Part of the Bay Area News Group

The signature gatherers strike back!

By Josh Richman
Tuesday, August 9th, 2011 at 4:38 pm in ballot measures.

Dozens of ballot-measure petition signature gatherers plan to besiege the Pleasanton headquarters of grocery giant Safeway at 11 a.m. tomorrow to protest a new company policy barring such solicitors from stores.

Or, as they put it, they’re going “to protest the company’s policy of denying citizens their constitutional right to free speech.”

“Safeway’s unconstitutional policies specifically target the rights of citizens to lawfully collect signatures to qualify ballot measures,” a news release said. “Recently Safeway managers have been harassing, photographing, and threatening signature gatherers with restraining orders, denying their right to participate in California’s direct democracy.”

And their right to get paid, no doubt.

“This is quite hilarious,” Safeway spokeswoman Susan Houghton said today after reading the news release – managers have indeed taken pictures, but only to demonstrate to courts how the signature gatherers are disrupting the stores’ entrances and exits. “We’re taking a pretty aggressive stance, we’re actually filing injunctions against some of these individuals, because our customers are just fed up with it.”

As an example, she sent me this photo taken last month at a store in Palo Alto, where petition signature gatherers had set up a table and canopy that partially blocked a store entrance – a safety hazard for customers, she said.

Houghton said most signature gatherers have refused to comply with the company’s existing “time, place and manner” policy, which required groups wishing to solicit to check with store managers in advance and fill out a form with contacts and other information. The new policy now being drafted, she said, will allow legitimate nonprofit community charities – Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, football teams and so on – to keep doing what they do.

“We want to be community-minded… but what has happened is that it has become an industry, it has become a business, these are professional people paid to gather signatures and quite frankly harass our customers,” she said. “We believe that in the end it’s not good for our customers to have to be exposed to this environment.”

Safeway’s move follows the recent advent of a union-backed group called “Californians Against Identity Theft” which has been running an ad to warn people against signing petitions, drawing criticism from various identity-theft and good-government watchdog groups.

“We’re all a bunch of independent businesses and subcontractors and we’ve had enough. Safeway’s rules have gotten to the point that they’re not just restricting time, place and manner anymore,” Rick Fenton, an organizer of tomorrow’s protest, said this afternoon. “It’s clearly designed to say, ‘Hey, go find someplace else to circulate.’ ”

Safeway has modernized its stores and updated its business model in recent years so that most locations now have cafes and tables at which to consume prepared foods, he noted, becoming “commercial islands” that compete with the traditional town square.

“With that comes responsibility and they’re not acting responsibly,” Fenton said. “Regardless of what you may think of us, we have a right to be there”

[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]

  • Elwood

    I was approached by a signature gatherer at Safeway this afternoon.

    No one seemed to be harassing or photographing him, but maybe I just wasn’t there at the right time.

    I don’t know what he was working for but I held up my hand to indicate that I wasn’t interested and he backed off immediately.

  • RR, Senile Columnist

    These petition pushers are a royal pain. Just tell the raggedy losers to get lost. You’re too busy to listen to their crap.

  • John W

    Good for Safeway! It’s private property. No 1st Amendment rights are involved.

  • Pingback: “Safeway’s unconstitutional policies target the rights of citizens | Cactus Thorns

  • Patty O’Day

    This action by Safeway dismays me. I have spent many weekend afternoons in front of several different Safeways in the East Bay registering voters and getting signatures on petitions to help get propositions on the ballots.

    I have always commended Safeway for their community involvement. They are better than any chain I know of in this matter.

    I can understand them wanting to establish rules. When I was volunteering at one of these table, I always got permission (in writing, and in advance) from the store manager. I always checked in with the Store Manager before setting up our table. I followed their rules, and was very careful not to be in the doorway and not to be obnoxious. (Unless someone got obnoxious with me. I can give it as good as I get it when needed.)

    Safeway has the right to set rules, but to select and single out certain groups is wrong. I love the kids and the veterans. I donate to them almost every time. But you know, some of those cute little girl scouts can get a little irritating in their enthusiasm as well.

    I say that Safeway should set the same rules for everyone. If their rules are not followed, then make the people leave. The people in that picture were wrong. I agree with Safeway on that one. Call the police if you have to, but to automatically disallow paid signature gatherers is wrong and Safeway should be ashamed.

    I have no problem with paid petition gatherers as long as they don’t cheat (like ACORN), and they follow the rules and don’t get obnoxious. I personally have not been harassed by any of them.

  • Eileen Ray

    The thing everyone seems to miss is that they are taking away the rights of the voters to sign the petition, to petition their government.

  • Team Harringon Petitioners

    So Eileen if they follow safeways time place and manner are petitioners allowed at safeways now or not?