Part of the Bay Area News Group

Torlakson seeks cigarette tax hike

By Lisa Vorderbrueggen
Tuesday, January 6th, 2009 at 5:02 pm in California Legislature.

Assemblyman Tom Torlakson, D-Antioch

Assemblyman Tom Torlakson, D-Antioch

Assemblyman Tom Torlakson, D-Antioch, has reintroduced a bill that would hike the cigarette tax and use the proceeds to fund education, children’s health care and smoking cessation programs.

Taxes would go up about $2 a pack and bring in roughly $2 billion a year.

(Yes, Torlakson was a state senator but he termed out and returned to the Assembly, where he has one term left. He has said he will run for state superintendent of schools in 2010.)

Read more for the press release from his office.

Assemblyman Tom Torlakson (D-Antioch) announced today he introduced Assembly Bill 89, which could raise approximately $2 billion annually by increasing the state’s cigarette tax. The money would go toward education, children’s healthcare and programs to help people stop smoking.

“As we confront the difficult decisions facing us during our severe budget crisis, we must look at additional revenue options as part of a balanced solution that protects the education of our children,” said Torlakson.  “This revenue stream will not only save tax payers billions of dollars currently going to treat tobacco-related medical conditions, but will also save lives by helping to prevent smoking.   This measure is truly a win for California’s schools, families, as well as our budget coffers.”

AB 89 is similar to Senate Bill 24, legislation Torlakson introduced last year.  AB 89 could raise approximately $2 billion annually for education, children’s healthcare, and tobacco-related disease, research, and cessation programs by raising the tobacco tax by $2.10 per pack.  Since 2000, 42 of the 50 states have increased their cigarette excise taxes, while California’s levels haven’t changed from .87 since 1998.  Thirty-three other states have a higher tax than California.

Specifically, about $1 billion would go to our severely under-funded public education system–partially backfilling lost Proposition 98 dollars and “cost-of-living” cuts.  A portion of this funding could go towards enrolling 700,000 uninsured children into the Healthy Families and dental care programs, fortifying the Medi-Cal program, reversing cuts already made to programs serving our state’s developmentally disabled and autistic children, and preventing further cuts to protective services for children.

Each year, smoke causes 31,000 asthma attacks in children and hundreds of thousands lower respiratory tract infections.  At the same time, reports show that while smoking among teenagers was on the decline in California until 2004, the trend reversed course and increased from 13 percent in 2004 to 16 percent in 2006. Additionally, 11 percent of children, six years and younger are regularly exposed to secondhand smoke in the home.

In 2006, voters narrowly defeated Proposition 86, which would have imposed an additional $2.60 tax per pack.   Even in its flawed form, the proposition almost passed and polling shows growing public support for a tobacco tax.

“It is my hope, and I fully expect a tobacco tax will be a declining revenue stream,” added Torlakson.  “However, it could be used to fund critical needs today.”

Share

[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]

No Responses to “Torlakson seeks cigarette tax hike”

  1. Arne Simonsen Says:

    Nice to see that Tom still hasn’t seen a tax increase that he doesn’t like. At least he is consistent.

    There is a serious flaw with his nexus.

    Hey, Tom, why not go for those high increases in beer and alcohol taxes; or even better yet, find a way to tax all the people using illegal drugs – at least there is a nexus between illegal drug use/activities and the programs you are talking about.

  2. Walter, GOP Livermore City-Chair Says:

    Another Democrat fighting to raise taxes? Imagine that! Raising the price by $2 a pack might even create a black-market for cigarettes.

  3. KM Says:

    I say GO FOR IT! The worst thing that could happen is all the smokers would move away or quit. I watched my dad die of cancer. I watched his mother die of lung cancer when she had NEVER smoked in her life but lived with three smokers! If it is going to stay legal then tax the h— out it!

  4. Arne Simonsen Says:

    KM, I think you will find out that people who use illegal drugs have a far greater impact on society in the form of shootings, murders, drug overdoes, robberies, burglaries, purse snatching, hospitalization, homelessness, and the list goes on.

    Tobacco users are using a legal substance which is already overtaxed.

    Go after the people that are really negatively impacting our society – illegal drug sellers and users!!

  5. Adam Says:

    Why stop at cigarettes? We should raise taxes on alcohol by $2-3 per pint. Next raise taxes on unhealthy fatty foods, let’s face it we have a medical crisis on our hands and I don’t want to have to pay for all these fat people’s clogged arteries just because they chose to eat at McDonalds. Make them all pay per gram over what is considered a healthy intake. Like say $.02 over 20 grams. That would raise an extra $1.50 or so off all those combo meals at the burger joints. My guesstimate is we could pull in about 2 billion anually just off McDonalds customers alone.

    Next stop, 1984. All aboard!

  6. steve Says:

    The economy is tanking hard and the one thing we have to reduce some stress is smoke they have already taken away almost anywhere to actually smoke which is fine but 2 dollars a pack tax this guy must have hell of lot more money than me if they not nailing us on gas prices we get shaft on tax increase on cigs.how about legalize weed and tax that can you imagine that 2 billion a year the yoyo talking about would be more like 10 billion.I dont understand how some of these idiots get elected i really dont

Leave a Reply