Part of the Bay Area News Group

Lynndie England blames the media

By Josh Richman
Tuesday, March 18th, 2008 at 3:13 pm in Iraq, Media.

lynndie-england.jpgLynndie England — the U.S. soldier depicted with a smile while demeaning and humiliating Iraqi prisoners in some of the notorious Abu Ghraib photos — has given a lengthy interview to a German news magazine in which she vacillates from regret (“Of course it was wrong. I know that now.”) to defiant unrepentance (“To be honest, the whole time I never really felt guilty because I was following orders and I was doing what I was supposed to do. So I’ve never felt guilty about doing anything that I did there.”)

And guess what… she blames the media!

england2-credit-epa.jpgI guess after the picture came out the insurgency picked up and Iraqis attacked the Americans and the British and they attacked in return and they were just killing each other. I felt bad about it, … no, I felt pissed off. If the media hadn’t exposed the pictures to that extent then thousands of lives would have been saved.
[snip]
Yeah, I took the photos but I didn’t make it worldwide. Yes, I was in five or six pictures and I took some pictures, and those pictures were shameful and degrading to the Iraqis and to our government. And I feel sorry and wrong about what I did. But it would not have escalated to what it did all over the world if it wouldn’t have been for someone leaking it to the media. Hell, I was at Fort Bragg when the pictures came out and I had no idea.

england1-credit-afp.jpgEven after being subjected to one of the most publicized courts-martial in U.S. history; being convicted of one count of conspiracy, four counts of maltreating detainees and one count of committing an indecent act; and serving about a year and five months in a military prison, this young woman still doesn’t get it.

So here’s a quick-and-dirty civics lesson for the unduly dense: The job of the free press is to report on the world as it is, what’s really happening, blemishes at all, regardless of politics. It puts the facts out there and so that people can decide for themselves, and it lets the chips fall where they may. And that’s exactly what happened here.

If these photos incited anti-American sentiment (which I agree they almost certainly did), that’s not the media’s fault. It’s the fault of the amoral people who committed, allowed or encouraged these crimes, and who were stupid — mind-bogglingly, epically, evolutionary-dead-endingly stupid — enough to photograph themselves performing what many argue are war crimes.

Make no mistake, former U.S. Army Reserve Spc. Lynndie England of Fort Ashby, W.Va., and her cohorts at Abu Ghraib, and those who allowed or approved what happened there, brought enormous dishonor upon all the upstanding men and women who wear the uniform in defense of the United States of America, and most likely helped incite violence that claimed many of those fine troops’ lives.

England failed at her jobs as a soldier and as a human being; she has a lot of gall, a mountainous heap of hypocrisy, blaming the press for succeeding at its job.

[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]

  • Theo

    Nice way to pass the buck.

  • jh

    Hmmmm….How many heads did she cut off ?

  • Josh Richman

    Jh — Is that really the standard to which you believe U.S. troops should be held? Aren’t we supposed to be “the good guys?”

  • jh

    Yes Josh you never put it into proper perspective…Of course she should have not done the things she did but when you compare it to what others do it isn’t even close to the same level. It is fine to make sure it isn’t swept under the carpet but then move on. Our media in general goes on about some humiliation like it is on the same level and any chance to report anything negative about our military is ran over and over into the ground…So here we are years later and she gets more attention in our media over humiliation than terrorists cutting off the heads of their prisoners on tape no less so their familes can see it.

  • stuart jones

    She was a private following the orders of her superiors. Yes she was very naive but why was nobody above the rank of sergeant ever charged? Does anybody really think these soldiers did this of their own initiative? That the orders did not come down the chain of command.
    The senior officers always wriggle out of it.

  • Badger

    Media works like this:
    Abu Ghraig = BAD! ABUSE! WAR CRIME!
    9-11= the infidels had it coming! America is bad!

    How was WW2 won by the Allies? By destroying the enemy, the fascists.

    How will this war be won? By destroying the enemy, the islamo-fascists.

    Not by pussyfooting around stupid regulations and pretending to be “superior”, “sophisticated” and on the moral high ground.

    What they did at Abu Ghraib was dumb, but I have no problems with it. Personally I think that non-military personnel shouldn’t even be taken prisoner. See a jihadi with a gun? Shoot to kill. Period. Them or us.

  • Bernard

    I see nothing wrong in her doing. War is not just a nice walkabout, war is war and the task of a soldier is to kill. Or to be killed, of course.

    War is done by the soldier, but the soldier does not declare the war. If there is any guilt at all, then it is the guilt of the politician who declares war.