GM Reggie McKenzie on free agency

Caught up with Raiders general manager Reggie McKenzie following San Jose State’s pro day Thursday. Topics included the Raiders progress in free agency, his thoughts on the Rodger Saffold deal falling through, the departures of Jared Veldheer and Lamar Houston and the future of the quarterback position in Oakland. A transcription of McKenzie’s first interview since the start of free agency:

Q: You’ve concentrated your efforts on picking up a lot of players between 29 and 31 years old who have experience playing in big games. How would you assess how free agency has gone so far?

McKenzie: You can’t assess it until the end of the season, to be honest with you and what we’re trying to do is add some veteran leadership. Guys who have some production, and just make sure we upgrade this team. And that’s the bottom line, trying to upgrade the team through production and the leadership. We’ve got some young guys on this team and we want to try and get that good mix, try to build. Hopefully building up front will help.

Q: Do you feel you have a good head start on that process?

McKenzie: We definitely got a head start. Instead of waiting until the draft, or later in this offseason, if you have an opportunity to get a guy, try to go after him and then you’re hopeful that you can land some of these guys. Sometimes you can’t. Sometimes you can.

Q: How much of a setback was losing the Saffold deal and letting Veldheer get away? The outside perception is that t his was a big blunder for the Raiders . . .

McKenzie: No, no. That stuff happens. I’ve been in situations before where guys fail physicals. That’s the way it is. Now, we would have loved to have kept all of our guys that we lost, but it’s their decision whether to go or to stay and it was unfortunate that their decision was to leave. You have to respect that.

Q: There were reports that it was Mark Davis that pulled out of the Saffold deal . . .

McKenzie: Our medical people make that call and we go by what our medical people say. We made that decision based on that.

Q: Another term associated with that deal was `buyer’s remorse,’ that the you thought better of bringing in Saffold at that price . . .

McKenzie: Oh, no. Noooo. There’s a good reason why I really don’t spend a whole lot of time _ no disrespect _ reading a whole lot (about the Raiders). I get fed a whole lot of information about what’s going on. But I do know that we listen to our medical people and a risk is a risk, and that’s the bottom line. That’s what we go with and that’s what we go with, we make our decision that way.

Q: Andrew Brandt of ESPN, who you worked with in Green Bay, said having a player failing a physical in one place and passing it in another is really not all that unusual . . .

McKenzie: It happens all the time. We pass guys that other teams fail. It just depends on the nature of it and if their medical people see something different. Sometimes we may pass one of our own because we know all the stuff that he went through versus another team may not pass our guy. That will always happen. Always.

Q: But you had it within your grasp to keep Veldheer or Houston if you wanted to and you didn’t use the franchise tag . . .

McKenzie: No, that was not an issue there. You talk about, you can try and place a value on the franchise tag, I want to keep these guys for more than one year. I didn’t want to rent ‘em for a year. That’s not the way we do it. The key is if the players want to be here. If they don’t want to be here, we have to move on.

Q: You’ve addressed this before, but there’s the perception that Veldheer and Houston weren’t `Reggie’s guys,’ that they weren’t drafted by you . . .

McKenzie: Oh, no. That has zero to do with it. I’d love to have those guys. I don’t care who drafts them, it really doesn’t matter expect. All that matters is their production on the field, that determines whether they come or go. And those two guys, they were good, solid players for us. That’s why we wanted them to stay. But they got their opportunity and they took it.

Q: At the end of the season, you sounded a little pessimistic about McFadden returning, saying he was going to test the market _ which I guess he did _ were you pleasantly surprised he would come back?

McKenzie: We had no clue how the other teams thought. Was he going to get a long-term contract? Did he even want a long-term contract? If they were going to go after him, how were they going to go about it? What kind of contract were they going to give him? I think we were very competitive that way and it helps that he wanted to be here. That’s why he’s here.

Q: Do you think you know at this moment who your quarterback will be in 2014?

McKenzie: Do I have an idea? I have a really good idea. Do you want me to tell you?

Q: Of course . . . but you have to have to have options, because it’s got to be someone who wants to be here or can be here . . .

McKenzie: The bottom line still is the guy’s got to come I and compete, show the team, his teammates, the staff, that he can do it. There’s always going to be competition. I hope it’s strong competition. But at the end of the day, I have a good idea.

Q: Donald Penn put out on Twitter today he is a Raider _ I don’t know if Raiders have confirmed but assume you will today . . . .

McKenzie: I know as of last night and early this morning, he was going over everything with his agent. When I left it was on its way to being done. I’m sure we’re close to having everything agreed to. Hopefully it’s a done deal. Outside of I haven’t seen the signature yet, that’s the only thing I’m waiting on.

Q: How beneficial to have a guy with that kind of durability and pedigree for a guy like Menelik Watson to learn from?

McKenzie: All these guys. A guy like James Jones, we’ve got a young receiving corps. And James Jones will do wonders for that group. The O-line. We’ve got some young guys. We added some veteran guys and hopefully the right type of guys that are guys can see and learn from. That’s what it’s about. We have Wiz and Khalif, to me we needed more, and hopefully, at all those positions, our young guys can learn from the veterans that we brought in, and the veterans that have been here. They all need to jell together.

Q: That part of it gets tricky . . . the top teams view free agency to fill a couple of holes and build from within. That’s the way I assume you want to do it as well _ but you’re going to rely on a lot of new faces again . . .

McKenzie: I think it helps if you have the right type of guys. I really do. If you have the right type of guys, that type of transition won’t be as difficult as some would think.

Q: Did you hear the San Jose State fan begging you to draft David Fales?

McKenzie: Yeah, I heard that (laughs).

Q: What did you see from him today that you liked?

McKenzie: I thought he had a good day. I the quarterback coach, Terry Shea, put him through just about every possible situation, every possible throw that he would have to make and what he displayed is he can make all the throws. I thought he did a good job showing himself. A lot of scouts were here to see it. It was good for him, good for him.

Q: Is (quarterback coach and former SJSU offensive coordinator) John DeFilippo pushing you to draft him?

McKenzie: He definitely knows the guy very well. We spent time with him at the Senior Bowl and we know him pretty well. But we’ve got good handle on the kid and I just wanted to make sure I got a chance to see him in front of his own, and in his own setting.

Q: Dennis Allen has been in Louisville watching Teddy Bridgewater and in Florida watching Blake Bortles. Is Manziel next up for Allen?

McKenzie: Yeah, Manziel is next and we’ve got Carr tomorrow.

Q: Are you going to Stanford or see Carr?

McKenzie: I’ll probably go see Carr.


Jerry McDonald - NFL Writer

  • Dakota

    Great…I guess.

  • 0ak R8rs

    Be very ironic if we did all of our groundwork for ten days in FA, then signed a big day 1 type of FA at the end. Not sure of ironic is the right word actually…..

  • JV.

    If we were to get Allen, tuck, smith and sims on the same dline….I think I’d start the 2014 Super Bowl movement.

  • 0ak R8rs

    I’m sure I’m missing someone, but besides Jano and Lechler, was Woodson our last solid pick? 16 years ago?

  • Purvisman/Eternal Optimist
  • SaintKaufman

    I also love and agree with what he says about CNN coverage.

  • Purvisman/Eternal Optimist

    Bush in the 4th?

  • scooboy

    Didn’t say, all it says it was a 2 yr deal

  • 0ak R8rs

    Easy. Still no QB or RBs or experienced TEs. We have a ways to go. Looking interesting tho. That’s for sure.

  • JV.

    Nnamdi, Reece , zach miller..

  • 0ak R8rs

    Wow. Yea. That’s ONE.

  • RaiderCDE

    And with the #5 pick in the 2014 NFL draft, the Oakland Raiders select _____________.

  • SaintKaufman

    Sweet. I’ll need to highlight the better passages so that I can come back to them for future reference. Thanks for the link.

  • jesusraiderjim

    Raider Prayers.. Jesus is in the blackhole

  • RaiderCDE

    Khalil Mack

  • JV.

    Khalil Mack baby!

  • 0ak R8rs

    Nhamdi. Ok. Reece was UDFA I believe? Miller hasn’t done much in Seattle but they thought enough of him to resign him. So I guess so.

  • TrevJo

    Football, Johnny

  • DanfromVegas

    Apparently, they kinda do. Marcus Allen has both Raiders and Chiefs in his Plaque. I thought he went in as a Chief but the articles below clarified this for me.


  • JV.

    Yea Reece was UDFA and didn’t miller make a pro bowl once?? I forget.

  • Purvisman/Eternal Optimist

    Jesus, Jesus. Is he really?

  • Gdog

    Actually this defense looks perfect for a Tampa-2 off the top of my head, especially if they are keeping Roach at MLB. CWood and Branch split the safety positions…

  • SaintKaufman

    Don’t give up on Moore yet. Either one.

  • Purvisman/Eternal Optimist

    I thought he just left Chicago?

  • TrevJo

    lol, my vote was in the minority in that poll.

  • 0ak R8rs

    Not really talking about recent guys. Veldheer and Houston were certainly solid. All in all probably about 10 in 16 years is my guess. Ugh.

  • disqus_yeZNegncsV

    Yeah, remember his sarcastic scoffing at Romney in the foreign policy debate when the moderator asked Romney what country was our foe. Romney answered that Russia was our greatest geopolitical foe. Mr. Smarty Smarmy Pants smirked and said Romney was stuck in the post WW2 past and Romney responded no, he wasn’t, that Russia wanted to rise again and was a “geopolitical foe” while Iran a contemporary present danger.
    Smarmy Pants is actually stupid, a real amateur, but the press protects him because 1) he’s “progressive” and so are they and 2) he’s the first minority POTUS and they just can’t accept that a minority POTUS might go down in the history books as either a mediocre or downright unsuccessful Prez so they minimize his idiocies.

  • 0ak R8rs

    Yea. He did. Reece came off Dallas ps I believe.

  • JV.

    I think our draft will be offense heavy but that’s my feeling.

  • 0ak R8rs

    Very informative. Thanks!

  • R8drTahoe in SF

    laughing is awesome! thank you!

  • disqus_yeZNegncsV

    I’ve never seen Khalil Mack play. I suspect most of the people on here haven’t either.
    Have you?

  • SaintKaufman


  • Miamiraider78

    I see everyone is fine and dandy with all of our signings (as I am too) but we still have to see if our coaching staff can put these players in the correct positions to make plays and win us games.

  • 0ak R8rs

    I hope he spreads it around. I want young kids behind all of these vets. Otherwise it doesn’t seem worth the effort.

  • Purvisman/Eternal Optimist

    Russia is our greatest foe? Someone said that? That’s just dumb.

  • jesusraiderjim

    must have me confused with another Jesus. We all look the same.

  • TrevJo

    Veldheer and Wiz.
    Houston and Branch.

  • Purvisman/Eternal Optimist

    And I miss the Cold War when they were the Evil Empire.

  • scooboy

    Watkins or Bridgewater

  • R8drTahoe in SF

    this can not be the first time you’ve heard a gm or hc answer rhetorically…

  • Avion Davis

    Teddy Bridgewater

  • jesusraiderjim

    Great read. LOL

  • Gdog

    Veldheer and Houston… oh wait. We are supposed to forget about them because “they didn’t want to be here.”

  • Marley Bob

    I’m interested in Woodley’s transition from LOLB to RDE, much harder to play on the right side and in a different position, even if he played it in College, that was a long time ago.

  • SaintKaufman

    The sun is easily our greatest foe.

  • JV.


    vs Ohio State

    vs Stony Brook

    vs Ohio

    vs San Diego State

    vs UMass

    vs Baylor

    Really good instincts and tackle machine. Reminds me of clay Mathews and Von miller.

  • Marley Bob

    CJ Mosley

  • TrevJo

    unlikely. They will probably put Woodson at DT, Penn at QB, and Tuck at K

  • 0ak R8rs

    So, we have:


    Regardless, it’s a very short and sad list.