Comments on: MDUSD board meeting and budget study session tonight

By: Theresa Harrington

Theresa Harrington — Tue, 22 May 2012 01:32:36 +0000

Normally, I do. But, tonight I won’t be able to attend the first part of the meeting due to a family commitment. It’s possible I may go late.
Here is a preview post: http://bit.ly/JLRJJ8
I encourage anyone who attends or who listens in to comment on the post.

By: Just curious

Just curious — Tue, 22 May 2012 01:18:24 +0000

Do you blog during the meeting?

By: Theresa Harrington

Theresa Harrington — Tue, 22 May 2012 01:10:09 +0000

No, but the district should post audio tomorrow. Sometimes the district also broadcasts the meeting on the CVHS radio station at KVHS 90.5. You may be able to access it online.

By: Just curious

Just curious — Tue, 22 May 2012 01:02:18 +0000

Is there a way to follow what’s happening at the board meeting on the computer?

By: Theresa Harrington

Theresa Harrington — Tue, 22 May 2012 00:39:21 +0000

I’ve heard some Sun Terrace parents may speak at tonight’s board meeting, which will start at 7 p.m.: http://esbpublic.mdusd.k12.ca.us/public_agendaview.aspx?mtgId=343

By: Theresa Harrington

Theresa Harrington — Tue, 22 May 2012 00:05:32 +0000

MDEA and MDUSD have reached a tentative agreement: http://bit.ly/JjCsjr

By: g

Mon, 21 May 2012 21:53:49 +0000

You all do realize that you are only talking about the main district contract. Individual departments can and do write their own separate contracts. Generally they are one task oriented and usually only around $10K each and get little if any attention from the board.

By: Wait a Minute

Wait a Minute — Mon, 21 May 2012 21:04:48 +0000

MDUSD BW@223

I don’t think that either EberMarsh or Rolen have any shame as they are well aware they are colluding to run a mafia operation here in the MDUSD with alot of help from Stevie Lawrence and a few others.

But in any case it is
ABSOLUTELY A BLATANT CONFLICT OF INTEREST
for “general counsel of the MDUSD Greg Rolen to engineer a
400% INCREASE IN COMPENSATION for ROLEN’S LOVER!!!!

Notice that this latest “proposal” to tack on 16K to Marisol Padilla’s compensation just happens to bring her fees up to $99,000.

I wonder why that figure was chosen?

Possibly to deflect criticism from adding 6 figures to Greg Rolen’s latest household???

I hope that everyone concerned about the real purpose of the MDUSD and the real customers (children) of the MDUSD write a complaint about this to the Grand Jury:
http://www.cc-courts.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=page.viewpage&pageid=4186#matters

Because until this grossly unethical conduct stops the children and parents and taxpayers of the MDUSD will continue to get fleeced by these criminals posing as public servants.

By: MDUSD Board Watcher

MDUSD Board Watcher — Sun, 20 May 2012 21:27:48 +0000

Rolen and Padilla,

There absolutely has to be a conflict of interest here. The board is disgusting that they can’t or won’t look into this.

Rolen – you should be ashamed of yourself.

Eberhart – you should resign in shame immediately.

By: Anon

Anon — Sun, 20 May 2012 21:06:25 +0000

@anon**221 While I agree with you on the issue of Rolan and Padilla You can’t say that the NPS for their children should be considered. Unless you have proof that the local school could handle their education. I know where they go to school and I think you are worng with the local school being able to handle their education.
As much as I can’t stand Rolan and Company these are two seperate issues and you can’t bring the kids into the argument. The Board should not be involved with LRE placement. This is a Special Education issue and having the Board making those decisions will open this District up to Many Law Suits.
As for Rolan and Padilla I still don’t understand how the board can and did renew contracts and increse monies paid out.