Comments on: Who are the California superdelegates?

By: Mary

Mary — Sat, 31 May 2008 00:29:36 +0000

I agree fully with Marie. Obama cannot win in November. As soon as he is announced the nominee, watch out for the Republican ads that will kill his chances. Not that I want him in the first place. His lack of experience and hyprocrisy are glaring and so many are not seeing through it.

By: Marie

Marie — Thu, 08 May 2008 09:16:02 +0000

heh. if you nominate obama, there is no way that he can win in november. he won’t be elected. mccain will win and the republicans will remain in control of the white house.

btw, i have no respect for richardson. nobody likes a “benedict arnold” figure.

i have to mention, the dnc has also shut out the voters of florida and michigan, who WILL be voting in november. now the media is trying to prematurely end the nomination process without letting the remaining states vote. the rules also say the superdelegates can vote for anyone they please. it doesn’t say anything about voting for the person with more pledged delegates – anyone who says this is just trying to change the rules to suit themselves.

By: Kathy

Kathy — Sun, 04 May 2008 21:20:18 +0000

It is the Clinton’s fault she is behind and can’t catch up without playing unfairly, making up new math metrics and trying to damage Senator Obama. She does not play well with others.

This article explains why Senator Obama “closed the deal” in February on Super Tuesday!

http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/January-1993/Vote-of-Confidence/

Senator Clinton had no plan because she was overconfident that she would win. Why, because she was a First Lady, he was little known, and she felt entitled as Govenor Richardson said.

There will be hell to pay for the Democratic Party if the Superdelegates take the nomination and give it to Senator Clinton for any other reason than she has more pledged delegates. That will not go over well, and they will pay for it for years and years.

By: niagaragirl

niagaragirl — Sun, 06 Apr 2008 00:44:13 +0000

Voter’s will be surprised to learn how many foreign countries support Barack Obama. Which is a ‘refreshing..terrific thing. I blog globally on a daily basis, and the Clinton’s do have very, very high negative’s. They don’t know whether to laugh or cry.

Of course, part of the problem is the “Homeland Security” and “National Security” damage that’s been done during ‘The Reign’ of the Clinton’s as far back as Arkansas. We are 10 or so Country’s, affected by bioterrorism during his administration.

Of course, there was also domestic terrorism such as Waco and Oklahoma, WTC-93, American Embassies oversees, The “Cole”…but who’s counting. I think this couple’s scandels will continue with ferver, but hopefully Obama wins the Presidency. JOhn McCain will not against Obama. Maybe America can shine again

By: Gladys Figueroa

Gladys Figueroa — Tue, 01 Apr 2008 23:45:31 +0000

Would like to let the superdelagates of California know that they should support Senator Clinton not only because she won here in California but also she is the person that can actually win the general elections.The only way that the delegates should be thinking when casting their vote is which canditate is more electable. We democrats need to get the the White House back. They should not be influenced by the media. The Republican sound the senator Clinton is devisive is just that a sound bite. We voters know better. Senator Obama is not experienced enough at this time and this is not time to get a trainee of the job….times are hard, people will be voting depending most likely on the economy issues….thank you.

By: sally gilmore

sally gilmore — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:51:09 +0000

Re: Florida & Michigan

I thought the DNC represented us Democrats? Is it true that one candidate is able to control the DNC by extortion of withholding further contributions? If so, and it is successful, I will not support the Democrats. How many on the DNC rules committee support Obama? Hillary? This committee made the rules so why are they all of a sudden arbitrary?

By: dvdpt

dvdpt — Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:11:44 +0000

Dianne Feinstein,Barbara Boxer,and her crone!!!
clinton superdelegates are BUSH cronnies!!!

(MRS CLINTON IS A LIAR,CORRUPT,EVIL,)
( SHE IS THE DEVIL )

By: Kathy

Kathy — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:05:05 +0000

“The Democratic Party must be democratic. The superdelegates should let the voters decide between Clinton and Obama, PLEASE support the people’s choice.”

WRITE TO YOUR CONGRESSMAN & SENATOR!

Why has Obama received so many less superdel than Clinton from Cal? Aren’t you letting the voter decide? Yet the election was

Vote: Clinton – 52%, Obama – 42%
Superdelegates: Clinton – 27, Obama – 13

Doesn’t this seem skewed?

“The superdelegates should let the voters decide between Clinton and Obama, PLEASE support the people’s choice.”

By: Mark

Mark — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:24:39 +0000

Sorry, you are right. They are actually considered Party Leader/Elected Official Delegates.

http://www.cadem.org/site/c.jrLZK2PyHmF/b.3643973/

By: Nancy Pelosi Bitch Slaps Hillary Clinton; Becomes Obama’s Super Mama : The Feldman Blog

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:26:55 +0000

[...] House speaker said today that the so-called Superdelegates should not go against the will of the people when it comes time to decide whom to back at the [...]