Part of the Bay Area News Group

Legislative records lawsuit settled

By Josh Richman
Tuesday, June 16th, 2009 at 1:52 pm in California Legislature, campaign finance.

A pair of open-government groups have settled their lawsuit against the state Office of Legislative Counsel now that a machine-readable database of lawmakers’ voting records has been made available.

The California First Amendment Coalition and – a Berkeley-based nonpartisan nonprofit research group that exposes connections between money and politics – said the database became available not long after they filed their lawsuit in December in Sacramento County Superior Court.

“It shouldn’t take a lawsuit for the government to realize its data belongs to the people,” executive director Daniel Newman said in a news release. “In this new era of highlighting transparency, we hope this settlement serves as an example to city and state governments across the country to provide public access to public information.”

California Legislative data, including how lawmakers vote, legislation in progress, and laws, used to be available to the public only in a plain-text format on the California Legislative Information website. It could be viewed and printed, but provided access to only one bill at a time, making analysis difficult. CFAC and had asked for copies of the electronic database used to create the Web site, but the Office of the Legislative Counsel had refused their requests.

Now the website offers a “structured database” containing data on lawmakers’ votes in a machine-readable format. As part of the settlement agreement, which is effective today, CFAC and agreed to dismiss their lawsuit and agreed that they will not re-file any similar suit so long as the Legislative Counsel maintains this structured database at the same functional level at which it exists today.

The settlement agreement also provides that the Office of the Legislative Counsel will release another database, known as the “Inquire” database that and CFAC seek to review. The agreement also stipulates that the Office of the Legislative Counsel will pay $65,000 towards’s and CFAC’s attorney’s fees.

“No longer can legislators use the complexity of the legislative process, and the sheer volume of bills and votes, to hide the favors they are doing for special interests that fund their elections,” said CFAC executive director Peter Scheer. “The more voters know about the influence of money on their elected representatives, the less tolerant they will be.” plans to use the structured database to create a new government transparency website, California, modeled after a Congress website providing transparency tools including a Money and Votes database showing connections between campaign donations and legislative votes.

[Both comments and pings are currently closed.]

  • RR

    Money linked to politics? What the hell is wrong with that! Jefferson accepted contributions; Stalin didn’t need to. When he needed something, he went ahead and took it. Even these holier-than-thou “netroots” are happy to accept cash, so long as its source isn’t directly tied to greedy corporations. Trial lawyers have been the backbone of “Nader’s Raiders” for years.

  • Ralph Hoffmann, Guest Columnist

    This article doesn’t say there’s anything wrong with money being linked to politics. The ease of public access to contribution records should merely allow the correlation of elected officials voting records with the monetary contributions they have received easier.