Part of the Bay Area News Group

Bipartisan call to protect IHSS from cuts

By Josh Richman
Thursday, January 27th, 2011 at 2:39 pm in Assembly, California State Senate, Jerry Brown, state budget.

As the state budget process inches forward, even some Republicans are now saying that deep cuts to the state’s In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program may be ill-advised because they’ll cost California more in the long run.

Gov. Jerry Brown’s budget proposal includes cutting all IHSS funding for domestic services – things such as cooking, cleaning and laundry – for certain recipients; foes of the plan say this would mean more than 380,000 elderly and disabled people losing this aid. The budget also includes a proposed 8.4 percent cut to all IHSS recipient hours, atop the 3.6 percent cuts from the 2010 budget.

State lawmakers from both sides of the aisle held a news conference this morning in Sacramento to express concerns.

“It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand that cutting IHSS will have a negative impact on our state’s economy as well as local economies,” said Assemblyman Jim Silva, R-Huntington Beach, according to a news release issued by the UDW Homecare Providers Union. “As a former Orange County Supervisor, I’ve seen firsthand that IHSS is much more cost-effective than institutional care.”

The release said Assemblyman Brian Nestande, R-Riverside, recognized some inefficiency in the program, but said he doesn’t believe cuts are the solution. “Instead, the Governor and the Legislature should be seeking to improve standards and oversight for IHSS to ensure that taxpayer dollars are being maximized.”

Assemblyman Paul Cook, R-Yucaipa, also voiced support for IHSS, the release said. “I am not one of those Republicans who say all government is bad government. I believe that government has a responsibility to take care of children, the elderly, disabled and veterans in the most humane, cost-effective way possible,” he said. “And I believe that cutting IHSS benefits would be an example of cutting off our nose to spite our face.”

Many Democrats have decried past cuts as well as Brown’s proposal for more.

“The fundamental question is: Do we want to promote institutional care that costs $55,000 or more per person per year to operate? Or do we want to encourage home care that costs about $12,000 per person per year?” said state Sen. Juan Vargas, D-San Diego, according to the union’s release. “Instead of cutting IHSS, we must figure out ways to move a portion of the 100,000 people currently in institutions into IHSS so we can really begin to save the state money.”

Meanwhile, a member of another union – SEIU United Long Term Care Workers – testified today before an Assembly Budget subcommittee about the hardships IHSS cuts would create. Cindy Valdez is a full-time provider to her partner, Jeff.

“If domestic services were cut I would no longer be able to afford to work as his full-time caregiver. I would have to look for a full-time job,” she said. “We would probably have to hire another caregiver to take care of Jeff, someone who doesn’t know him and would have a harder time anticipating his medical and emotional needs. We might even have to resort to placing him in an assisted living center, something that both he and I do not want for him.”

SEIU ULTCW President Laphonza Butler issued a release saying the state’s most vulnerable citizens can’t afford to lose these hours of care, and “for caregivers, these cuts mean fewer hours of work, possible loss of healthcare benefits, and the potential for job loss at a time when the state’s unemployment rates are already at historic highs.”

[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Bipartisan call to protect IHSS from cuts | Political Blotter -- Topsy.com

  • Other

    We’re all waiting…well.

    I postulate that the very republicans who vent against taxes actually have a larger cut of those who are in the need slice and a smaller slice of the “I pay the bills”.

    Come on, where’s the banter, the lecturing? Where’s the “black and white”?

  • True Blue

    Or, is it true red? Seems that the demicrats now have two votes from the Reps for Brown’s Tax Increase.

  • Elwood

    Re: #2

    Could you please rephrase your questions in English?

  • John W

    Anybody know if other states have comparable IHSS programs — in terms of population-adjusted caseload and spending?

  • RR, Uninvited Columnist

    So about 10% of Californians are enfeebled by age or disability. The 90% of us who are able can’t pitch in for a short time?

  • Dane

    These benefits need to be protected and should be being expanded with dramatic cost of living increases for obvious reasons. If all these workers, who provide a much needed and valued service, not only to the disabled, blind and aged, but to society at large, lose 12% in proposed hours or jobs they are going to flood the skyrocketing unemployment rosters, adding MILLIONS IN EDD burdens and taking jobs needed by others. All the whilenthe costs of the STILL REQUIRED HEALTH CARE SERVICES skyrocket as well. Leave the poor and disabled alone, Brown and find your cuts ELSEWHERE!

  • Lupe

    IHSS providers often save taxpayers big bucks. For example, case in San Diego County, where parents of severely-autistic adult chose to keep their child at home, saving tax payers over $500,000 a year, since if he weren’t at home, he’d be at Fairview Developmental Center, where it was estismated it would cost approximately 1 million dollars a year to staff his extraordinary behavioral needs (he punches himself in the head with extreme force and often requires 2 to 3 staff to protect him). Not including the round the clock medical and behavioral analysis, treatment, adjustments to treatment, exercise therapy, nutritional managment, etc…that goes into complex cases of autism like this. Yes, indeed, this is precisely the type of case that IHSS helps save tax payers money. Is their fraud in IHSS? I’m sure there’s some, and those folks need to be weeded out and arrested for blowing it for others who truly need it. That said, Think long and hard about who and what you cut, because those like this case require protective supervision that would cost much, much more if it weren’t supplmented IN HOME. In fact, cases like this should be given much more support, as when they aren’t, the families give up, burn out or otherwise can’t handle the extraordinary care, and then the person costs the state 100 x more when they’re placed in group homes or state instituions requiring 2 staff 24 hours a day to handle them.

  • Pingback: Cook, Nestande rally with domestic workers : Political Empire