CD11: Emken targets Harmer in nasty mailer

GOP primary 11th Congressional District candidate Elizabeth Emken has hit opponent David Harmer with a nasty mailer (post below) that paints him as a greedy credit card lawyer for a failed bank who profited from the federal bailout.

Emken and Harmer are in a tight, four-way primary race for their party’s nomination on June 8 and the opportunity to challenge incumbent Democratic Rep. Jerry McNerney.

The other two Republican candidates, Tony Amador and Brad Goehring, have weighed in on the issue,  as well. (See their responses at the bottom of this post.)

The mailer contains the usual mix of truth and distortions. Here is an analysis of its contents and the Harmer campaign’s response:

WHAT IT SAYS: “Harmer took $485,779 in bonus and pay from a Wall Street bailout bank seized by federal regulators.”

IS IT TRUE? Yes and no. Washington Mutual, where Harmer was a first vice president and assistant general counsel in its credit card division, never received bailout money.

The FDIC forced Washington Mutual into receivership on Sept. 25, 2008, and orchestrated the a sale to JPMorgan Chase for $1.9 billion.

A month later, JPMorgan Chase received $25 billion from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. There is no evidence on way or the other that JPMorgan, which had already acquired Bear Stearns, used or needed TARP money to buy Washington Mutual. (A reader sent this link from BusinessInsider, where the author suggests documents show the federal government forced JPMorgan Chase and the other banks to take the bailout; that they didn’t want it.)

However, Harmer collected a salary, bonus and severance from JPMorgan Chase for a few months until the new owner shut down the division — it already had one — and he lost his job in January 2009.

Several banking industry experts say only JPMorgan knows if it used TARP funds to cover or enable its Washington Mutual acquisition costs, such as Harmer’s severance check.  There were no requirements that banks segregate and publicly identify how or if they spent TARP funds.

HARMER RESPONSE: “Harmer never took a single dime of bailout funding. It’s blatantly untrue. The piece is designed to distort the picture.”

WHAT IT SAYS: “Harmer took almost half a million dollars in bonuses and pay in the months leading up to his bank’s seizure.”

IS IT TRUE? Yes. Harmer earned $219,714 in salary and an $80,000 bonus in 2008. In the first few months of 2009, before JPMorgan closed his division, Harmer was paid $26,073 in salary and a $75,406 bonus.

He subsequently received an $84,586 severance check, for a total of $485,779 between Jan. 1, 2008, and April 30, 2009.

HARMER RESPONSE: “It’s meaningless. Everyone with a job has earned some amount of money in any given time period.”

WHAT IT SAYS: “After his bank was seized by federal regulators and sold to JPMorgan, taxpayers were on the hook for $25 billion in federal bailout money.”

IS IT TRUE? Yes. JPMorgan was one of 19 banks that federal regulators deemed eligible for the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. Congress authorized it Oct. 3, 2008, about two weeks after the FDIC seized and sold Washington Mutual.
JPMorgan has repaid the money plus with interest.

HARMER RESPONSE: “That fact that Washington Mutual failed or JPMorgan Chase bought it had nothing to do with Harmer. He worked in the credit card compliance division, where he did his job very well and he was rewarded.”

WHAT IT SAYS: “Then Harmer turned around and had the nerve to file a jobless claim and collected nearly $2,400 from California’s Unemployment Insurance Fund. Unemployment insurance should be reserved for people truly in need — not greedy lawyers …”

IS IT TRUE? Yes and no.

Harmer collected $2,395 in unemployment insurance through April 30, 2009. However, all eligible workers who pay into the unemployment insurance pool receive benefits regardless of whether they “need” the money.

The implication is that as a conservative candidate who opposes TARP and the other federal stimulus dollars, it looks bad for Harmer to collect unemployment while he runs for Congress.

HARMER RESPONSE: “It is insurance. David Harmer has paid in far more into the system than he has ever collected.”

Page 1

Page 1

Page 2

Page 2

Click through to see Amador and Goehring’s statements on this issue.

Amador’s news release:

David Harmer’s Hypocrisy Reaches New Level
“Harmer is Running for Congress Because He Needs a Job”

STOCKTON—Retired United States Marshal Tony Amador said a Stockton Record investigative news story demonstrates that opponent David Harmer has reached a new level of hypocrisy.

“On the campaign trail, David Harmer says he opposes federal bailouts, yet when David saw an opportunity for a personal bailout, he had his hand out,” Amador said after addressing the Republican Women Federated of Stockton Wednesday at the Brookside Country Club.

Amador was referring to the article written by columnist Mike Fitzgerald that revealed Harmer applied for unemployment compensation despite hundreds of thousands of dollars of assets and earning about $500,000 in 15 months.  Harmer earned a sizeable bonus as an attorney for big banks that received TARP federal bailout money.  After Washington Mutual failed, he was laid off by JP Morgan Chase.   On the way out, Harmer received a handsome severance package.

He immediately ran for Congress in the 10th District where he still resides.  For months, Harmer accused Garamendi of carpet bagging into the district.  Then, a few months later, Harmer is running again as a candidate in the 11th District, this time as the carpetbagger.

Unlike his GOP primary opponents, U.S. Marshal Amador, health care lobbyist Elizabeth Emken and farm labor contractor Brad Goehring, Harmer will not be able to vote for himself on Election Day.  The four-way Republican primary on June 8th will determine who runs against Rep. Jerry McNerney for California’s 11th Congressional District.

“There’s a long list of Harmer’s hypocrisy on carpet bagging, Obamacare, on gay marriage and don’t ask/don’t tell.  Now we can add Harmer’s hypocrisy on bailouts,” Amador said.  “The fact is David Harmer will say anything to get elected to a congressional seat, somewhere.”

“I think David Harmer is running for Congress because he needs a job,” Amador said.

Goehring’s news release:

Harmer Campaign Looking for a Bailout

Self described Reagan Republican Congressional candidate takes $160,000 “Golden Parachute” in bailout money while receiving unemployment checks.

STOCKTON (CA) -While campaigning for the 11th Congressional District voters often hear candidate David Harmer rail against the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) otherwise known as the stimulus that failed to stimulate the economy. Harmer has even said “We’re disgusted by it.” Apparently Mr. Harmer’s disgust wasn’t enough to stop him from shamelessly taking over $160,000 in bailout money for himself.

Before attempting to carpetbag the 11th Congressional District after losing two other races for Congress, lawyer David Harmer was employed by Washington Mutual (WaMu). WaMu disintegrated during the mortgage crisis and was purchased by JP Morgan Chase who promptly laid Harmer off. JP Morgan Chase took over $25 billion in bailout money and Harmer walked away with over $160,000 in bonuses and severance courtesy of the tax payers.

Harmer, who earned over $400,000 over the last year and lists hundreds of thousands of dollars in assets took over $2,000 in unemployment benefits on top of his taxpayer “Golden Parachute”. After the company Harmer worked for failed he was rewarded with bailout money to the tune of $160,000 and then took an additional $2,000 from the unemployment system.

Carl Fogliani, spokesman for 11th Congressional District frontrunner Brad Goehring stated:

“David Harmer says he’s a conservative but lives like a San Francisco liberal. You can’t bash the stimulus with one hand while cashing your stimulus check with the other. Harmer calls himself a Reagan Republican but he looks more like an Obama Republican. Brad Goehring is leading this race because he is a true constitutional conservative who will go to Washington and fight against out of control government spending.”

“Voters in the 11th District have a choice, they can vote for a guy like Harmer who is looking for a job and handouts or they can go with a fighter like Brad Goehring who has created jobs and wants to stop the out of control spending in Washington,” said Fogliani. “I think Republicans now know that David Harmer isn’t the kind of Republican who can defeat Jerry McNerney in the fall.”

Lisa Vorderbrueggen

  • Ernie Konnyu

    I represented the Santa Clara county portion of the 11th CD in Congress back in the 1980’s. Reading this expose it is very clear that David Harmer should not be the Republican choice on June 8. Harmer’s hypocracy would make him an easy Democrat target this November.

    With his overwhelming endorsements in the San Joaquin and Santa Clara county portions of the district, Brad Goering should be our Republican nominee. Beside all that, Goering being named by CNBC as the “Worst Person In The World” makes him the perfect Republican candidate, the clear choice.

  • Dan

    Elizabeth Emken’s vapid attack campaign is apparently: David Harmer is a lawyer who worked for a bank and got a bonus to support his wife and their four young children. He ran for Congress before. And did I mention (again) that he’s a Mormon?

    The voters of the 11th CD are not as stupid or as bigoted as Emken thinks, which is why she will probably finish 4th in the 4 way race.

  • Frank

    The Contra Costa Times has again gone above and beyond the usually dismissal of GOP candidates with Harmer. CCT defended Harmer for being Campaign Manager of a corrupt team in Utah last fall.
    Good strategy to solidify the General Election for the Dems, aid the corrupt republican in the primary.

  • Arne

    It should be noted that employees do not pay the Unemployment Tax – Employer’s pay it (to the State and Federal Government) and regularly receive statements with the balance and experience factor for their account.

  • Lisa Vorderbrueggen

    It may be a difference without much of a distinction. What I have been told is that although employers pay the unemployment tax, they do so on behalf of their employees. No employee may receive benefits unless he or she has worked and the employer has paid the premiums. Employers consider unemployment insurance, or the payroll tax, as part of an employee’s benefits and salary package.