Part of the Bay Area News Group

MDUSD board to discuss Common Core spending, layoffs and new contract for Northgate HS aquatics center tonight

By Theresa Harrington
Wednesday, February 26th, 2014 at 5:01 pm in Education.

The Mt. Diablo school board will meet at 7:30 p.m. tonight in the district board room at 1936 Carlotta Drive in Concord. Here is the agenda:

“1.0 Call to Order
1.1 President will call the meeting to order Info
2.0 Announcements

2.1 In closed session, the Board will consider the items listed on the closed session agenda. Info
3.0 Public Comment
3.1 The public may address the Board concerning items that are scheduled for discussion during closed session only. These presentations are limited to three minutes each, or a total of thirty minutes for all speakers or the three minute limit may be shortened. Speakers are not allowed to yield their time. Info

4.0 Closed Session Agenda
4.1 Negotiations – The Board may discuss negotiations or provide direction to its representatives regarding represented employees, pursuant to EERA (Govt. Code Section 3549.1) Agency negotiators: Julie Braun Martin and Deborah Cooksey, Agencies: MDEA, CSEA, Local One M&O, Local One CST, MDSPA, and Supervisory. Info/Action
4.2 Jane Doe v. MDUSD Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No. C13-00342 Info/Action
4.3 Readmission of Student #E-13 into the Mt. Diablo Unified School District. Action
4.4 Admission of Student # C-14 into the Mt. Diablo Unified School District. Action
4.5 Anticipated Litigation – Significant exposure to litigation or claims made pursuant to Gov’t. Code Section 54956.9 (d)(2) Info
4.6 Anticipated Litigation – Significant exposure to litigation or claims made pursuant to Gov’t. Code Section 54956.9 (d)(2) Info
4.7 Anticipated Litigation – Significant exposure to litigation or claims made pursuant to Gov’t. Code Section 54956.9 (d)(2) Info
5.0 Adjourn to Closed Session at 6:00 p.m.

6.0 Reconvene Open Session
6.1 Reconvene Open Session at 7:30 p.m. Info

7.0 Preliminary Business
7.1 Pledge of Allegiance and Roll Call Info

8.0 Report Out Action Taken in Closed Session
8.1 Negotiations Info/Action
8.2 Jane Doe v. MDUSD Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No. C13-00342 Info/Action
8.3 Readmission of Student #E-13 into the Mt. Diablo Unified School District. Action
8.4 Admission of Student # C-14 into the Mt. Diablo Unified School District. Action
8.5 Anticipated Litigation – Significant exposure to litigation or claims made pursuant to Gov’t. Code Section 54956.9 (d)(2) Info
8.6 Anticipated Litigation – Significant exposure to litigation or claims made pursuant to Gov’t. Code Section 54956.9 (d)(2) Info
8.7 Anticipated Litigation – Significant exposure to litigation or claims made pursuant to Gov’t. Code Section 54956.9 (d)(2) Info

9.0 Recognitions and Resolutions
9.1 Resolution #13/14-33 determining district needs for 2014-15 and adopting criteria for determining order of seniority for those certificated employees with the same date of first paid probationary service. Action
9.2 Resolution No. 13/14 – 34 to decrease the number of certificated employees due to a reduction or elimination of particular kinds of services. Action
9.3 Resolution #13/14-35 proclaiming March 2-8, 2014, the Week of the School Administrator Action

10.0 Public Employee Appointment
10.1 Appointment of Principal, Elementary School – Hidden Valley Elementary Action

10.2 Appointment of Coordinator, Student/Community Services 9-12 – Concord High School Action

10.3 Appointment of Extended Year Summer Program Administrators Action

11.0 Board Member Reports
11.1 Board Member Reports Info

12.0 Superintendent’s Report
12.1 Superintendent’s Report Info

13.0 Consent Agenda Action
13.1 (Item #1) Items listed under Consent Agenda are considered routine and will be approved/adopted by a single motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items; however, any item may be removed from the consent agenda upon the request of any member of the Board and acted upon separately. Action
13.2 (Item #2) Recommended Action for Certificated Personnel Action
13.3 (Item #3) Request to Increase and Decrease Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for the 2013-2014 School Year Action
13.4 (Item #4) Recommended Action for Classified Personnel Action
13.5 (Item #5) Classified Personnel: Request to Increase Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for the 2013-14 School Year and Decrease Full Time Equivalent (FTE) for the 2014-15 School Year Action
13.6 (Item #6) Contract with Dr. Adria Klein for professional development and coaching support at Meadow Homes Elementary. Action
13.7 (Item #7) Contracts with Staff Development for Educators (SDE) for services provided at Rio Vista Elementary and district wide for Singapore Math trainings. Action
13.8 (Item #8) Increase Independent Service contract for Deiredre Ryan-Booth, behavior intervention services provider. Action
13.9 (Item #9) Contract Extension for Eagle Software Aeries Student Information System for 2014-2015 Action
13.10 (Item #10) Kaspersky antivirus software contract Action
13.11 (Item #11) Award of Bid #1649: PE Building Renovation at MDHS Action
13.12 (Item #12) Approve Final Deductive Change Order #1652-001 (FCO) for Project #1652/C-917: Parking Improvements at Clayton Valley Charter High School Action
13.13 (Item #13) Notice of Completion for Bid #1652/Contract C-917 Action
13.14 (Item #14) Minutes for the Board of Education Meeting held on December 11, 2013 Action
13.15 (Item #15) Minutes for the Special Board of Education Meeting held on December 11, 2013 Action
14.0 Consent Items Pulled for Discussion

15.0 Communications
15.1 District Organizations – At regular Board meetings, a single spokesperson of each recognized district organization may make a brief presentation following the Consent Agenda. Items are limited to those which are informational. Info

16.0 Community Input Meeting
16.1 Public Hearing Regarding the Common Core State Standards Spending Plan Action

17.0 Reports/Information
17.1 Representatives from the Student Services Department will provide an overview of the department to the Board of Education. Info

18.0 Public Comment
18.1 The public may address the Board regarding any item within the jurisdiction of the Board of Education of the Mt. Diablo Unified School District that is not on this agenda. These presentation are limited to three minutes each, or a total of thirty minutes for all speakers, or the three minute limit may be shortened. If there are multiple speakers on any one subject, the public comment period may be moved to the end of the meeting. Speakers are not allowed to yield their time. Info

19.0 Business/Action Items
19.1 Concord High School’s Spring Break Hawaii Performance, Educational and Cultural Tour Info/Action

19.2 Mt. Diablo Adult Education/Surgical Technologist Training Students Attendance at Association of Surgical Technologist Association Conference in Denver, Colorado. Action

19.3 2014-2015 School Calendar Action

19.4 WSCA Procurement of Microsoft Software and HP Computers for Technology upgrades at various schools. Action

19.5 Contract Extension of CALNET II State Contract to June 30, 2015 Action

19.6 Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP – Legal Services Contract Action

19.7 Award of Lease-Leaseback Agreement to Taber Construction, Inc. for the Construction of New Aquatics Center at Northgate High School Action

19.8 Approve Intermediate Change Order 1645-001 to Taber Construction, Inc. on Bid 1645 – Sports Field Lighting at Ygnacio Valley High School Action

19.9 CMAS Procurement of Extron Pole Vault System for New Classrooms Action

19.10 Renewal of Charter for Eagle Peak Montessori School Info

19.11 Student Representative Info/Action

19.12 Minutes for the Board of Education Meeting held on February 12, 2014 Action

19.13 Meeting Extension Action

20.0 Future Agenda Items
20.1 Future Agenda Items Info

21.0 Closed Session
21.1 Items not completed during the first Closed Session will be carried over to this closed session. Action

22.0 Adjournment
22.1 Adjourn Meeting Info”

How do you think the district should spend its Common Core funding?

[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]

  • Doctor J

    The district has concealed the estimates of costs so it is impossible to even have a discussion. LCFF was intended to give the public more knowledge so it could make its feelings known. As long as the district holds its cards close to the vest, the public cannot give meaningful input.

  • Doctor J

    Lynne Dennler gets another tardy. Poor example to students. Why doesn’t she just resign ?

  • Doctor J

    Trustee Brian Lawrence patronized once again by Julie B-M who refused to follow recent board direction to disclose in the agenda names of internal candidates proposed for new jobs –saying she “needs more board direction”. In a recent board meeting she agreed to an interim disclosure of internal candidates. Why doesn’t she propose her own agenda item ? Why does Dr. Nellie allow such public insults to the Board by an Ass. Supt. ?

  • tmharrington

    Trustee Cheryl Hansen mentioned that Dr. Bernard had proposed some sort of “pilot” plan to reveal the names of candidates, but no one explained what the pilot plan was or why Braun-Martin wasn’t following through with it. If there is a pilot plan, she should already know about it and be implementing it. If she needs more direction, trustees should give it to her. But it is Meyer who approves the agenda. So, if the names are missing, she should add them.

  • Doctor J

    Julie B-M is so disingenuous that her lack of credibility has become perverted. It was just on Jan 15 during the appointment of Lisa Keck to Sequoia MS VP that Brian continued his commentary from previous months that at least an internal appointment should be disclosed to the public — and Dr. Nellie nodded her agreement emphatically. Yet Julie B-M’s arrogance of defiance of both Trustee Lawrence and Dr. Nellie, especially her on camera smirk to Brian Lawrence, is deserving of at least a public apology if not disciplinary action. See it for yourself on Jan 15 video, at 1:35:40 to 1:36:10. It sure looks like to me that Dr. Nellie agreed to at least disclose internal candidates in the public agenda at least 72 hours in advance. I also recall an exchange in either December or November where that was also agreed.

  • Doctor J

    Last night Dr. Nellie said she was openly critical of John McMorris after one dad described in detail McMorris’ caustic words berating a troubled teen, telling the teen he was no good, wasn’t wanted at Northgate, in front of the parent and son. Dr. Nellie called McMorris’ behavior “a problem”. McMorris’ mal-behavior is digging his own hole deeper and deeper. Hear the dad at 26:55.

  • Flippin’ Tired

    The superintendent’s name is Dr. Meyer. You insult and belittle the person and her position every time you refer to her by her first name. Have some respect.

  • Guest

    McMorris already told his staff that the he had the board’s total support

  • Guest

    I agree. Dr. J has posted an explanation for referring to her in this matter, claiming she was called “Dr. Nellie” in San Diego by staff. I think that is irrelevant; in this forum she should be referred to by her last name, just as Teresa Harrington refers to her. Imagine if Teresa called her Dr. Nellie? If Dr. J knows the superintendent, he can call her by her first name in person, but should not do so here.

  • tmharrington

    If Dr. Meyer has agreed to disclose the names on the agendas, then she should do it. She’s the boss, not Braun-Martin.

  • tmharrington

    I see WCCUSD has a “Quick Link” to mandated reporting info on its home page: http://www.wccusd.net/Page/1

    Annie Nolen has told me that MDUSD also recently placed mandated reporting info on its website at her continued urging. I search on “mandated reporting” and couldn’t find it. I looked on the Student Services website and couldn’t find it. Finally, I looked under “personnel forms” and found it listed as “Child Abuse Report Form.” This information shouldn’t be this hard to find: http://www.mdusd.org/personnel/Pages/Forms.aspx

  • Doctor J

    No FT, her name is Nellie Meyer. Please don’t confuse names with titles. One of her titles is Superintendent which is a temporary title based on her employment. Another title she earned with her EdD. Is Doctor. Another title she has is wife and mother — well earned in her case. Do you belittle her accomplishments by abbreviating her titles ? I don’t think so and I don’t believe I disrespect her by only using her given name. If you ask Dr. Nellie which title is most important to her, I am sure she would say wife and mother. In your case . . . I will leave it up to you to decide what is your most important title. Mine certainly is not doctor. Is yours “flipping” (a vulgarity substitute) or “tired” ????

  • tmharrington

    Here’s a new blog post reminder about the Sunday FAFSA and Cal Grant application deadline: http://www.ibabuzz.com/onassignment/2014/02/28/sunday-is-the-fafsa-and-cal-grant-deadline/

  • Flippin’ Tired

    Really, you’re going to defend your disrespect? That’s pathetic.

  • Concerned13

    Just more poor decision making on behalf of MDUSD. Having an easy to find link… with “special instructions” (like they have on the WCCUSD site… should have been a top priority. Immediately.

    If you notice on the WCCUSD site – it also has a “checklist” of sorts to do in case of an emergency. What’s at the top of the page (the only thing above this is encouragement to report ANY suspected abuse) >> CALL the Police Department or CPS. This is not “optional” – it’s the law.

  • Doctor J

    Really ? Total support for what ? Taking $40,000 “under the table” ? Or verbally berating and humiliating a troubled teen in front of his father ? Was McMorris having serial communications with the Board ? Is McMorris so arrogant he can admit to crimes and think he can get away with it ?

  • g. de la verdad

    The board was distressed that Moore brought the hidden payments to the public eye — but none of them seemed surprised about the payments.
    Expect some fancy footwork in Bryan’s next expenditure reports. The PFC should have run the payments through their District contributions/offsets to allow the District to properly file taxes and Worker’s Comp reports. How they will cover up for last year’s IRS 990 is a question to ponder.

  • tmharrington

    Here’s my story about the preponderance of lease-leasebacks in MDUSD: Controversial lease-leaseback contracts have become popular in Mt. Diablo district

  • tmharrington

    Northgate HS placed fourth in the recent countywide Mock Trial competitions: http://www.contracostatimes.com/news/ci_25251839

    No other MDUSD school competed. However, CVCHS was there, along with schools from many neighboring districts.

  • Doctor J

    CDE agenda is posted. Did Lorie O’brien get caught lying ? agenda W-22 says the public hearing notice was “published” — published is a legal term of art requiring published for ten days prior to the hearing. Did not happen. Her prior response to Theresa was just 72 hours on line. ALSO, CDE found out that Lorie did not tell MDEA who didn’t respond until the day after the Board vote –how disingenuous. MDEA opposed and the Board did not know of it. CDE is soliciting email comments.

  • Doctor J

    CDE doesn’t recommend approval of waivers for 2014/15 school year!!! Only for 2013/14 school year. Not disclosed to MDUSD Board by Lorie O’Brien: Oak Grove Site council opposed the waiver: Where are site Council minutes ? Lorie O’Brien told Theresa that Public Hearing was only noticed by Brown Act requirements for “Special Meeting” and not published for ten days in Newspaper — yet she told CDE that Public Hearing Notices were published in newspaper ostensibly for ten days. NOT true. MDUSD Board meeting was Dec 16 — yet MDEA didn’t oppose until Dec 17 ! MDHS Site council didn’t meet until Dec 23 — really ???? — where are the Site council Minutes ? Oak Grove site council opposed on dec 17 — again the day after. I hope the public will notify CDE about the “funny business” going on.

  • Doctor J

    Dr. Nellie announces MDEA/MDUSD “deal” but keeps details secret. Rumors ongoing since before the board meeting are that MDEA caved in and took a 3% raise retro to July 1 with a one time 2% bonus. Essentially both sides sold “class size reduction” down the river in favor of putting the extra money in administrators pockets under the “me too” under the table deal. Class size reduction will NOT happen in MDUSD for either 13/14 or 14/15 school years and perhaps beyond. No postings as of yet on MDEA website. Will MDEA members ratify “tentative agreement” or “reject it” and strike ? .Can’t wait until Bryan Richards calculates the deal for Board approval AND how he factors in the CDE requiring a return to small class sizes at Mount for the 2014/15 school year QEIA requirements.

  • Guest

    Details on MDEA website…..thanks to Dr. Meyer, Barbara Oaks, Cheryl Hansen, and Lynn Dennler, four authentic educators who helped make this happen. If this had been two years ago with the old regime and board majority we would have been nowhere. Thank you.

  • Doctor J

    so guest! where are we ?

  • Doctor J

    every dollar taken away from the children. Guy, are you really proud of stealing candy from the children ? so what is the impact on the “me too” administrators ? do they get an equivalent to the increased MDV to the teachers ?

  • Tk

    Doctor J,
    Seriously? Are you going to sit here and tell teachers in this district that they are taking from their own students? Those who the teachers serve every single day, in their extra time, over summers, and go the extra mile for over and over again?
    Unbelievable.
    Teachers deserve a raise and medical benefits. You have a Strange outlook on this topic.

  • Doctor J

    @TK, Guy Moore had his teachers carry union made signs promoting Class size reductions during the negotiations — then he sells out the children to line the pockets of administrators. Just like Crooksey said: “I’m on your side — I get whatever raise you get.” Just wait n see how much this takes from the children’s classroom — a three year deal. Richards must tell us how it is going to be paid for — ask what budget line items are being reduced to pay for the three year deals.

  • tmharrington

    Agenda for special joint meeting tonight with Clayton City Council has been posted: http://www.mdusd.org/boe/Documents/ClaytonjointBOE.pdf

  • tmharrington
  • tmharrington

    This board action summary incorrectly describes item 2 – it should say the Community Day School and Necessary Small HS administrator positions were removed from the list: http://www.mdusd.org/boe/Documents/action/2014/02-26-14.pdf

  • tmharrington

    Here’s info on the upcoming votes from MDEA:

    “We will vote to ratify our new contract March 18 through March 20.

    If you would like more information before you vote, please attend one of the following meetings:

    MDEA Contract Ratification Meetings

    Thursday, March 6 College Park
    Monday, March 10 Ygnacio Valley High School
    Wednesday, March 12 Concord High School
    Tuesday, March 18 Riverview Middle School

    All meetings will start at 4:00 and should be over by 5:00

    I’ve requested the Library at each school, but the Use Permits haven’t been approved yet, so we might get moved to a different room. We’ll update the information if something changes.

    Thank you for all of the happy thoughts today and all of your support at Rallies, Board Meetings and everything else you did to build support for this change.
    .
    MDEA Leadership”

  • tmharrington

    Unfortunately, I was unable to attend last night’s CAC meeting. However, it looks like some interesting items were discussed, including anticipated program changes and transportation: http://www.mdusd.org/Lists/UpcomingEvents/Attachments/366/cac-agenda-030414.pdf

    Did any readers attend? If so, what was the CAC response to the proposed changes? Thanks!

  • Doctor J

    Theresa, we need to see the total costs with breakdowns including all hidden raises to administrators and other piggy back unions. surely Bryan Richards has that or can your financial genius do it or check Richards calculations ?

  • tmharrington

    Santa Clara COE is offering a free bond workshop featuring MDUSD financial adviser Jon Isom and David Olson of KNN, who consults for WCCUSD: http://santaclara.k12oms.org/1041-81089

  • Doctor J

    Many, if not all, links to school websites formerly available from the “our schools” link have been taken down by the district.

  • tmharrington

    Please note that I am uploading video from last night’s joint meeting with the Clayton City Council to http://www.youTube.com/TunedToTheresa. Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to capture the entire meeting since I arrived late and had storage issues on my phone and ipad. Discussion regarding “the elephant in the room” – Clayton Valley Charter HS – was very interesting.

  • Doctor J

    Vice-Mayor Shoe really gave MDUSD the polite “number 10″ about its unwritten policy of exclusion of parent/community volunteers. Too bad Theresa ran out of memory — the responses to that would have been fantastic. The MDUSD issue is so apparent at Northgate — parents give us your required donations and we will line the principal’s pocket with $40,000 under the table. Then for McMorris to declare he has “full Board support” — how does he know that ? Brown Act serial meeting violations ? board, we need — no, we demand — an explanation.

  • Doctor J

    Contrast the “open communication” of CVCHS and the closed secrecy of myopic MDUSD as highlighted by the Clayton City Council last night. Monthly updates from Dr. Meyer ?? Never seen one in six months. Several emails a week from CVCHS — regular occurrence. Board President Barbara Oaks was so UNPREPARED last night — she didn’t have correct statistics of Mt Diablo elementary or of Diablo View Middle — just guessed at them miserably. It was embarrassing. CVCHS has really put to shame the old and the new boards of MDUSD. Is DVMS the next teacher trigger charter ?

  • Doctor J

    The dirty secret the Board is keeping from the public: ADMINISTRATOR’S secret raises will cost the district more money this fiscal year than teacher’s raises. Administrators through DMA (Diablo Manager’s association) have a secret “me too” deal to keep the separation between aministrator’s pay and teacher’s pay in “parity”. Since the 2% pay increase for teachers doesn’t kick in until Feb 2015, the Board sweetened the deal for the Big Four, all whose contracts expire on June 30, 2014. ALL administrators working as of Feb 24, 2014 will get a 2% bonus on top of the 3% retro to 7/1/13. This will make Administrators as a group, costing the district more in raises, than all of the teacher raises during this fiscal year. If you don’t believe me, ask the Board to make all the financial impacts public NOW ! Board, stop the secrecy. Stop the favoritism to the administrators. I can see it coming now: In Jan/Feb 2015 when teachers get $12,500 for medical and a 2% raise the administrators are going to be clamoring for their “me too” raise. as Yogi Berra said, it’s déjà vu all over again.

  • tmharrington

    All that will likely make it more difficult to restore CST hours or improve CSEA benefits.

  • tmharrington

    No one from the district responded to the Clayton council members’ comments about the differences between CVCHS and district schools. They also didn’t respond to allegations that the district is stonewalling CVCHS attempts to expand.

  • Doctor J

    The MDUSD culture of deception and dishonesty continues at Dent and Holbrook. Also note that when asked about the “five year plan” Dr. Nellie punted to the ever slippery silver-tounged Tim Cody who ignored the question and BS’d about the last two years. Truth: there is NO FIVE YEAR PLAN going forward. With no one challenging the ballot language vagueness, Dent and Meas C feel invincible.

  • tmharrington

    My favorite part was when the Clayton Council members said they only found out the middle school was getting a new science building when they read about it in the paper.
    “That would have been nice to know, when people ask us about what’s going on at the middle school,” said Councilwoman Julie Pierce.
    But no MDUSD staff offered to keep the council informed about new construction going forward.

  • Doctor J

    Three Blind Mice . . .or Three Stooges ? Linda Mayo, Cheryl Hansen, Barbara Oaks. It was pathetic. Let’s take a vote. Theresa, I am glad you enjoyed the show !!

  • g. de la verdad

    And sadly, while CSTs and MDEA cry out for “help,” none will forego even a tiny portion of their own monitary demands in order to get the extra feet on the ground they say they must have. Marie Antoinette comes to mind.

  • g. de la verdad

    500 sq miles, 6 cities = time to elect school board by city/zone/population percentage! We’ve waited too long!

  • Sherry Whitmarsh

    I agree

  • Doctor J

    I also agree. sherry, during your tenure on the board was this issue ever discussed ? I thought at one time the ACLU was targeting school districts for this very purpose.

  • Sherry Whitmarsh

    There was a very brief discussion with Dr Lawrence. I’ve hear more from parent recently. This would also allow more minorities to have a chance of being elected. I’m not sure how the unions would feel as they would have less of a voice in the elections instead of basically being the deciding factor.

  • Sherry Whitmarsh

    I’ve always has lots of respect for Ms Mayo as I think she really studied the issues. Even when we were on opposing camps she was logical and thoughtful.