Comments on: DA: Peterson replies to O’Malley ‘judge’ issue

By: Jason

Jason — Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:43:04 +0000

Funny, doesn’t Judge Judy still hold onto her title even though she’s technically no judge via her show? What about previous Presidents still known by their respective titles? On another final note about Peterson’s bickering…who cares?

By: Elwood

Elwood — Thu, 07 Oct 2010 05:15:06 +0000

Is it just me, or does Peterson look like a weasel?

By: Oscar F

Oscar F — Wed, 06 Oct 2010 07:21:16 +0000

If the (ret.) after the name and salutation is alright for the military, then it’s alright with me! Everyone know what it means.

By: John W

John W — Mon, 04 Oct 2010 03:58:50 +0000

I don’t know who’s honest or not, and presume that neither candidate is either a saint or a crook. But I have seen Peterson on the job, from the perspective of a jury pool member in one of his murder trials. The guy is good. He has, by far, more experience as a career prosecutor and, by far, a better legal education. Besides, family dynasties annoy me — whether it’s two Clintons or two Bushes in the White House; the Piepho/Nejedly’s; or the prospect of one family simultaneously controlling the District Attorney’s offices in both major East Bay counties plus the Superior Court chief judge position in one of those counties. Others may disagree. That’s life.

By: RF

RF — Mon, 04 Oct 2010 02:24:52 +0000

If Peterson is what you call “Honest”, we are in trouble in Contra Costa County.

By: Needs A Honest DA

Needs A Honest DA — Mon, 04 Oct 2010 01:11:44 +0000

http://orodefense.com/attorneys/biographies/william-daniel-omalley.html

Daddy’s boy trying to follow daddy’s footsteps or daddy wants Danny boy to follow dada’s footsteps…either way p, the should obey the law…after all, it is the DAs office!!!

By: Needs A Honest DA

Needs A Honest DA — Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:43:41 +0000

Get really people, take a look at the article, for your convenience, here is the link to the rape case article:

http://www.eastbayexpress.com/ebx/a-troubled-rape-case-becomes-even-more-troubling/Content?oid=2032479

Peterson is trying playing by the “LAW” while Danny boy is playing along his daddy’s connection.

Please read the article!!!

By: Djundrcover

Djundrcover — Sun, 03 Oct 2010 13:38:35 +0000

#4,

I agree, society does need defense attorney’s. The 30 second ad doesn’t really paint the whole picture. Head on over to eastbayexpress.com for a pretty in depth story on O’malley connection to the plea agreement. There are some interesting fasts that didn’t come out in the commercial.

By: John W

John W — Sun, 03 Oct 2010 04:33:10 +0000

Re: #3

I’m leaning toward voting for Peterson, but have to agree the Roy Gordon ad is pretty sleezy. Defense attorneys are integral to the justice system, and it’s the nature of the beast that the people they defend often are not candidates for sainthood. That said, calling Peterson a “career politician” is equally a cheap shot. I mean, what’s the monthly pay for a Concord city councilman — about $900 or so?

By: RF

RF — Sun, 03 Oct 2010 00:42:05 +0000

Someones internal polling suggests he isn’t as far ahead as the primary would make one believe.

http://www.thefactsaboutdan.com/

This sophomoric Willie Horton commercial is just plain desperate.

I was going to vote for Peterson, “was” being the main point.