Say it slowly now – “Meg and Sara WHO ??!!” is ONE (1) alias . . .

But a new question arises from these last two “responses” –

Is the political right or RNC struggling in its abilities to defend its candidates that its supporters are left with only the strategy of name calling and slandarous argument as the basis for their political positions ?? I certainly hope not.

Tell you what RR – let’s discuss the candidate and their values and political positions – see post #2 above, now try to respond to points made –

See, failure to focus on the facts causes your alias, the political positions you stand for, and the candidates you are supporting to be discredited in the eyes of any thinking person . . .

But, maybe, just maybe, that’s the point – that Meg’s strategy is to capture the knee-jerk reactions of a “non thinking” voter. . . . indeed, it would make infinite sense.

Don’t all those sour grapes really make you pucker?

Meg thumbed her nose squarely at the democratic process and her responsibility to same when she denied electorate the right to observe a debate by opposing political candidates.

Meg thumbed her nose squarely at any definition of “fiscal responsibility” when she decided to out-spend any California gubernatorial candidate by several orders of magnitude.

Meg thumbed her nose squarely at the intellect of electorate by presuming that voters dont notice these obvious conflicts.