GForce21 Says:
August 5th, 2012 at 7:48 pm

Lets see how he performs in a conventional D instead of having to play single high safety before we write him off.

The list of people who have come here and failed playing our (Al’s) version of FS is quite long (and littered with high draft picks).

___________________________________

Lol….whatever…I’ve heard that statement by people before….do you have any of your own thoughts on the matter?

A High Man Safety should have the highest number of opportunities to make plays because everyone else is in man….He can roam free (if he prepares) and only get credit and never have to assume responsibility because he is “FREE”.

——————–

Yep, and if you are out of position its your fault because you are the last line of defense. So, what defines out of position when your responsibility is the whole field?

I bet it was really cool when you could place an athlete at FS in the 70s and 80s and say run to the ball, but today all receivers seem to run 4.4.

Who was the last really successful safety we had that executed (primarily) single high and was a threat to go to the pro bowl? I mean, besides Huff who almost went two years ago.

————————————————————

Might be a valid point if Huff played that position in passing situations regularly. But he’s played just as much corner, cover 2, SS, and other experimental positions in past years.

Do you:

A) Come in to the facility every goddamn day and work with the staff to get your weight down and your cardiovascular conditioning up, or

B) Sit at home, play PS3, eat cheeseburgers, and assume there’s NO WAY they’d get rid of you.

Ivey picked wrong. Buh-bye, you worthless sack of crap.

————————————————————

When did that happen?

Him talking about the new scheme like ALL the players are was not talking S about AD, imo.

YOLO!