Comments on: George Miller blasts SCOTUS’ Walmart decision

By: RR, Senile Columnist

RR, Senile Columnist — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:14:10 +0000

Re:#5 The lawsuit failed because you argued for the plaintiffs.

By: P. D'Antonio

P. D'Antonio — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 05:38:19 +0000

This lawsuit failed primarily because of the many states where Wal-mart has a presence, there were no plaintiffs from several of those states. We need to know what those contented states are doing differently than the California that exploits all women.

By: Doug

Doug — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:29:10 +0000

Socialism writ large, by George.

Of course it’s discrimination that I’m not paid the same wage for my job as the woman next to me. It’s not my fault that I don’t have the same education or experience or drive or commitment or skill set or availability or tenure or NEGOTIATING ABILITY.

By: Publius

Publius — Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:45:10 +0000

36 years and still ticking. The pure hatred for Wal Mart (one of Americas largest employers) displayed by lefties like George, drives the anti job creating policies that are destroying the very fabric of our country. California is a perfect example of this self destructive perception.

By: John W

John W — Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:38:51 +0000

Darn! There goes my plan for a class action suit against all employers on behalf of all bald men who have been, or may have been the victims of follicular discrimination.

By: Elwood

Elwood — Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:25:32 +0000

Another blast of wildly indignant bloviation from Georgie Porgie.

As if anyone cares what he thinks about anything.

But where is Baba Booboo?