<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MDUSD board to hold special closed session meeting Monday regarding superintendent&#8217;s evaluation and possible litigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2012/07/13/mdusd-board-to-hold-special-closed-session-meeting-monday-regarding-superintendents-evaluation-and-possible-litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2012/07/13/mdusd-board-to-hold-special-closed-session-meeting-monday-regarding-superintendents-evaluation-and-possible-litigation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 06:37:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor J</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2012/07/13/mdusd-board-to-hold-special-closed-session-meeting-monday-regarding-superintendents-evaluation-and-possible-litigation/comment-page-2/#comment-29367</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=9269#comment-29367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With just days left before the release of the 2012 STAR test results, Supt Lawrence will being the &quot;spin&quot; on another year of poor peformance in MDUSD -- consistent with his track record in West Sac and last year&#039;s measley 2 point API gain in the district.  Lawrence in the next week will receive the results and plug them into a &quot;private program&quot; [purchased by the district] to predict API scores so he doesn&#039;t have to wait -- so he will likely know BEFORE the Aug 20 Board meeting and certainly before the Aug 27 Board Meeting what he needs to spin -- if you think the US Presidential election will have spin, you ain&#039;t seen nothing yet compared to what Lawrence will twist and turn, while declaring &quot;hocus pocus&quot;.  

The question remains:  After two years of SASS &quot;reforms&quot; that haven&#039;t worked, what will be the future of &quot;one size fits all&quot; and &quot;test, test, test and more testing&quot; ?  Unless we see a substantial gain in the API district score of at least 50 plus points [that&#039;s only a two year average of 25 points] who will tell Lawrence he has failed again ?  Will the newly elected School Board have the guts to tell Lawrence to &quot;pack his bags&quot; and eat the buy-out under his contract ?  

Here is what the CDE announced on July 17 about the release of the STAR test results: &quot;Consequently, your district will receive STAR Student Reports no later than August 22, 2012. The public release of the 2012 statewide STAR Results will be August 31, 2012.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With just days left before the release of the 2012 STAR test results, Supt Lawrence will being the &#8220;spin&#8221; on another year of poor peformance in MDUSD &#8212; consistent with his track record in West Sac and last year&#8217;s measley 2 point API gain in the district.  Lawrence in the next week will receive the results and plug them into a &#8220;private program&#8221; [purchased by the district] to predict API scores so he doesn&#8217;t have to wait &#8212; so he will likely know BEFORE the Aug 20 Board meeting and certainly before the Aug 27 Board Meeting what he needs to spin &#8212; if you think the US Presidential election will have spin, you ain&#8217;t seen nothing yet compared to what Lawrence will twist and turn, while declaring &#8220;hocus pocus&#8221;.  </p>
<p>The question remains:  After two years of SASS &#8220;reforms&#8221; that haven&#8217;t worked, what will be the future of &#8220;one size fits all&#8221; and &#8220;test, test, test and more testing&#8221; ?  Unless we see a substantial gain in the API district score of at least 50 plus points [that's only a two year average of 25 points] who will tell Lawrence he has failed again ?  Will the newly elected School Board have the guts to tell Lawrence to &#8220;pack his bags&#8221; and eat the buy-out under his contract ?  </p>
<p>Here is what the CDE announced on July 17 about the release of the STAR test results: &#8220;Consequently, your district will receive STAR Student Reports no later than August 22, 2012. The public release of the 2012 statewide STAR Results will be August 31, 2012.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2012/07/13/mdusd-board-to-hold-special-closed-session-meeting-monday-regarding-superintendents-evaluation-and-possible-litigation/comment-page-2/#comment-28585</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2012 03:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=9269#comment-28585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a new blog post that includes a transportation letter sent to special ed parents and the draft FCMAT report: http://bit.ly/PgSGux]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a new blog post that includes a transportation letter sent to special ed parents and the draft FCMAT report: <a href="http://bit.ly/PgSGux" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/PgSGux</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue Berg</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2012/07/13/mdusd-board-to-hold-special-closed-session-meeting-monday-regarding-superintendents-evaluation-and-possible-litigation/comment-page-2/#comment-28583</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue Berg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=9269#comment-28583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anon #102, The District administration and Board did know pretty quickly that the IRS penalty could be successfully argued. Dick Nicoll, assistant superintendent overseeing the Fiscal Services Department at the time the IRS issue arose, worked with staff to provide the documents needed to prove the district&#039;s case to the IRS. He reported to the Board and Superintendent on several occasions that it would be resolved--not quickly, but eventually--in the district&#039;s favor. And all Board members and the Superintendent asked many questions about it.

Many of us who listened to the staff reports and Board discussions of the issue were surprised to hear Gary Eberhart publicly blame the Superintendent and chastise his fellow Board members about it. There were some attempts to counter his comments, but if you recall, Eberhart&#039;s voice was beginning to drown out all others at that time. He and Paul Strange were presenting themselves as the only independent thinkers on the Board, the only ones willing to challenge the Superintendent&#039;s thinking and recommendations. They were the &quot;common men&quot; rising up to fight the &quot;establishment.&quot; Who doesn&#039;t love that story? A majority of voters certainly did. Those of us who tried, in vain, to counter the accusations and support the Superintendent and the three other Board members were ridiculed on the Strange Eberhart blog; most have since left the district.

It&#039;s all water under the dam now, but there is a lesson to be learned: Sometimes the loudest voice is not the one to heed. Listen carefully--and skeptically--to the voices of all the candidates who run for a Board seat in November. Base your vote on information, not rhetoric.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon #102, The District administration and Board did know pretty quickly that the IRS penalty could be successfully argued. Dick Nicoll, assistant superintendent overseeing the Fiscal Services Department at the time the IRS issue arose, worked with staff to provide the documents needed to prove the district&#8217;s case to the IRS. He reported to the Board and Superintendent on several occasions that it would be resolved&#8211;not quickly, but eventually&#8211;in the district&#8217;s favor. And all Board members and the Superintendent asked many questions about it.</p>
<p>Many of us who listened to the staff reports and Board discussions of the issue were surprised to hear Gary Eberhart publicly blame the Superintendent and chastise his fellow Board members about it. There were some attempts to counter his comments, but if you recall, Eberhart&#8217;s voice was beginning to drown out all others at that time. He and Paul Strange were presenting themselves as the only independent thinkers on the Board, the only ones willing to challenge the Superintendent&#8217;s thinking and recommendations. They were the &#8220;common men&#8221; rising up to fight the &#8220;establishment.&#8221; Who doesn&#8217;t love that story? A majority of voters certainly did. Those of us who tried, in vain, to counter the accusations and support the Superintendent and the three other Board members were ridiculed on the Strange Eberhart blog; most have since left the district.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all water under the dam now, but there is a lesson to be learned: Sometimes the loudest voice is not the one to heed. Listen carefully&#8211;and skeptically&#8211;to the voices of all the candidates who run for a Board seat in November. Base your vote on information, not rhetoric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2012/07/13/mdusd-board-to-hold-special-closed-session-meeting-monday-regarding-superintendents-evaluation-and-possible-litigation/comment-page-2/#comment-28581</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 16:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=9269#comment-28581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@100...The district&#039;s CFO should have known pretty quickly that the IRS penalty could be sucessfully argued.  The IRS is incorrect many times.  This blog post by Eberhart is ironic...I&#039;ve lost count of how many more significant and &quot;ridiculous problems&quot; have occured since McHenry&#039;s departure.  In addition, I&#039;d like to know why Eberhart felt publicly flogging/blogging about McHenry&#039;s evaluation of mistakes was proper given this was likely closed session discussion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@100&#8230;The district&#8217;s CFO should have known pretty quickly that the IRS penalty could be sucessfully argued.  The IRS is incorrect many times.  This blog post by Eberhart is ironic&#8230;I&#8217;ve lost count of how many more significant and &#8220;ridiculous problems&#8221; have occured since McHenry&#8217;s departure.  In addition, I&#8217;d like to know why Eberhart felt publicly flogging/blogging about McHenry&#8217;s evaluation of mistakes was proper given this was likely closed session discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: g</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2012/07/13/mdusd-board-to-hold-special-closed-session-meeting-monday-regarding-superintendents-evaluation-and-possible-litigation/comment-page-2/#comment-28560</link>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2012 03:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=9269#comment-28560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Theresa, regarding #97:  I only saw part of the post, and hadn&#039;t yet opened it to see if there was more.  But there&#039;s an old Yiddish proverb worth considering and repeating, especially as election time comes near:

&quot;A half truth is a whole lie.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theresa, regarding #97:  I only saw part of the post, and hadn&#8217;t yet opened it to see if there was more.  But there&#8217;s an old Yiddish proverb worth considering and repeating, especially as election time comes near:</p>
<p>&#8220;A half truth is a whole lie.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2012/07/13/mdusd-board-to-hold-special-closed-session-meeting-monday-regarding-superintendents-evaluation-and-possible-litigation/comment-page-2/#comment-28558</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=9269#comment-28558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HFO: It looks like all of the &quot;news&quot; items have the 2009 copyright along the bottom. However, it would be a good idea for the district to put a date on such notices. 
Since the fingerprint item just showed up on the district&#039;s home page, I assume it is more recent than the solicitation below it for BOC members, which asked for applications by July 20: http://www.mdusd.org/Pages/default.aspx.

On another note, I also just came across an old 2008 Northgate HS blog post, which criticized the former Eberhart/Strange MDUSD blog for allowing &quot;posts that were reminiscent of a lynching mob rather than a place where people with common issues come together to discuss ideas and viewpoints&quot;: http://nghsblog.blogspot.com/

It is somewhat ironic that Eberhart and Whitmarsh (who ran on a slate with Eberhart) have since criticized other blogs. 

Like the Northgate blogger, I urge blog readers to make constructive comments and reserve the right to edit or remove comments or portions of comments.

I also found an MDUSD blog entry blasting former Superintendent Gary McHenry for the $833,000 IRS penalty. Recently, when Bryan Richards announced that most of this penalty was dismissed, Eberhart commented that he hoped the press would give the dismissal as much attention as it gave the original IRS investigation. I thought that this was ironic, since it was Eberhart who had made a big deal out of it in the first place.

Here&#039;s what he wrote in his Sept. 2008 blog post, before Whitmarsh was elected:

&quot;What was truly amazing was that there was not a single question or comment on this issue from our Board majority. How can they continue to blindly support the superintendent with these types of continual mistakes being made? This type of costly mistake truly upsets me. We are supposed to be spending our dollars educating our students, not paying for administrative incompetence. If this didn&#039;t wake the Board majority up, nothing will. I hope that the voters are awake enough to replace April (Treece) with Sherry Whitmarsh. Please don&#039;t put April back on the board with me. I need someone there that will help fix these ridiculous problems.&quot;

It turns out there was not a problem after all and his allegations of incompetence by McHenry were unfounded. But, when Richards recently announced that the penalty was minimal, Eberhart did not apologize for his previous lambasting of the former superintendent. Instead, he chose to imply that the press had somehow blown the IRS penalty out of proportion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HFO: It looks like all of the &#8220;news&#8221; items have the 2009 copyright along the bottom. However, it would be a good idea for the district to put a date on such notices.<br />
Since the fingerprint item just showed up on the district&#8217;s home page, I assume it is more recent than the solicitation below it for BOC members, which asked for applications by July 20: <a href="http://www.mdusd.org/Pages/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.mdusd.org/Pages/default.aspx</a>.</p>
<p>On another note, I also just came across an old 2008 Northgate HS blog post, which criticized the former Eberhart/Strange MDUSD blog for allowing &#8220;posts that were reminiscent of a lynching mob rather than a place where people with common issues come together to discuss ideas and viewpoints&#8221;: <a href="http://nghsblog.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://nghsblog.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>It is somewhat ironic that Eberhart and Whitmarsh (who ran on a slate with Eberhart) have since criticized other blogs. </p>
<p>Like the Northgate blogger, I urge blog readers to make constructive comments and reserve the right to edit or remove comments or portions of comments.</p>
<p>I also found an MDUSD blog entry blasting former Superintendent Gary McHenry for the $833,000 IRS penalty. Recently, when Bryan Richards announced that most of this penalty was dismissed, Eberhart commented that he hoped the press would give the dismissal as much attention as it gave the original IRS investigation. I thought that this was ironic, since it was Eberhart who had made a big deal out of it in the first place.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what he wrote in his Sept. 2008 blog post, before Whitmarsh was elected:</p>
<p>&#8220;What was truly amazing was that there was not a single question or comment on this issue from our Board majority. How can they continue to blindly support the superintendent with these types of continual mistakes being made? This type of costly mistake truly upsets me. We are supposed to be spending our dollars educating our students, not paying for administrative incompetence. If this didn&#8217;t wake the Board majority up, nothing will. I hope that the voters are awake enough to replace April (Treece) with Sherry Whitmarsh. Please don&#8217;t put April back on the board with me. I need someone there that will help fix these ridiculous problems.&#8221;</p>
<p>It turns out there was not a problem after all and his allegations of incompetence by McHenry were unfounded. But, when Richards recently announced that the penalty was minimal, Eberhart did not apologize for his previous lambasting of the former superintendent. Instead, he chose to imply that the press had somehow blown the IRS penalty out of proportion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hell Freezing Over</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2012/07/13/mdusd-board-to-hold-special-closed-session-meeting-monday-regarding-superintendents-evaluation-and-possible-litigation/comment-page-2/#comment-28557</link>
		<dc:creator>Hell Freezing Over</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=9269#comment-28557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TH #98 - how can you tell if the fingerprint memo is current? I don&#039;t see any date on the memo.  For all the public can tell, that memo has been there since the 2009 copyright date at the bottom of the page ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TH #98 &#8211; how can you tell if the fingerprint memo is current? I don&#8217;t see any date on the memo.  For all the public can tell, that memo has been there since the 2009 copyright date at the bottom of the page &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2012/07/13/mdusd-board-to-hold-special-closed-session-meeting-monday-regarding-superintendents-evaluation-and-possible-litigation/comment-page-2/#comment-28556</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=9269#comment-28556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In looking through some old files, I came a  Dick Nicoll &quot;Monday Memo&quot; - a weekly update of district activities and education-related issues from the superintendent&#039;s office. (I believe these were discontinued after the board laid-off Sue Berg, assistant to the superintendent.)

The May 4, 2009 memo is chock full of timely information about the latest swine flu outbreaks, employee recognitions, end-of-the-year activities, the summer CARES program and the district&#039;s layoff hearings.

Nicoll ended his memo with pithy quotes, including this one from nutritionist Adelle Davis, who died in 1974: &quot;Thousands upon thousands of persons have studied disease. Almost no one has studied health.&quot;

In contrast, superintendent Lawrence has not released one of his News Updates since April 10, when he wanted to persuade the public to support the Measure C tax rate increase: http://www.mdusd.org/NewsRoom/Pages/SuperintendentNewsUpdate.aspx

On another note, the district is encouraging  parents who want to volunteer at schools to make fingerprint appointments now, to avoid the fall rush: http://bit.ly/MBDfeu

This message is not a superintendent&#039;s update, however. It appears to be in the form of a district bulletin.

I also came across board minutes from 2008 regarding the &quot;Mt. Diablo Achievement Team&quot; that piloted Professional Learning Communities at Holbrook Elem., Sun Terrace Elem. and Glenbrook MS, focused on building a &quot;community of schools.&quot; Now, only one school is left in that community.

Finally, I came across a January 2008 story I wrote about the board&#039;s legal department reorganization after Whitmarsh was elected. Mayo and Allen voted against the move, which made the general counsel report to the board instead of to the superintendent.

The story also said that Whitmarsh said one of her top priorities was to overcome the mistrust that had developed in the district.

&quot;The first thing that&#039;s very important is to rebuild our relationships and open lines of communication to where people feel like they&#039;re being listened to,&quot; she said.

Do you believe that Whitmarsh has accomplished this goal?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In looking through some old files, I came a  Dick Nicoll &#8220;Monday Memo&#8221; &#8211; a weekly update of district activities and education-related issues from the superintendent&#8217;s office. (I believe these were discontinued after the board laid-off Sue Berg, assistant to the superintendent.)</p>
<p>The May 4, 2009 memo is chock full of timely information about the latest swine flu outbreaks, employee recognitions, end-of-the-year activities, the summer CARES program and the district&#8217;s layoff hearings.</p>
<p>Nicoll ended his memo with pithy quotes, including this one from nutritionist Adelle Davis, who died in 1974: &#8220;Thousands upon thousands of persons have studied disease. Almost no one has studied health.&#8221;</p>
<p>In contrast, superintendent Lawrence has not released one of his News Updates since April 10, when he wanted to persuade the public to support the Measure C tax rate increase: <a href="http://www.mdusd.org/NewsRoom/Pages/SuperintendentNewsUpdate.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.mdusd.org/NewsRoom/Pages/SuperintendentNewsUpdate.aspx</a></p>
<p>On another note, the district is encouraging  parents who want to volunteer at schools to make fingerprint appointments now, to avoid the fall rush: <a href="http://bit.ly/MBDfeu" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/MBDfeu</a></p>
<p>This message is not a superintendent&#8217;s update, however. It appears to be in the form of a district bulletin.</p>
<p>I also came across board minutes from 2008 regarding the &#8220;Mt. Diablo Achievement Team&#8221; that piloted Professional Learning Communities at Holbrook Elem., Sun Terrace Elem. and Glenbrook MS, focused on building a &#8220;community of schools.&#8221; Now, only one school is left in that community.</p>
<p>Finally, I came across a January 2008 story I wrote about the board&#8217;s legal department reorganization after Whitmarsh was elected. Mayo and Allen voted against the move, which made the general counsel report to the board instead of to the superintendent.</p>
<p>The story also said that Whitmarsh said one of her top priorities was to overcome the mistrust that had developed in the district.</p>
<p>&#8220;The first thing that&#8217;s very important is to rebuild our relationships and open lines of communication to where people feel like they&#8217;re being listened to,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p>Do you believe that Whitmarsh has accomplished this goal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDUSD Board Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2012/07/13/mdusd-board-to-hold-special-closed-session-meeting-monday-regarding-superintendents-evaluation-and-possible-litigation/comment-page-2/#comment-28555</link>
		<dc:creator>MDUSD Board Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 22:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=9269#comment-28555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[NOTE: This comment was edited to remove an unsubstantiated accusation.]

Remember Chevron Sherry has shown herself to be a ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[NOTE: This comment was edited to remove an unsubstantiated accusation.]</p>
<p>Remember Chevron Sherry has shown herself to be a &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2012/07/13/mdusd-board-to-hold-special-closed-session-meeting-monday-regarding-superintendents-evaluation-and-possible-litigation/comment-page-2/#comment-28553</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2012 19:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/?p=9269#comment-28553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CARES Staff: Was anyone on the CARES staff consulted about what kind of person they would like to see in their new administrator? 
Although Jacobs has been widely criticized for an alleged lack of tact and communications skills, she has been praised for her ability to get grants. Do you think her ability to get grants is more important than her alleged lack of ability to motivate staff?
One of the district&#039;s draft Strategic Plan goals is to improve its ability attract and retain quality staff. At the board retreat, Board President Sherry Whitmarsh said this was her top priority. Yet, she told me she trusted the personnel department when it recommended Jacobs&#039; appointment to this position.
How do you think the district should go about trying to attract and retain high quality staff?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CARES Staff: Was anyone on the CARES staff consulted about what kind of person they would like to see in their new administrator?<br />
Although Jacobs has been widely criticized for an alleged lack of tact and communications skills, she has been praised for her ability to get grants. Do you think her ability to get grants is more important than her alleged lack of ability to motivate staff?<br />
One of the district&#8217;s draft Strategic Plan goals is to improve its ability attract and retain quality staff. At the board retreat, Board President Sherry Whitmarsh said this was her top priority. Yet, she told me she trusted the personnel department when it recommended Jacobs&#8217; appointment to this position.<br />
How do you think the district should go about trying to attract and retain high quality staff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 6/19 queries in 0.035 seconds using apc
Object Caching 284/288 objects using apc

Served from: www.ibabuzz.com @ 2013-05-21 00:06:48 -->