggle on both sides that ended in tragedy is much more close to the truth than the media’s attempt to depict it as a “white-hispanic” man pulled up on an innocent kid (who we’re blatantly trying to portray as a helpless 12-year-old with this picture) and gunned him down because he was wearing a hoodie.

  • Just Fire Baby

    The “issue” is more the law than the actions.

    Zimmerman is very much smack dab in the middle of the grey area of a bizarre law.

    Just months ago, in Florida as well, a hispanic guy chased down someone who was burgalarizing his house, chased him 3 blocks down the road and stabbed him 10 times and killed him.

    No charges were filed.

    Got to love the South.

  • http://www.raiderettes.com Sullivan44

    JFB,

    You don’t hate on the winners in life?

    Last I checked the president beat McCain in a landslide. You’ve been hating since day one.

  • http://www.Raiders.com KoolKell

    We’re all in this thing, together. that’s what some of you people, don’t want to hear.

  • http://www.raiderettes.com Sullivan44

    Chris in NY, where did you hear that Martin was bashing Zimmerman’s head into the pavement?

    The media.

    The same media you accuse of having a bias against Zimmerman.

  • http://www.raiders.com Raider O

    Sully,

    Let me give you an example. An Iraqi woman was killed in El Cajon last week. Her 17 yo daughter found her laying in a pool of blood with a note that said “go back to your home your terrorists). How come this is not national news?
    Btw, her husband works with the US military.
    The media tells people to jump, and they ask how high. That’s my point.

  • Just Fire Baby

    Last I checked the president beat McCain in a landslide. You’ve been hating since day one.

    ******************************

    I appreciate BO’s rag to riches story, and it is inspirational to every child in this country.

    Just don’t agree with his policy, other than extending the Bush tax cuts and keeping Guatanamo open.

  • papertiger418

    I think the only media coverage we should be whining about is that which is related to the Tebow presser; NFLN is now a 24hr Tebow screensaver.

  • http://www.raiderettes.com Sullivan44

    Raider O, don’t disagree. But the media seems to skew facts that serve both sides of each issue. Like, for instance, Zimmerman. Yes, on one hand they’re only showing pictures of Martin from when he was 10. On the other hand, they’re hiding Zimmerman’s criminal past (and the fact that Martin has no criminal record to speak of). It cuts both ways. The media’s about money.

  • DJ Johnny

    188.8RaiderReign8 Says:
    March 26th, 2012 at 7:52 pm
    See it’s like this…

    Hispanic = Spain = Europe = Caucasian

    Or…like this:

    Pew Hispanic Center
    Demographic Profiles of U.S. Hispanics by Country of Origin
    September 16, 2009

    More than eight-in-ten Hispanics self-identify themselves as being either of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Salvadoran or Dominican origin. Hispanics of Mexican origin are by far the largest group, accounting for nearly two-thirds of the Hispanic population in the U.S.

  • Twocents

    Seymour, it is clear to me what the majority of “Americans” want. Security, an easy life at the expense of others and world domination so that they can get scarce recourses at a bargain price.
    Others have tried that course and they have failed and those that follow that path deserve what they get.

  • http://www.raiderettes.com Sullivan44

    You said you don’t hate on winners, JFB. You’re one of the biggest haters of the president in here. He got more votes in 2008 than any candidate in history, plus he commanded the military that toe tagged Bin Ladin. Still, nothing but hate from you. So I just don’t know if I buy your claim that you give props to the winners and hate the losers, etc.

  • Chris in NY

    Sullivan44 Says:
    March 26th, 2012 at 8:45 pm
    Chris in NY, where did you hear that Martin was bashing Zimmerman’s head into the pavement?

    The media.

    The same media you accuse of having a bias against Zimmerman.

    —————————-

    Fair enough. But this came out after days if not weeks of the national media beating the drum of racism, little kid gunned down for no reason, southern law enforcement turning a blind eye only because the kid was black, etc.

    This account makes far more sense. The initial media account was much too simplistic and sensationalistic. Just never seemed plausible to me. This new depiction — based on reports of witness verification of Zimmerman’s story — is far more plausible to me.

    Now if Zimmerman came up on the kid with his gun drawn, acting aggressive, etc., then the kid has every right to deck him and try to beat him down for his own self defense. But even in that case I don’t buy it as a hate crime assassination of a kid. It’s more likely a mixture of bad judgment, pride, fear, etc. by one or both parties.

  • http://www.raiderettes.com Sullivan44

    Chris, the same national media that “beat the drum of racism” also withheld Zimmerman’s criminal record, which includes assaulting a cop and a woman.

  • Twocents

    Sully, are you paid to regurgitate statist propaganda or do you really belive it?

  • Pingback: Oakland Raiders Links That You’ll Want To See March 26, 2012 | Raiders Central | Oakland Raiders Blog

  • JR

    None of it belongs on a blog called “Inside the Oakland Raiders,”

    Raider O Says:
    March 26th, 2012 at 8:27 pm

    I thought I was talking about race and society issues. Only an uneducated monkey would confuse that with politics.