Comments on: Nader has a snit over impeachment hearing

By: Dems to Win

Dems to Win — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:17:43 +0000

Nader is a pathetic whiner. He’s the one who said “there’s no difference between Bush and Gore”. So why in the world would anyone consider him a public policy ‘expert’ after he spouted such nonsense?

By: jonathan elliott

jonathan elliott — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:25:08 +0000

as an englishman it seems to me that the congressional commitee chair wants to close its ears and eyes to what mr Nader has to say.
I can only guess to as to why but this is my susspion, the chairman is playing politics and not looking for “truth” since mr nader has been investigating the rights and wrongs of the bush administration for meny years so has a wide and expanded knolege on the subject.
since he is being put down so much i have to ask who has the real problem with their egos or is it insecurities?

By: Jerry

Jerry — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:57:30 +0000

A simple question for all. Who is going to elect the PRESIDENT OF OUR NATION ? THE MEDIA AND BLOGS OR WE THE PEOPLE? Am I the only one who wonders? I will be voting as I always do for the person whose public sevice records and policies will best serve this nation’s needs!!!

By: Jerry

Jerry — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:42:32 +0000

MR Nader has been a champion of and for himself for forty years. His biggest and only noticable accomplishment during his tarnished career was to kill the production of the Chevrolet Corvair. The reason was becuse the gas tank set in front and the engine in the rear making it to dangerous to operate.He failed to mention that this car was a best selling compact of it’s time . Nor did he mention that the gas tanks on pick up trucks were commonly installed behind the seat in the cab. Nor did he attack the VW Beetle for the same reason. NADER is and always has benn for NADER!!!

By: Shiu Hung

Shiu Hung — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:14:53 +0000

We disagree, Mr. Nader is a public interest lawyer, and has been a champion of Americans freedoms for more than forty years. He deserves a place at the table, and it is unacceptable if he is excluded.Explain why Libertarian candidate Bob Barr is invited, and not Independent candidate Ralph Nader? This is unfair, and nothing short of a double standard. We want to know that Mr. Nader can attend these important hearings, and share his insights, knowledge and assessments with the public.