Part of the Bay Area News Group

California, meet Propositions 28 and 29

By Josh Richman
Monday, January 30th, 2012 at 11:55 am in ballot measures, taxes.

Secretary of State Debra Bowen has announced the numbers for the two measures set to appear on the June 5 ballot, and interested Californians now can submit arguments to be considered for inclusion in the state’s official voter information guide.

Here are the ballot measures, with their official titles and summaries as written by the state attorney general’s office:

Proposition 28 – Limits on Legislators’ Terms in Office. Initiative Constitutional Amendment. Reduces the total amount of time a person may serve in the state legislature from 14 years to 12 years. Allows a person to serve a total of 12 years either in the Assembly, the Senate, or a combination of both. Applies only to legislators first elected after the measure is passed. Provides that legislators elected before the measure is passed continue to be subject to existing term limits. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: No direct fiscal effect on state or local governments. (09-0048)

Proposition 29 – Imposes Additional Tax on Cigarettes for Cancer Research. Initiative Statute. Imposes additional five cent tax on each cigarette distributed ($1.00 per pack), and an equivalent tax increase on other tobacco products, to fund cancer research and other specified purposes. Requires tax revenues be deposited into a special fund to finance research and research facilities focused on detecting, preventing, treating, and curing cancer, heart disease, emphysema, and other tobacco-related diseases, and to finance prevention programs. Creates nine-member committee charged with administering the fund. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Increase in new cigarette tax revenues of about $855 million annually by 2011-12, declining slightly annually thereafter, for various health research and tobacco-related programs. Increase of about $45 million annually to existing health, natural resources, and research programs funded by existing tobacco taxes. Increase in state and local sales taxes of about $32 million annually. (09-0097.)

People can submit arguments for or against any measure, and those selected for the official ballot guide will be on public display from Feb. 21 through March 12.

State law gives first priority to arguments written by the initiative’s proponents, and then to bona fide citizen associations, and then to individuals. No more than three signers are allowed to appear with an argument or rebuttal to an argument. Ballot arguments can’t exceed 500 words and rebuttals can’t exceed 250 words; all submissions should be typed and double-spaced, and can be hand-delivered to the Secretary of State’s Elections Division at 1500 11th Street, 5th Floor, Sacramento, California 95814; faxed to (916) 653-3214; or emailed to VIGarguments@sos.ca.gov. If faxed or emailed, the original copies must be received within 72 hours. The deadline for ballot arguments is 5 p.m. next Tuesday, Feb. 7; the deadline for rebuttals is 5 p.m. Thursday, Feb. 16.

[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]

  • RR, Senile Columnist

    Dig 29! Make smokers pay more for their choice and then use the proceeds to discourage other people from making the same choice. Let’s make beer and spirits customers pay the same tax for the same purpose. And don’t stop there: Tax big expensive automobiles, Business and First-class air travelers, jewelry store patrons, consumers of high-calorie foods and snacks, tanning salons, bikini wax customers, fat people, gun owners, and anybody else who defies PC wisdom.

  • RR, Senile Columnist

    If anyone thinks 28 is a good idea, let’s make all prospective candidates take tough exams on public affairs. If they won ‘t be allowed to have on the job training, they better have the background to be effective in the short time allotted to them.

  • John W

    Yes, California is a poster child for how term limits on legislators leads to good governance!

    As for 29, excellent idea; ’cause nobody else is doing heart and lung research, and a California committee of political appointees (paid?) can do a great job of filling the void.

  • Ken Head

    Let’s put a tax on people who want to tax everything. They create stress for everyone else and decrease the length of our lives by creating ever more interventions in them. Or a gulag, where we can throw rocks at them.

  • Carl S.

    Prop 29 is just another scam written by Don Perata. It will siphon billions from the California economy. We already have one of the lowest smoking rates in the country. It is not needed.