What planet are you from?

It is your camp that coined the phase “Save the Delta” not mine or was that just wasted on you? Actually you just made my point.

I addressed the facts, you simply made statements that had no back up.

Sorry you did not get it. I feel the rest of us did.

Facts are easy, it is opinions that are tossed about with disregard that are troublesome.

Best of luck to you with your opinions such as these;

“Those opposing a peripheral canal are detached from reality and urinating into the breeze.”

“The PC is the only way to solve the simultaneous problems of the Delta environment and water deliveries.”

Facts are troublesome things, aren’t they?

Much more difficult to deal with than emotions.

Shouting “Save the Delta” is much easier than actually implementing a solution.

The PC is the solution.

Those who deal with emotion rather than facts are the problem.

You must be joking right? This is not about water flowing up hill (we all know it doesn’t). The Delta sits at sea level.

Money flow? You might be on to something; just follow that money flow directly into the “buy in” of this recycled PC idea.

It is simply about “allowing” the destruction of the Delta so that water can unnaturally be exported to the Southland. You don’t have to take my word for it; there are plenty of reports available regarding the pros and cons of a canal.
I can’t see an advantage in redirecting flows which in turn allow salt water intrusion into the Delta. It is not rocket science that we need fresh water, not salt water!

How would you rationalize that as being good for water quality, existing habitat, or the environment simply by labeling it “saving the Delta”? It just doesn’t add up no matter what you call it.

My question for you is why would you be trolling here advocating for it? Hmmmmmm.

Water deliveries are not going to stop.

If anything they will increase.

The only time water flows up hill is when it’s flowing toward money.

The PC is the obvious best solution for both the delta and the water needs of the state.

Calling it anything else is futile.

The existing diversion of delta water is already causing enough havoc. If we want to ‘save the delta’ we can start by shutting of the export pumps.

During the recent shut down of the pumps the delta waters never looked so clear.

Let’s face it, the more water diverted the more saltwater intrusion, the worse the water quality. It is simply hydraulics. Calling it something else doesn’t change a thing.

Let’s hope our leadership here can pull together and defeat this (again) before we really damage the delta and the ecosystem.

This is not ’82.

Resistance is futile.

The PC is the only solution.

The PC is the only way to solve the simultaneous problems of the Delta environment and water deliveries.