Part of the Bay Area News Group

Archive for the 'Alameda County' Category

30 East Bay elementary schools named “2012 California Distinguished Schools”

Congratulations to the 30 East Bay elementary campuses that were named 2012 California Distinguished Schools!

Tom Torlakson, state Superintendent of Public Instruction, announced Thursday that 387 schools throughout California earned that honor for innovative education programs that encourage students to learn and help close the achievement gap.

“The schools we are recognizing today demonstrate the incredible commitment of California’s teachers, administrators, and school employees to provide a world-class education to every student, in spite of the financial hardships facing our state and our schools,” Torlakson said in a news release. “Their dedication is inspiring, and I applaud and admire their passion and persistence.”

Here are the East Bay schools that made the list, by county and district:


Alameda City Unified: Amelia Earhart Elementary, Donald D. Lum Elementary

Berkeley Unified: Malcolm X Elementary

Castro Valley Unified: Chabot Elementary, Independent Elementary, Jensen Ranch Elementary, Palomares Elementary, Vannoy Elementary

Dublin Unified: James Dougherty Elementary, John Green Elementary

Fremont Unified: Forest Park Elementary, Glenmoor Elementary, Hirsch Elementary, J. Haley Durham Elementary, Oliveira Elementary, Parkmont Elementary, Warm Springs Elementary

Livermore Valley Joint Unified: Altamont Creek Elementary, Arroyo Seco Elementary

Oakland Unified: Acorn Woodland Elementary, Henry J. Kaiser Jr. Elementary

Pleasanton Unified: Fairlands Elementary


Byron Union Elementary: Discovery Bay Elementary, Timber Point Elementary

Martinez Unified: John Swett Elementary, Morello Park Elementary

Mt. Diablo Unified: Highlands Elementary

Pittsburg Unified: Los Medanos Elementary

West Contra Costa Unified: Hanna Ranch Elementary, Olinda Elementary

The complete list is on the California Department of Education’s website at

Here is more information about the annual recognition program, from the news release:

“The 2012 California Distinguished Schools Program focuses on California’s students and their entitlement to an equitable and rigorous education. The program identifies and honors those schools that have demonstrated educational excellence for all students and progress in narrowing the achievement gap.

To be invited to apply for Distinguished School honors, schools must meet a variety of eligibility criteria including designated federal and state accountability measures based on the Elementary and Secondary Education Act and the Academic Performance Index requirements.

Once schools are deemed eligible, the CDE (California Department of Education) invites them to apply to be recognized as a California Distinguished School. The application process consists of a written application, which includes a comprehensive description of two of the school’s signature practices, and a county-led site validation review process, which validates the implementation of those signature practices.

Elementary and secondary schools (middle and high schools) are recognized in alternate years. This year focuses on elementary schools.

Schools earning the Distinguished School title agree to share their signature practices with other schools and serve as mentors to other educators who want to replicate their work. An updated searchable database of these Signature Practices will be available later this spring by the California Department of Education.

Schools selected for recognition will be honored as Distinguished Schools at award ceremonies where Torlakson will present each school with a 2012 Distinguished School plaque and flag. The event and awards are funded by donations from many of California’s most prominent corporations and statewide educational organizations.

To see signature practices shared by the 2009 California Distinguished Elementary Schools, visit

What are your school’s signature practices?

Posted on Friday, March 30th, 2012
Under: Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Education | No Comments »

Campolindo retains title as county Academic Decathlon champ

Two Academic Decathlon teams from Campolindo High in Moraga again bested their competition during the annual Contra Costa County competition, sponsored by the Contra Costa County Office of Education.

Since the Alameda County Office of Education doesn’t put on a similar event, Contra Costa also hosted two schools from that county in its competition, with Irvington High from Fremont winning.

Both the Campolindo and Irvington teams will advance to the state competition representing Contra Costa and Alameda counties, respectively.

Here’s more information about the competition from a news release I received today:

Campolindo High School Returns as Contra Costa County’s 2012 Academic Decathlon Champion

PLEASANT HILL, Calif., February 9, 2012 – Last night, during an exciting awards reception, it was announced that Campolindo High School (Moraga) Red Team successfully defended its title as the overall team winner of the 2012 Contra Costa County High School Academic Decathlon. Along with Campolindo Red Team’s triumphant return, the school’s Blue Team also repeated its second place standing from last year, as well. This year’s third place team went to Acalanes High School (Lafayette). The Campolindo Red Team will now represent Contra Costa County at the California State Academic Decathlon, to be held in Sacramento, March 15-18. (This year’s National Academic Decathlon will be held in Albuquerque, N.M., April 26 – 28.)

Also noteworthy, of the two Alameda County participating schools, Irvington took first place; the school will represent their county at the California State Academic Decathlon. (Alameda County Office of Education does not produce a county-wide Academic Decathlon.)

Directed by the Contra Costa County Office of Education (CCCOE), and with the assistance of community volunteers, the county’s Academic Decathlon provides an opportunity for high school students to compete as individuals and teams in a series of ten academic tests and demonstrations. The curriculum includes art, economics, language and literature, mathematics, music, science, essay, interview, speech (prepared and impromptu), and the Super Quiz™. More than 155 participating high school students had been studying and preparing for this event with their coaches since September. This year’s Academic Decathlon theme was The Age of Empire, and the Super Quiz™ will focus on the topic of The Age of Imperialism: The Making of a European Global Order. The Super Quiz™ included readings on such topics as mercantile empires, the Atlantic economy, motives for imperialism, the role of technology in the age of imperialism, New Imperialism, tactics of colonial rule, and decolonization and postcolonial immigration.

This year’s participating teams represent the following high schools: Acalanes (Lafayette), Antioch (Anticoch), California (San Ramon), Campolindo (Moraga), Dublin (Dublin), Freedom (Oakley), Irvington (Fremont), Las Lomas (Walnut Creek), Miramonte (Orinda), and Pittsburg (Pittsburg). Acalanes High School has won the past four years. High school teams are made up of nine students, grades 9-12, with a maximum of three students in each of the following divisions: Honors (3.75-4.00 GPA), Scholastic (3.00-3.74 GPA) and Varsity (2.99 GPA and below). High schools that have more than nine students who want to participate in Academic Decathlon, can field more than one team, e.g., Campolindo’s Red and Blue Teams. The teams can also bring guests or alternate participants from their school.

During the awards ceremony, many individual awards were also given out. (All Academic Decathlon statistics will be posted on the CCCOE’s website in the very near future.)

The Academic Decathlon was first created by Dr. Robert Peterson, former Superintendent of Schools in Orange County, California. Firmly believing that everyone’s learning potential can be maximized through competitive challenge, Dr. Peterson set in motion the contest that has since come to be recognized as the most prestigious high school academic team competition in the United States. The program spread rapidly throughout the states due to the success and excitement it engendered. USAD was founded in 1981.”

Do you think this competition is a worthwhile event for the Contra Costa County Office of Education to organize?

Posted on Thursday, February 9th, 2012
Under: Alameda County, Contra Costa County Office of Education | 4 Comments »

Report of gun at Acalanes HS unfounded

In response to rumors Tuesday that a student brought an unloaded gun to Acalanes High in Lafayette, police and school administrators conducted a search of the campus, Principal Aida Glimme said, in a Wednesday message to the community.

“Yesterday, Tuesday 9/27, Acalanes administration received a report of a possible weapon on campus,” Glimmer wrote. “In partnership with the Lafayette Police Department, a thorough search and investigation were conducted. A weapon was not found on campus.

The school’s safety procedures were followed and students were secure and safe on campus. We appreciate the partnership and aid of the Lafayette PD. We continue to encourage our students to keep the Acalanes staff informed of any safety risks to our students.”

Based on the school’s reported suspensions and expulsions for 2010-11, weapons were not an issue on campus last year:

However, the school logged 67 suspensions, including 44 related to violence or drugs. This far exceeded the number of suspensions on all other district campuses. However, Las Lomas High was the only district school to expel a student last year (for sale of controlled substances, alcohol, or intoxicants).

Are you satisfied with the school’s policies and procedures related to student safety?

Posted on Wednesday, September 28th, 2011
Under: Acalanes school district, Education, Lafayette | No Comments »

A closer look at API and Program Improvement in Contra Costa County and the Tri-Valley

According to data released by the state Wednesday, East Bay schools are improving when measured by state Academic Performance Index (API) scores, but many are failing when evaluated by federal No Child Left Behind standards.

Why? Because the state rewards schools that make modest gains, while the federal government is expecting incrementally larger gains each year by students on math and English tests.

According to the No Child Left Behind law, the federal government’s goal is for all students to be proficient in both subjects by 2014. The goal for the state is for schools to keep making moderate progress, even though most educators seem to agree that proficiency for all students in the next three years is unattainable.

Frustrated, some administrators say the federal program appears to be setting them up for failure. Still, most agree the goal of proficiency for all students is laudable and say schools should strive to achieve it.

Here’s how East Bay districts stacked up against each other on their API scores:

(Scores range from 200-1,000, with target of 800)
Acalanes 903
Antioch 731
Brentwood 843
Byron 827
Canyon 888
John Swett 742
Knightsen 847
Lafayette 922
Liberty 764
Martinez 832
Moraga 955
Mt. Diablo 786
Oakley 790
Orinda 957
Pittsburg Not available
San Ramon 922
Walnut Creek 905
West Contra Costa 709
Alameda 842
Albany 881
Berkeley 790
Castro Valley 865
Dublin 885
Emery 702
Fremont 877
Hayward 715
Livermore 832
Newark 773
New Haven 775
Oakland 726
Piedmont 930
Pleasanton 906
San Leandro 738
San Lorenzo 741
Sunol Glen 939
Detailed school, district and county scores are at

Although these scores look pretty good overall, 66 percent of Contra Costa County schools and 60 percent of Alameda County schools are in federal Program Improvement for because students in various designated groups failed to made adequate yearly progress two years in a row. Student subgroups include: ethnic minorities, low-income students, English learners and those with disabilities.

Sanctions escalate each year a school fails to improve. In the first year, schools must notify parents of their program improvement status and set aside 5 percent of Title 1 funds for professional development. By year 5, schools must restructure their staffs and the district must offer alternative choices to students, along with supplemental services.

Districts entering program improvement must develop plans to address deficiencies and devote a percentage of Title 1 funds to professional development.

I and several other Times reporters spoke to local district officials about their scores to get a better sense of what they thought they did right and where they think they need to work harder.

Here’s a sampling of what they said:


ACALANES: Reporter Jonathan Morales told me the Acalanes district can no longer claim to be the highest-scoring high school district in the state. It was edged out this year by the Los Gatos-Saratoga Joint Union district in Santa Clara County, which received an API of 904, compared to 903 for Acalanes.
Here’s Morales’ story about the Lamorinda district school results:

Reporter Paul Burgarino reports that Antioch Unified saw its overall API score fall by one point to 731. While three elementary schools scored 800 or higher, only one increased its score.
Two schools — Orchard Park and Dozier Libbey Medical High — fell back below the 800 mark.
Though the district made little progress on meeting federal standards, no additional schools were designated for program improvement.
Antioch Superintendent Donald Gill said many teachers in the district were moved around last year because the district removed class-size reduction, which forced them to adjust to teaching new grade levels.
“I believe this year things will start to stabilize,” Gill said.
Schools that had specialized coaching for teachers showed improvement, while the district’s four-year data shows improvement in eight out of 10 subgroup categories, Gill said.
Three quarters of the teachers at Turner Elementary were new to their grade level last year. That school’s API score dropped 24 points to a 745.

Reporter Roman Gohkman reports that in the Brentwood Union School District, nine of 10 schools finished above 800. All three middle schools increased their scores; the largest jump coming at Adams Middle School, which increased its score by 17 points from 854 to 871.
All six elementary schools, however, saw their scores decline. The only school that finished below 800, Marsh Creek Elementary, had a growth target of 5 points. Instead, the school dropped 9 points.
“We had really great gains between 2009 and 2010, but our results this year are a mixed bag,” said Michael Bowen, district director of curriculum and instruction.
Bowen said the scores for the district’s six elementary schools dropped possibly because the district put more emphasis into increasing the scores of its three middle schools.
“We’ll be engaging our principals in diving into the data and addressing areas of need,” he said. “When we see drops we always want to dig deep and see what’s going on.”
All three middle schools, including Edna Hill, which is in the second year of program improvement, met their components in the AYP report, while four of the six elementary schools did not meet target goals on at least one component. Garin Elementary, which is in the second year of program improvement, did not meet the target in English-language arts or math.
“I think the targets are becoming unrealistic,” Bowen said.

Reporter Lisa White reports that Superintendent Rami Muth said a a teacher at Las Juntas Elementary (whom she declined to identify) did not follow the directions when administering the STAR test, so those students’ scores were declared invalid. Since those test results affected more than 5 percent of the student body, the test scores for the entire school weren’t counted, thus it was placed in Program Improvement.
The district hired a contractor to crunch the data, which found that every subgroup did make AYP, according to Muth. This, however, is unofficial and not recognized by the state.
So, technically the school is in Year 1 of Program Improvement and will have to do all the things the feds require. Parents will be notified at Back to School Night that they can apply to have their child transferred to one of the other elementary schools (all of which did make AYP) on a space-available basis.
“From our perspective,” Muth said, “the label — while not a good thing — we’re using it as a tool to grow.”

I spoke with Rose Lock, assistant superintendent for student achievement and school support. I will do a separate blog post looking more closely at the district, but here are a few of her comments:
She noted that many schools made good gains on their API scores, but said she wasn’t surprised by the district’s program improvement status:
“We knew it was coming, because we know that our subgroups are continuing to struggle,” she said. “Other school districts across the state are in a similar situation. If you look at the California API accountability, we are making gains. Unfortunately, it’s the federal accountabliity system that’s challenging. Walnut Creek is in program improvement too. We’re in good company.”
She pointed out that only a few districts met all the components of growth targets for all their schools. These included Moraga and Orinda.
“Even San Ramon didn’t,” she said. “Even Lafayette didn’t. But that doesn’t take away the work that we need to do.”
Lock said that being named a program improvement district requires the district to set aside at least 10 percent of its Title 1 money for district-wide professional development.
“We have been focusing on improvement,” Lock said. “Our department is really focused on really targeted and focused efforts — working with our schools in terms of using data and formative assessments — being more strategic in how we respond to the needs of students.”
She said the district hopes to complete its Master Plan for English learners by March, with the newly appointed Director of English Language Services.
“That’s a highest priority,” she said.
The district is also working on an Equity Plan to help narrow the achievement gap for black and Latino students.
In addition, Superintendent Steven Lawrence issued a News Update to the community about the district’s API and AYP results. However, he omitted the Eagle Peak Montessori Charter School from his list. Its score rose by 27 points to 918 and it met all federal targets.

Reporter Rick Radin reports that all Pittsburg elementary and middle school scores rose between 4 and 52 points, with one school — Los Medanos Elementary — scoring over 800.
Superintendent Linda Rondeau (a former MDUSD administrator) credited “a tight focus on teaching strategies and expository writing” in the schools for the improvement.
Pittsburg High and Riverside continuation school scores will not be available until October or November because of data errors by the testing service, Rondeau said.
Total test score increases at the Pittsburg elementary schools far outstripped those at the middle schools.
The elementary school curriculum is more aligned with state testing standards than the middle school curriculum, said Abe Doctolero, assistant superintendent for educational services.
“It becomes more difficult to get everyone aligned on the same instructional page in the middle schools because the teachers teach different subjects,” Doctolero said.

Reporter Eric Louie reports that the San Ramon Valley school district as a whole did not meet the standards because socioeconomically disadvantaged students and those with disabilities did not make the mark in math. Yet, Pine Valley Middle School in San Ramon was the only school that failed to meet its adequate yearly progress goal for math because too few Latino students achieved proficiency.
All other district schools did meet proficiency goals. However, like the majority of schools in the large district, Pine Valley is not a Title 1 school, so it will not be subject to No Child Left Behind sanctions.

I spoke to Superintendent Patricia Wool, who said the district did not meet its adequate yearly progress goals for English learners and Hispanic or Latino students.
“Overall as a district, we’re doing really well,” she said. “In fact our API is 905.”
Every year, the district prepares an Achievement Gap report, she said. The district will come up with a plan to address lagging students.
“We’ve got some work to do,” she said. “We’re trying to come up with varying ways to adjust the curriculum.”
Murwood and Buena Vista elementary are Title 1 schools. Murwood was newly identified as a Program Improvement school this year for failing to make adequate yearly progress in both English and math. Buena Vista failed to meet its math goals, but hasn’t been placed in program improvement yet. If it doesn’t improve, it could be headed for program improvement next year.
“We’re certainly committed to each and every subgroup,” she said. “We don’t rest on our laurels.”
I mentioned that the Cupertinto schools superintendent strongly objected to his district being singled out for “Program Improvement” this year, since that district also has high test scores overall. But Wool said she didn’t have a similar reaction.
“Am I up in arms? No,” she said, “because it’s going to take all of us in this district working together to figure out how to support all the subgroups.”

Reporter Shelly Meron reports that the West Contra Costa school district showed modest improvement overall this year, increasing its API score by 13 points to 709. School officials there say there were many successes this year, with several schools showing significant improvement since 2010.
“We’re in a better place than we were last year and we continue to see that movement in the right direction, and continue to focus on accelerating that growth,” said Nia Rashidchi, the district’s assistant superintendent for educational services. “Our teachers and administrators are working really hard. I think our scores are showing that effort.”
Title I schools in the district performed all over the map. Several campuses – including Stege Elementary, Dejean Middle School and Kennedy High, all in Richmond – dropped significantly. Others showed big improvements, including Bayview Elementary in San Pablo and Highland, Lincoln, Nystrom and Peres elementaries in Richmond.
Rashidchi said local schools have been tackling the job with close collaboration among staff, regular and in-depth assessment of student performance, pinpointing where strengths and weaknesses are, and figuring out how to replicate practices that are working and to weed out what’s not.
“Everyone’s working on that,” Rashidchi said. “Some of our schools have gotten more proficient at it.”
Rashidchi praised 60-point API growth at Lincoln Elementary to 719. The school met growth targets school-wide and for all subgroups.
Kennedy High, on the other hand, is still struggling. Its API score dropped by 33 points to 518 this year, and the school failed to meet its growth targets. It is also in year 5 of program improvement.
“There’s a sense of urgency with the (Kennedy) staff that we know we need to meet the needs of all our kids. We’ll be sitting down and talking with the staff, working with them and providing support to make sure we see the gains we see at other schools,” Rashidchi said. “We will have folks who are perhaps having more success talk with each other about what strategies they’re using. There is lots of energy and effort being put into Kennedy.”


Reporter Eric Louie reported that Frederiksen Elementary in Dublin entered its first year of program improvement, with the school as a whole and multiple subgroups not meeting proficiency targets. Latino and English learners missed their goals in both math and English. White, low-income students missed the English target.
Elsewhere in the district, Dublin Elementary and Wells Middle school — which meet all the standards in 2010 — did not in 2011. If they miss their targets next year, they could fall into program improvement.
Superintendent Stephen Hanke noted the district’s Academic Performance Index has been rising — from 878 last year to 885 in 2011 — far past the target of 800. He said while the district strives to have all students proficient and above, meeting the goal by 2014 as required by federal guidelines isn’t realistic.

Reporter Robert Jordan spoke to Superintendent Parvin Ahmadi about that district’s difficulties keeping campuses out of program improvement. Pleasanton Middle School entered program improvement last year, followed this year by Valley View Elementary.
“We have to do something,” Ahmadi said. “We have been waiting for NCLB reauthorization for a couple of years. We know we have to take a look at a different set of criteria to look at proficiency — a growth model rather than 100 percent by a specific date.”
If the law doesn’t change soon, he predicted even more dire consequences in the next three years.
“By 2013-14, 100 percent of every sub group has to be proficient,” he said. “I would say that most districts in California will be in program improvement.”

What do you think local school districts that are struggling should do to help boost student achievement?

Posted on Friday, September 2nd, 2011
Under: Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Education, Tri-Valley | 7 Comments »

Memorial/donation details regarding Las Lomas students who died in rafting accident


Acalanes school district Superintendent John Stockton has issued the following news release regarding memorial services and donations following the deaths of Las Lomas students Matt Miller and Gavin Powell:

“Friday, February 25, 2011

The entire Acalanes Union High School District community is mourning the loss of Matthew Miller and Gavin Powell, two Las Lomas juniors. Our heartfelt condolences go out to their families.

Below is information on services and charitable donations for both:

Memorial Service
Sunday, February 27 at 3:00 p.m.
St. Matthew Lutheran Church
399 Wiget Lane, Walnut Creek

Donations may given to Amigos De Las Americas
1-800-231-7796 x142
Amigos De Las Americas
Development Dept.
5618 Star Lane
Houston, TX 77057

Memorial Service
Saturday, February 26 at 2:00 p.m.
Mt. Diablo Unitarian Universalist Church
55 Eckley Lane, Walnut Creek

Donations may be given to the Powell Memorial Fund
Checks can be made out to the “Powell Memorial Fund” (There is a drop box in the main office at Las Lomas High School). Please include on the check the account # 05970-70974. Please contact Ms. Steele, Las Lomas Associate Principal or Bank of America for electronic transfer or PayPal information.”

Posted on Friday, February 25th, 2011
Under: Acalanes school district, Education | No Comments »

Dublin district says dropout rate inaccurate

By Theresa Harrington

A report released by the state Department of Education today erroneously showed the Dublin school district’s dropout rate was 99.9 percent, Dublin Superintendent Stephen Hanke told me late this afternoon.

Unfortunately, Hanke contacted me after my deadline (and hours after I had left a message for him with his secretary), so I was unable to add his comments to my print story.

“This is obviously a gross error,” he said. “If you look at the actual rate and how that is reported, they add in some lost transfers.”

According to the state report , the district had 21 grade 9-12 dropouts in 2008-09 out of 1,556 students, reflecting an estimated four-year drop-out rate of 5.3 percent. Eight students re-enrolled, but the district shows 1,015 as “lost transfers,” meaning they left the district and cannot be accounted for.

This is the number that appears to be in error, and which pushed the district’s estimated dropout total to 1,028 students or 99.9 percent.

“We’re actually down less than 1 percent,” Hanke said. “I would say that the issue is likely that this is CALPADS (California Longitudinal Pupil Achievement Data System) and this is the first year and there are some errors in sending or receiving data. We are in the process of calling the state Department of Education.”

Hanke said he conceptually agrees that CALPADS is a good way to track students. However, there is a learning curve with any new system, he said.

In addition, the district got a new student tracking system in the fall, which has further added to the learning curve, Hanke added. Still, he said he suspected the error occurred at the state level, rather than at the district level.

Posted on Tuesday, December 7th, 2010
Under: Alameda County, Dublin school district, Education, Theresa Harrington | No Comments »

Five East Bay school districts get technology grants

By Theresa Harrington

Congratulations to five East Bay school districts that have been selected to receive $1.5 million in federal Enhancing Education Through Technology (EETT) competitive grants!

In Alameda County, the Livermore Valley Joint Unified district and San Lorenzo Unified district willl each receive $250,000.

Contra Costa County districts receiving the grants are: Pittsburg Unified, which will get $50,000; West Contra Costa Unified, which will receive $500,000; and San Ramon Valley Unified, which has been awarded $450,00.

State Schools Chief Jack O’Connell said 151 local educational agencies will share in more than $36 million in grant money. The complete list of grant recipients is at

“These grants will help schools use data effectively to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap,” said O’Connell, in a news release. “With the state budget crisis continuing, our cash-strapped schools desperately need these funds as soon as possible so they can use education data and technology to better prepare students for college or careers.”

Funding for the grants was provided through the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. They range between $10,000 and $3 million, based on the number of 7-12th grade students enrolled in each district.

To be eligible to receive the funding, district were required to have state-approved technology plans and receive federal Title I funding designed to help socioeconomically disadvantaged students.

More information about the grant program is at

Posted on Tuesday, November 30th, 2010
Under: Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Theresa Harrington | No Comments »

Congrats to Chevron Classroom challenge winners

By Theresa Harrington
Ten East Bay schools have received $25,000 each to bolster Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) programs through the “Chevron Classroom Challenge” contest.
Five Contra Costa County and five Alameda County winners were selected from more than 300 projects submitted.
Contra Costa County winners are: Debra Arthur, Ygnacio Valley High School, in the Mt. Diablo district; Martha Kessler, Indian Valley Elementary in the Walnut Creek School Distric; Catherine Vanier, Lovonya De Jean Middle School, in the West Contra Costa district; and Liz Ritchie of Deer Valley High School and Michelle Flowers of Park Middle School — both in the Antioch school district.
Alameda County winners are: Christie Carnahan, of Valley View Elementary School in the Pleasanton school district; and Oakland district teachers Devon McCrory of the Ascend School, Emily Greene of Thurgood Marshall Elementary, Christine Tenorio of the E. C. Reems Academy of Technology & Art, and Aaron Vanderwerff of the Lighthouse Community Charter School.
I’ll be writing more about the winners soon.
If you’re an educator, how do you teach about science, technology, engineering and math?

Posted on Friday, November 19th, 2010
Under: Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Education, Theresa Harrington | No Comments »