<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Local Dems running hard with student-loan issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2012/05/01/local-dems-running-hard-with-student-loan-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2012/05/01/local-dems-running-hard-with-student-loan-issue/</link>
	<description>Politics in the Bay Area and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:24:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnW</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2012/05/01/local-dems-running-hard-with-student-loan-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-76573</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/?p=19641#comment-76573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the story was about student loans, not about &quot;Liveshot.&quot;  Nice segue though.  The crux of the problem is neither interest rates nor tuition per se.   Taxpayers used to pay nearly 100% of the cost of providing an education in the UC and Cal State systems.  The taxpayer share paid by the state is now down to about 10%.  Other states weren&#039;t quite as generous as California, but a similar trend has occurred throughout the country.  So, while the underlying cost of providing a college education has exceeded the rate of inflation, for various reasons, a major factor has been the shift in cost-sharing burden from taxpayer to student.  Had the taxpayer share remained steady, we wouldn&#039;t be arguing about student loans or whether the cost of obtaining a college education today is worth it from the student&#039;s perspective.  However, maintaining the former taxpayer share would be  prohibitive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the story was about student loans, not about &#8220;Liveshot.&#8221;  Nice segue though.  The crux of the problem is neither interest rates nor tuition per se.   Taxpayers used to pay nearly 100% of the cost of providing an education in the UC and Cal State systems.  The taxpayer share paid by the state is now down to about 10%.  Other states weren&#8217;t quite as generous as California, but a similar trend has occurred throughout the country.  So, while the underlying cost of providing a college education has exceeded the rate of inflation, for various reasons, a major factor has been the shift in cost-sharing burden from taxpayer to student.  Had the taxpayer share remained steady, we wouldn&#8217;t be arguing about student loans or whether the cost of obtaining a college education today is worth it from the student&#8217;s perspective.  However, maintaining the former taxpayer share would be  prohibitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soquel Creek</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2012/05/01/local-dems-running-hard-with-student-loan-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-76566</link>
		<dc:creator>Soquel Creek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 17:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/?p=19641#comment-76566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This shouldn&#039;t be surprising.

BARBARA LEE MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&amp;cid=N00008046&amp;type=I

#7: United Auto Workers (UAW), who, despite their name, also organizes student employees on California campuses
http://www.uaw.org/page/uaw-uniting-academic-workers
http://www.uaw.org/story/first-ever-contract-university-california
#19: University of California

BARBARA BOXER MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&amp;type=I&amp;cid=N00006692&amp;newMem=N&amp;recs=20

#2: University of California
#9: Cotchett, Pitre &amp; McCarthy
#11: Milberg, Weiss et al
#15: Stanford Univeristy

Cotchett, Pitre &amp; McCarthy has various ties to the University of California and the Regents of the Univeristy of Calfiornia.

Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes &amp; Lerach LLP has served as legal council for the University of California. 

ZOE LOFGREN MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS
http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&amp;type=I&amp;cid=N00007479&amp;newMem=N&amp;recs=20

#17: Stanford University
#18: Marcus &amp; Millichamp Real Estate Investment Services

The &quot;Marcus&quot; in &quot;Marcus &amp; Millichamp&quot; is George M. Marcus, a major contributor to California Democrats and until March of this year, was a Regent for the University of California.
http://articles.latimes.com/2000/dec/28/news/mn-5622]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This shouldn&#8217;t be surprising.</p>
<p>BARBARA LEE MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS<br />
<a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&#038;cid=N00008046&#038;type=I" rel="nofollow">http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&#038;cid=N00008046&#038;type=I</a></p>
<p>#7: United Auto Workers (UAW), who, despite their name, also organizes student employees on California campuses<br />
<a href="http://www.uaw.org/page/uaw-uniting-academic-workers" rel="nofollow">http://www.uaw.org/page/uaw-uniting-academic-workers</a><br />
<a href="http://www.uaw.org/story/first-ever-contract-university-california" rel="nofollow">http://www.uaw.org/story/first-ever-contract-university-california</a><br />
#19: University of California</p>
<p>BARBARA BOXER MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS<br />
<a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&#038;type=I&#038;cid=N00006692&#038;newMem=N&#038;recs=20" rel="nofollow">http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&#038;type=I&#038;cid=N00006692&#038;newMem=N&#038;recs=20</a></p>
<p>#2: University of California<br />
#9: Cotchett, Pitre &amp; McCarthy<br />
#11: Milberg, Weiss et al<br />
#15: Stanford Univeristy</p>
<p>Cotchett, Pitre &amp; McCarthy has various ties to the University of California and the Regents of the Univeristy of Calfiornia.</p>
<p>Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes &amp; Lerach LLP has served as legal council for the University of California. </p>
<p>ZOE LOFGREN MAJOR CONTRIBUTORS<br />
<a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&#038;type=I&#038;cid=N00007479&#038;newMem=N&#038;recs=20" rel="nofollow">http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/contrib.php?cycle=Career&#038;type=I&#038;cid=N00007479&#038;newMem=N&#038;recs=20</a></p>
<p>#17: Stanford University<br />
#18: Marcus &amp; Millichamp Real Estate Investment Services</p>
<p>The &#8220;Marcus&#8221; in &#8220;Marcus &amp; Millichamp&#8221; is George M. Marcus, a major contributor to California Democrats and until March of this year, was a Regent for the University of California.<br />
<a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2000/dec/28/news/mn-5622" rel="nofollow">http://articles.latimes.com/2000/dec/28/news/mn-5622</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick K.</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2012/05/01/local-dems-running-hard-with-student-loan-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-76526</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 05:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/?p=19641#comment-76526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Congressman &quot;Live Shot&quot; Garamendi also share his opinion on this issue? UC students pay higher tuition because the nepotism/cronyism that link California&#039;s political elites and the UC administration. &quot;Live Shot&quot;&#039;s son, John Garamendi, Jr., was given a cushy $209,000 a year job at UC Merced. See for yourself at: http://www.mercurynews.com/salaries/uc/2009.  Money like that goes a long, long way in the San Joaquin Valley. Garamendi, Jr. was 30-something then. Was it a mere coincidence that a politician&#039;s son was named to the No. 3 post on a UC campus?  Garamendi, Sr. was president of the UC Merced Foundation from 1999-2009. See: http://www.votesmart.org/candidate/biography/29664/john-garamendi  It&#039;s very likely that Garamendi, Sr. used his position with the foundation to install Garamendi, Jr. in that $209,000 a year job -- more-qualified, less-connected candidates for the lucrative job likely were pushed aside.  UC Davis students, staff and faculty need to question Congressman Garamendi about this apparent act of nepotism/cronyism.  Davis students are paying higher tuition and Davis staff members are losing pay and jobs because the UC administration is top-heavy with children of politicians with names like Garamendi. Why should &quot;Live Shot&quot; Garamendi be rewarded with another term in Congress when the Garamendi family puts its own personal profiteering above the interests of common folk like UC students? Can you spell H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will Congressman &#8220;Live Shot&#8221; Garamendi also share his opinion on this issue? UC students pay higher tuition because the nepotism/cronyism that link California&#8217;s political elites and the UC administration. &#8220;Live Shot&#8221;&#8216;s son, John Garamendi, Jr., was given a cushy $209,000 a year job at UC Merced. See for yourself at: <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/salaries/uc/2009" rel="nofollow">http://www.mercurynews.com/salaries/uc/2009</a>.  Money like that goes a long, long way in the San Joaquin Valley. Garamendi, Jr. was 30-something then. Was it a mere coincidence that a politician&#8217;s son was named to the No. 3 post on a UC campus?  Garamendi, Sr. was president of the UC Merced Foundation from 1999-2009. See: <a href="http://www.votesmart.org/candidate/biography/29664/john-garamendi" rel="nofollow">http://www.votesmart.org/candidate/biography/29664/john-garamendi</a>  It&#8217;s very likely that Garamendi, Sr. used his position with the foundation to install Garamendi, Jr. in that $209,000 a year job &#8212; more-qualified, less-connected candidates for the lucrative job likely were pushed aside.  UC Davis students, staff and faculty need to question Congressman Garamendi about this apparent act of nepotism/cronyism.  Davis students are paying higher tuition and Davis staff members are losing pay and jobs because the UC administration is top-heavy with children of politicians with names like Garamendi. Why should &#8220;Live Shot&#8221; Garamendi be rewarded with another term in Congress when the Garamendi family puts its own personal profiteering above the interests of common folk like UC students? Can you spell H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 6/12 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 179/183 objects using apc

Served from: www.ibabuzz.com @ 2013-06-18 19:20:44 -->