<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CD11: Harmer responds to public schools issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2010/10/20/cd11-harmer-responds-to-public-schools-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2010/10/20/cd11-harmer-responds-to-public-schools-issue/</link>
	<description>Politics in the Bay Area and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:06:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: curt</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2010/10/20/cd11-harmer-responds-to-public-schools-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-20938</link>
		<dc:creator>curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 04:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/?p=13926#comment-20938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Dave Jones has publicly stated that he would not raise money from special interests he will affect as Commissioner, his latest fundraising report demonstrates the hypocrisy of Dave Jones and his campaign. 
 
His report released today shows $15,000 from attorneys at Shernoff, Bidart, Echeverria, which advertises itself as &quot;Lawyers for Insurance Policyholders,&quot; $1,300 from Mannion &amp; Lowe whose business is &quot;representing plaintiffs in disputes with their insurance carriers,&quot; and $2,500 from Manatt, Phelps &amp; Phillips whose clients include Metropolitan Life Insurance, Monumental Life Insurance Company, and an unnamed &quot;largest workers&#039; compensation carrier in California.&quot;  Health care contributors who will be affected by federal health care reform issues before the Commissioner include United Pharmacists Network ($1,000), Union of American Physicians &amp; Dentists ($2,000), and CA Optometric PAC ($5,000).
 
Perhaps the most egregious example of Jones&#039; hypocrisy is his acceptance of a total this year of $11,000 from the law firm Roxborough, Pomerance, Nye and Adreani, who in March filed a major lawsuit with the Department of Insurance over health insurance issues.
 
The Los Angeles Times, Capitol Weekly, and other publications have previously exposed Jones and his fundraising tactics.  When caught by the media fundraising from insurance interests, Jones and his campaign only had the following to say:
 
&quot;&#039;If they list Mother Teresa on their website, should I return it?&#039; Jones said. &#039;I would just ask that it be kept in perspective.&#039;&quot;  (Sacramento Bee, October 13, 2010)

&quot;Jones spokeswoman Sandra Sanchez said the campaign screens contributions for licensed insurance companies and brokers but would not automatically reject money from a group representing those providers or a PAC funded by insurance money.

&quot;&#039;It&#039;s very, very difficult to track every single organization to find out what money they accept and what they don&#039;t,&#039; Sanchez said.&quot;  (California Watch, October 11, 2010)

Jones will cripple California&#039;s economy, raise workers comp rates exponentially and kill private sector jobs.  VOTE NO ON DAVE JONES!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Dave Jones has publicly stated that he would not raise money from special interests he will affect as Commissioner, his latest fundraising report demonstrates the hypocrisy of Dave Jones and his campaign. </p>
<p>His report released today shows $15,000 from attorneys at Shernoff, Bidart, Echeverria, which advertises itself as &#8220;Lawyers for Insurance Policyholders,&#8221; $1,300 from Mannion &amp; Lowe whose business is &#8220;representing plaintiffs in disputes with their insurance carriers,&#8221; and $2,500 from Manatt, Phelps &amp; Phillips whose clients include Metropolitan Life Insurance, Monumental Life Insurance Company, and an unnamed &#8220;largest workers&#8217; compensation carrier in California.&#8221;  Health care contributors who will be affected by federal health care reform issues before the Commissioner include United Pharmacists Network ($1,000), Union of American Physicians &amp; Dentists ($2,000), and CA Optometric PAC ($5,000).</p>
<p>Perhaps the most egregious example of Jones&#8217; hypocrisy is his acceptance of a total this year of $11,000 from the law firm Roxborough, Pomerance, Nye and Adreani, who in March filed a major lawsuit with the Department of Insurance over health insurance issues.</p>
<p>The Los Angeles Times, Capitol Weekly, and other publications have previously exposed Jones and his fundraising tactics.  When caught by the media fundraising from insurance interests, Jones and his campaign only had the following to say:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;If they list Mother Teresa on their website, should I return it?&#8217; Jones said. &#8216;I would just ask that it be kept in perspective.&#8217;&#8221;  (Sacramento Bee, October 13, 2010)</p>
<p>&#8220;Jones spokeswoman Sandra Sanchez said the campaign screens contributions for licensed insurance companies and brokers but would not automatically reject money from a group representing those providers or a PAC funded by insurance money.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;It&#8217;s very, very difficult to track every single organization to find out what money they accept and what they don&#8217;t,&#8217; Sanchez said.&#8221;  (California Watch, October 11, 2010)</p>
<p>Jones will cripple California&#8217;s economy, raise workers comp rates exponentially and kill private sector jobs.  VOTE NO ON DAVE JONES!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2010/10/20/cd11-harmer-responds-to-public-schools-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-20913</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/?p=13926#comment-20913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is anybody watching these videos?

At 5:13 Jerry McNerney predicts that if we stop stimulus spending we&#039;ll have a double dip. 

Watch as Jerry McNerney explains his plans for doing nothing differently. He voted on $1.3 Trillion in spending already, and he reveals that it’s not enough. 

And if you&#039;re looking for some humor: in the beginning he says Joe Biden had some good ideas about Afganistan.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anybody watching these videos?</p>
<p>At 5:13 Jerry McNerney predicts that if we stop stimulus spending we&#8217;ll have a double dip. </p>
<p>Watch as Jerry McNerney explains his plans for doing nothing differently. He voted on $1.3 Trillion in spending already, and he reveals that it’s not enough. </p>
<p>And if you&#8217;re looking for some humor: in the beginning he says Joe Biden had some good ideas about Afganistan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gram-Reefer</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2010/10/20/cd11-harmer-responds-to-public-schools-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-20826</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gram-Reefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 04:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/?p=13926#comment-20826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not government money or vouchers, Wendy, when its parents spending their own dollars on schooling of their choice. 

Bigoted and unconstitutional Blaine Amendment language aside (in the constitutions of western states), government has no business favoring and subsidizing one form of religious (parochial or secular) pedagogical worldview over any other.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not government money or vouchers, Wendy, when its parents spending their own dollars on schooling of their choice. </p>
<p>Bigoted and unconstitutional Blaine Amendment language aside (in the constitutions of western states), government has no business favoring and subsidizing one form of religious (parochial or secular) pedagogical worldview over any other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Lack</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2010/10/20/cd11-harmer-responds-to-public-schools-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-20806</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Lack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/?p=13926#comment-20806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though the voucher concept is hugely popular with parents, it&#039;s not so with schools, especially parochial schools which justifiably are cautious about accepting government funding.  The nose in the tent concern is the primary reason that most parochial schools oppose vouchers.

So vouchers are great in theory, but tough to execute in practice.

That said, I&#039;ll also add that it makes a huge difference in student learning when government is not involved in any aspect of a school -- we&#039;ve experienced this first hand with a student at Hillsdale College which accepts zero state or federal monies (even government loans).  

The academic freedom this affords professors benefits student learning like no other school environment (public or private).  And elimination of state-mandated politically-correct mickey mouse multicultural B.S. courses frees up tons of time in student schedules for, well, actual learning!  What a concept.

Which also is why homeschooled students receive a vastly superior education than that available in any group classroom.

And again, private schools -- K-12 as well as universities -- are capable of delivering superior service at a significantly lower price than government schools.  

The fact is everything the government does is lower quality at a higher price.  The private sector can always provide services better, faster and cheaper.  Which is one reason why taxpayers are tired of paying inflated prices for mediocre (or worse, in the case of Mt. Diablo USD schools) service -- and seek to limit government services to the bare Constitutional minimum.

Who in their right mind wants to pay top dollar for crap?  That&#039;s essentially what taxpayers are doing by funding most government services.  Sad but true.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though the voucher concept is hugely popular with parents, it&#8217;s not so with schools, especially parochial schools which justifiably are cautious about accepting government funding.  The nose in the tent concern is the primary reason that most parochial schools oppose vouchers.</p>
<p>So vouchers are great in theory, but tough to execute in practice.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;ll also add that it makes a huge difference in student learning when government is not involved in any aspect of a school &#8212; we&#8217;ve experienced this first hand with a student at Hillsdale College which accepts zero state or federal monies (even government loans).  </p>
<p>The academic freedom this affords professors benefits student learning like no other school environment (public or private).  And elimination of state-mandated politically-correct mickey mouse multicultural B.S. courses frees up tons of time in student schedules for, well, actual learning!  What a concept.</p>
<p>Which also is why homeschooled students receive a vastly superior education than that available in any group classroom.</p>
<p>And again, private schools &#8212; K-12 as well as universities &#8212; are capable of delivering superior service at a significantly lower price than government schools.  </p>
<p>The fact is everything the government does is lower quality at a higher price.  The private sector can always provide services better, faster and cheaper.  Which is one reason why taxpayers are tired of paying inflated prices for mediocre (or worse, in the case of Mt. Diablo USD schools) service &#8212; and seek to limit government services to the bare Constitutional minimum.</p>
<p>Who in their right mind wants to pay top dollar for crap?  That&#8217;s essentially what taxpayers are doing by funding most government services.  Sad but true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gram-Reefer</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2010/10/20/cd11-harmer-responds-to-public-schools-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-20799</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gram-Reefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/?p=13926#comment-20799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John&#039;s idea that &quot;don&#039;t make us peel off funding from public schools&quot; is nonsense. Such an attitude only serves the government and teacher unions, not parents or kids. There is a lot of room for government to be involved in education but it is not competent to run the schools themselves as we have learned in California and across the country over the past 50 years.

Empower parents, not unions and their puppets]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John&#8217;s idea that &#8220;don&#8217;t make us peel off funding from public schools&#8221; is nonsense. Such an attitude only serves the government and teacher unions, not parents or kids. There is a lot of room for government to be involved in education but it is not competent to run the schools themselves as we have learned in California and across the country over the past 50 years.</p>
<p>Empower parents, not unions and their puppets</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gram-Reefer</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2010/10/20/cd11-harmer-responds-to-public-schools-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-20798</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gram-Reefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/?p=13926#comment-20798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s real simple: fund every child equally and let parents choose the schools they prefer for their children.

If parents want to send their kids to MDUSD that&#039;s their choice. If they want to send them to some other school, that&#039;s their choice; just like the taking a Pell Grant and choosing between St Mary&#039;s or Cal, or selecting a doctor (while you can) before Obamacare kicks in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s real simple: fund every child equally and let parents choose the schools they prefer for their children.</p>
<p>If parents want to send their kids to MDUSD that&#8217;s their choice. If they want to send them to some other school, that&#8217;s their choice; just like the taking a Pell Grant and choosing between St Mary&#8217;s or Cal, or selecting a doctor (while you can) before Obamacare kicks in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen Caine</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2010/10/20/cd11-harmer-responds-to-public-schools-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-20797</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Caine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 22:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/?p=13926#comment-20797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What John said!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What John said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John W</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2010/10/20/cd11-harmer-responds-to-public-schools-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-20793</link>
		<dc:creator>John W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/?p=13926#comment-20793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m all for competition.  Anybody with the means can opt out of public ed and educate their kids through private and parochial schools or home schooling.  Within the public school framework, we have charter schools.  There are plenty of examples of high quality public school districts right here in the East Bay.  We can make things better by both empowering teachers and principals and holding them  more accountable and through other reforms.  If private schools had to deal with the diverse challenges that public schools handle, they might not be seen as so great either.  They get to pick and choose.  If somebody wants to go the private school route, great.  Just don&#039;t expect to do it at the expense of public schools by asking us to peel off funding for public schools and handing it over to you to pay the tuition.  Your choice.  Your tab.  If somebody wants to rely on their own private security arrangements rather than the police force, good for them.  It doesn&#039;t mean we&#039;re going to hand over part of the police budget to help you pay for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for competition.  Anybody with the means can opt out of public ed and educate their kids through private and parochial schools or home schooling.  Within the public school framework, we have charter schools.  There are plenty of examples of high quality public school districts right here in the East Bay.  We can make things better by both empowering teachers and principals and holding them  more accountable and through other reforms.  If private schools had to deal with the diverse challenges that public schools handle, they might not be seen as so great either.  They get to pick and choose.  If somebody wants to go the private school route, great.  Just don&#8217;t expect to do it at the expense of public schools by asking us to peel off funding for public schools and handing it over to you to pay the tuition.  Your choice.  Your tab.  If somebody wants to rely on their own private security arrangements rather than the police force, good for them.  It doesn&#8217;t mean we&#8217;re going to hand over part of the police budget to help you pay for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith S.</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2010/10/20/cd11-harmer-responds-to-public-schools-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-20790</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/?p=13926#comment-20790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question of public education is discussed 34 minutes into the interview with Mr. Harmer.

A reporter rightly--and repeatedly--asks the candidate: Do you believe what you wrote? 

Had they more time, the reporters might have asked: do you support federal spending on public education? 

Revealing interview!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question of public education is discussed 34 minutes into the interview with Mr. Harmer.</p>
<p>A reporter rightly&#8211;and repeatedly&#8211;asks the candidate: Do you believe what you wrote? </p>
<p>Had they more time, the reporters might have asked: do you support federal spending on public education? </p>
<p>Revealing interview!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elwood</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2010/10/20/cd11-harmer-responds-to-public-schools-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-20760</link>
		<dc:creator>Elwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 05:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/?p=13926#comment-20760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Wendy said!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Wendy said!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 5/19 queries in 0.007 seconds using apc
Object Caching 284/288 objects using apc

Served from: www.ibabuzz.com @ 2013-05-19 09:51:41 -->