<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Clayton Valley HS principal says she&#8217;ll be responsive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2011/05/29/new-clayton-valley-hs-principal-says-shell-be-responsive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2011/05/29/new-clayton-valley-hs-principal-says-shell-be-responsive/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:18:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wait a minute</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2011/05/29/new-clayton-valley-hs-principal-says-shell-be-responsive/comment-page-1/#comment-6446</link>
		<dc:creator>wait a minute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=3370#comment-6446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its time to point something out people.

This &quot;Anon&quot; who began posting all over the CC Times blog to defend the MDUSD leadership and try and shift blame to anyone else started doing this at the same time as Sue Brothers was hired and is none other then SUE BROTHERS herself!!!

Her posts have been shown to a couple of dozen of her former colleagues from West Sac/Roseville and all agree its Sue&#039;s writing. By the way, comments about Sue ranged from vile, manipulative, incompetent egotistical control freak to many that are unprintable.

So why is she doing this? Because of the 3 reasons she went to MDUSD: #1, West Sac became (to quote Sue herself) &quot;no longer a comfortable place&quot; for her and her M.O.  #2, her benefactor Steve Lawrence hired her to try and quash the CVHS Charter.  #3, she has also been hired to fight the info war here on the CC Times to try and protect her savior Lawrence.

Some other interesting information has also come up.

Sue extensively lied in her interviews with Theresa Harrington. She claimed she was only making $125,000 at West Sac when she was at the top of the pay scale there at $145,000 plus benefits. She claimed she spent lots of time in classrooms and sites (when she rarely left the administrative offices until the new Super Dr. Gilleland made her get out last year and start regularly visiting sites/classrooms).

In fact, Sue spent the better part of her 5 years in smallish West Sac building up a personal empire. In her Dpt of Ed Services she had 2 &quot;Directors&quot; at $110,000 each (one of whom was infamous in that district for having been caught having sex at a school site with one of the custodians and whom Sue tried to replace one of West Sac&#039;s best principals with when her Directors position was cut!). Sue also had at least one other administrator and several &quot;Teachers on Special Assignment&quot; as well as 2 secretaries. So her Dpt had well over 1 million dollars in salaries/benefits in a 1 HS town until the budget cuts of last year. In fact, Sue was famous for manipulating hiring in West Sac. She decided who would be hired ahead of time and represented panel interviews were conducted only to go through the motions.

Her record in these matters is less then stellar. A Super of HR who was forced to leave his former district for having conducted a blatant affair with a colleague and having unlawfully fired a teacher was hired by Sue to be a reliable and unethical hatchet man who proceeded to drive up litigation costs to exceed the rest of the districts in that county combined! She also replaced the well respected and successful Continuation HS principal with an incompetent personal friend of hers that took that school from safe to dangeous and ended up expelling like 20 kids in an over-correction.

Meanwhile Sue claims she is this zen-like coach to all the principals in matters like discipline. Well that explains why West Sac&#039;s River City HS had a student riot in late 2009 that was so bad that the Principal suffered severe head injuries and missed months of work. To make matters worse both Sue And Stevie Lawrence lied to the board and called the riot just a food fight and this lie ended up in the Sacramento Bee!
This incident is a main reason that Stevie fled to the MDUSD and now Sue has followed him as she has her whole administrative career.

Sue also said that West Sac has a good relationship with  charters. It has only had this since Lawrence left.Sue and Stevie opposed every Independant charter trying to come into West Sac and they both constantly raved about how bad charters were so Anon/Sues post #11 represents Sue&#039;s true feelings about charters, hated competition that puts pressure on a district to reform bad management.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its time to point something out people.</p>
<p>This &#8220;Anon&#8221; who began posting all over the CC Times blog to defend the MDUSD leadership and try and shift blame to anyone else started doing this at the same time as Sue Brothers was hired and is none other then SUE BROTHERS herself!!!</p>
<p>Her posts have been shown to a couple of dozen of her former colleagues from West Sac/Roseville and all agree its Sue&#8217;s writing. By the way, comments about Sue ranged from vile, manipulative, incompetent egotistical control freak to many that are unprintable.</p>
<p>So why is she doing this? Because of the 3 reasons she went to MDUSD: #1, West Sac became (to quote Sue herself) &#8220;no longer a comfortable place&#8221; for her and her M.O.  #2, her benefactor Steve Lawrence hired her to try and quash the CVHS Charter.  #3, she has also been hired to fight the info war here on the CC Times to try and protect her savior Lawrence.</p>
<p>Some other interesting information has also come up.</p>
<p>Sue extensively lied in her interviews with Theresa Harrington. She claimed she was only making $125,000 at West Sac when she was at the top of the pay scale there at $145,000 plus benefits. She claimed she spent lots of time in classrooms and sites (when she rarely left the administrative offices until the new Super Dr. Gilleland made her get out last year and start regularly visiting sites/classrooms).</p>
<p>In fact, Sue spent the better part of her 5 years in smallish West Sac building up a personal empire. In her Dpt of Ed Services she had 2 &#8220;Directors&#8221; at $110,000 each (one of whom was infamous in that district for having been caught having sex at a school site with one of the custodians and whom Sue tried to replace one of West Sac&#8217;s best principals with when her Directors position was cut!). Sue also had at least one other administrator and several &#8220;Teachers on Special Assignment&#8221; as well as 2 secretaries. So her Dpt had well over 1 million dollars in salaries/benefits in a 1 HS town until the budget cuts of last year. In fact, Sue was famous for manipulating hiring in West Sac. She decided who would be hired ahead of time and represented panel interviews were conducted only to go through the motions.</p>
<p>Her record in these matters is less then stellar. A Super of HR who was forced to leave his former district for having conducted a blatant affair with a colleague and having unlawfully fired a teacher was hired by Sue to be a reliable and unethical hatchet man who proceeded to drive up litigation costs to exceed the rest of the districts in that county combined! She also replaced the well respected and successful Continuation HS principal with an incompetent personal friend of hers that took that school from safe to dangeous and ended up expelling like 20 kids in an over-correction.</p>
<p>Meanwhile Sue claims she is this zen-like coach to all the principals in matters like discipline. Well that explains why West Sac&#8217;s River City HS had a student riot in late 2009 that was so bad that the Principal suffered severe head injuries and missed months of work. To make matters worse both Sue And Stevie Lawrence lied to the board and called the riot just a food fight and this lie ended up in the Sacramento Bee!<br />
This incident is a main reason that Stevie fled to the MDUSD and now Sue has followed him as she has her whole administrative career.</p>
<p>Sue also said that West Sac has a good relationship with  charters. It has only had this since Lawrence left.Sue and Stevie opposed every Independant charter trying to come into West Sac and they both constantly raved about how bad charters were so Anon/Sues post #11 represents Sue&#8217;s true feelings about charters, hated competition that puts pressure on a district to reform bad management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa  Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2011/05/29/new-clayton-valley-hs-principal-says-shell-be-responsive/comment-page-1/#comment-5749</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa  Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=3370#comment-5749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trinka: The board expects to approve a contractor with auditor Christy White on Tuesday: http://esbpublic.mdusd.k12.ca.us/public_itemview.aspx?ItemId=4232&amp;mtgId=305]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trinka: The board expects to approve a contractor with auditor Christy White on Tuesday: <a href="http://esbpublic.mdusd.k12.ca.us/public_itemview.aspx?ItemId=4232&#038;mtgId=305" rel="nofollow">http://esbpublic.mdusd.k12.ca.us/public_itemview.aspx?ItemId=4232&#038;mtgId=305</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trinka Ragland</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2011/05/29/new-clayton-valley-hs-principal-says-shell-be-responsive/comment-page-1/#comment-5655</link>
		<dc:creator>Trinka Ragland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=3370#comment-5655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m so frustrated with the Mt Diablo School District.  My husband worked as a carpenter for the district for almost ten years before he was laid off 3 years ago.  So I have no use for Pete Pederson.  He got his job saved and now gets to be hired as a contractor making even more money from Measure C bonds and gets to drive a district truck. Maybe he should have been out at Delta View marking the correct trees to be removed.  Who cuts down trees without a supervisor marking the right trees.  Oh now lets hire another person to work below Peter making $100,000.  Give me a break.  Measure C money is always being misspent.  My husband would love to come back and help manage this project but Pete has his &quot;good old boys club&quot; all set up.  I bet they hire Ron Hansen former President of the union. Those two were a corrupt team when they worked together at the district.  Somebody needs to audit their spending habits before this really gets out of hand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so frustrated with the Mt Diablo School District.  My husband worked as a carpenter for the district for almost ten years before he was laid off 3 years ago.  So I have no use for Pete Pederson.  He got his job saved and now gets to be hired as a contractor making even more money from Measure C bonds and gets to drive a district truck. Maybe he should have been out at Delta View marking the correct trees to be removed.  Who cuts down trees without a supervisor marking the right trees.  Oh now lets hire another person to work below Peter making $100,000.  Give me a break.  Measure C money is always being misspent.  My husband would love to come back and help manage this project but Pete has his &#8220;good old boys club&#8221; all set up.  I bet they hire Ron Hansen former President of the union. Those two were a corrupt team when they worked together at the district.  Somebody needs to audit their spending habits before this really gets out of hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor J</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2011/05/29/new-clayton-valley-hs-principal-says-shell-be-responsive/comment-page-1/#comment-5159</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=3370#comment-5159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Hell Freezing Over -- Yeah, is there any doubt in your mind that when Steve told Sue there was a principal opening and she just had a reassignment, that she would be the next Principal in MDUSD ?  Steve just had to make sure she got into the final four so that Stue would rise from the ashes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hell Freezing Over &#8212; Yeah, is there any doubt in your mind that when Steve told Sue there was a principal opening and she just had a reassignment, that she would be the next Principal in MDUSD ?  Steve just had to make sure she got into the final four so that Stue would rise from the ashes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2011/05/29/new-clayton-valley-hs-principal-says-shell-be-responsive/comment-page-1/#comment-5158</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=3370#comment-5158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Hell Freezing Over--I agree completely.  It was patronizing, to say the least, when the District &quot;invited&quot; parent and community input for the qualities of a principal at CV.  The first meeting was a Tuesday (with about 2 hours advance notice) and the second input meeting was that Thursday.  Which would have been great if the initial interview process hadn&#039;t happened on that WEDNESDAY.  It seemed clear to me that the District already had their 14 initial candidates lined up regardless of what the parent community said.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hell Freezing Over&#8211;I agree completely.  It was patronizing, to say the least, when the District &#8220;invited&#8221; parent and community input for the qualities of a principal at CV.  The first meeting was a Tuesday (with about 2 hours advance notice) and the second input meeting was that Thursday.  Which would have been great if the initial interview process hadn&#8217;t happened on that WEDNESDAY.  It seemed clear to me that the District already had their 14 initial candidates lined up regardless of what the parent community said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hell Freezing Over</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2011/05/29/new-clayton-valley-hs-principal-says-shell-be-responsive/comment-page-1/#comment-5157</link>
		<dc:creator>Hell Freezing Over</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 22:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=3370#comment-5157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m having a hard time believing the Supt and the Board listened to input from anyone else regarding who was or wasn&#039;t a fair candidate for the principal positions at CVHS or CP, after the school closure committee process and recommendations fiasco.  

As ugly as that got - watching how that played out in public with the way parents / teachers / the public were ignored or treated during the board meetings, I now tend to believe the Supt and Board make their minds up prior to anyone being &#039;allowed&#039; to review and make their recommendations for anyhing in this district.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having a hard time believing the Supt and the Board listened to input from anyone else regarding who was or wasn&#8217;t a fair candidate for the principal positions at CVHS or CP, after the school closure committee process and recommendations fiasco.  </p>
<p>As ugly as that got &#8211; watching how that played out in public with the way parents / teachers / the public were ignored or treated during the board meetings, I now tend to believe the Supt and Board make their minds up prior to anyone being &#8216;allowed&#8217; to review and make their recommendations for anyhing in this district.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa  Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2011/05/29/new-clayton-valley-hs-principal-says-shell-be-responsive/comment-page-1/#comment-5153</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa  Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=3370#comment-5153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FYI, the charter petition reportedly has received more than enough signatures to be forwarded to the district: http://bit.ly/iZVPxv.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, the charter petition reportedly has received more than enough signatures to be forwarded to the district: <a href="http://bit.ly/iZVPxv" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/iZVPxv</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor J</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2011/05/29/new-clayton-valley-hs-principal-says-shell-be-responsive/comment-page-1/#comment-5152</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=3370#comment-5152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Long-Time BW, yes, the initial panel makes the multiple recommendations.  But once it gets to the second level, the decision is that of the Supt after he and his staff interview the candidates recommended.  There is no doubt in my mind that on paper, SB has a lot of district experience working under Lawrence, but what she doesn&#039;t have is the local experience nor the experience of being a principal. Neither does she have the record of &quot;turn around&quot; as the schools she has worked with do not improve significantly their scores.   I do agree with Cheryl Hansen that her close working relationship with Lawrence is a huge negative rather than a positive, and that she has no local knowledge.  I also agree that the motives of her and Lawrence are less than alturistic. Obviously the Board had 4 days notice of who was being appointed and Cheryl Hansen did her homework.  For some reason, the Board, even after Nugentgate, does not permit the public to know the candidate until the moment of vote.  That makes public vetting impossible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Long-Time BW, yes, the initial panel makes the multiple recommendations.  But once it gets to the second level, the decision is that of the Supt after he and his staff interview the candidates recommended.  There is no doubt in my mind that on paper, SB has a lot of district experience working under Lawrence, but what she doesn&#8217;t have is the local experience nor the experience of being a principal. Neither does she have the record of &#8220;turn around&#8221; as the schools she has worked with do not improve significantly their scores.   I do agree with Cheryl Hansen that her close working relationship with Lawrence is a huge negative rather than a positive, and that she has no local knowledge.  I also agree that the motives of her and Lawrence are less than alturistic. Obviously the Board had 4 days notice of who was being appointed and Cheryl Hansen did her homework.  For some reason, the Board, even after Nugentgate, does not permit the public to know the candidate until the moment of vote.  That makes public vetting impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2011/05/29/new-clayton-valley-hs-principal-says-shell-be-responsive/comment-page-1/#comment-5151</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=3370#comment-5151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long-Time Board Watcher,

Blah, blah, blah.  Too long didn&#039;t read.

Did you see the funny video on youtube?  Just google MDUSD Parody.  Come on even an old stiffy like you was probably laughing out loud.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long-Time Board Watcher,</p>
<p>Blah, blah, blah.  Too long didn&#8217;t read.</p>
<p>Did you see the funny video on youtube?  Just google MDUSD Parody.  Come on even an old stiffy like you was probably laughing out loud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Long-time Board Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2011/05/29/new-clayton-valley-hs-principal-says-shell-be-responsive/comment-page-1/#comment-5150</link>
		<dc:creator>Long-time Board Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=3370#comment-5150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, Dr. J, according to your explanation, the panel of parents and staff first interview numerous candidates for principal positions and forward the few they like to the Superintendent and Council, who conduct the second interview and make a recommendation to the Board. In this process the Superintendent could not have even considered Sue Brothers for CVHS if the parent/staff panel had not selected her as a finalist. To imply that the Superintendent influenced the first panel&#039;s decision making is an insult to all the conscientious people who took time to serve on the panel and carefully assess the candidates. 

From what I&#039;ve heard, the panel considered Sue Brothers to be one of the strongest of those they interviewed. They had to be aware of her background. They would have seen her work with Lawrence in WUSD on her resume and at least some of them probably read the blogs. If they&#039;d had misgivings, they could have sent only three names forward--or two, one, or none. It&#039;s happened. 

We all get it. You and a few others detest Lawrence and Eberhart and have little regard for Whitmarsh, Rolen, and one or two others. Some of us may share your feelings to some extent, but that&#039;s actually a good reason why we should support parents and staff who are trying to be involved in district decisions. 

It&#039;s clear that many in the CVHS community believe changes are needed at the school and two scenarios have emerged: converting the school to a charter or working within the current system. Good, thoughtful people (parents, staff, and students) are on both sides of the debate, all with the same goal: better programs for students. How &#039;bout we let all these folks find ways to work together without having to endure name-calling and derogatory comments?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Dr. J, according to your explanation, the panel of parents and staff first interview numerous candidates for principal positions and forward the few they like to the Superintendent and Council, who conduct the second interview and make a recommendation to the Board. In this process the Superintendent could not have even considered Sue Brothers for CVHS if the parent/staff panel had not selected her as a finalist. To imply that the Superintendent influenced the first panel&#8217;s decision making is an insult to all the conscientious people who took time to serve on the panel and carefully assess the candidates. </p>
<p>From what I&#8217;ve heard, the panel considered Sue Brothers to be one of the strongest of those they interviewed. They had to be aware of her background. They would have seen her work with Lawrence in WUSD on her resume and at least some of them probably read the blogs. If they&#8217;d had misgivings, they could have sent only three names forward&#8211;or two, one, or none. It&#8217;s happened. </p>
<p>We all get it. You and a few others detest Lawrence and Eberhart and have little regard for Whitmarsh, Rolen, and one or two others. Some of us may share your feelings to some extent, but that&#8217;s actually a good reason why we should support parents and staff who are trying to be involved in district decisions. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear that many in the CVHS community believe changes are needed at the school and two scenarios have emerged: converting the school to a charter or working within the current system. Good, thoughtful people (parents, staff, and students) are on both sides of the debate, all with the same goal: better programs for students. How &#8217;bout we let all these folks find ways to work together without having to endure name-calling and derogatory comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 5/19 queries in 0.014 seconds using apc
Object Caching 284/288 objects using apc

Served from: www.ibabuzz.com @ 2013-05-21 15:37:34 -->